864. Adolescent Primary Care Provider Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Universal Screening at a Midwest Academic Medical Center

Abstract Background HIV remains a problem for adolescents with 21% of new infections in the United States in 2018 occurring in youth. In this study we attempted to assess the knowledge of and comfort with pre-exposure prophylaxis and universal HIV testing among adolescent primary care providers affiliated with one academic medical center. Methods We conducted a survey of internal medicine/pediatrics, pediatrics, and family medicine residents and attending physicians affiliated with an academic medical center. Data collected included provider prescribing and referring habits for PrEP and information on their universal HIV testing habits. A “test your knowledge” section followed the survey which asked participants to name PrEP medications and to correctly select laboratory monitoring required for PrEP. Correct answers and prescribing resources were provided on completion of the survey. Results 138 (76%) respondents were aware that PrEP is approved for adolescents. There was no significant difference across specialties or between residents and attendings. 44.8% of respondents felt uncomfortable prescribing PrEP and two thirds had never prescribed PrEP. Reasons for not prescribing PrEP included: not seeing adolescents who qualify (n=80), not having enough training (66), confidentiality concerns (22), forgetting to address PrEP (19), and concern incidence of HIV is too low to recommend PrEP (15). Pediatricians were the least likely to test for HIV with 11% of pediatrician, 32% of internal medicine/pediatric, and 38% of family medicine respondents reported universal HIV testing for patients 15 years and older (p < 0.05). Residents were more likely to test for HIV than attendings (33.3% versus 16%, p < 0.05). 111 participants completed the “test your knowledge” section. 31.5% correctly named two approved PrEP medications. There were 183 responses to the survey (49% response rate). Conclusion Adolescent primary care providers are aware that PrEP is FDA approved for adolescents but a gap in PrEP prescribing and HIV testing persists. There remain perceptions that HIV incidence is too low to discuss PrEP and that providers are not seeing patients who qualify. Next steps include developing an institutional PrEP guideline and creating an electronic medical record order set to facilitate PrEP prescribing. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background. HIV remains a problem for adolescents with 21% of new infections in the United States in 2018 occurring in youth. In this study we attempted to assess the knowledge of and comfort with pre-exposure prophylaxis and universal HIV testing among adolescent primary care providers affiliated with one academic medical center.
Methods. We conducted a survey of internal medicine/pediatrics, pediatrics, and family medicine residents and attending physicians affiliated with an academic medical center. Data collected included provider prescribing and referring habits for PrEP and information on their universal HIV testing habits. A "test your knowledge" section followed the survey which asked participants to name PrEP medications and to correctly select laboratory monitoring required for PrEP. Correct answers and prescribing resources were provided on completion of the survey.
Results. 138 (76%) respondents were aware that PrEP is approved for adolescents. There was no significant difference across specialties or between residents and attendings. 44.8% of respondents felt uncomfortable prescribing PrEP and two thirds had never prescribed PrEP. Reasons for not prescribing PrEP included: not seeing adolescents who qualify (n=80), not having enough training (66), confidentiality concerns (22), forgetting to address PrEP (19), and concern incidence of HIV is too low to recommend PrEP (15). Pediatricians were the least likely to test for HIV with 11% of pediatrician, 32% of internal medicine/pediatric, and 38% of family medicine respondents reported universal HIV testing for patients 15 years and older (p < 0.05). Residents were more likely to test for HIV than attendings (33.3% versus 16%, p < 0.05). 111 participants completed the "test your knowledge" section. 31.5% correctly named two approved PrEP medications. There were 183 responses to the survey (49% response rate).
Conclusion. Adolescent primary care providers are aware that PrEP is FDA approved for adolescents but a gap in PrEP prescribing and HIV testing persists. There remain perceptions that HIV incidence is too low to discuss PrEP and that providers are not seeing patients who qualify. Next steps include developing an institutional PrEP guideline and creating an electronic medical record order set to facilitate PrEP prescribing.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures Background. About 25% of Cameroonian female sex workers (FSW) lived with HIV in 2018. PrEP was introduced in Cameroon in 2019, with minimal uptake as of 2021. The goal of this pilot project was to evaluate the potential of a novel social media intervention to raise Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and complement HIV prevention strategies among FSW, a key risk population.

Social Media Secret Facebook Groups for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Awareness among Female Sex Workers in Cameroon
Methods. From October 2020 to April 2021, sixty adult HIV-negative FSW who owned a phone with internet access joined the study; 40 in the intervention arm and 20 in the control arm. The intervention had a Secret Facebook Group (SFG) platform for confidentiality. It included 12 videos on HIV prevention in the local dialect, released over 8 weeks. In-person surveys were administered before and after the intervention, and three months later. Likert scale was used to evaluate the main outcome: PrEP awareness. Data was analyzed using Stata IC/version 14.2.
Results. Demographic characteristics were similar between intervention and control groups for age (29 years, SD7.3), literacy (45% secondary school), parity (1.9, SD1.5), and years as sex worker (7.8, SD5.1). One FSW had heard about PrEP before the intervention. After a brief introduction, 39% (15/38) of FSW in the intervention group and 50% (10/20) in the control group strongly agreed to be interested in taking PrEP (p=0.2). Baseline PrEP knowledge was poor in the intervention group (15/40, 38%) and very poor in the control group (19/20,95%) (p=0.0001). In the second survey, the intervention and control groups' PrEP knowledge improved (p=0.0001 and p=0.02, respectively). It was more significant in the intervention group, with all FSW reporting good level of knowledge (p=0.0001) (Figure 1). In addition, more FSW in the intervention group (67%,27/40) strongly agreed to be interested in taking PrEP (p=0.01), while numbers remained similar in the control group (55%, 11/20, p=0.8). Three months after the intervention, 31.5% (12/38) of participants reported excellent PrEP knowledge, a significant improvement since the second survey (p=0.02). Figure 1. Self-reported Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis knowledge before and after intervention in the intervention and control groups.
Conclusion. The use of a social media HIV prevention tool tailored to FSW in Cameroon improved PrEP awareness with good retention of knowledge. Cross contamination between groups might have hindered the differential impact of the brief intervention.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures