Hospital doctors in Ireland working through COVID-19 pandemic: learning from individual experience

Abstract Background This study was part of a 5-year, HRB-funded research project about hospital doctor retention and emigration. Methods In 2021, we conducted a Mobile Instant Messaging Ethnography (MIME) with 28 hospital doctors in Ireland. This involved interviewing doctors via Zoom and engaging them in a 12-week work-related conversation via WhatsApp. Results Our findings illustrate that the pandemic intensified already difficult working conditions. Respondents described working in an under-staffed and under-resourced system, in which they were unable to protect their own wellbeing or achieve a work-life balance. Morale was low and few had hope of health system improvement. Conclusions The findings reveal a workforce under strain and raise concerns about health worker wellbeing and health worker attrition, post-pandemic. However, they also highlight the importance (and value) of listening to the voices of frontline health workers and using their insights to inform and enhance retention policies.


Background:
General practices are experiencing increasing pressures due to rising demand, declining staff numbers, and knock-on impacts on patient care. The COVID-19 pandemic has added further challenges and reinforced the importance of teamwork and organisational settings. We undertook a mixed-method systematic review to explore which interventions can improve teamwork within primary care and improve inter-sector partnerships with other health and social care services.

Methods:
Five major bibliographic databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from inception to February 2022. We included controlled intervention study designs and linked qualitative studies. For amenable data, meta-analysis is being undertaken using random effects models taking into account the between study heterogeneity (quantified using the I2 statistic) and potential publication bias (funnel plots and Egger's test). The qualitative studies are analysed using thematic analyses.

Results:
The original search yield of 3012 studies, of which 14 studies with 1,534 participants were include in our analyses. Most of the evaluated interventions focused on improving nontechnical skills and provided evidence of improvements in the quality of teamwork in primary care. Meta-analysis and narrative synthesis is undertaken to examine the impact of the teamwork interventions on staff outcomes (team attitudes, knowledge, and functioning; wellbeing), and patient outcomes (e.g. quality of patient care, patient satisfaction/experience).

Conclusions:
The findings provide information of immediate importance for the mental health and wellbeing and teamwork support of professionals entering primary care and for the organisation of primary care services.

Background:
This study was part of a 5-year, HRB-funded research project about hospital doctor retention and emigration.

Methods:
In 2021, we conducted a Mobile Instant Messaging Ethnography (MIME) with 28 hospital doctors in Ireland. This involved interviewing doctors via Zoom and engaging them in a 12-week work-related conversation via WhatsApp.

Results:
Our findings illustrate that the pandemic intensified already difficult working conditions. Respondents described working in an under-staffed and under-resourced system, in which they were unable to protect their own wellbeing or achieve a worklife balance. Morale was low and few had hope of health system improvement.

Conclusions:
The findings reveal a workforce under strain and raise concerns about health worker wellbeing and health worker attrition, post-pandemic. However, they also highlight the importance (and value) of listening to the voices of frontline health workers and using their insights to inform and enhance retention policies.

Background:
Within the SARS-CoV-2 screening campaign offered through RT-PCR test by Sapienza University of Rome, we conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors for the acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection among university students.

Methods:
Positive students identified through the SARS-CoV-2 screening campaign (September 2021 -February 2022) were enrolled as cases and matched to two randomly selected students who tested negative on the same day. The interview questionnaire consisted of 39 questions investigating exposure to modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 in the two weeks before testing. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was constructed to identify predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI were calculated. Results: Out of 8.730 tests for SARS-CoV-2, 173 students tested positive (2.0%), of which 122 were included in the case-control study (response rate: 70.5%). Most students were female (73.2%), with a mean age of 23.3 years (SD AE 3.6), vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 (97.8%) and enrolled in non-health faculty (56.8%). At the multivariable analysis, significant positive associations were found with having had contact with a person who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (aOR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.59-5.82) or having been to a disco/nightclub (aOR: 5.37, 95% CI: 2.00-14.38). Instead, being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.01-0.93), having a valid EU COVID iii22 European Journal of Public Health, Volume 32 Supplement 3, 2022