Femaleness for improving grain yield potential and hybrid production in barley

This article comments on: Selva C, Yang X, Shirley NJ, Whitford R, Baumann U, Tucker MR. 2023. HvSL1 and HvMADS16 promote stamen identity to restrict multiple ovary formation in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 74, 5039–5057.


Insights from the ABCDE model
Flowers are key reproductive units for most plant species (angiosperms).They are typically composed of four whorls of floral organs sequentially arranged from the outside to the center of a flower, including sepals, petals, stamens (androecium), and carpels (gynoecium).Each type of floral organ has a distinct role during reproduction.For example, sepals can protect and support the inner floral organs; petals can attract pollinators (or humans); and stamens and carpels are male and female sex organs, respectively, which determine the ultimate reproduction.The spatiotemporal arrangements of these four floral organs are specified by the genetic hierarchy of certain groups of proteins referred to as the A-, B-, C-, D-, and E-class proteins according to the popular ABCDE model (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991;Zahn et al., 2006).Yet the proteins responsible for the identity of each floral organ are not simple homologous conversions among different plant species (Hirano et al., 2014).
In the Triticeae cereal crop barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), the sex floral organs contain three stamens (male part) and three fused carpels that enclose a single ovule (female part) (Fig. 1).The single ovary phenotype is maintained by at least three independent genetic loci termed mov1, mov2, and mov5; mutations in any of them give rise to a multiovary (mov) phenotype.Previous research by Selva et al. (2021) identified the barley LEAFY (HvLFY) homolog as the causal gene underlying the mov5 locus.Now, Selva et al. (2023) focused on the mov1 and mov2 mutants, both of which showed homeotic conversions of the three stamens into additional carpels.In addition, lodicules (petal homologs) in the mov1 mutant were converted into leaf-like structures but remained normal in the mov2.g mutant.Interestingly, ectopic carpels could be observed in the mov2.g mutant, but not in mov1, indicating that MOV2 might also control carpel determinacy.Through map-based cloning and functional characterization, Selva et al. (2023) showed that the mov2 locus was due to a deletion in the STAMENLESS1 homolog (HvSL1) encoding a C2H2 zinc-finger protein, and the mov1 locus was most probably due to a gene deletion in the B-class gene MADS16 (HvMADS16), a barley homolog of rice SUPERWOMAN1 (SPW1) and Arabidopsis APETALA3 (AP3).They further showed that the SL1-MADS16 regulatory module for the specification of stamen identity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Xiao et al., 2009) was conserved in barley.Some divergences, however, also existed.rice, the ossl1 mutant exhibited homeotic conversions of both lodicules and stamens into palea/lemma-like organs and carpels, resembling the spw1/osmads16 mutant (Xiao et al., 2009).Selva et al. (2023) clearly showed that lodicules were unaffected in the barley mov2.g/hvsl1mutant.Perhaps most striking are the additional carpels in hvsl1 mutants that remain fertile when crosspollinated, which was not known in rice.The work by Selva et al. (2023) thus not only provides insights into how floral architecture is controlled in a Triticeae crop-barley-but also demonstrates a promising way in which homeotic gene mutations can increase grain yield potential.
The quest for more grains: a way forward The broad implications for studying homeotic genes can be well demonstrated by the horticultural selection of many garden ornamental flowers such as roses and tulips (Bendahmane et al., 2013).In these species, genetic manipulations on the ABCDE program may push the outward shift of the expression of B-class genes, thereby altering the organization of outward whorls of floral organs (e.g.sepals and petals) to provide aesthetic benefits for humans.In terms of plants for food purposes, such as many of the cereal crops, selections may tend to focus on the direction of more harvestable grains for human diets.Prominent examples are the genetic modifications of the meristem determinacy/identity signaling pathways leading to the increase of the final spikelet/floret number (Koppolu et al., 2013(Koppolu et al., , 2022;;Poursarebani et al., 2015Poursarebani et al., , 2020;;Dixon et al., 2018), which often require a de novo assembly of the ABCDE program to establish the spikelet/floret identity (Fig. 1).An undesired trade-off commonly observed when more spikelets/florets are produced is the reduction in grain size or fertility because extra spikelets/florets would mean extra costs, among others the synthesis of new floral organs (e.g.lemmas and paleas) and vasculatures.This suggests that additional assimilation from the  (Koppolu et al., 2013).COMPOSITUM1 (COM1) and COM2 encode TCP and AP2/ERF (ortholog of rice FRIZZY PANICLE) transcription factors, respectively, and determine inflorescence branching via the meristem identity signals (Poursarebani et al., 2015(Poursarebani et al., , 2020)).The multiflorus2.b(mul2.b)mutant also displayed a multispikelet phenotype, but the candidate gene is still not known (Koppolu et al., 2022).In all cases, an extended outgrowth of the spikelet axis (rachilla) is observed, which potentially defines the extra spikelet formation.The regulatory relationships among the three cloned genes are based on Poursarebani et al. (2020).The ABCDE model is drawn according to Zahn et al. (2006).To improve visualization, the extra spikelet is shown in gray.The regulatory model for the formation of the multiovary phenotype is drawn according to Selva et al. (2021).Dashed arrows indicate insignificant or not major changes of the transcripts.Mutations in any of the three genes, namely HvLFY, HvSL1, and HvSPW1 (HvMADS16), all give rise to a multiovary phenotype due to the homeotic conversions of stamens into carpels.Only the extra ovaries from hvlfy and hvsl1 mutants remain fertile, but not those in hvspw1.In hvlfy mutants, an incomplete conversion of stamens into carpels was observed; we therefore indicate the dispensable stamens with gray dashed lines.
source side is required to achieve an improved source-sink balance.At broader scale, the number of ovules per flower can span over several orders of magnitude among angiosperms (Burd et al., 2009).In an evolutionary context, a female-biased allocation is more likely to emerge in self-pollinating hermaphrodites when flower size is increased (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1981).In this regard, the multiovary in one floret reported by Selva et al. (2023) appears to be a resource-conserving strategy for increasing grain number, if fertilization can be secured for barley.Intriguingly, a well-known yet unidentified dominant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mutant, called Three Pistils (TP) per floret (Peng, 2003), has already solved this fertility problem.The TP trait appears specifically interesting because it also offers a greater grain yield potential per se.Considering the prominent TP phenotype, it is quite likely that genes involved in ovule initiation and development, such as the B Sister -class genes MADS29, MADS30, and MADS31 (Callens et al., 2018;Wilkinson, 2019), may be affected in this mutant.By aligning the known genomic locations of all MADS-box genes from hexaploid wheat (Schilling et al., 2020) with the TP mapping locus on the long arm of chromosome 2D (Peng et al., 2008), only MADS31/TaBS-D2 remains as the best candidate gene.In any case, only future work will be able to show whether this postulated candidate gene can be confirmed.
The male-to-female sex transition in the mov2.g mutant may raise another layer of research interest for hybrid breeding.Barley is a strictly self-pollinating crop that would require the generation of male-sterile plants for hybrid production.However, available approaches such as cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) and chemical gametocides remain a major challenge, in particular for temperate cereals crops such as barley (Fernández-Gómez et al., 2020).For floral sex determination, homeotic genes, especially those from the B-, C-, and D-class and their upstream regulators, have been studied in a considerable number of plant species (Feng et al., 2020) and are continuing to emerge in less exploited crop species such as barley.Genetic approaches such as genome editing may enable a targeted cessation (or conversion) of male or female floral organ development at an unprecedented precision, thereby maximizing cross-pollination efficiency and ultimately grain set in an F 1 grain production context.The study by Selva et al. (2023) therefore demonstrates a 'kill two birds with one stone' approach whereby mutations of homeotic genes can simultaneously promote outbreeding efficiency and capture the benefits from heterotic yield potential and stability.

Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1.Two floral meristem identity/determinacy signals potentially leading to more grains in barley.A schematic representation of a wild-type spikelet morphology is shown on the left.Each floral organ is highlighted with different colors.Two proposed molecular pathways resulting in multispikelet or multiovary phenotypes are shown on the top right and bottom right, respectively.In barley, at least four loci have been shown to negatively affect spikelet number via the meristem identity/determinacy signals.Mutations in the SIX-ROWED SPIKE4 (VRS4) gene encoding an ortholog of maize RAMOSA2 (RA2) results in a multispikelet phenotype due to the loss of spikelet determinacy(Koppolu et al., 2013).COMPOSITUM1 (COM1) and COM2 encode TCP and AP2/ERF (ortholog of rice FRIZZY PANICLE) transcription factors, respectively, and determine inflorescence branching via the meristem identity signals(Poursarebani et al., 2015(Poursarebani et al., , 2020)).The multiflorus2.b(mul2.b)mutant also displayed a multispikelet phenotype, but the candidate gene is still not known(Koppolu et al., 2022).In all cases, an extended outgrowth of the spikelet axis (rachilla) is observed, which potentially defines the extra spikelet formation.The regulatory relationships among the three cloned genes are based onPoursarebani et al. (2020).The ABCDE model is drawn according toZahn et al. (2006).To improve visualization, the extra spikelet is shown in gray.The regulatory model for the formation of the multiovary phenotype is drawn according toSelva et al. (2021).Dashed arrows indicate insignificant or not major changes of the transcripts.Mutations in any of the three genes, namely HvLFY, HvSL1, and HvSPW1 (HvMADS16), all give rise to a multiovary phenotype due to the homeotic conversions of stamens into carpels.Only the extra ovaries from hvlfy and hvsl1 mutants remain fertile, but not those in hvspw1.In hvlfy mutants, an incomplete conversion of stamens into carpels was observed; we therefore indicate the dispensable stamens with gray dashed lines.