Abstract
The main aspect of this work is to study the differences and define the behaviour of two different routing protocols. The first side is Dynamic MANETs On- Demand (DYMO) while the other side is proactive, optimal link-state routing (OLSR) and both the first and second are interactive routing protocols in the Ad-hoc network (VANET). The efficiency of these protocols was analysed and studied based on the use of three performance indicators: PDR, normal load (NRO) and end-to-end de1ay (E2ED) on the ability to change the size of different nodes. Omnet ++ was used by the INET Framework. We also used the SUMO simulation tool to build random movement patterns for VANET. From full simulation, we noticed that OLSR is doing better than DYMO for VANET at a price. Late and, as a result, the development of OLSR work in VANETs compared to DYMO, packet receipt ratios (PDR), side-to-side delay, normal path load, and VANETs.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.