Changes in perceived health status in older men and women during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted older people. The disease and the measures to combat it have had a differential impact according to gender, with higher mortality rates in men and worse psychological and social consequences in women. The objective of this work is to analyze the changes in perceived health of older people in Europe during the first months of the pandemic and to assess the combined role of age and gender. Methods Wave 8 data of SHARE-corona (Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe) (n = 51,695, aged≥50) collected between Jun-Aug 2020 were used. Perceived health status was explored with a question on whether there has been a change compared with the health status before the COVID-19 outbreak (response options: worse, the same and better). Two-way ANOVA with interaction and Student's t-test with Bonferroni correction were used to compare the effects of gender and age group (50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and ≥80) in changes in perceived health. Results Differences in perceived health were observed by age, as well as by gender in participants aged ≥70 years (F = 91.94; p < 0.001). These differences were significant both by gender (F = 19.39; p < 0.001) and age (F = 191.79; p < 0.001). No interaction was detected between both factors (p = 0.170), which allowed their effect to be studied individually. Among the people who reported a worsening in their perceived health, women aged 70 to 79 years predominated (11.1%), followed by men aged 80 and over (15.3%) and women of the same age group (16.4%). Conclusions The results suggest an association between the change in perceived health during the pandemic and age. Women have a slightly worse health status than men in all age groups. Therefore, gender can be considered as an influential factor in perceived health in old age, which in turn can have a potential impact in the quality of life of older people. Funding Projects Ref. H2019/HUM-5698 and Ref. 202010E158. Key messages Older people have been severely impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. The combined effect of age and gender on the change in perceived health status during the pandemic have been analyzed.


Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic led to important disruptions in surgical activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on abdominal surgery outcomes in the region of Piedmont, in northern Italy. Methods: Data were gathered from 42 hospitals participating in the regional surveillance network from 2018 to 2020. SSI, overall mortality and case fatality rates (CFR) were calculated, comparing 2020 to mean 2018-19 data. Chi-squared tests were used to assess both the differences among the proportion of urgent and oncological procedures (based on ICD-9-CM codes) and rates between the two periods. Subgroup analyses on 2020 data were carried out comparing urgent vs. elective and oncological vs. non-oncological procedures using chi-squared tests. Analyses were performed using SPSS v. 28.0.1.0. Results: 5407 procedures were recorded in 2018-19; 310 SSIs and 120 deaths were observed. The mean proportions of urgent and oncological operations were, respectively, 21.90% and 43.24%. In 2020, 1057 procedures were recorded, along with 44 SSIs and 29 deaths. 34.44% of procedures were urgent and 39.74% oncological. The mean 2018-2019 SSI rate was 5.73%, with an overall mortality of 2.22% and a CFR of 7.42%. The SSI rate in 2020 was 4.16%, with an overall mortality of 2.74% and a CFR of 9.09%. The proportion of urgent procedures significantly differed between the two periods (p < 0.001), as did the proportion of oncological procedures and SSI rates (both p = 0.05). Considering 2020, significant differences were found comparing overall mortality between urgent vs. elective procedures (4.95% vs. 1.59%, p = 0.002) and comparing SSI rates between oncological vs. non-oncological patients (3.57% vs. 2.20%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions:
During the pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures significantly differed, reflecting public health decisions. Even though these differences did not reach statistical significance, overall mortality and CFR increased in 2020.

Key messages:
Results of this study suggest the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on outcomes after abdominal surgery. Further longer-term studies are needed to assess the impact of policies implemented during the pandemic, to help inform future pandemic plans.

Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted older people. The disease and the measures to combat it have had a differential impact according to gender, with higher mortality rates in men and worse psychological and social consequences in women. The objective of this work is to analyze the changes in perceived health of older people in Europe during the first months of the pandemic and to assess the combined role of age and gender.

Methods:
Wave 8 data of SHARE-corona (Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe) (n = 51,695, aged!50) collected between Jun-Aug 2020 were used. Perceived health status was explored with a question on whether there has been a change compared with the health status before the COVID-19 outbreak (response options: worse, the same and better). Twoway ANOVA with interaction and Student's t-test with Bonferroni correction were used to compare the effects of gender and age group (50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and !80) in changes in perceived health.

Results:
Differences in perceived health were observed by age, as well as by gender in participants aged !70 years (F = 91.94; p < 0.001). These differences were significant both by gender (F = 19.39; p < 0.001) and age (F = 191.79; p < 0.001). No interaction was detected between both factors (p = 0.170), which allowed their effect to be studied individually. Among the people who reported a worsening in their perceived health, women aged 70 to 79 years predominated (11.1%), followed by men aged 80 and over (15.3%) and women of the same age group (16.4%).

Conclusions:
The results suggest an association between the change in perceived health during the pandemic and age. Women have a slightly worse health status than men in all age groups. Therefore, gender can be considered as an influential factor in

Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions have affected the wellbeing of school children worldwide. Specific problems evolving during the pandemic, their extent and duration haveń t been sufficiently explored yet. We aimed at describing school childreń s psychosocial and behavioral parameters and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Berlin, Germany.

Methods:
Our longitudinal study included students from 24 randomly selected Berlin primary and secondary schools, assessing psychosocial wellbeing and behaviors at four time points between June 2020 and March 2021. We analyzed temporal changes in the proportions of anxiety, fear of infection, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), physical activity and social contacts, as well as sociodemographic and economic factors associated with anxiety, fear of infection and HRQoL.

Results:
Of initially 384 recruited students, 324 still participated in the fourth study round after nine months. During the observation period, presence of anxiety symptoms increased from 26.2% (96/367) to 34.6% (62/179), and fear of infection from 28.6% (108/377) to 40.6% (73/180). The proportion of children with limited social contacts (<1/week) increased from 16.4% (61/ 373) to 23.5% (42/179). Low physical activity (<3 times sports/ week) was consistent over time. Low HRQoL was observed among 44% (77/174). Factors associated with anxiety were female sex, increasing age, secondary school attendance, lower household income, and presence of adults with anxiety symptoms in the student's household. Fear of infection and low HRQoL were associated with anxiety.

Conclusions:
A substantial proportion of school children experienced unfavorable psychosocial conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020/2021. In particular, students from households with limited social and financial resilience require special attention.

Key messages:
Berlin school childreń s anxiety increased significantly during the pandemic months between June 2020 and March 2021 and was associated with anxiety in the family and lower household income. Almost half of the schoolchildren in our study reported low health-related quality of life after the second pandemic lockdown in March 2021.

Introduction:
Vaccination behaviour is influenced by various determinants. Evidence indicates a higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among university students due to their age and a lower risk of complications compared to the general population in Germany. However, little is known about other COVID-19related determinants for the population of German university students. This study aimed to investigate determinants of vaccination behaviour among German university students.

Methods:
The cross-sectional COVID-19 German Student Well-being Study was conducted at five German universities at the end of 2021 via an online survey (n = 7.267). Multiple logistic regressions were calculated to examine associations of vaccination behaviour (not vaccinated vs. fully vaccinated) and attitudes towards vaccination (5Cs: confidence in the safety of the vaccine, complacency -not perceiving diseases as high risk, constraints -structural and psychological barriers, calculation -engagement in information seeking, collective responsibility -willingness to protect others), health literacy in a pandemic (CHL-P), and additional determinants.

Results:
All 5Cs were associated with the vaccination status 'fully vaccinated', except for complacency. Regarding CHL-P, we found that students who felt that the current scientific knowledge about COVID-19 in terms of the policy decisions on pandemic measures was very complex had a higher odds for being vaccinated (OR = 3.02; 95% CI: 2.26-4.04). Regarding additional determinants, the analysis revealed that students who had been previously infected had in all regressions a lower odds for being vaccinated compared to students with no previous infection.

Conclusions:
Due to the strong association of the attitudes towards vaccination and vaccination behaviour among university students, we recommend that the different components of the 5Cs should be considered in future COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in the university context. Key messages: Attitudes towards vaccinations impact on vaccination behaviour among university students.
Perceiving the current scientific knowledge on COVID-19 as very complex increased the odds for vaccination.