TRANSPARENCY, DOCUMENTATION, AND OPEN SCIENCE

Abstract Some GSA journals are especially interested in promoting transparency and open science practices, reflecting how some subdisciplines in aging are moving toward open science practices faster than others. In this talk, I will consider the transparency and open science practices that seem most relevant to aging researchers, such as preregistration, open data, open materials and code, sample size justification and analytic tools for considering null effects. I will also discuss potential challenges to implementing these practices as well as reasons why it is important to do so despite these challenges. The focus will be on pragmatic suggestions for researchers planning and conducting studies now that they hope to publish later.


HOW TO PUBLISH: GUIDANCE FROM GSA'S JOURNAL EDITORS Chair: Suzanne Meeks
Each year he GSA publications team sponsors a symposium to assist authors who wish to publish in GSA's high impact and influential journals. The first part of the session will include five brief presentations from the editors of The Gerontologist, Innovation and Aging, and the Journals of Gerontology Series A and B plus GSA's managing editors. We will integrate practical tips with principles of publication ethics and scholarly integrity. The topics will be as follows: (1) Preparing your manuscript: strong and ethical scholarly writing for multidisciplinary audiences, (2) common problems that affect peer review, (3) addressing translational significance and fit to journal expectations, (4) transparency, documentation, and Open Science; and (5) working with Scholar One. Following these presentations, we will hold round table discussions with editors from the GSA journals portfolio. At these round tables, editors will answer questions related to the podium presentations and other questions specific to each journal. Intended audiences include emerging and international scholars, and authors interested in learning more about best practices and tips for getting their scholarly work published.

PREPARING YOUR MANUSCRIPT: STRONG AND ETHICAL SCHOLARLY WRITING FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY AUDIENCES Suzanne Meeks, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
This presentation will emphasize the importance of plain, good writing. Editors read 10 or more manuscripts per week with pressure to reject 80-90% of them. If the point and contribution are not clear in a quick scan of the paper, it will not be reviewed favorably. I will provide tips for writing that are commonly violated in submissions, provide references for additional writing support, cover expectations for language consistent with GSA's Reframing Aging initiative, and discuss some common publication ethics issues that arise during the review process, including author contributions and embedding your scholarship in the context of prior work.

COMMON PROBLEMS THAT IMPACT PEER REVIEW Rozalyn Anderson, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
This presentation will review the most common issues that affect how reviewers see a manuscript submission. These include clarity, use of figures, and attention to existing research, especially establishing the significance and novelty of the work, and how to frame a narrative. I will also address responding to peer review. The focus will be on the biological science perspective (Journals of Gerontology Series A), but these issues are relevant to all submissions to GSA journals.

DEFINING TRANSLATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE IN GERONTOLOGY Steven Albert, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Innovation in Aging requires a statement from authors on translational significance. This requirement forces authors to consider the implications of their research for changing some component of aging. How does the research address a challenge posed by aging bodies, minds, relationships, or societies? The editorial board has developed criteria for assessing translational significance. Translational research must meet at least one of three criteria. It (i) must predict or explain a health or behavioral outcome, (ii) be advanced enough in deployment or development to assess these effects, and (iii) have a clear pathway to large-scale program delivery or change in clinical practice. The criteria rule out some kinds of submissions, such as scale development, single-case studies, or reviews of literature. We use these criteria to structure each article's required translational significance statement. Rethinking translation may help focus research across the full set of GSA journals.

TRANSPARENCY, DOCUMENTATION, AND OPEN SCIENCE
Derek Isaacowitz, Northeastern University, Northeastern University, Massachusetts, United States Some GSA journals are especially interested in promoting transparency and open science practices, reflecting how some Innovation in Aging, 2021, Vol. 5, No. S1 subdisciplines in aging are moving toward open science practices faster than others. In this talk, I will consider the transparency and open science practices that seem most relevant to aging researchers, such as preregistration, open data, open materials and code, sample size justification and analytic tools for considering null effects. I will also discuss potential challenges to implementing these practices as well as reasons why it is important to do so despite these challenges. The focus will be on pragmatic suggestions for researchers planning and conducting studies now that they hope to publish later.

GSA MANAGING EDITORS' PERSPECTIVE ON SUBMISSION DOS AND DON'TS Kathleen Jackson, and Karen Jung, The Gerontological Society of America, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
In this presentation, the managing editors of GSA's peerreviewed journals will discuss how the editorial offices operate and their roles in the publishing process. The topics will include how to navigate the ScholarOne submission system, why it is important to read the Instructions to Authors, and how authors can work with the editorial offices to increase the visibility and impact of their published articles.

Session 2255 (Symposium) LEVERAGING A POPULATION-BASED DYADIC DATA SET TO PROMOTE HEALTH EQUITY AMONG CHINESE AMERICANS Chair: XinQi Dong Co-Chair: Dexia Kong
Recognizing the central role of family-oriented values in Chinese culture, developing a family-based understanding of health and wellbeing in Chinese Americans is imperative. By linking two unique population-based datasets (one on Chinese older adults, and another on their corresponding adult children caregivers), the purpose of this symposium is to present interactive analyses of dyad-level data to achieve an interpersonal understanding of health outcomes of Chinese older adults and their adult children within the family context. Data were obtained from 807 Chinese older adults-adult children dyads by merging data from two epidemiological studies, namely the Population Study of ChINese Elderly in Chicago (the PINE study) and the PIETY study of corresponding adult children caregivers of PINE participants. Specifically, this symposium presents findings from five interconnected research projects. Session 1 provides an overview of study design and sample characteristics of the dyadic dataset. Session 2 examines the relationship between adult children's endorsement of the filial piety value and older parents' mental health outcomes. Session 3 investigates the level of congruence between older parents' selfperceived mental health and adult children's evaluation of their parents' mental health. Session 4 investigates the extent to which depressive symptoms among older parents were associated with those of their adult children. Session 5 explores the relationship between older parents' physical function and adult children's perceived caregiving burden. Taken together, this symposium presents potential contributions of dyad-level analyses in advancing minority population health.
Study findings have the potential to inform the development of family-centered intervention strategies targeting Chinese Americans.

DYADIC DATA ON U.S. CHINESE OLDER ADULTS AND THEIR ADULT CHILDREN: STUDY DESIGN AND SAMPLE OVERVIEW
Dexia Kong, 1 and XinQi Dong, 2 1. The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong ,Hong Kong,2. Rutgers University,Rutgers Institute for Health,New Jersey,United States This paper aims to describe study design of the unique dyadic older Chinese American-adult children dataset, and present sample characteristics of the dyads. A total of 807 older parents were matched with their adult children (characteristics of matched versus not matched participants will be compared). On average, adult children were 48 years old, had 12 years of education, lived with 3 persons in household, had 2 children, and lived in U.S. for 17 years. Approximately 65% of the adult children sample were female, 82% married, 93% preferred to speak Chinese dialects, and over 97% foreign-born immigrants. On the other hand, older parents were 74 years old, had 7 years of education, lived with 3 persons in household, had 3 children, and lived in U.S. for 17 years on average. About 60% of the older parent sample were female, 73% married, over 99% foreign-born immigrants who preferred to speak Chinese dialects.

. Rutgers University, Rutgers Institute for Health, New Jersey, United States
Filial piety is an important Chinese cultural value that prescribes child behavior towards their parents, but little is known about its relationship to the parents' psychological wellbeing. This study utilizes dyad data from the PINE and PIETY Studies. Filial piety was measured by asking how much the participant thought children should 1) care; 2) respect; 3) greet; 4) please and make happy; 5) obey; and 6) provide financial support to their parents. Depressive symptoms were measured by Patient Health Questionaire-9 with a cutoff of 5 indicating the presence of depressive symptoms. Logistic regressions were used to examine the associations controlling for both children's and parents' sociodemographic characteristics. Higher filial piety in happy (OR:0.80, (0.65-0.99)) or obey (OR:0.83, (0.68-1.00)) was associated with a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms among parents. Future research should explore the potential causal relationships between children's filial piety and parents' mental health.