Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Lytic Programmed Cell Death in Acute Inflammation

Significance: Redox signaling through mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) has a key role in several mechanisms of regulated cell death (RCD), necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and apoptosis, thereby decisively contributing to inflammatory disorders. The role of mtROS in apoptosis has been extensively addressed, but their involvement in necrotic-like RCD has just started being elucidated, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of acute inflammation. Recent Advances: p53 together with mtROS drive necroptosis in acute inflammation through downregulation of sulfiredoxin and peroxiredoxin 3. Mitochondrial hydroorotate dehydrogenase is a key redox system in the regulation of ferroptosis. In addition, a noncanonical pathway, which generates mtROS through the Ragulator-Rag complex and acts via mTORC1 to promote gasdermin D oligomerization, triggers pyroptosis. Critical Issues: mtROS trigger positive feedback loops leading to lytic RCD in conjunction with the necrosome, the inflammasome, glutathione depletion, and glutathione peroxidase 4 deficiency. Future Directions: The precise mechanism of membrane rupture in ferroptosis and the contribution of mtROS to ferroptosis in inflammatory disorders are still unclear, which will need further research. Mitochondrial antioxidants may provide promising therapeutic approaches toward acute inflammatory disorders. However, establishing doses and windows of action will be required to optimize their therapeutic potential, and to avoid potential adverse side effects linked to the blockade of beneficial mtROS adaptive signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 39, 708–727.

I n 1965, Lockshin and Williams observed cells dying during the metamorphosis of the silkworm via a process named ''programmed cell death'' (Lockshin and Williams, 1965).These authors used the term ''programmed'' because cells were programmed to die according to the ''construction manual'' for insect development (Nagata and Tanaka, 2017).In 1972, a similar cell death process was observed in human tissues (Kerr et al., 1972) and the term ''apoptosis'' was then coined to describe a specific morphological aspect of cell death charac-terized by the rounding-up of the cell, retraction of pseudopods, reduction of cellular volume (pyknosis), chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation (karyorrhexis), without or only very subtle ultrastructural modifications of cytoplasmic organelles, and maintenance of plasma membrane integrity until the final stages of the process culminating in engulfment of the apoptotic cell by phagocytes (Kroemer et al., 2009).
This type of cell death contrasted with ''necrotic cell death,'' morphologically characterized by a gain in cell volume (oncosis), swelling of organelles, plasma membrane rupture, and subsequent loss of intracellular contents (Kroemer et al., 2009).
Until the beginning of the 21st century, necrosis was believed to be merely an accidental and uncontrolled form of cell death.However, accumulating evidence proved that many cases of what was considered necrosis were, in fact, a tightly regulated form of cell death (Kroemer et al., 2009;Wang et al., 2018).Consequently, the cell death classification system had to discriminate between programmed forms of necrosis and the accidental form of necrosis (Galluzzi et al., 2015;Galluzzi et al., 2012;Kroemer et al., 2009).
Today, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death distinguishes two mutually exclusive types of cell death: accidental cell death (ACD) and regulated cell death (RCD) (Galluzzi et al., 2015).ACD is a biologically uncontrolled process, whereas RCD involves signaling cascades and effector mechanisms (Tang et al., 2019).While RCD can be pharmacologically and/or genetically modulated, ACD, generally caused by severe insults, including physical, chemical, and mechanical aggressions, cannot be prevented (Galluzzi et al., 2015).
During the past decades, many novel forms of nonapoptotic RCD have been identified, including necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, entotic cell death, parthanatos, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, alkaliptosis, and oxeiptosis (Tang et al., 2019).We focus here on lytic RCD in acute inflammation, with a special emphasis on necroptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis (Fig. 1).These three cell death types are highly relevant to the pathophysiology of multiple diseases, and, in particular, inflammatory disorders (Chen et al., 2021b;Choi et al., 2019).
Necroptosis and pyroptosis are clearly relevant to the cell death occurring during viral infections, and their mechanisms have been elucidated (Oberst, 2016;Tang et al., 2019), in contrast to ferroptosis the physiological significance of which is still unclear as are the signaling events that trigger its induction ( Jiang et al., 2021).
Cellular redox mechanisms and control pathways critically influence cell survival-death decisions (Ueda et al., 2002).Although oxidative stress is considered as a decisive factor in the trigger of cell death (Ryter et al., 2007), various redox signals also contribute to fine-tuning cell survival or death decisions (Benhar, 2020;Trachootham et al., 2008).
As one of the main sites of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondria is relevant to the mechanisms that trigger cell death programs (Collins et al., 2012).A large variety of intra-and extracellular cues that can signal cell fate decisions promote or prevent cell death by modulating mitochondrial function and structure (Sedlackova and Korolchuk, 2019).Indeed, most of the biochemical events associated with cell death, including irreversible metabolic changes and activation of cell death effectors, eventually trigger mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, a decisive step that delimits the frontier between cell survival and death (Kroemer et al., 2007).
We address here the role of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) in the regulation of lytic programmed cell death in the context of acute inflammation.Literature over the past 15 years was identified in PubMed database by searching the following keywords: necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, mitochondrial ROS, mitochondrial antioxidants, and inflammation.Relevant references to the topic cited by publications retrieved using this search strategy were also consulted.

Necroptosis
Necroptosis, a programmed form of cell death morphologically similar to necrosis, is triggered by the engagement of cell surface death receptors, such as the Fas cell surface death receptor (Fas), tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 1 (TNFR1), interferon receptors (IFNRs), Toll-like receptors, and intracellular RNA-or DNA-sensing molecules (Choi et al., 2019).The receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3) and the pseudokinase mixed-lineage

Tribute
Professor Lester Packer was, indeed, one of the great pioneers in the field of Free Radicals and Antioxidants.He founded the Oxygen Club of California (OCC), served as President for many years, and was President of Society for Free Radical Research International (SFRR-I).He also organized numerous international meetings all over the world always exhibiting exceptional interpersonal skills, and greatly promoting the scientific career of many young investigators.I had the great opportunity to personally enjoy his enthusiasm for excellence in science in many OCC meetings, and particularly I had the honor of organizing together with Josiane Cillard, Joa ˜o Laranjinha, and Enrique Cadenas the OCC World Congress in Valencia in 2015, in his last visit to Europe.Professor Lester Packer will forever remain a reference for all of us, and we are indebted to him for pursuing the investigation in this exciting area of redox signaling and antioxidants.kinase domain-like (MLKL) are the key proteins that execute necroptosis, which may occur when apoptosis is impaired (Vanden Berghe et al., 2014).
Within complex I, cIAPs-dependent ubiquitination of RIPK1 causes recruitment of the inhibitor of I-jB kinase complex, leading to activation and nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-jB) (Choi et al., 2019).NF-jB-dependent cell survival response is critical to counteract activation of the cytosolic pro-apoptotic complex IIa formed by TRADD-FAS-associated death domain protein (FADD) and caspase-8 (Dondelinger et al., 2016).
However, when activation of NF-jB by complex I is downregulated, TRADD dissociates from complex I and engages FADD and pro-caspase-8 in the cytosol, causing the formation of complex IIa (Micheau and Tschopp, 2003).The formation of complex IIa activates caspase-8, which triggers activation of the apoptosis effectors caspase-3 and caspase-7 (Dondelinger et al., 2016).
Alternatively, when ubiquitination of RIPK1 is disrupted in complex I as a consequence of cIAPs inhibition or CYLD upregulation, a protein that removes polyubiquitin from RIPK1, RIPK1 dissociates from complex I and interacts with FADD and pro-caspase-8 (Dondelinger et al., 2016;Kist et al., 2021).The formation of this complex also promotes activation of apoptosis in a caspase-8-dependent manner and thus, it is considered a pro-apoptotic RIPK1 kinasedependent version of complex II, which is usually denoted as complex IIb (Wegner et al., 2017).
Phosphorylated RIPK3 then phosphorylates MLKL, which triggers the formation of MLKL oligomers that localize to and destabilize the plasma membrane (Cai et al., 2014;Dondelinger et al., 2014;Newton and Manning, 2016;Wang et al., 2014a).Phosphatidylinositol transfer protein alpha (PITPa), which transfers phosphatidylinositol between membranes, and HSP90 interact with MLKL, facilitating its oligomerization and plasma membrane localization ( Jacobsen et al., 2016;Jing et al., 2018).The precise mechanisms that regulate MLKL membrane localization and subsequent disruption of plasma membrane integrity are still unclear (Li et al., 2021).According to the model of TNFamediated necroptosis in HEK293T and L929sAhFas cell lines, MLKL binds phosphatidylinositol phosphate through positive charges present in the four-helical bundle domain of its N-terminal region, thereby disrupting plasma membrane directly (Dondelinger et al., 2014).
Nevertheless, the studies on TNFa-induced necroptosis in HT29, FADD -/-Jurkat, J774A.1,U937, and L929 cell lines suggest that MLKL recruits and primes Ca 2+ and Na + ion channels, thereby causing osmotic pressure increase and membrane rupture (Cai et al., 2014;Chen et al., 2014b).Although several studies have pointed that the latter model cannot be correct, since the aforementioned ion channels are not essential for necroptosis, the effect of MLKL on ion influx might be relevant (Flores-Romero et al., 2020;Ousingsawat et al., 2017;Xia et al., 2016).
Alternatively, MLKL oligomers themselves may instead act as a channel (Xia et al., 2016).It, thus, remains to be elucidated whether membrane permeability is the result of MLKL insertion into the lipid bilayer or alternatively MLKL formation of pores that act as ion channels, or possibly to both mechanisms (Flores-Romero et al., 2020).
Importantly, MLKL trafficking and accumulation at the plasma membrane control the kinetics and threshold for necroptosis (Samson et al., 2020).Activated MLKL generates bubbles with exposed phosphatidylserine that are released from the surface (Li et al., 2021).The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-III machinery is required for the formation of these bubbles and controls the duration of plasma membrane integrity, allowing necroptotic cells to generate and release signaling molecules before membrane rupture (Gong et al., 2017).
In fact, ESCRT-III-mediated bubble formation can sustain cell survival when MLKL activation is reduced or reversed (Gong et al., 2017).Consequently, activation of MLKL is not a ''point-of-no-return'' for cell survival since cells harboring active MLKL can be resuscitated by maintaining ESCRT activity (Gong et al., 2017).Accordingly, membrane bubbling appears as a transient step during necroptosis since it occurs during the induction phase of necroptosis but decreases just before cell death (Gong et al., 2017;Samson et al., 2020).
Activated MLKL accumulates at the plasma membrane until a membranolytic threshold is reached, which causes membrane blowout and cell death (Samson et al., 2020).At this stage, MLKL traffics together with tight junction proteins to the cell periphery via Golgi-microtubule-actin-dependent mechanisms, thus accumulating at sites of intercellular junctions.The accumulation of phosphorylated MLKL at intercellular junctions accelerates necroptosis of neighboring cells, thereby propagating necroptotic signaling within the tissue (Samson et al., 2020).

Necroptosis and inflammation
Necroptosis exhibits typical morphological features of necrosis, including organelle swelling, plasma membrane rupture, cell lysis, and leakage of intracellular components, which may propagate secondary inflammatory responses (Choi et al., 2019).When released during cell death, intracellular contents can act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that induce an inflammatory response by interacting with and activating different innate immune effectors (Kaczmarek et al., 2013).
Hence, necroptosis must have a decisive role in inflammatory diseases such as sepsis, stroke, cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury, inflammatory bowel disease, acute kidney injury, acute pancreatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and skin inflammation (Choi et al., 2019;Khoury et al., 2020;Newton and Manning, 2016;Weinlich et al., 2017).The specific pathophysiological role of each DAMP in modulating immune responses associated with necroptosis remains to be clarified though (Choi et al., 2019).
DAMPs can be passively released by membrane rupture due to necroptosis, but they can also be actively secreted by living cells under life-threatening stress (Murao et al., 2021;Ve ´ne ´reau et al., 2015).The mechanisms that govern DAMPs release in necroptotic cells are not fully understood.Using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer biosensor, termed SMART, in combination with imaging of the release of nuclear DAMPs and live-cell imaging for secretion activity, two different modes of HMGB1 release have been revealed: ''a burst-mode'' and ''a sustained-mode'' (Murai et al., 2018).
Charged multivesicular body protein 4B (CHMP4B)-a key component of the ESCRT-III complex that preserves plasma membrane integrity during necroptosis execution (Gong et al., 2017)-contributes toward maintaining the sustained-mode of HMGB1 release, possibly by actively repairing plasma membrane (Murai et al., 2018).In addition, this experimental approach showed that HMGB1 was rapidly released from necroptotic cells through two sequential steps: the first step is nucleo-cytoplasmic translocation, and the second step is the extracellular release from the cytoplasm (Murai et al., 2018).This observation suggests that the nuclear membrane is damaged before the cytoplasmic membrane becomes ruptured.
There is no evidence that necroptosis is accompanied by release of a specific set of DAMPs.In fact, many DAMPs released from cells undergoing necroptosis coincide with those released during other types of cell death such as apo-ptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and NETosis (Murao et al., 2021).Nevertheless, several studies suggest that the compositions and signatures of DAMPs might be qualitatively and quantitatively different as a function of the different biochemical pathway that control each type of cell death (Choi et al., 2019;Tanzer et al., 2020).
For instance, the full-length biologically active IL-33 released during necroptosis is different from the nonimmunological form of IL-33 released during apoptosis produced by caspasedependent proteolysis of IL-33, since caspase activity is abrogated during necroptosis execution (Lu ¨thi et al., 2009;Shlomovitz et al., 2019).Furthermore, H3 is not or only marginally released by necroptotic cells (Murai et al., 2018), whereas histones, which are highly associated with caspasedependent DNA fragmentation, are released from apoptotic cells (Chen et al., 2014a).Release of the calreticulin-an ''eat me'' signal for dendritic cells-is also dependent on the activity of caspase-8 and therefore, this DAMP is associated with apoptosis but not with necroptosis (Panaretakis et al., 2009).
Of note, macrophages use different internalization mechanisms, hence exhibiting different kinetics to clear out apoptotic and necrotic/necroptotic cells (Brouckaert et al., 2004;Krysko et al., 2006).Apoptotic bodies are cleared out through the formation of tight phagosomes, whereas necrotic/necroptotic cells are internalized by a macropinocytic mechanism, which involves the formation of multiple ruffles directed toward necrotic debris (Krysko et al., 2006).
Hence, phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is quantitatively and kinetically more efficient than phagocytosis of necrotic/necroptotic cells, which suggest that necroptotic cells could release more DAMPs than apoptotic cells, therefore promoting a stronger inflammatory response (Brouckaert et al., 2004).
Under basal conditions, HMGB1 is not tightly bound to chromatin, and therefore it can passively diffuse from the nucleus to the extracellular space in necrotic cells ( Janko et al., 2014).However, during apoptosis, caspase-dependent acetylation of histones and chromatin condensation cause attachment of HMGB1 to chromatin, which limits HMGB1 release from apoptotic cells (Kaczmarek et al., 2013;Scaffidi et al., 2002;Taylor et al., 2008).
The ROS can modify redox-sensitive DAMPs and, consequently, their immunogenicity (Koenig and Buskiewicz-Koenig, 2022).By modification of the three conserved redox-active cysteine (Cys 23 , Cys 45 , and Cys 106 ) that it carries, HMGB1 is found in three different oxidation states that are designated as ''reduced HMGB1'' (with all three cysteine residues in the thiol state), ''disulfide HMGB1'' (with an intramolecular disulfide bond between Cys 23 and Cys 45 ), and ''sulfonic HMGB1'' (with all three cysteines in the hyperoxidized sulfonic acid state).
Another necroptotic DAMP, cfDNA, was, however, detected in the plasma of mice with acute pancreatitis in parallel with the presence of necroptosis in the pancreas, indicating that cfDNA levels but not HMGB1 levels may serve as a marker of necroptosis (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).In Ripk1 -/- mice, IL-1a and IL-33 levels increased in plasma and correlated better than HMGB1 with the extensive necroptosis found in these mice (Rickard et al., 2014).Nevertheless, the kinetics of HMGB1 release may differ between different cell types (Murai et al., 2018), so a detailed time-course of plasma HMGB1 levels would be required to establish its exact relevance in these inflammatory models.
Although necroptosis is highly pro-inflammatory, it might also paradoxically cause anti-inflammatory effects in specific pathophysiological contexts in which elimination of necroptotic cells could be beneficial (Kearney and Martin, 2017).In particular, necroptosis can serve to eliminate pathogen-infected cells during infectious diseases (Choi et al., 2019).
This idea is corroborated by the high Staphylococcus aureus load, impaired ability to limit IL-1b production, and excessive inflammation of Mlkl -/-mice infected by this pathogen, and by the increased bacterial load of mice treated with RIPK1 or RIPK3 inhibitors in a model of sepsis (Kitur et al., 2016).These findings indicate that necroptosis contributes to innate immunity during infection, and that its inflammatory effects are complex and highly dependent on the net balance between the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the level of DAMPs released by dying cells.
The ROS generation triggered by RIPK3 is necessary for TNFa-induced necroptosis (Zhang et al., 2009a).RIPK3 activates the enzymes glycogen phosphorylase, glutamateammonia ligase, and glutamate dehydrogenase 1, and, in turn, these key enzymes enhance TNFa-induced ROS pro-duction (Zhang et al., 2009b).Indeed, increasing glucose utilization by breaking down glycogen or the use of glutamine and glutamate as energy substrates fuels the mitochondrial respiratory chain generating mtROS at the ubisemiquinone site in cells incubated with cytotoxic doses of TNFa (Zhang et al., 2009b).
RIPK3-induced mtROS generation appears associated with aerobic respiration during necroptosis, as suggested by the following observations.ROS production during TNFa-induced necroptosis was prevented by treatment with BHA or MitoQ (Yang et al., 2018).Activated RIPK3 in the necrosome FIG. 3. Different redox states of HMGB1.HMGB1 is found in three different oxidation states: reduced HMGB1 (with Cys23, Cys45, and Cys106 residues in the thiol state), ''disulfide HMGB1'' (with an intramolecular disulfide bond between Cys23 and Cys45), and ''sulfonic HMGB1'' (with all three cysteines in the hyperoxidized sulfonic acid state).Reduced HMGB1 exhibits chemokinelike function, disulfide HMGB1 promotes cytokine production, whereas in contrast, sulfonic HMGB1 does not exert any immunological function.HMGB1, high mobility group box 1.
phosphorylates the PDC-E3 subunit of the mitochondrial matrix pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) to increase aerobic respiration and ROS generation, which then induces necroptosis (Yang et al., 2018).RIPK3 must localize to mitochondria to phosphorylate PDC-E3 ( Joplin et al., 1995).
Interestingly, MLKL is required for PDC activation, and MLKL phosphorylation is also required for mitochondrial localization of the necrosome (Yang et al., 2018).It has, thus, been proposed that the high affinity binding of MLKL to cardiolipin-a lipid component of the mitochondrial inner membrane (Paradies et al., 2014)-would be the driving force bringing RIPK3 to the inner side of mitochondria to regulate PDC and aerobic respiration (Wang et al., 2014a;Yang et al., 2018).
Remarkably, in mycobacterium-infected macrophages, excess TNFa increased cellular glutamine uptake (Roca et al., 2022).Excess glutamine enhanced succinate production by the Krebs cycle, which triggered a large increase in mtROS generation by reverse electron transport (RET) through complex I leading to necroptosis (Roca et al., 2022).
In vesicular stomatitis virus-infected macrophages, RIPK1 phosphorylates DRP1 at Ser616, and binds DRP1 in the presence of RIPK3, thus forming a ternary complex (Rayamajhi and Miao, 2014;Wang et al., 2014b).Importantly, the anti-diabetic drug metformin abrogated necroptosis by blocking RET-generated mtROS at complex I and/or by acting on mitochondrial dynamics through inhibition of DRP1 (Roca et al., 2022;Zhang et al., 2019b).
Considering that mitochondrial fission has been associated with reduced electron transport efficiency, increased aerobic glycolysis, and augmented ROS generation (Buck et al., 2016;Yu et al., 2006), further investigation about how PGAM5 and mitochondrial fission regulate necroptosis is warranted.
Remarkably, when the inflammasome is activated in leukine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) G2019S macrophages-a gain-of-function allele associated with a more severe inflammatory response against Mycobacterium tuberculosisdisruption of mitochondrial membranes by the pore-forming protein gasdermin D elevates mtROS to trigger necroptosis instead of pyroptosis (Weindel et al., 2022).Hence, mtROS may act as a switch between necroptosis and pyroptosis.
On the other hand, hyperglycemia caused a shift from apoptosis to necroptosis via mtROS-dependent oxidation of RIPK1, which exacerbated neonatal hypoxia-ischemia brain injury in mice (Deragon et al., 2020).These results highlight the critical role of mtROS to modulate cell death fate according to the cellular redox status.
Remarkably, repression of the NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex 8 (NDUFB8), a subunit of mitochondrial complex I, markedly diminished necroptotic cell death induced by TNFa or by TNFa plus the IAP antagonist BV6 (Vanlangenakker et al., 2011).Hence, complex I activity seems critical to regulate mtROS generation during necroptosis.Further, NDUFB8 appeared nitrated in endothelial cells undergoing necroptosis, and this nitration was prevented by overexpression of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (Davis et al., 2010).
In kidney tubular epithelial cells, RIPK3 promotes oxidative stress together with inhibition of mitochondrial complexes I and III, and upregulation of NOX4 (Sureshbabu et al., 2018).Interestingly, RIPK3 and NOX4 form a complex in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli, which promotes the accumulation of NOX4 into the mitochondria (Sureshbabu et al., 2018).
RIPK3-dependent signaling also triggers mitochondrial depolarization, reduced expression of mitochondrial complex subunits, and increased ROS production during kidney inflammation (Sureshbabu et al., 2018).Therefore, mitochondrial NOX4 and the downregulation of mitochondrial respiratory complexes by RIPK3 contribute to ROS generation during necroptosis in the inflamed kidney.
As recently established, the mitochondrial peroxiredoxin (PRX), PRX3, and the PRX sulfinic reductase, sulfiredoxin (SRX), have a critical role in the regulation of necroptosis through mtROS (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).At the early stage of acute pancreatitis, SRX became upregulated and accumulated into mitochondria from its cytoplasmic location, thus preventing PRX3 hyperoxidation.
In the late stage of pancreatitis, at the time of necroptosis activation, SRX was then dramatically downregulated, PRX3 became hyperoxidized, and H 2 O 2 levels were increased (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).During pancreatitis in mice lacking SRX, necroptosis occurred much faster, and could be prevented by the mitochondrial antioxidant MitoTEMPO, therefore indicating the critical importance of mtROS in necroptosis activation, and hence the role of PRX3 and SRX in mitigating mtROS levels (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).
Considering that PRX3 can also act as ONOO -oxidoreductase, exhibiting kinetic constants toward this oxidant in the range of those measured for H 2 O 2 (Cox et al., 2009;De Armas et al., 2019), this enzyme must also serve to combat the mitochondrial nitrosative stress seen in necroptotic cells (Davis et al., 2010).
SRX protein levels during necroptosis appear to be controlled by p53, which accumulates in mitochondria.In the pancreas of mice with acute pancreatitis lacking p53, SRX downregulation was lost, hyperoxidized PRX3 was quasi undetectable as a consequence of high SRX expression, and MLKL phosphorylation was not detected (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).Reciprocally, mtROS stimulate the mitochondrial translocation of p53 required for the execution of necroptosis, as seen in the pancreas of mice with pancreatitis and also in obese mice (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).
It has also been shown that when p53 accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix, it forms a complex with cyclophilin D (CypD), which may trigger the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTP) and necrosis (Guo et al., 2014;Vaseva et al., 2012).Similarly, when phosphorylated at serine 23, mitochondrial p53 binds CypD, thereby causing necrosis in mouse cortical neurons (Pei et al., 2014).
We found that during pancreatitis, mice lacking SRX had a marked accumulation of p53 into mitochondria, in addition to displaying elevated levels of mitochondrial H 2 O 2 and accelerated necroptosis (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).Treatment with MitoTEMPO decreased mitochondrial translocation of p53 and abrogated necroptosis in these mice, thus indicating the importance of mtROS in the mitochondrial translocation of p53 (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).
The requirement of p53 for regulated necrosis has also been observed during normal spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster (Napoletano et al., 2017), and in mammalian cardiomyocytes exposed to H 2 O 2 , a requirement that involved the transcriptional upregulation of the long noncoding RNA necrosis-related factor (Wang et al., 2016a).
In summary, the decision between survival and necroptotic cell death during pancreatitis appears to be a function of mtROS levels, which are at least in part governed by a reciprocal regulation between p53 and the SRX-PRX3 antioxidant system, with p53 promoting an mtROS buildup by causing the inactivation of PRX3 by hyperoxidation through the downregulation of SRX, and the SRX-PRX3 system restraining p53 mitochondrial accumulation by decreasing mtROS levels (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).
It is worth noting that activation of the necrosome is paralleled by an increased flux of calcium in the cytoplasm (Gonza ´lez-Juarbe et al., 2017;Nomura et al., 2014;Sun et al., 2017).The accumulation of [Ca 2+ ] m is generally associated with increased mtROS production (Go ¨rlach et al., 2015), thus suggesting a potential [Ca 2+ ] m -mediated regulation of mtROS during necroptosis.
Remarkably, treatment with MitoQ rescued these cells from necroptosis, suggesting that mtROS are part of the ultimate step in ER-stress mediated necroptosis induction (Lv et al., 2019).Importantly, [Ca 2+ ] m modulates the activity of several rate-limiting enzymes of the Krebs cycle, including PDC (Denton, 2009).Therefore, it is plausible that elevated mitochondrial calcium levels act synergistically with mitochondrial metabolism to enhance mtROS and necroptosis.
In addition, elevated [Ca 2+ ] m can also disturb F 1 F 0 -ATP synthase activity and cause opening of mPTP, two conditions tightly associated with elevated mtROS production and necroptosis (Faizan and Ahmad, 2021).However, mitochondria lacking the mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter exhibited enhanced mPTP calcium sensitivity (Parks et al., 2019).Hence, the regulation of mPTP opening by [Ca 2+ ] m in the generation of mtROS and cell death during necroptosis deserves further investigation.
In contrast to the findings mentioned so far, some authors have reported a lack of mitochondrial translocation of RIPK3, and the existence of RIPK1/RIPK3-independent mechanisms in the regulation of ROS production during necroptosis (Vanlangenakker et al., 2011).Other authors have questioned the key role of mitochondria in necroptosis, as this type of cell death may occur in mitochondrial-depleted cells.
These contradictory findings could be rationalized by the differences in the response to TNFa exhibited in different cell types (Marshall and Baines, 2014;Tait et al., 2013).Indeed, ROS are not induced by TNFa in human colon cancer HT-29 cells (Yang et al., 2018), and ROS are dispensable for necroptosis in certain cell lines, such as endothelial SVEC or fibroblasts 3T3-SA cells (He et al., 2009;Tait et al., 2013).Interestingly, in cells with RIPK3-dependent regulation of mtROS generation, hypoxia inhibits necroptosis without altering RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL levels (Yang et al., 2018).
It is noteworthy that hypoxia induces pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 expression, which phosphorylates PDC and inhibits PDC activity attenuating ROS generation (Kim et al., 2006).Hence, the coupling of aerobic respiration and mtROS generation with RIPK3 signaling could be a key mechanism in certain cell types to control the threshold for necroptosis induction according to the local oxygen concentrations (Kim et al., 2006;Yang et al., 2018).

Ferroptosis
Ferroptosis was discovered in 2012 by Stockwell as an iron-dependent lipid peroxidation process causing cell death, with morphological, biochemical, and mechanistic features markedly different from the other types of RCD (Dixon et al., 2012;Dixon and Stockwell, 2014;Galluzzi et al., 2018).Ferroptosis is characterized by lipid peroxidation and prevented by iron depletion (Fig. 4) (Dixon et al., 2012;Yang et al., 2016).
Iron depletion resulting from dysfunction of iron regulatory proteins (Dixon et al., 2012) prevented the induction of ferroptosis by arestin or other inducers, whereas autophagic degradation of ferritin promoted it by increasing cellular labile iron availability (Ye et al., 2020).Such an iron dependency is not fully understood.Excess labile iron availability by driving the nonenzymatic Fenton chain reaction presumably promotes ferroptosis by enhancing lipid peroxidation, but iron is also required in iron-dependent enzymes, such as lipoxygenase (LOX), an enzyme responsible for the lipid peroxidation that affects unsaturated fatty acids in the plasma membrane, which execute ferroptosis (Wenzel et al., 2017).
The glutathione-dependent enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4) and system X c -are essential in the control of ferroptosis (Zhang et al., 2021).System X c -is a transmembrane protein complex that contains the subunits solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) and solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2), which acts as a cystine/glutamate antiporter to provide the oxidized form of the amino acid cysteine (cystine) as a source of organic sulfur (Fig. 4) (Lewerenz et al., 2013).

Inhibition of system X c
-with erastin, sulfasalazine, or sorafenib triggers ferroptosis due to blockade of cystine uptake (Dixon et al., 2014;Jeong et al., 2013;Yu et al., 2019).However, whether cysteine deficiency causes ferroptosis by decreasing glutathione synthesis is the subject of discussion.
GPX4 is a selenoenzyme initially discovered by Ursini et al. (1982) on the basis of its ability to scavenge phospholipids hydroperoxides by reduction to their respective alcohols.GPX4 is the major enzyme catalyzing this reduction in and out of cell membranes (Yang et al., 2014).GPx4 knockout mice are highly susceptible to ferroptosis in different experimental models (Xie et al., 2016).
Pharmacological inhibition of GPx4 by RAS-selective lethal 3 (RSL3) prevented the induction of ferroptosis by arestin or other inducers, and other such compounds cause ferroptosis with parallel accumulation of lipid hydroperoxides (Yang et al., 2014).These studies highlight the importance of the X c -/GPx4 axis in the regulation of ferroptosis (Li et al., 2022).

Ferroptosis in acute inflammation
Ferroptosis underlies multiple pathological processes, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, ischemia/ reperfusion injury, and inflammation (Han et al., 2020).Interestingly, ferroptosis is a relevant form of cancer cell death and reduced ferroptosis may contribute to tumor development, thus indicating that it is a tumor-suppression mechanism (Gong et al., 2022).
Excessive ferroptosis has also been linked to disorders associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, such as acute inflammation (Chen et al., 2021b).Ferroptosis is, indeed, involved in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis as well as acute kidney, acute lung, and acute liver injury.
Oxidative stress and glutathione depletion are involved in the onset of acute pancreatitis (Moreno et al., 2014), and pancreatic-specific Gpx4 deficiency exacerbates ceruleininduced pancreatitis in mice via a trypsin-dependent mechanism (Dai et al., 2020;Liu et al., 2022b).Interestingly, the

FIG. 4. Regulation of ferroptosis by mtROS.
Ferroptosis is an iron and ROS-dependent regulated form of cell death characterized by the formation of lipid hydroperoxides.The mtROS cause lipid peroxidation in the mitochondria, which contributes to ferroptosis.Cytosolic GPX4 and mitochondrial GPX4 prevent ferroptosis, directly converting lipid hydroperoxides to lipid alcohols in the plasma membrane and in the inner mitochondrial membrane, respectively.FSP1 and DHODH prevent ferroptosis by generating ubiquinol from ubiquinone to counteract oxidative lipid production into the plasma cell membrane and into the inner mitochondrial membrane, respectively.DHODH, hydroorotate dehydrogenase; FSP1, NAD(P)H/ferroptosis suppressor protein-1; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4.
circadian transcription factor BMAL1 (also known as aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like) regulates the expression of key ferroptotic inhibitory genes, such as SLC7A11 and GPX4, and pancreatic-specific Bmal1deficient mice exhibited enhanced pancreatic ferroptosis in acute pancreatitis with increased mortality, tissue injury, neutrophil infiltration, and HMGB1 release (Liu et al., 2020).
Ferroptosis may, in fact, be the trigger of the inflammatory response, as shown in acute kidney injury (Martin-Sanchez et al., 2020), thereby providing a novel therapeutic approach to inflammatory disorders.For instance, ferrostatin-1 alleviated organ damage and necrosis in acute kidney injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion (Linkermann et al., 2014), folic acid (Martin-Sanchez et al., 2017), and cisplatin (Ikeda et al., 2021).
In acute kidney injury induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pretreatment with MitoQ attenuated glutathione depletion and lipid peroxidation and prevented the formation of small mitochondria characteristic of ferroptosis (Liang et al., 2022).Ferrostatin-1 or the iron chelator desferoxamine completely prevented acute liver failure and mortality induced by high-dose acetaminophen (Yamada et al., 2020), or by LPS and d-galactosamine (Huang et al., 2022).

Mitochondrial regulation of ferroptosis: role of mtROS
Mitochondria contribute to the regulation of ferroptosis, and, in fact, the alteration of mitochondrial morphology is used to differentiate ferroptosis from other types of cell death (Dixon et al., 2012).Three categories of morphologies have been established, based on the mitochondria morphology and their density around the nucleus, with elongated mitochondria defining class I, those with fragmented mitochondria class II, and those with fragmented mitochondria that cluster around the nucleus class III ( Jelinek et al., 2018;Neitemeier et al., 2017).
Ferroptotic cells show increased mitochondrial membrane density, volume reduction, and increased membrane potential, but they do not share any of the characteristic morphologic features observed in necrosis, apoptosis, or autophagy, that is, cytoplasmic swelling, chromatin condensation, and formation of double-membrane enclosed vesicles (DeHart et al., 2018).
Erastin is a potent ferroptosis inducer that acts by directly inhibiting X c -and also the mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC).Erastin can directly bind to VDAC2 and VDAC3, causing their opening to increase mitochondrial potential and subsequent ferroptosis; whereas knockdown of VDAC2 and VDAC3 leads to erastin resistance (DeHart et al., 2018;Yagoda et al., 2007).
Although initial investigations did not focus on the role of mtROS in ferroptosis (Dixon et al., 2012;Wang et al., 2016b), more recent studies demonstrate their contribution to this type of programmed cell death.The ROS production by mitochondria can activate the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-Unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase (ULK1) axis, increasing intracellular iron levels and lipid peroxidation, and triggering vascular inflammation and ferroptosis in endothelial cells after exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles (Qin et al., 2021).
Furthermore, ferroptosis triggered by mtROS is considered a critical mechanism contributing to sepsis-induced cardiac injury.Thus, in H9c2 myofibroblasts treated with LPS, increased cytoplasmic Fe 2+ levels activated the expression of siderofexin in the mitochondrial membrane, which transported cytoplasmic Fe 2+ to the mitochondria leading to enhanced production of mtROS and ferroptosis (Li et al., 2020).Accordingly, yesassociated protein 1 can block the transport of cytoplasmic Fe 2+ into the mitochondria via SFXN1, reducing the generation of mtROS and, consequently, inhibiting ferroptosis in murine lung epithelial-12 cells stimulated with LPS (Zhang et al., 2022).
In addition, ferroptosis can be triggered by inactivation of mitochondrial hydroorotate dehydrogenase, which leads to extensive mitochondrial lipid peroxidation in cells with low GPX4 levels (Fig. 4) (Mao et al., 2021).Ferroptosis can be also caused by accumulation of glutamate resulting from the inhibition of system X c -, which increases mtROS production as a consequence of enhanced Krebs cycle fueling via glutaminolysis (Zheng and Conrad, 2020).
For instance, glutamate enhanced ROS production and lipid peroxidation in oligodendrocytes, leading to opening of the mPTP and ferroptosis in an Sirt3-dependent mechanism, a key deacetylase of the mitochondrial antioxidant system (Novgorodov et al., 2018).
The precise mechanism of membrane rupture in ferroptosis and the contribution of mtROS to ferroptosis are still unclear and require further research.
Gasdermins, which have an N-terminal cell death domain and a C-terminal autoinhibition domain, trigger pyroptosis, a pro-inflammatory form of lytic programmed cell death (Broz et al., 2020;Swanson et al., 2019).Gasdermin is cut of its C-terminus inhibitory domain by caspase-1 (He et al., 2015;Shi et al., 2015), then binds by its N-terminal domain phosphatidylinositol phosphates and phosphatidylserine in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, oligomerizes, and inserts into the plasma membrane in which it forms large pores that cause membrane permeabilization and cell killing (Broz et al., 2020;Ding et al., 2016).
IL-1b is a potent endogenous pyrogen that stimulates fever, leukocyte tissue migration, and expression of diverse cytokines and chemokines.IL-18 induces IFNc production and is important for the activation of T cells, macrophages, and other cell types involved in immune responses (Bergsbaken et al., 2009).In addition, plasma-membrane rupture in cells undergoing pyroptosis causes the release of other proinflammatory intracellular contents that exacerbate the inflammatory response (Man et al., 2017).
Pyroptosis protects against infection and acts as a host defense mechanism in a wide range of microbial infections, including those be Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, Listeria, and Legionella pneumophila (Pan et al., 2022).Early in infection, pyroptosis helps to eliminate infected cells and leads to activation and recruitment of immune cells and innate response (Wu et al., 2022).During persistent infection, continued caspase-1-dependent inflammation promotes the development of adaptive immune responses that lead to resolution of infection (Bergsbaken et al., 2009).
Although low grade or moderate pyroptosis facilitates homeostasis, overactivated pyroptosis can be detrimental (Wu et al., 2022).Thus, in inflamed tissues, excessive activation of pyroptosis contributes to persistent inflammation and notably impacts inflammatory disease progression (Rao et al., 2022).Indeed, pyroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory diseases, such as myocardial infarction, cerebral ischemia, inflammatory bowel disease, acute lung injury, acute pancreatitis, and endotoxic shock (Bergsbaken et al., 2009;Coll et al., 2022).
Autophagy inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation through p62-dependent clearance of damaged mitochondria (Zhong et al., 2016), and inhibition of mitophagy exacerbates the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and of pyroptosis by lack of clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria (Yu et al., 2014;Zhou et al., 2011).
The ER stress response caused by inactivation of the ER stress regulator XBP1 promotes mtROS production by impairing mitophagy, which enhances NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis of hepatocytes in acute liver injury (Liu et al., 2022b), whereas up-regulation of PGC-1a and mitofusin 2 lowers mtROS and suppresses NLRP3 activation and pyroptosis in alcoholic liver disease (Kai et al., 2020).By restraining mtROS production, PRX3 mitigates NLRP3dependent pyroptosis in acetaminophen-induced liver injury (Wang et al., 2021).
Other observations have linked mtROS production to the activation of pyroptosis.For instance, the Ragulator-Rag complex acts via mTORC1 to promote gasdermin D oligomerization and pore formation in macrophages by generating mtROS (Evavold et al., 2021), and the noncanonical activation of gasdermin D by caspase-4 triggers mtROS in macrophages upstream of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Platnich et al., 2018).Moreover, TRAF3 triggers mtROS production and pyroptosis in macrophages by promoting ULK1 ubiquitination and degradation.
Mitochondria may also act as docking sites for inflammasome assembly (Swanson et al., 2019).Under resting conditions, NLRP3 is located to the cytosolic face of the ER membrane, and when activated it relocates to the mitochondria outer membrane by binding cardiolipin, and during RNA viral infection to mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein and to mitofusin 2 (Elliott et al., 2018;Franchi et al., 2014;Ichinohe et al., 2013;Iyer et al., 2013;Park et al., 2013;Subramanian et al., 2013;Zhou et al., 2011).

Modulation of Lytic Programmed Cell Death by Mitochondrial Antioxidants: Significance and Future Perspectives
The ability of mitochondrial targeted antioxidants, such as MitoQ and MitoTEMPO, to modulate lytic programmed cell death in the context of acute inflammation has been tested in different experimental animal models (Table 1).

MITOCHONDRIAL ROS AND CELL DEATH IN INFLAMMATION
Nevertheless, their efficacy relies on adequate dosage and timing, and it also depends on the basal condition of the organism.
Treatment with MitoTEMPO at the dose of 20 mg/kg protected against acute liver injury by preventing necroptosis; however, it switched the mode of cell death to apoptosis during the late phase of this disease (Du et al., 2019).In acute pancreatitis, treatment with MitoTEMPO at the dose of 25 mg/kg abrogated necroptosis in mice lacking SRX, which exhibited hyperoxidation of mitochondrial PRX3 as an index of high mitochondrial H 2 O 2 generation (Rius-Pe ´rez et al., 2022).
In wild-type mice with acute pancreatitis, MitoQ treatment at both low (10 mg/kg) and high doses (25 mg/kg) reduced pancreatic edema and neutrophil infiltration (Huang et al., 2015).However, MitoQ was not efficient against necrosis in wild-type mice with acute pancreatitis, and unexpectedly even the higher dose tended to cause more necrosis (Huang et al., 2015).
MitoQ at 1 lM abolished mtROS formation and lipid peroxidation, preserved mitochondrial function, and prevented RSL3-induced ferroptosis in neuronal HT22 cells and mouse embryonic despite the loss of GPX4 activity ( Jelinek et al., 2018).Interestingly, MitoQ alone in the absence of RSL did not affect cell viability but triggered mitochondrial fragmentation ( Jelinek et al., 2018).Mito-TEMPO at the dose of 5 mg/kg also inhibited lipid peroxidation, iron-dependent ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes, and cardiomyopathy induced by doxorubicin without affecting iron levels (Fang et al., 2019).
Regarding pyroptosis, the mitochondrial antioxidant peptide SS-31 attenuated LPS-induced pyroptosis of nucleus pulposus cells by scavenging mtROS and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome (Peng et al., 2021).In addition, mito-TEMPO pretreatment at a dose of 20 mg/kg markedly diminished mtROS, restored mitochondrial size and function, and reduced LPS-induced liver inflammation and injury at least in part by preventing pyroptosis (Wang et al., 2022).
Therefore, the prevention of lytic programmed cell death by mitochondrial antioxidants provides a strong proof for the involvement of mtROS in this type of cell death.However, the abolishment of mtROS in healthy cells and under basal conditions or by using high doses of mitochondrial antioxidants may affect mitochondrial dynamics and might even abrogate protective mechanisms triggered by physiological low levels of mtROS, thus enhancing cell death under certain conditions.
Hence, the therapeutic use of mitochondrial antioxidants in acute inflammation should follow the guidelines of personalized and precision medicine, and it would require to establish the appropriate dosage, timing, and restrictions due to potential detrimental side effects according to the condition of the subject.

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives
The mtROS are definitively involved in the activation and execution of necroptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis, all forms of lytic RCD that unquestionably contribute to inflammatory disorders.mtROS together with the necrosome and p53, the inflammasome and gasdermin D, and GPX4 deficiency operate positive feedback loops in the activation of lytic RCD pathways, and in the tissue propagation of cell death.
The precise mechanism of membrane rupture in ferroptosis and the exact contribution of mtROS to ferroptosis are still unclear and require further research.Mitochondrial antioxidants provide new promising therapeutic approaches for acute inflammatory disorders.To allow their use, to optimize their therapeutic potential, and to avoid adverse side by compromising beneficial mtROS signaling, it will be critical to understand when mtROS cause detrimental effects and when and how they promote survival and beneficial signaling.

Table 1 .
Ability of Mitochondrial Targeted Antioxidants to Modulate Lytic Programmed Cell Death in the Context of Acute Inflammation in Different Experimental Animal Models DOX, doxorubicin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; Prx3, peroxiredoxin 3; ROS, reactive oxygen species.