The Conceptual Framework for the International Food Policy Study: Evaluating the Population-Level Impact of Food Policy

https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxac042Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

An unhealthy diet is among the leading global causes of death and disability. Globally, a range of policies are being implemented to support healthy food choices at a population level, including novel polices in the areas of food marketing, nutrition labeling, and taxation of less healthy foods. There is a need to evaluate and inform the implementation of these policies, including their impacts on marginalized population subgroups. The International Food Policy Study (IFPS) consists of repeated cross-sectional surveys conducted in 5 high- and upper-middle-income countries: Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In each country, approximately 4000 adults and 1200 children and youth (aged 10–17) were recruited from a global commercial panel to complete an online survey using consistent measures and methodologies across countries. The first annual IFPS surveys were conducted in 2017 with adults; annual surveys for young people aged 10–17 were launched in 2019 in the same countries, as well as in Chile. The design of the IFPS surveys creates a framework for evaluating “natural experiments” in food policies, including comparisons over time within countries implementing the policy and comparisons with countries in which the policy was not implemented. IFPS surveys have 3 primary areas of focus: 1) knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs associated with specific policies; 2) diet-related behaviors; and 3) dietary intake, including 24-hour dietary recalls for adults in 4 of the 5 countries. Surveys also assess food insecurity, income adequacy, sex and gender, race/ethnicity, and a range of other measures to assess trends among priority subgroups. Overall, the IFPS project has the potential to address important gaps in national monitoring surveys for dietary patterns, and to evaluate the impacts of novel food policies implemented in any of the 5 countries over the study period.

Keywords:

food policy, nutrition policy
policy evaluation
quasi-experimental study
dietary intake
between-country comparisons

Abbreviations used:

AAPOR
American Association for Public Opinion Research
ASA24
Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool
BFQ
Beverage Frequency Questionnaire
CCHS
Canadian Community Health Survey
FOP
front-of-package
GDA
Guideline Daily Amounts
IFPS
International Food Policy Study
NCD
noncommunicable diseases
OECD
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
SES
socioeconomic status

Cited by (0)

This supplement was supported by funding from a Project Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-162167). The views expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research or other sources of funding. The International Food Policy Study is funded by a Project Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (PJT-162167) and supported by a Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)-CIHR Chair in Applied Public Health (to DH). JA and MW are supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number MC_UU_00006/7). GS is a recipient of an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellowship (2021/GNT2008535). AJC and GS are the recipients of Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowships from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (project numbers 102611 and 102035).

Author disclosures: DH has served as a paid expert witness on behalf of public health authorities in the legal challenge to San Francisco’s health warning ordinance for sugar-sweetened beverages. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figures 1 and 2 are available from the “Supplementary data” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at https://academic.oup.com/jn/.