62. Secondary Prophylaxis in Clostridioides difficile Infections: a Closer Look at Outcomes

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an urgent public threat and carries a 25% chance of recurrence (rCDI). Data on safety and efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) in reducing rCDI is limited. We implemented a best practice advisory (BPA) to alert the prescriber and antibiotic stewardship (ASP) team for patients with CDI in the previous 60 days being initiated on systemic antimicrobials. The alert states “Don’t use antibiotics in patients with recent CDI without convincing evidence of need. Antibiotics pose a high risk of recurrence”. ASP team would recommended OVP if antibiotics are continued. This study evaluated the impact of the BPA alert on OVP prescribing and patient outcomes. Methods IRB approved, retrospective, observational cohort study comparing patients who received OVP to no OVP. Inclusion: adults with history of laboratory confirmed CDI, ≥ 14 days post-CDI treatment completion, BPA from 3/7/19 – 3/31/20, receiving non-CDI systemic antimicrobials, and without history of bezlotoxumab infusion. Data were reported using descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis. Primary endpoint: rCDI within 2-8 weeks post-OVP completion. Secondary endpoints: vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (VRE) in clinical culture post-OVP and 1-year mortality. Results 70 patients included: 32 (46%) no-OVP and 38 (54%) OVP. Baseline characteristics, previous CDI treatment, and outcomes were similar (Table 1). Index CDI was severe in the OVP group (18, 47% vs. 9, 28%). Median Charlson comorbidity index: 7 (3 – 9) no-OVP and 7 (5 – 9) OVP. OVP regimens, 125 mg by mouth: once daily 4 (10%), twice daily 22 (58%), and every 6 hours 12 (32%). Median prophylaxis duration: 10 days (6 – 13). rCDI occurred in 3 (9%) no-OVP and 2 (5%) OVP (P = 0.654). Mortality: 10 (31%) no-OVP and 16 (42%) OVP (P = 0.458). Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Endpoints Conclusion OVP was utilized in approximately half of patients who required non-CDI antibiotics. Efficacy interpretation is limited by inconsistent dosing regimens and significant comorbid illness in the cohort. Future work will focus on further optimizing the BPA and standardizing the OVP regimen. Disclosures Rachel Kenney, PharmD, Medtronic, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, spouse is an employee and shareholder) Susan L. Davis, PharmD, Nothing to disclose


Background.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an urgent public threat and carries a 25% chance of recurrence (rCDI). Data on safety and efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) in reducing rCDI is limited. We implemented a best practice advisory (BPA) to alert the prescriber and antibiotic stewardship (ASP) team for patients with CDI in the previous 60 days being initiated on systemic antimicrobials. The alert states "Don't use antibiotics in patients with recent CDI without convincing evidence of need. Antibiotics pose a high risk of recurrence". ASP team would recommended OVP if antibiotics are continued. This study evaluated the impact of the BPA alert on OVP prescribing and patient outcomes.
Methods. IRB approved, retrospective, observational cohort study comparing patients who received OVP to no OVP. Inclusion: adults with history of laboratory confirmed CDI, ≥ 14 days post-CDI treatment completion, BPA from 3/7/19 -3/31/20, receiving non-CDI systemic antimicrobials, and without history of bezlotoxumab infusion. Data were reported using descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis. Primary endpoint: rCDI within 2-8 weeks post-OVP completion. Secondary endpoints: vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (VRE) in clinical culture post-OVP and 1-year mortality.
Disclosures Methods. This is a retrospective study of all admitted patients who received a FQ for greater than 48 hours from 01/01/2019 -12/31/2020 in an urban academic center. "Phase 1" (pre-intervention phase) covered 01/1/2019-03/31/2019. "Phase 2" (intervention phase) covered 03/03/2020-12/23/2020. In "Phase 2", our ASP reviewed FQ use 2-3 days per week and an IDF provided feedback interventions that averaged 30-60 minutes of IDF time spent per day. We categorized FQ use as either: "appropriate", "appropriate but not preferred", or "inappropriate", as determined by local clinical guidelines and ASP team opinion. We compared FQ use in both phases, indications for FQ use, and new Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI).
Conclusion. An IDF-driven ASP intervention has a positive impact on appropriate inpatient use of FQs in our hospital. This highlights a promising ASP model which not only improves appropriate use of FQ, but also offers an opportunity for IDF mentorship and use of available resources to promote ASPs.
Disclosures. Katie A. McCrink, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Background. Fever with neutropenia (FN) is common and the timing of antibiotic cessation in patients without an identified fever source is uncertain. Absolute neutrophile count (ANC) recovery has been used clinically to represent bone marrow recovery (BMR) but other options should be considered. We hypothesized that absolute monocyte count (AMC), and absolute phagocyte count (APC) are more sensitive, and an earlier safe marker of antibiotic cessation (AC) compared with ANC Methods. A retrospective review was performed for FN episodes (FNEs) at UCM Comer Children's Hospital between 2009 and 2016 in pediatric oncology patients. Eligible FNEs who were a febrile for 24 hours, had no bacterial source identified at time of AC, and did not receive chemotherapy 10 days following AC. Ten-day post-AC outcomes, length of stay and cost were assessed and compared among different BMR parameters (ANC vs AMC).