1097. A Comparison of Area-Under Curve (AUC)-Guided vs Trough-Guided Monitoring of Vancomycin and Its Impact on Nephrotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Background Trough levels have been used for Vancomycin (VAN) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) historically due to its practicality. A paradigm shift towards the use of area under curve (AUC)-guided dosing TDM has been made due to availability of advanced pharmacokinetics software, variability between trough levels and AUC values and the potential for reducing toxicity. This review aims to evaluate the impact of AUC-guided vs trough-guided vancomycin TDM on nephrotoxicity-related outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted using PubMed®, Embase®, Web of Science®, CINAHL®, Google scholar and Cochrane library® up till 1st January 2021 and was reported according to the PRISMA checklist. Studies which evaluated AUC-guided or trough-guided VAN TDM and vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity were included. Random effects models were used to compare differences in nephrotoxicity between trough level or AUC based vancomycin TDM due to expected heterogeneity in study designs. PRISMA Flowchart PRISMA flow chart depicting the selection process of studies included in the meta-analysis Results Of 1191 records retrieved, 57 studies were included. Majority of studies included adult and elderly patients (n=47, 82.5%). The pooled prevalence of nephrotoxicity was lower using the AUC-guided TDM [6.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9 – 9.5%] compared to trough-guided TDM [17.0%; 95% CI: 14.7 – 19.2%]. The risk of nephrotoxicity was lower with the AUC-guided approach as compared with the trough-guided approach [OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32–0.89]. AUC thresholds correlated with risk of nephrotoxicity only for the first 96 hours of therapy. A frequency analysis of significant multivariable factors showed that concomitant use of nephrotoxins, VAN trough levels and duration of VAN therapy were most commonly associated with nephrotoxicity. Forest plot comparing the risk of nephrotoxicity of AUC-guided vs trough-guided Forest plot comparing the risk of nephrotoxicity of AUC-guided vs trough-guided Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from AUC-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from AUC-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from trough-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from trough-guided monitoring Conclusion The AUC-guided approach appeared to have lower risk of nephrotoxicity which supports the updated American Society of Health-System Pharmacists recommendations. More studies should be performed to evaluate the optimal derivation of AUC and clinical utility of repeated measurements of vancomycin AUC and trough levels. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Session: P-62. PK/PD Studies
Background. Trough levels have been used for Vancomycin (VAN) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) historically due to its practicality. A paradigm shift towards the use of area under curve (AUC)-guided dosing TDM has been made due to availability of advanced pharmacokinetics software, variability between trough levels and AUC values and the potential for reducing toxicity. This review aims to evaluate the impact of AUC-guided vs trough-guided vancomycin TDM on nephrotoxicity-related outcomes.
Methods. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed®, Embase®, Web of Science®, CINAHL®, Google scholar and Cochrane library® up till 1st January 2021 and was reported according to the PRISMA checklist. Studies which evaluated AUCguided or trough-guided VAN TDM and vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity were included. Random effects models were used to compare differences in nephrotoxicity between trough level or AUC based vancomycin TDM due to expected heterogeneity in study designs.

PRISMA Flowchart
PRISMA flow chart depicting the selection process of studies included in the meta-analysis Results. Of 1191 records retrieved, 57 studies were included. Majority of studies included adult and elderly patients (n=47, 82.5%). The pooled prevalence of nephrotoxicity was lower using the AUC-guided TDM [6.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9 -9.5%] compared to trough-guided TDM [17.0%; 95% CI: 14.7 -19.2%]. The risk of nephrotoxicity was lower with the AUC-guided approach as compared with the troughguided approach [OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89]. AUC thresholds correlated with risk of nephrotoxicity only for the first 96 hours of therapy. A frequency analysis of significant multivariable factors showed that concomitant use of nephrotoxins, VAN trough levels and duration of VAN therapy were most commonly associated with nephrotoxicity.
Forest plot comparing the risk of nephrotoxicity of AUC-guided vs trough-guided Forest plot comparing the risk of nephrotoxicity of AUC-guided vs trough-guided Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from AUC-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from AUC-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from trough-guided monitoring Pooled nephrotoxicity rates from trough-guided monitoring Conclusion. The AUC-guided approach appeared to have lower risk of nephrotoxicity which supports the updated American Society of Health-System Pharmacists recommendations. More studies should be performed to evaluate the optimal derivation of AUC and clinical utility of repeated measurements of vancomycin AUC and trough levels.

A Phase 1 Safety and Tolerability of Single Ascending Doses of a Novel Engineered Cationic Peptide, PLG0206, in Healthy Subjects
David Huang, MD, PhD 1 ; Despina Dobbins, BS 1 ; Parviz Ghahramani, PhD, PharmD, MSc, MBA 2 ; Jonathan Steckbeck, PhD 1 ; 1 Peptilogics, Houston, Texas; 2 Inncelerex, Jersey City, New Jersey Session: P-62. PK/PD Studies Background. PLG0206 is a novel engineered cationic antimicrobial peptide being evaluated for treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). This abstract presents the results from the first in human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PLG0206 when administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion.
Methods. 6 cohorts of 8 participants were planned to receive escalating single 1-hour IV infusions of PLG0206 at 0.05, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mg/kg dose or placebo. Participants were randomized to receive either PLG0206 (6 per cohort) or placebo (2 per cohort). At each dose level, there were 2 sentinel participants (1 active, 1 placebo) who were dosed at least 48 hours in advance of the other participants in their group. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were taken prior to infusion and up to 48 post infusion. Safety and tolerability was assessed throughout the study. There was at least a 7-day period after dosing at each of the dose levels before dose escalation.
Results. PLG0206 was safe and well tolerated when administered to healthy volunteers at doses ranging from 0.05 and 1 mg/kg. Therapeutic exposures were achieved at 1 mg/kg. The 2 and 3 mg/kg cohorts were not studied. The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events related to study drug administration was low and most events mild (Grade 1) in severity and was similar between the PLG0206 treatment and placebo groups. There were no SAEs, life-threatening events or deaths throughout the study. IV PLG0206 exhibited linear PK over the dose range of 0.05 to 1.0 mg/kg. The median terminal half-life (t½) ranged from 7.37 to 19.97 hours. AUC 0-∞ increased with increasing PLG0206 dose ranging between 1581.41 and 21141.52 ng.hr/mL. Cmax ranged between 256 and 2653 ng/mL. The mean apparent volume of distribution (Vz) increased was between 25.49 and 94.2 L, mean clearance (CL) were similar across all and ranged from 2.42 to 4.18 L/hour.
Conclusion. Following single IV infusion to healthy volunteers, PLG0206 was safe and well tolerated at doses ranging from 0.05 to 1 mg/kg. IV PLG0206 exhibits linear PK over the dose range. These findings support the ongoing development of IV PLG0206 and will inform dosing regimens in future studies to investigate its utility as an antimicrobial agent. Background. LSVT-1701 is an anti-staphylococcal phage lysin being developed for treatment of MRSA infections in combination with SoC antibiotics. The safety and PK of single ascending doses of LSVT-1701 0.1 to 10 mg/kg in healthy adult volunteers were previously described (Jun, et.al, AAC 2017;61:e02629-16). We further evaluated the safety and PK of multiple ascending doses of LSVT-1701 in healthy adult subjects.
Methods. Study ITB-101-1b was a Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study. 8 subjects were randomized 3:1 to active:placebo in each cohort. LSVT-1701 was administered as a 6 mg/kg single dose and twice daily (BID) doses of 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg/kg for 4 days (24h between Doses 1-2, 12h between Doses 2-6). Study drugs were administered as a 1-hour IV infusion. Serial serum samples were collected over 24 hours following the first and last doses for measurement of LSVT-1701 concentrations by a validated ELISA method. PK analysis of LSVT-1701 concentration-time data was done using noncompartmental methods. Safety was assessed by AEs, clinical labs, vital signs, and ECG.
Results. 30/32 (94%) subjects completed the study. No subjects withdrew due to AEs, and there were no severe AEs, no serious AEs, and no deaths. AEs were of mild (97%) to moderate (3%) intensity and were reported by all subjects in the LSVT-1701 6 mg/kg single dose group and 1-3 (17-50%) of subjects receiving 1.5 to 4.5 mg/kg BID or placebo. The most common AEs of headache, chills, rigors, and fever generally lasted for ≤2 days with or without acetaminophen treatment, and no clinically significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, ECG, or clinical labs (other than transient increases in CRP) were observed. Infusion site reactions (erythema, pain, induration, warmth) were observed with BID administration of LSVT-1701, but not with the single 6 mg/kg dose or placebo. LSVT-1701 exposure increased greater than in proportion to dose and t 1/2 was concentration-dependent, increasing with higher doses. No accumulation in LSVT-1701 exposure was observed.
Summary of LSVT-1701 PK Parameters Summary of LSVT-1701 PK Parameters Conclusion. The safety and PK profile of LSVT-1701 is favorable for evaluation in patients with S. aureus infections, including bacteremia and infective endocarditis, for which new treatments are needed. Disclosures