Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T10:54:17.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Hospital Cleaning Practices by Use of an Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John M. Boyce ,
Nancy L. Havill ,
Diane G. Dumigan ,
Michael Golebiewski ,
Ola Balogun  and
Ramo Rizvani
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, New Haven, Connecticut Hospital of Saint Raphael, and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Nancy L. Havill
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, New Haven, Connecticut
Diane G. Dumigan
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, New Haven, Connecticut
Michael Golebiewski
Affiliation:
Environmental Services Department, New Haven, Connecticut
Ola Balogun
Affiliation:
Environmental Services Department, New Haven, Connecticut
Ramo Rizvani
Affiliation:
Environmental Services Department, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Infectious Diseases Section, Hospital of Saint Raphael, 1450 Chapel Street, New Haven, CT 06511 (JBoyce@srhs.org)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To evaluate the usefulness of an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay for assessing the efficacy of daily hospital cleaning practices.

Design.

A 2-phase prospective intervention study.

Setting.

A university-affiliated community teaching hospital.

Methods.

During phase I of our study, 5 high-touch surfaces in 20 patient rooms were sampled before and after daily cleaning. Moistened swabs were used to sample these surfaces and were then plated onto routine and selective media, and aerobic colony counts were determined after 48 hours of incubation. Specialized ATP swabs were used to sample the same high-touch surfaces in the 20 patient rooms and were then placed in luminometers, and the amount of ATP present was expressed as relative light units. During phase II of our study, after in-service housekeeper educational sessions were given, the housekeepers were told in advance when ATP readings would be taken before and after cleaning.

Results.

During phase I, the colony counts revealed that the 5 high-touch surfaces were often not cleaned adequately. After cleaning, 24 (24%) of the 100 surface samples were still contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and 16 (16%) of the 100 surface samples still yielded vancomycin-resistant enterococci. ATP readings (expressed as relative light units) revealed that only bathroom grab bars and toilet seats were significantly cleaner after daily cleaning than before. During phase II, a total of 1,013 ATP readings were obtained before and after daily cleaning in 105 rooms. The median relative light unit was significantly lower (ie, surfaces were cleaner) after cleaning than before cleaning for all 5 high-touch surfaces.

Conclusions.

Suboptimal cleaning practices were documented by determining aerobic colony counts and by use of an ATP bioluminescence assay. ATP readings provided quantitative evidence of improved cleanliness of high-touch surfaces after the implementation of an intervention program.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 7 , July 2009 , pp. 678 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007;35(Suppl 2):S65–S164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Samore, MH, Venkataraman, L, Degirolami, PC, Levin, E, Karchmer, AW. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of sporadic and clustered cases of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhea. Am J Med 1996;100:32–40.Google Scholar
3.Hayden, MK, Bonten, MJ, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, van de Vijver, DA, Weinstein, RA. Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1552–1560.Google Scholar
4.Hayden, MK, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, Moore, CG, Weinstein, RA. Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus or the colonized patient's environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:149–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Martinez, JA, Ruthazer, R, Hansjosten, K, Barefoot, L, Snydman, DR. Role of environmental contamination as a risk factor for acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci by in patients treated in a medical intensive care unit. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1905–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1945–1951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Goodman, ER, Platt, R, Bass, R, Onderdon, AB, Yokoe, DS, Huang, SS. Impact of an environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intenstive care unit rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wu, HM, Fornek, M, Schwab, KJ, et al.A norovirus outbreak at a long-term-care facility: the role of environmental surface contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:802–810.Google Scholar
9.Dancer, SJ. Mopping up hospital infection. J Hosp Infect 1999;43:85–100.Google Scholar
10.Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Management of multidrug-re-sistant organisms in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2006;35(10Suppl 2):S165–S193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sehulster, L, Chinn, RY; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(RR-10):1–42.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al.SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Malik, RE, Cooper, RA, Griffith, CJ. Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:181–187.Google Scholar
14.French, GL, Otter, JA, Shannon, KP, Adams, NMT, Watling, D, Parks, MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. J Hosp Infect 2004;57:31–37.Google Scholar
15.Carling, PC, Briggs, JL, Perkins, J, Highlander, D. Improved cleaning of patient rooms using a new targeting method. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:385–388.Google Scholar
16.Carling, PC, Parry, MF, Von Beheren, SM; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Identifying opportunities to enhance environmental cleaning in 23 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Eckstein, BC, Adams, DA, Eckstein, EC, et al.Reduction of Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:61.Google Scholar
18.Dancer, SJ. How do we assess hospital cleaning? A proposal for microbiological standards for surface hygiene in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2004;56:10–15.Google Scholar
19.Griffith, CJ, Cooper, RA, Gilmore, J, Davies, C, Lewis, M. An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:19–28.Google Scholar
20.Davidson, CA, Griffith, CI, Peters, AC, Fielding, LM. Evaluation of two methods for monitoring surface cleanliness—ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing. Luminescence 1999;14:33–38.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Lewis, T, Griffith, C, Gallo, M, Weinbren, M. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2008;69:156–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Cooper, RA, Griffith, CJ, Malik, RE, Obee, P, Looker, N. Monitoring the effectiveness of cleaning in four British hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:338–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Griffith, CJ, Obee, P, Cooper, RA, Burton, NF, Lewis, M. The effectiveness of existing and modified cleaning regimens in a Welsh hospital. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:352–359.Google Scholar
24.Aycicek, H, Oguz, U, Karci, K. Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing methods for the determination of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2006;209:203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.White, LF, Dancer, SJ, Robertson, C, McDonald, J. Are hygiene standards useful in assessing infection risk? Am J Infect Control 2008;36:381–384.Google Scholar
26.Poulis, JA, de Pijper, M, Mossel, DAA, Dekkers, PPhA. Assessment of cleaning and disinfection in the food industry with the rapid ATP-bio-luminescence technique combined with the tissue fluid contamination test and a conventional microbiological method. Int J Food Microbiol 1993;20:109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Carling, PC, Von Beheren, S, Kim, P, Woods, C; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Intensive care unit environment cleaning: an evaluation in sixteen hospitals using a novel assessment tool. J Hosp Infect 2008;68:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Alfa, MJ, Dueck, C, Olson, N, et al.UV-visible marker confirms that environmental persistence of Clostridium difficile spores in toilets of patients with C. decile-associated diarrhea is associated with lack of compliance with cleaning protocol. BMC Infect Dis 2008;8:64–70.Google Scholar