Kinetic Energy Recovery from a landing aircraft: Evaluating Onboard Energy Solutions

This paper compares onboard Energy Storage Solutions (ESSs) for a Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) from a landing aircraft. Energy is stored temporarily and reused so that it enables engine-less taxiing. This paper evaluates the choice of onboard Energy Storage Solutions (ESSs) (flywheels, batteries and supercapacitors) for recovering energy during the landing roll and storing it in the device. A design of an ESS with each of the three technologies was made, using commercially available products. The resulting devices are compared on the basis of weight, charging time, discharging time and complexity in retrofitting to existing systems. Results shows that while batteries have the highest energy density and will have the lowest weight, they are unable to charge/discharge quickly enough to satisfy this application. Conversely, supercapacitors have this ability but their low energy density make them heavy which in turn would offer penalty to the aircraft in flight. Flywheels emerge as the most interesting proposition due to their high energy density and fast charging ability, which satisfy the requirements for application.