Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:26:34.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multilateral Contracting in Australian Mining: The Development of Hamersley Iron, 1961–1966

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Abstract

Management theory andtransaction cost economics provide few insights into the dynamics of multilateral negotiations. A host of factors suggest that complex transactions—especially those that involve government agencies—face a high probability of failure. Yet history records many examples of successful multiple-party transactions. Using the records of a major Australian iron ore mining venture, Hamersley Iron, this article reveals a number of the tactics that are usedto engineer an agreement when the parties concerned have conflicting objectives, different cultural affiliations, and distinctive institutional ties. The essay also exposes some of the devices that the Japanese steel industry—Hamersley’s main customer—used to secure competitive advantages in raw material procurement during the industry’s rise to international prominence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Enterprise and Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Boyce, Gordon. Co-Operative Structures in Global Business: Communicating, Transferring Knowledge, and Learning across the Corporate Frontier. London, 2000.Google Scholar
Casson, Mark. Information and Organization. Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
Contractor, F. J., and Lorange, Peter, eds. Co-Operative Strategies in International Business. Lexington, Mass., 1988.Google Scholar
D’Costa, Anthony P. The Global Restructuring of the Steel Industry: Innovations, Institutions, and Industrial Change. London, 1999.Google Scholar
Hyde, Francis E. Cunard and the North Atlantic. Liverpool, 1972.Google Scholar
Lynn, Leonard. How Japan Innovates: A Comparison with the U.S. in the Case of Oxygen Steelmaking. Boulder, Colo., 1982.Google Scholar
Raggatt, Harold G. Mountains of Ore. Melbourne, 1968.Google Scholar
Trengove, Alan . Adventure in Iron: Hamersley’s First Decade. Mont Albert, Victoria, 1976.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. Markets and Hierarchies. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E.. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Boyce, Gordon. “The Western Mining Corporation-Hanna/Homestake Joint Venture: Game Theory and Inter-Organizational Co-Operation.Australian Economic History Review 37 (Oct. 1997): 202–21.Google Scholar
Brett, Joan F., Northcraft, Gregory B., and Pinkney, Robin L.. “Stairways to Heaven: An Interlocking Self-Regulation Model of Negotiation.Academy of Management Review 24, no.3 (1999): 435–51.Google Scholar
Foster, Mark S.Giant of the West: Henry J. Kaiser and Regional Industrialization, 1930–1950.Business History Review 59 (Spring 1985): 123.Google Scholar
Helper, Susan. “Comparative Supplier Relations in the U.S. and Japanese Auto Industries: An Exit/Voice Approach.Business and Economic History 17 (1990): 153–62.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Patricia. “Industry Structure as a Competitive Advantage: The History of Japan’s Post War Steel Industry.Business History 34 (Jan. 1992): 128–59.Google Scholar
Ring, Peter S., and Van de Ven, Andrew H.. “Developmental Processes of Co-Operative Interorganizational Relationships.Academy of Management Review 19, no. 1 (1994): 90118.Google Scholar
Boyce, Gordon. “Negotiating Costs and Transaction Costs: Devices for Reduing Dealmaking Expenses.” Paper presented to the Australian Econom and Maritime History Conference, Wollongong, New South Wales, Dec 2000.Google Scholar
Hamersley Iron Papers, University of Melbourne Archives, Melbourne, Autralia.Google Scholar
King Papers, University of Melbourne Archives, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar