Latin American oil palm follows an unfamiliar route to avoid deforestation

The rapid expansion of commodity crops, such as soy, coffee, rubber, and oil palm, has been of increasing environmental concern (Meyfroidt et al 2014). Oil palm, in particular, has gained notoriety as the cause of rapid deforestation in Southeast Asia (Carlson et al 2012). International campaigners have called for global boycotts of palm oil, which is ubiquitous in many household products and foodstuffs. But demand for palm oil is rising around the world—global production doubled over just the last decade. The increasing environmental concern over oil palm production has led to the development of certification schemes, notably the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil. While this is promising, it is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of such schemes without accurate estimates of forest loss caused by commodity crops such as oil palm. While there have been remarkable breakthroughs in estimating deforestation from space (Hansen et al 2013), such analyses do not specify the source of forest loss. Associating deforestation to the expansion of specific crops is a holy grail. Furumo and Aide (2017) have conducted one of the few large-scale studies linking deforestation to a particular crop—oil palm. And further, they have performed the first large-scale assessment of oil palm expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), whereas most attention to date on oil palm expansion has occurred in Southeast Asia. Their study used their previously developed LandMapper software to classify oil palm at 250m spatial resolution using MODIS satellite imagery. After performing accuracy assessment and removing false positives, they then used the most recent Google Earth high-resolution imagery to identify prior land uses. Furumo and Aide (2017) found that most oil palm expansion in LAC occurred onto grazed land (figure 1), contrary to what has been found in Southeast Asia, despite the LAC countries they studied being ‘forested’

The rapid expansion of commodity crops, such as soy, coffee, rubber, and oil palm, has been of increasing environmental concern (Meyfroidt et al 2014). Oil palm, in particular, has gained notoriety as the cause of rapid deforestation in Southeast Asia (Carlson et al 2012). International campaigners have called for global boycotts of palm oil, which is ubiquitous in many household products and foodstuffs. But demand for palm oil is rising around the world-global production doubled over just the last decade.
The increasing environmental concern over oil palm production has led to the development of certification schemes, notably the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil. While this is promising, it is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of such schemes without accurate estimates of forest loss caused by commodity crops such as oil palm. While there have been remarkable breakthroughs in estimating deforestation from space (Hansen et al 2013), such analyses do not specify the source of forest loss. Associating deforestation to the expansion of specific crops is a holy grail.
Furumo and Aide (2017) have conducted one of the few large-scale studies linking deforestation to a particular crop-oil palm. And further, they have performed the first large-scale assessment of oil palm expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), whereas most attention to date on oil palm expansion has occurred in Southeast Asia. Their study used their previously developed Land Mapper software to classify oil palm at 250 m spatial resolution using MODIS satellite imagery. After performing accuracy assessment and removing false positives, they then used the most recent Google Earth high-resolution imagery to identify prior land uses.
Furumo and Aide (2017) found that most oil palm expansion in LAC occurred onto grazed land (figure 1), contrary to what has been found in Southeast Asia, despite the LAC countries they studied being 'forested' nations. In particular, they estimated that 79% of oil palm plantations came from 'previously intervened' land. They suggest that cattle ranching and infrastructure development are important precursors for oil palm and other commodity crops in LAC. This finding is consistent with the predictions of bid rent theory, and the hypothesis of Meyfroidt et al (2014) that 'Use of already-cleared lands is favored when commodity crops require access to infrastructure.' There were, however, important variations in this overall result. Peru (particularly in the Loreto region), the Brazilian state of Pará, and the Petén region of Guatemala witnessed the greatest amount of forest loss for oil palm. Furumo and Aide (2017) provide an interesting explanation, that industrial-scale operations were chiefly responsible as they have the resources necessary to access remote areas. Indeed, they mapped industrial-scale plantations in both Peru and Guatemala in areas where oil palm encroached onto forests. This result underscores the need to identify the actors of deforestation in order to understand the land use dynamics.
Furumo and Aide (2017) further analyzed trade data to understand the main drivers and suggest that oil palm production is mainly meeting domestic demand, contrary to the typical narrative of southnorth commodity flows. In fact, 70% of palm oil exports stayed within LAC, with Mexico being the largest importer. Biofuel initiatives seem to be the major driver of this domestic demand.
The authors acknowledge that limitations of their methods may have resulted in misidentification of the land uses immediately preceding oil palm due to lack of image acquisitions close to the oil palm transition dates (for example, while they sometimes identify forest as the preceding land use, the real transition may have been forest to grazing to oil palm). But another potential misidentification may result from not fully capturing post-transition land use dynamics. For Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. example, while Furumo and Aide conclude that oil palm has not resulted in forest clearing, one could imagine a scenario where oil palm is replacing grazing land in the studied areas, but grazing land is being displaced to remote areas and causing deforestation elsewhere. Such 'displacement deforestation' has previously been suggested for soy expansion in Brazil (Arima et al 2011). Thus, to fully understand the role of oil palm in land use change, one needs to pay attention to preceding land uses but also to the full land use dynamics following the transition.
Given the major landscape transformation witnessed by LAC due to another commodity crop, soy (Gibbs et al 2015), a future scenario of increased oil palm expansion that the authors discuss is potentially alarming. As things stand, the oil palm sector in LAC is not facing as much scrutiny as Southeast Asia. But Furumo and Aide (2017) portray a more optimistic picture for LAC. First, despite the fact that much of the oil palm produced in LAC is traded within the region, there seems to be a growing movement toward certification in order to attract international markets. The authors report that membership and certified areas are increasing rapidly and nearly 20% of LAC oil palm is certified (comparable to the global average). But given the strong regional market, the inclusion of regional companies and users of oil palm as well as government policies are likely to be more effective than a pure focus on international export markets. Second, given the finding that only 21% of existing oil palm has encroached onto forests, the authors remain optimistic that LAC can trace a different trajectory than Southeast Asia in the quest for sustainable oil palm production.
In the past two decades, LAC witnessed rapid expansion of flex crops, particularly soy, sugarcane, and now oil palm. Often, land change studies capture important changes after the major transformations have occurred. But the timely study of Furumo and Aide (2017) offers valuable insights on the key patterns and drivers of oil palm expansion at a fairly early stage in LAC. These insights will help support policy efforts to reduce deforestation in LAC. Environ. Res. Lett. 12 (2017) 041001 N Ramankutty and J Graesser