Letters

EUROPIUM s-PROCESS SIGNATURE AT CLOSE-TO-SOLAR METALLICITY IN STARDUST SiC GRAINS FROM ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS

, , , , , , , and

Published 2013 April 18 © 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Janaína N. Ávila et al 2013 ApJL 768 L18 DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L18

2041-8205/768/1/L18

ABSTRACT

Individual mainstream stardust silicon carbide (SiC) grains and a SiC-enriched bulk sample from the Murchison carbonaceous meteorite have been analyzed by the Sensitive High Resolution Ion Microprobe-Reverse Geometry for Eu isotopes. The mainstream grains are believed to have condensed in the outflows of ∼1.5–3 M carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with close-to-solar metallicity. The 151Eu fractions [fr(151Eu) = 151Eu/(151Eu+153Eu)] derived from our measurements are compared with previous astronomical observations of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars enriched in elements made by slow neutron captures (the s-process). Despite the difference in metallicity between the parent stars of the grains and the metal-poor stars, the fr(151Eu) values derived from our measurements agree well with fr(151Eu) values derived from astronomical observations. We have also compared the SiC data with theoretical predictions of the evolution of Eu isotopic ratios in the envelope of AGB stars. Because of the low Eu abundances in the SiC grains, the fr(151Eu) values derived from our measurements show large uncertainties, in most cases being larger than the difference between solar and predicted fr(151Eu) values. The SiC aggregate yields a fr(151Eu) value within the range observed in the single grains and provides a more precise result (fr(151Eu) = 0.54 ± 0.03, 95% conf.), but is approximately 12% higher than current s-process predictions. The AGB models can match the SiC data if we use an improved formalism to evaluate the contribution of excited nuclear states in the calculation of the 151Sm(n, γ) stellar reaction rate.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Measurements of the 151Eu isotope fraction [fr(151Eu) = 151Eu/(151Eu+153Eu)] in stars are still scarce and only available for metal-poor stars (Sneden et al. 2002; Aoki et al. 2003a, 2003b; Roederer et al. 2008), with the exception of the solar system, where measurements on meteorites, as well as the solar photosphere, give fr(151Eu) = 0.48 (Lawler et al. 2001; Lodders 2003). Recent astronomical observations of the 151Eu isotope fraction in carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars enriched in the elements made by the slow neutron capture process (the s-process) have been shown to differ from the solar system value (Aoki et al. 2003b), but to be in good agreement with s-process predictions in low mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars of one-half solar metallicity (Arlandini et al. 1999). The values reported by Arlandini et al. (1999), however, were obtained using a theoretical 151Sm(n, γ)152Sm cross section from Toukan et al. (1995) that is approximately 40% lower than recent experimental measurements (Abbondanno et al. 2004; Marrone et al. 2006; Wisshak et al. 2006). The higher 151Sm(n, γ)152Sm cross section results in an enhanced neutron-capture channel on 151Sm and a lower production of 151Sm. Since 151Eu is the radiogenic product of the decay of 151Sm (with a half-life of 90 yr), a higher 151Sm(n, γ) cross section results in a lower predicted fr(151Eu)s-process value, outside the range observed in CEMP stars.

Analyses of presolar stardust grains provide an opportunity to explore the Eu isotopic compositions in stars with a different range of metallicities than those of metal-poor stars. This is because the vast majority of stardust SiC grains (the "mainstream grains") are believed to have originated in the outflows of ∼1.5–3 M carbon-rich AGB stars with close-to-solar metallicity (Hoppe et al. 1994; Zinner et al. 2006). Here, we present the results of Eu isotopic analyses carried out with a Sensitive High Resolution Ion Microprobe-Reverse Geometry (SHRIMP-RG). We analyzed 13 large mainstream SiC grains (LS+LU fractions) and a SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction) extracted from the Murchison carbonaceous chondrite (Amari et al. 1994).

Previous Eu isotopic secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) analyses by Terada et al. (2006) in two mainstream stardust SiC grains indicated fr(151Eu) values lower than s-process predictions and astronomical observations. The difference observed between the fr(151Eu) values obtained for SiC grains by Terada et al. (2006) and those obtained for CEMP stars by Aoki et al. (2003b) may indicate that fr(151Eu) depends on metallicity. However, the values reported by Terada et al. (2006) are even lower than the fr(151Eu) shown by the bulk solar system. Since 98% of Eu in the solar system is expected to have been produced by the rapid neutron capture nucleosynthesis (r-process), fr(151Eu) is commonly used as a proxy for fr(151Eu)r-process. Thus, it is surprising that the results presented by Terada et al. (2006) for grains believed to have condensed in the outflows of low mass carbon-rich AGB stars are closer to the fr(151Eu) expected for r-process nucleosynthesis than that expected for s-process nucleosynthesis. The results presented here will help to resolve these puzzles.

2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

2.1. Carbon, Nitrogen, and Silicon Isotopic Measurements

Carbon, N, and Si isotopic ratios for the KJB fraction have been previously reported by Amari et al. (2000), and are reproduced in Table 1. Two different mounts containing SiC grains from the LS+LU fractions were analyzed in the present study, namely LU and WU. Grains from the LU mount have been analyzed previously with a modified Cameca IMS-3f ion microprobe at Washington University (St. Louis) for their C, N, and Si isotopic compositions as well as for their trace-element concentrations (Virag et al. 1992). Some of these grains were analyzed for their Ti, Ba, and W isotopic compositions with the Sensitive High Mass-Resolution Ion Microprobe at the Australian National University (Ireland et al. 1991; Ávila et al. 2012, 2013). Grains from the WU mount were analyzed for their C, N, and Si isotopic compositions with a Cameca NanoSIMS at Washington University. The NanoSIMS measurements were performed by rastering a ∼100 nm Cs+ primary beam (∼1 pA) over a sample area of 2−10 μm2 while secondary electrons and the negative secondary ions 12C, 13C, 28Si, 29Si, and 30Si were simultaneously counted in electron multipliers. Subsequent to the C and Si isotopic measurements, nitrogen isotopes were measured as CN ions at masses 26 (12C14N) and 27 (12C15N). Synthetic SiC was used for normalization of the C and Si isotopes, while a fine-grained mixture of SiC and Si3N4 was used for calibration of the N isotopes.

Table 1. C, N, Si, and Eu Isotopic Compositions of Stardust SiC Grains from the KJB and LS+LU Fractions

Spot/ Grain Size (μm) 12C/13C ± 1σ 14N/15N ± 1σ δ29Si/28Si a ± 1σ (‰) δ30Si/28Si a ± 1σ (‰) 151Eu/153Eu ± 1σ fr (151Eu)b ± 1σ Eu (ppm)
Solar   89.0 459 0 0 0.92 0.48  
Murchison SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction)
KJBc 0.49 37.0 ± 0.4 521 ± 60 24.6 ± 1.3 37.8 ± 3.4      
KJB-01           1.19 ± 0.22 0.54 ± 0.04 0.192
KJB-02           1.20 ± 0.11 0.55 ± 0.03 0.198
KJB-03           1.21 ± 0.14 0.55 ± 0.03 0.216
KJB-04           1.18 ± 0.12 0.54 ± 0.03 0.143
Weighted averaged           1.20 ± 0.07 0.54 ± 0.02  
Murchison single SiC grains (LS+LU fractions)
Mount WU                
WU-01 8 × 9 57.5 ± 0.4 434 ± 24 98.6 ± 5.4 73.5 ± 9.7 1.02 ± 0.15 0.51 ± 0.04 0.084
WU-03 10 × 12 48.3 ± 0.3 461 ± 37 38.4 ± 4.7 51.4 ± 9.1 0.95 ± 0.05 0.49 ± 0.01 0.006
WU-04 26 × 34 49.3 ± 0.4 304 ± 14 32.4 ± 4.8 29.9 ± 9.1 1.28 ± 0.36 0.56 ± 0.08 0.002
WU-05 6 × 8 84.2 ± 0.6 n.a. 9.0 ± 4.6 31.9 ± 9.0 1.17 ± 0.19 0.54 ± 0.04 0.051
WU-14 4 × 4 81.8 ± 0.6 377 ± 23 37.0 ± 4.8 50.8 ± 9.2 0.97 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.02 0.111
WU-16 7 × 9 65.4 ± 0.5 416 ± 14 35.5 ± 4.8 25.7 ± 9.0 1.04 ± 0.12 0.51 ± 0.03 0.046
WU-17 6 × 6 52.2 ± 0.4 413 ± 23 110.3 ± 5.0 101.2 ± 9.6 1.62 ± 0.40 0.62 ± 0.07 0.088
WU-24 7 × 9 90.4 ± 0.7 340 ± 30 −15.7 ± 4.5 0.4 ± 8.7 1.18 ± 0.25 0.54 ± 0.05 0.016
WU-54 6 × 6 51.6 ± 0.4 345 ± 19 69.3 ± 5.4 64.2 ± 9.7 1.10 ± 0.39 0.52 ± 0.05 0.044
Mount LUd                
LU-29b 16 × 20 49.3 ± 0.5 610 ± 17 34.8 ± 3.1 38.2 ± 3.5 1.54 ± 0.52 0.61 ± 0.06 0.006
LU-30a 8 × 15 48.8 ± 0.4 467 ± 17 42.4 ± 2.5 44.5 ± 3.2 1.46 ± 0.47 0.59 ± 0.06 0.010
LU-32 5 × 13 63.0 ± 0.4 1088 ± 14 55.3 ± 2.5 47.8 ± 3.2 1.54 ± 0.46 0.61 ± 0.10 0.012
LU-33 7 × 15 48.5 ± 0.3 1314 ± 21 39.5 ± 2.5 43.0 ± 3.1 1.23 ± 0.32 0.55 ± 0.05 0.024

Notes. Errors are 1σ. n.a.: not analyzed. aδiSi/28Si (‰) = [(iSi/28Si)measured/(iSi/28Si)solar −1] × 103. bfr(151Eu) = 151Eu/(151Eu+153Eu). cC, N, and Si isotopic data of grains from KJB fraction reproduced from Amari et al. (2000). dC, N, and Si isotopic data of grains from mount LU reproduced from Virag et al. (1992).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

2.2. Europium Isotopic Measurements

Europium isotopic measurements in stardust SiC grains were carried out with the SHRIMP-RG at the Australian National University. We performed both "bulk analyses" on an aggregate of many grains from the KJB fraction and "single-grain analyses" on grains from the LS+LU fractions. Out of 25 single grains investigated from the LS+LU fractions, 13 had sufficiently high Eu concentrations for isotopic analysis. SHRIMP-RG measurements were performed with an O2 primary beam of 2–5 nA focused to sputter an area of ∼20 μm in diameter. Secondary ions were extracted at 10 keV and measured by single collector analysis on the ETPTM multiplier in magnetic peak-jumping mode. The acquisition time for each grain was ∼5 minutes, which consisted of 5–6 scans through the following peaks: 138Ba+, 139La+, 140Ce+, 151Eu+, and 153Eu+. We systematically bracketed three unknowns by a suite of standard reference materials (NIST-610 silicate glass, USGS BCR-2G silicate glass, and a SiC ceramic doped with heavy elements; Ávila et al. 2013).

The measurement of 151Eu+ and 153Eu+ in stardust SiC grains is challenging because of potential isobaric interferences. The secondary ion signals at masses 151 and 153 consist of contributions from 151Eu+ and 153Eu+, as well as from BaO+ (135Ba16O+ and 137Ba16O+, respectively). In order to resolve the 151Eu+ and 153Eu+ peaks from monoxide interferences, SHRIMP-RG was operated at a mass resolving power of mm = 8000 (at 10% peak height). At this level, the BaO+ species were well resolved from the Eu isotopes, with insignificant tailing contributions.

Further investigation of a "pure" synthetic SiC revealed the presence of molecular interferences in the mass region of interest. The ratio 151/153 in the "pure" synthetic SiC was found to be ∼0.5 (fr(151Eu) = 0.33), which is considerably different from the solar system 151Eu/153Eu ratio of 0.916 (Lodders 2003). The mass offset between the atomic species (151Eu+ and 153Eu+) and the molecular interferences is too small to be resolved by mass separation without drastically compromising the secondary ion yields. Therefore, to suppress molecular ion contributions to the atomic species, we used an energy filtering technique similar to the one described in Ávila et al. (2013). We found that for an energy offset of approximately 21 eV, selected based on the momentum spectrum at mass region 151 amu of ions sputtered from the NIST-610 silicate glass and a "pure" synthetic SiC, the molecular interferences were completely excluded from collection; however, the intensity of the secondary ion signal dropped by approximately one order of magnitude. A combination of high mass resolution and energy filtering was used in all analyses presented in this work. The NIST-610 silicate glass and a SiC ceramic doped with heavy elements (Ávila et al. 2013) were used to correct for instrumental mass fractionation.

3. RESULTS

The LS+LU SiC grains studied here show Si, C, and N isotopic compositions in the range displayed by mainstream grains (Table 1) suggesting that these grains formed in the outflows of low mass C-rich AGB stars with close-to-solar metallicity. The 151Eu/153Eu ratios measured in single SiC grains from the LS+LU fractions range from 0.95 to 1.62 (Table 1), compared to the solar system 151Eu/153Eu of 0.916 (Lodders 2003). The fr(151Eu) values derived from our measurements range from 0.49 to 0.61 (Figure 1 and Table 1). The weighted mean 151Eu/153Eu of the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction), based on four measurements, is 1.20 ± 0.14 (95% conf.), which corresponds to a fr(151Eu) value of 0.54 ± 0.03 (95% conf.). All single SiC grains show fr(151Eu) values higher than the solar system value, however, only 1 out of 13 grains shows a fr(151Eu) value that differs from the solar system value by more than 2σ.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. fr(151Eu) values measured for single grains (LS+LU fractions) and the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction). The fr(151Eu) values are compared with two CEMP-r+s stars, LP 625-44 and CS 31062-050 (Aoki et al. 2003b). The black dashed line indicates fr(151Eu) given by Lodders (2003). The gray band corresponds to the fr(151Eu) value (weighted mean ±1σ) derived from measurements of the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction). Error bars are 1σ.

Standard image High-resolution image

Our results are clearly at odds with previous SIMS determinations in two mainstream stardust SiC grains from low-mass AGB stars that indicated lower-than-solar fr(151Eu) values (Terada et al. 2006). The fr(151Eu) values derived by Terada et al. (2006) for the two SiC grains are ∼0.43. We suspect that the inconsistency between our measurements and those of Terada et al. (2006) may be due to differences in the experimental approach used. We have shown previously that energy filtering, i.e., the selection of an appropriate energy window for the secondary ions on the basis of the momentum spectrum, is essential for suppressing unwanted interferences in the mass region of the Eu isotopes in a SiC matrix. The data of Terada et al. (2006) were obtained by using high-mass resolution alone, which we have found to be insufficient to remove molecular interferences that can significantly affect the Eu isotope measurements. Given the low value measured by Terada et al. (2006) and the similarly low ratio we have measured in the pure SiC standard, we suspect that their measurements are compromised.

Since the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction) yields a fr(151Eu) value that is within the range observed in the single grains, but considerably more precise, we will focus the following discussion on this result.

4. DISCUSSION

In AGB stars, the s-process nucleosynthesis is responsible for the production of elements heavier than Fe. The main neutron source for the s-process in the He-intershell of AGB stars is the 13C(α, n)16O reaction which operates under radiative conditions at relatively low temperatures (T ∼ 0.9 × 108 K) during the intervals between thermal pulses, and results in low neutron densities (∼106–107 neutrons cm−3). During thermal pulses in low-mass AGB stars, the 22Ne(α, n)25Mg reaction is marginally activated when the maximum temperature at the bottom of the He-burning shell reaches T ∼ 3 × 108 K, producing a small neutron burst with a high neutron density peak (up to ∼1010 neutrons cm−3).

Branching points on the s-process path at 151Sm, 153Sm, 152Eu, and 153Gd affect the production of 151Eu and 153Eu isotopes in the He-intershell of AGB stars (Figure 2(a)). The competition between neutron capture and β-decay at these branching points can be expressed by a branching factor (fn), calculated from

where λn = Nn νT 〈σ〉 and λβ = ln2/t1/2 are the neutron capture rate and the β-decay rate, respectively. Here, Nn, νT, 〈σ〉, and t1/2 are the neutron density, the thermal velocity, the Maxwellian averaged (n, γ) cross section (MACS), and the half-life, respectively. Branching factors were calculated for 151Sm, 153Sm, 152Eu, and 153Gd as a function of neutron density for thermal energies of kT = 8 keV (T ∼ 0.9 × 108 K) and kT = 23 keV (T ∼ 2.7 × 108 K). The results are given in Figures 2(b) and (c). We used the β-decay rates reported by Takahashi & Yokoi (1987) and the latest accepted neutron-capture rates from Dillmann et al. (2006). Note that the branching at 152Eu is peculiar, since it involves the competition between neutron capture, β-decay, and electron capture (EC). The branching at 153Gd is governed by electron capture and neutron capture.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. (a) Part of the nuclide chart showing the s-process nucleosynthesis path in the region of Sm–Eu–Gd. Percent abundances in the solar system (non-italic) are shown for each stable isotope (solid boxes) and laboratory half-lives (italic) for each unstable isotope (dashed line boxes). The main s-process path is shown as a bold line and branches and secondary paths are shown as finer lines. The s-only isotopes 150Sm, 152Gd, and 154Gd are indicated by bold boxes. (b) and (c) Branching factors (fn) at 151Sm, 153Sm, 152Eu, and 153Gd are shown as a function of neutron density at temperatures kT = 8 keV and 23 keV. All values are calculated for an electron density of 5 × 1026 cm−3. The branching factor (given in %) indicates the probability that the unstable isotope captures a neutron rather than decays. The gray areas in (b) and (c) correspond to the conditions typically found during interpulse and thermal pulse phases, respectively, in low-mass AGB stars.

Standard image High-resolution image

During the interpulse periods most of the s-process flow proceeds via the sequence 151Sm(n, γ) 152Sm(n, γ) 153Sm(β, ν) 153Eu bypassing 151Eu. After the neutron flux is extinguished, 151Eu is fed by the radioactive decay of 151Sm. During the thermal pulses, the β-decay rate of 151Sm is increased by a factor of ∼26 (Takahashi & Yokoi 1987) and the s-process path can branch toward 151Eu. However, the neutron-capture channel on 151Sm is also enhanced since higher neutron densities are produced together with higher temperatures. The branching points at 153Gd and 153Sm are largely open at these high neutron densities, feeding 154Gd and 154Sm, respectively, which result in a smaller s-process contribution to 153Eu. The AGB model predictions shown in Figure 3 demonstrate that the final result is a very mild enhancement of fr(151Eu) values in the stellar envelope.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Evolution of fr(151Eu)envelope as a function of the thermal pulse number for theoretical models of AGB stars of masses M = 1.3, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 M and metallicities Z = 0.0001, 0.0003, 0.01, and 0.014 (Cristallo et al. 2009, 2011). Symbols are only shown for C/O > 1 in the stellar envelope. The gray band in (a) and (b) corresponds to the fr(151Eu) value (weighted mean ±1σ) derived from measurements of the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB fraction) and the gray band in (c) and (d) corresponds to the fr(151Eu) value (weighted mean ±1σ) derived from observations of CEMP-r+s stars (LP 625-44 and CS 31062-050; Aoki et al. 2003b).

Standard image High-resolution image

In Figure 3, the stardust SiC-enriched bulk data are compared to the s-process AGB predictions from the FRUITY database (for details, see Cristallo et al. 2009, 2011). In all stellar models, the fr(151Eu)envelope is not significantly different from the solar value. The close-to-solar metallicity models (Z = 0.01 and Z = 0.014, Figures 3(a) and (b), respectively) show fr(151Eu)envelope approximately 2% higher than the fr(151Eu) value (Lodders 2003). The low-metallicity models (Z = 0.0001 and Z = 0.0003; Figures 3(c) and (d), respectively), on the other hand, show fr(151Eu)envelope values that are about 4% lower than the fr(151Eu) value. It is important to note that Cristallo et al. (2009, 2011) adopted the experimental 151Sm(n, γ) cross section reported by Marrone et al. (2006), which is significantly higher than the value used by Arlandini et al. (1999). This higher cross section results in a lower fr(151Eu) as more 151Sm is destroyed by neutron captures. The fr(151Eu) derived for the SiC-enriched bulk sample (KJB) shows a higher fr(151Eu) value than those predicted by Cristallo et al. (2009, 2011).

The fr(151Eu) values derived from our measurements agree well with fr(151Eu) values derived from astronomical observations (Figure 1). Aoki et al. (2003b) reported fr(151Eu) for two CEMP stars, LP 625-44 and CS 31062-050, which show excesses of s-process elements. These stars are very metal-poor subgiants with [Fe/H] of −2.7 (LP 625-44; Aoki et al. 2000) and −2.4 (CS 31062-050; Aoki et al. 2002). Both stars show variations of their radial velocities, indicating that they belong to binary systems (Aoki et al. 2000, 2003b). According to the classification suggested by Jonsell et al. (2006), LP 625-44 and CS 31062-050 are CEMP-r+s stars, showing both s- and r-process enhancements. One possible scenario to explain the enrichment observed in CEMP-r+s stars is to assume that the parent cloud of the binary system was already enriched in r-process elements, while the s-process elements (and also carbon) were the result of mass transfer from an AGB star to the lower-mass companion (e.g., Bisterzo et al. 2010). Lugaro et al. (2012) instead propose that the composition of CEMP-r+s stars is the result of a neutron-capture process in-between the s-process and the r-process. The fr(151Eu) values derived by Aoki et al. (2003b) for LP 625-44 and CS 31062-050 are 0.60 and 0.55, respectively. These values are clearly higher than fr(151Eu) of 0.48 and current AGB model predictions from Cristallo et al. (2009, 2011).

To address this mismatch we performed several tests varying the neutron-capture cross sections and beta-decay rates that affect fr(151Eu) and found that the 151Sm(n, γ) reaction rate plays the major role in setting the predicted fr(151Eu) value. In Figure 4, we show fr(151Eu) in the envelope of a 2 M model with Z = 0.01 computed with different theoretical 151Sm(n, γ) reaction rates and their uncertainties. Models have been calculated with the FUll-Network Stellar Evolutionary Code (Straniero et al. 2006 and references therein). The results labeled as "M06" were obtained using the experimental data by Marrone et al. (2006), multiplied by the theoretical stellar enhancement factor (SEF) from Bao et al. (2000). Marrone et al. (2006) reported an experimental uncertainty on the order of 5%, which results in a narrow predicted range of fr(151Eu). In previous investigations, applying the SEF was thought to account for the contribution of excited nuclear states in stellar environments. It has been shown that this is not the case by Rauscher et al. (2011), and Rauscher (2012) presented an improved approach, also accounting for the uncertainties in the stellar rates. This leads to error bars larger than those given by the experiments due to the remaining theoretical uncertainties in the excited state contributions to the stellar rate. Using this approach (labeled "R12" in Figure 4), we obtained a larger allowed range of fr(151Eu), which easily covers the values observed both in CEMP stars and in SiC grains.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Evolution of fr(151Eu) in the envelope as a function of ΔtTP-AGB (time from the beginning of the TP-AGB phase) for a M = 2 M and Z = 0.01 AGB model using two different 151Sm(n, γ) reaction rates. The shaded area (plotted only for the C-rich phases of the evolution) represents the associated uncertainties. M06 represents the experimental rate from Marrone et al. (2006) multiplied by the SEF from Bao et al. (2000). R12 represents the stellar rate computed using the method of Rauscher (2012) including the experimental data from Marrone et al. (2006).

Standard image High-resolution image

5. CONCLUSION

We presented new Eu isotopic data obtained on stardust SiC grains with SHRIMP-RG and compared them to previous astronomical observations in CEMP stars enriched in s-process elements and with s-process AGB model predictions. Despite the difference in metallicity between the parent stars of the grains and the metal-poor stars, we found good agreement between the grains and the stellar data. Because of large uncertainties in the single grain data, the result of low Eu concentrations, only in one case is the fr(151Eu) value derived for a single grain higher than fr(151Eu) by more than 2σ. The fr(151Eu) value derived for the KJB aggregate is, on the other hand, very well constrained, and matches those of CEMP stars, but is approximately 12% higher than current s-process predictions. Our new data can only be matched when the uncertainties predicted with the model of Rauscher (2012) are applied and support this more accurate approach of computing neutron-capture cross sections in stellar environments.

J. N. Ávila acknowledges support by CNPq grants 200081/2005-5 and 150570/2011-2. T. R. Ireland acknowledges support by ARC grants DP0342772 and DP0666751. M. Lugaro acknowledges the support of the ARC via a Future Fellowship and of Monash University via a Monash fellowship. E. Zinner acknowledges support by NASA grant NNX11AH14G. S. Cristallo acknowledges financial support from the FIRB2008 program (RBFR08549F-002) and from the PRIN-INAF 2011 grant "Multiple populations in Globular Clusters: their role in the Galaxy assembly." T. Rauscher acknowledges support by the Swiss NSF, the EUROCORES EuroGENESIS research program, and the ENSAR/THEXO European FP7 program. We thank an anonymous referee for comments.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/L18