A publishing partnership

The following article is Free article

ERRATUM: "CONSTRAINING THE QUADRUPOLE MOMENT OF STELLAR-MASS BLACK-HOLE CANDIDATES WITH THE CONTINUUM FITTING METHOD" (2011, ApJ 731, 121)

and

Published 2015 October 29 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Cosimo Bambi and Enrico Barausse 2015 ApJ 813 79 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/79

0004-637X/813/1/79

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

In the published version of the paper, Equation (6) should have g3 in the integral, where g is the redshift factor

Equation (1)

${u}_{o}^{\mu }=(1,0,0,0)$ is the 4-velocity of the observer, and ${u}_{e}^{\mu }=({u}_{e}^{t},0,0,{\rm{\Omega }}{u}_{e}^{t})$ is the 4-velocity of the emitter. The correct formula is thus

Equation (2)

Indeed, from Liouville's theorem we have ${I}_{e}({\nu }_{e})/{\nu }_{e}^{3}={I}_{o}(\nu )/{\nu }_{}^{3},$ where Ie(νe) and Io(ν) are, respectively, the specific intensity of the radiation in the rest frame of the emitter and in that of the distant observer.

This typo is also present in our code, but we have verified that the corrections to the disk's thermal spectrum are small and that the conclusions of our paper do not change. This can be understood qualitatively as follows. First, in our analysis we only compare theoretical predictions with theoretical predictions, without involving real data. The correction affects thus all the spectra in a similar way. Second, the thermal spectrum of the disk is not very informative: it is mainly sensitive to the position of the ISCO radius and therefore to the value of rin.

We acknowledge support from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/PEOPLE-2011-CIG) through the Marie Curie Career Integration Grant GALFORMBHS PCIG11-GA-2012-321608 (to E.B.)

10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/79