Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

• Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two committee members

• Conference submission management system: Submissions were received and handled via E-mail isenrem2021@apps.ipb.ac.id. The initial submission were handled by the chief of scientific committee Prof. Dr. Ir. Widiatmaka, DAA, IPU or his affiliates. Further correspondence with the authors and reviewers was handled via the same email under the supervision of the volume editor Dr. Yudi Setiawan, SP, M.Env.Sc.

• Number of submissions received: 164

• Number of submissions sent for review: 117

• Number of submissions accepted: 105

• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64%

• Average number of reviews per paper: 2,5

• Total number of reviewers involved: 50

• Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round.

• Peer Review Criteria

• Number of pages: Total page number of the articles should not be more than 10 pages in IOP format;

• Writing Format: Formats should in accordance with IOP formats including titles, author names, tables and figures;

• Abstract: Components in abstract should be complete, which include background, research objective, methodology and results; abstract should not more than 200 words;

• Abbreviations: Abbreviations should be written completely with abbreviation in brackets in the first mention;

• Introduction: Introduction should include State of the Art and existing condition of the subjects studied; introduction should describe importance of the research;

• Methodology: Methodology should be written clearly; research should be repeatable in terms of methodology;

• Discussion: Results should be presented and then discussed; the results should be discussed and interpreted; discussion should refer the reference; results obtained should be compared to existing knowledge;

• Conclusion: Conclusion should answer research objective and research questions;

• Reference: Reference list should be in accordance to IOP format;

• Plagiarism Checking: The maximum plagiarism checks results (done by editor with Turnitin) have a maximum similarity of 15 percent;

• Gramarly Checking: Gramarly checking is done by editor, informed to the author in the first round of review for text improvement.

Contact:

Chief of Scientific Committee

Prof. Dr. Ir. Widiatmaka, DAA

widiatmaka@apps.ipb.ac.id