Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:19:31.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cotton Textiles in England: the East India Company's Attempt to Exploit Developments in Fashion 1660-172*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Audrey W. Douglas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Men and women who wish to uphold the interests of the textile trade should “make fashion follow the trade, and not trade the fashion,” declared Daniel Defoe in 1705. But long before this time the East India Company had discovered that the exploitation of fashion for profit is a more artful business than a mere dictatorship exercised by the “trade.” After 1660 the Company's policy regarding the import of cotton textiles was particularly concerned to influence the type and design of goods produced in India to make them serve current English needs and trends in taste. Striking success was achieved by the end of the century, but thereafter the flow of cotton manufactures was impeded by serious difficulties, chiefly the restrictions imposed on the trade by prohibition acts in 1701 and 1721, together with the competitive development of domestic calico-printing.

The English had of course been familiar with cotton for several centuries before 1660, although the acquaintance brought little opportunity to build up technological skill in the processing of pure cotton goods from the raw state to the finished piece. Imports had included raw “cotton-wool” from the Levant for use in stuffing and quilting and fustians of European manufacture containing cotton. But probably it was not until the sixteenth century that a cotton weft was used in the production of domestic fustians, and not until the seventeenth that cotton was brought into linen and smallwares manufacturing. The early history of pure cotton fabrics in England is debatable ground, partly because of confusing terminology; so-called “cottons,” for instance, were produced in England before 1660, but the term is descriptive of the finishing process, or “cottoning,” rather than of content.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 28 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am indebted to N. Z. Davis of the University of Toronto for critical discussion during the preparation of this material. A. W. D.

References

1. Secord, Arthur W. (ed.), Defoe's Review [Facsimile Text Society] (New York, 1938), II, No. 2 (3 Mar., 1705)Google Scholar.

2. Khan, S. A., The East India Trade in the Seventeenth Century (London, 1923), p. 172Google Scholar.

3. Sainsbury, E. B., Calendar of Court Minutes of the East India Company (Oxford, 1923), VI (1660-63), 202–03Google Scholar.

4. Morris, C. (ed.), The Journeys of Celia Fiennes (London, 1947), p. 279Google Scholar.

5. William Love to the House of Commons, 1680, in Thomas, P. J., Mercantilism and the East India Trade (London, 1926), p. 64Google Scholar.

6. Sainsbury, , Court Minutes, VI, 258Google Scholar, 244.

7. Secord, , Defoe's Review, VIIIGoogle Scholar, No. 42 (6 Jan., 1712).

8. Ibid.

9. Ibid., III, No. 11 (24 Jan., 1706).

10. Novak, M. E., Economics and the Fiction of Defoe (Berkeley, 1962), p. 135Google Scholar.

11. Khan, , East India Trade, p. 153Google Scholar.

12. Thomas, , Mercantilism, pp. 26, 61Google Scholar.

13. Khan, , East India Trade, p. 257Google Scholar.

14. Thomas, , Mercantilism, p. 46Google Scholar.

15. Khan, , East India Trade, p. 293Google Scholar.

16. Thomas, , Mercantilism, p. 26Google Scholar.

17. Irwin, John, “The Indian Textile Trade of the Seventeenth Century: (1) Western India,” Journal of Indian Textile History, I (1955), 4Google Scholar.

18. Khan, , East India Trade, p. 256Google Scholar.

19. Baker, G. F., Calico Printing and Painting in the East Indies (London, 1921), I, 30Google Scholar.

20. Ibid., I, 33.

21. Khan, , East India Trade, p. 224Google Scholar, n. 1.

22. Baker, , Calico Printing, I, 32Google Scholar.

23. Thomas, , Mercantilism, p. 168Google Scholar.

24. Baker, , Calico Printing, IIGoogle Scholar, plates 19, 20, for illustration of this point.

25. Ibid., I, 33; Thomas, , Mercantilism, p. 168Google Scholar.

26. Brett, K., “The Flowering Tree in Indian Chintz,” Journal of Indian Textile History, III (1957), 45–49Google Scholar.

27. K. Brett, “An English Source of Some Indian Chintz Designs,” ibid., I (1955), 40-45.

28. Baker, , Calico Printing, I, 32, 33Google Scholar.

29. Edwards, Ralph (ed.), Dictionary of English Furniture (London, 1954), II, 73Google Scholar.

30. O'Neill, Charles, The Practice and Principles of Calico Printing, Bleaching and Dyeing (Manchester, 1878), I, 84Google Scholar.

31. Fairlie, Susan, “Dyestuffs in the Eighteenth Century,” Econ. Hist. Rev., second series, XVII (1964–1965), 490–91Google Scholar.

32. Schwartz, P. R., “French Comments on Indian Cotton Painting: (1) The Beaulieu Ms., c. 1734,” Journal of Indian Textile History, II (1956), 19Google Scholar.

33. Clayton, M. and Oakes, A., “Early Calico-Printers around London,” Burlington Magazine, XCVI (1954), 136Google Scholar. Trie German printing machine appears in a drawing of ca. 1700 in Ploss, Emile Ernst, Ein Buch von Alten Farben (Heidelberg, 1962), p. 150Google Scholar.

34. Thomas, , Mercantilism, p. 121Google Scholar.

35. Ibid., p. 126.

36. Wadsworth, A. P. and Mann, J. De L., The Cotton Trade and Industrial Lancashire (Manchester, 1931), p. 125Google Scholar.

37. The Weavers' True Case (London, 1719)Google Scholar, examined in Thomas, , Mercantilism, pp. 132–33Google Scholar.

38. For excise returns for 1711-19, see Wadsworth, and Mann, , Cotton Trade, p. 138Google Scholar.

39. Described, with other illicit dealings in chintz, in A Brief State of the Question between the Printed and Painted Callicoes and the Woollen and Silk Manufactures (London, 1719)Google Scholar, Introduction.

40. Penney, Norman (ed.), The Household Account Book of Sarah Fell of Swarthmoor Hall (Cambridge, 1920), pp. 23, 169Google Scholar; Eland, G. (ed.), Purefoy Letters 1735-1753 (London, 1931)Google Scholar, ch. xii.

41. Morley, H. (ed.), Spectator (New York, 1888), p. 461Google Scholar, No. 319 (6 Mar., 1712).

42. Morris, , Journeys, pp. 243–44Google Scholar.

43. Penney, , Household Account Book, p. 61Google Scholar. The accounts cover the period 1673-77.

44. Ibid., p. 441. About 2s 6d was paid for a yard of scotchcloth and a quarter of a yard of calico. In the accounts scotchcloth ranges from 10d to 1s 2d per yard.

45. Wadsworth, and Mann, , Cotton Trade, pp. 124–25Google Scholar.

46. Steer, F. W. (ed.), Farm and Cottage Inventories of Mid-Essex, 1635-1749 [Essex Record Office Publications, No. 8] (Chelmsford, 1950)Google Scholar. See inventories 93, 101, 127 (William Craig, mercer); 159, 165 (William Bird); 169 (Joseph Clarke, grocer and draper).

47. Morris, , Journeys, pp. 345–46Google Scholar.

48. Ibid., p. 339.

49. Brief State of the Question.

50. Defoe, Daniel, Complete English Tradesman (reprinted with notes; Edinburgh, 1839), PP. 78–79Google Scholar.

51. John Pollexfen to the Board of Trade, 1696, in Khan, , East India Trade, pp. 163–64Google Scholar.