Mutation of knots
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by C. Kearton PDF
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 105 (1989), 206-208 Request permission
Abstract:
In general, mutation does not preserve the Alexander module or the concordance class of a knot.References
- R. P. Anstee, J. H. Przytycki, and D. Rolfsen, Knot polynomials and generalized mutation, Topology Appl. 32 (1989), no. 3, 237–249. MR 1007103, DOI 10.1016/0166-8641(89)90031-X
- Eva Bayer, Unimodular Hermitian and skew-Hermitian forms, J. Algebra 74 (1982), no. 2, 341–373. MR 647245, DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(82)90030-8
- E. Bayer, J. A. Hillman, and C. Kearton, The factorization of simple knots, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 90 (1981), no. 3, 495–506. MR 628832, DOI 10.1017/S0305004100058953
- C. Kearton, Noninvertible knots of codimension $2$, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (1973), 274–276. MR 341466, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0341466-9
- W. B. R. Lickorish and Kenneth C. Millett, A polynomial invariant of oriented links, Topology 26 (1987), no. 1, 107–141. MR 880512, DOI 10.1016/0040-9383(87)90025-5
- Charles Livingston, Knots which are not concordant to their reverses, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 34 (1983), no. 135, 323–328. MR 711524, DOI 10.1093/qmath/34.3.323 H. R. Morton and P. Traczyk, Knots, skeins and algebras, preprint.
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1989 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 105 (1989), 206-208
- MSC: Primary 57M25
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1989-0929430-1
- MathSciNet review: 929430