1385. Impact of Deceased Organ Donor Injection Drug Use on Donor Culture Positivity

Abstract Background With the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, there has been an increase in the proportion of deceased organ donors with a history of injection drug use (IDU), raising concern for additional infectious risks to transplantation.We sought to determine how recent IDU among deceased organ donors impacted donor culture results. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at four transplant centers in Philadelphia between 1/1/2015 and 6/30/2016. All deceased organ donors who donated ≥ 1 organ to one of the centers were included. Exposed donors were those with a recent history of IDU (defined by use in the prior 12 months based on donor chart review). Unexposed donors were those with no recent history of IDU. The primary outcome was any positive donor culture (taken during the terminal hospitalization or at the time of organ procurement) for bacteria or Candida. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between recent IDU and donor culture positivity. Secondarily, the association between donor IDU and isolation of (1) a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) on culture, (2) Staphylococcus aureus on culture, (3) Candida on non-respiratory culture, and (4) bacteria or Candida on blood culture were determined. Results Of 394 total donors, 66 (17%) had a history of recent IDU and 343 (87%) had at least one positive donor culture. On multivariable analysis, recent IDU was associated with significantly increased odds of having at least one positive donor culture (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.1-11.9, P=0.04) and Candida on non-respiratory culture (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.2, P=0.03). However, recent IDU was not significantly associated with increased odds of MDRO on culture (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.41-1.93, P=0.79), S. aureus on culture (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.79-2.28, P=0.27), or positive blood culture (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.32-1.95, P=0.60). Conclusion Donors with a recent history of IDU are more likely to have bacteria or Candida identified on cultures taken during their terminal hospitalization or at organ procurement. This increase does not appear to be driven by MDROs, S. aureus, or bloodstream infections but rather by Candida isolated from non-respiratory sites, potentially alleviating some fears surrounding the acceptance of solid organs from donors with a history of recent IDU. Disclosures Ebbing Lautenbach, MD, MPH, MSCE, Merck (Other Financial or Material Support, Member of Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)) Emily Blumberg, MD, Amplyx (Other Financial or Material Support, Member of Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB))Hologic (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Member of Scientific Advisory Committee)Takeda (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Member of Scientific Advisory Committee) Jennifer Han, MD, MSCE, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Judith A. Anesi, MD, MSCE, Nothing to disclose

Differences in ID evaluation practices by type of cellular therapy candidate. Table 2 Characteristics of survey respondents.

Conclusion.
Practices around pre-HCT infectious disease evaluation and management are heterogenous among the centers surveyed. The adoption of standardized screening for and management of infectious diseases in this patient population would likely be beneficial.
Disclosures. Background. With the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, there has been an increase in the proportion of deceased organ donors with a history of injection drug use (IDU), raising concern for additional infectious risks to transplantation.We sought to determine how recent IDU among deceased organ donors impacted donor culture results.
Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at four transplant centers in Philadelphia between 1/1/2015 and 6/30/2016. All deceased organ donors who donated ≥ 1 organ to one of the centers were included. Exposed donors were those with a recent history of IDU (defined by use in the prior 12 months based on donor chart review). Unexposed donors were those with no recent history of IDU. The primary outcome was any positive donor culture (taken during the terminal hospitalization or at the time of organ procurement) for bacteria or Candida. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between recent IDU and donor culture positivity. Secondarily, the association between donor IDU and isolation of (1) a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) on culture, (2) Staphylococcus aureus on culture, (3) Candida on non-respiratory culture, and (4) bacteria or Candida on blood culture were determined.
Conclusion. Donors with a recent history of IDU are more likely to have bacteria or Candida identified on cultures taken during their terminal hospitalization or at organ procurement. This increase does not appear to be driven by MDROs, S. aureus, or bloodstream infections but rather by Candida isolated from non-respiratory sites, potentially alleviating some fears surrounding the acceptance of solid organs from donors with a history of recent IDU. Background. The liver transplant center at University Hospital (Newark, NJ) is one of the busiest in northern NJ. Current guidelines for Strongyloides stercoralis (Ss) screening in solid transplant recipients recommend targeted testing. We propose a high seroprevalence of this infection in our facility given its significant percentage of foreign-born patients from Ss endemic areas such as Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa.
Methods. Descriptive study from secondary data. We obtained the total number of Strongyloides antibody tests performed at University Hospital in the last two years (08/2018-10/2020). Subsequently, medical charts were reviewed to obtain epidemiological and clinical data.
Results. A total of 388 patients underwent screening for Strongyloides antibody, of whom 71 (18%) were positive. The test was mainly performed in male (58%) and foreign-born (55%) patients. More than half (55%) of the US-born individuals had history of travel overseas. The main reasons for testing were transplant evaluation (65%), immunosuppression (14%) and eosinophilia (9%). There was no association between transplant evaluation and seropositivity (81% vs 81%, p = 0.994). Being foreign-born