66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      From January 2024, all of our readers will be able to access every part of ROAPE as well as its archive without a paywall. This will make ROAPE accessible to a much wider readership, especially in Africa. We need subscriptions and donations to make this revolutionary intiative work. 

      Subscribe and Donate now!

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distant obligations: speculations on NGO funding and the global market

      Published
      research-article
      a
      Review of African Political Economy
      Review of African Political Economy
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This article offers speculative answers to two inter‐related questions of strategic importance for non‐governmental development organisations (NGOs). First, what is the long‐term scenario for their funding, particularly for NGOs in the poorer countries of the South and especially in Africa? Second, what, if any, is the likely relationship between NGO financing and the rapid growth of a global capitalist market? Answers to these questions are arrived at using a simple model of the various sources of NGO finance and information on their trends. Two conclusions are that, for the foreseeable future, Southern NGOs will remain dependent on surpluses derived from Northern economies in which official aid will become dominant; and that NGOs will increasingly function as a component of an international system of social welfare because this role serves the international reproduction of capital.

            An ancillary conclusion is that poorer states, although nominally sovereign, will act as local governments in a new international order because their ability to function is essentially determined by foreign aid. These findings suggest that NGOs will have to (a) revise current notions that they operate as agents of popular transformation and facilitators of countervailing power, (b) review their position within the future political‐economy of poor Southern states and (c) recognise that the self‐financing of Southern NGOs will remain an illusion unless Northern donors significantly change their funding practices. Overall, NGOs need to make a radical reappraisal of their development strategies and roles, as well as taking strategic decisions on how to secure the autonomy of their funding base.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            crea20
            CREA
            Review of African Political Economy
            Review of African Political Economy
            0305-6244
            1740-1720
            November 1992
            : 19
            : 55
            : 9-29
            Affiliations
            a University of Sussex , Brighton , UK
            Article
            8703964 Review of African Political Economy, Vol. 19, No. 55, November 1992, pp. 9-29
            10.1080/03056249208703964
            d6937551-2fdc-41f9-9801-d32b4b6dcae4

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 42, Pages: 21
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Sociology,Economic development,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics,Africa

            Bibliographic Note

            1. Beets N, Neggere J and Wils F. . 1988. . “‘“Big and Still Beautiful”: Enquiry into the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Big NGOs (BINGOs) in South Asia’. ”. In Programme Evaluation . , Vol. Vol. No. 32. , The Hague : : Netherlands Government, Staats Uitgeverij. .

            2. Charities Aid Foundation. . 1992. . Individual Giving and Volunteering in Britain . , Tonbridge : : Charities Aid Foundation. .

            3. Clarke J. . 1991. . Democratizing Development: The Role of Voluntary Organizations . , London : : Earthscan. .

            4. Duffield M. . 1992. . “The emergence of two‐tier welfare in Africa: marginalization or an opportunity for reform?’. ”. In Public Administration and Development . Vol. Vol. 12. , p. 139––154. . London :

            5. Elliott C. . 1987. . ‘Some Aspects of the Relations Between North and South in the NGO Sector’. . World Development . , Vol. 15: Autumn;: 57––77. .

            6. Fowler A. . 1988. . “‘Non‐Governmental Organizations in Africa: Achieving Comparative Advantage in Micro‐development’. ”. University of Sussex, IDS. .

            7. Fowler A and Bauer G. . 1989. . ‘A Survey of Official Aid to NGOs in Kenya’ . , Nairobi : : The Ford Foundation. .

            8. Fowler A. . 1991. . “‘Building Partnerships between Northern and Southern NGOs: issues for the 1990s’. ”. In Development in Practice . , Vol. Vol. 1. , p. 5––18. . Oxford : : OXFAM. .

            9. Fowler A. . 1992a. . ‘Non‐Governmental Organisations as Agents of Democratization: An African Perspective’. . Journal of International Development . ,

            10. Fowler A. . 1992b. . “‘NGOs and Democratization in Africa: A Case Study of Kenya’. ”.

            11. Galbraith J K. . 1992. . The Culture of Contentment . , London : : Sinclair‐Stevenson. .

            12. Giles S. . 1990. . The Third World Directory . , (Directory of Social Change). London :

            13. Hellinger D. . 1987. . “‘NGOs and the Large Aid Donors: Changing the Terms of Engagement’. ”. In World Development . , Vol. Vol. 15. , p. 135––143. . Oxford : : Pergamon Journals. .

            14. Hirschman A. . 1967. . Development Projects Observed . , Washington : : Brookings Institute. .

            15. ICSW. . 1988. . Justice in the Aid Relationship?: A Dialogue on Partnership . , Vienna : : International Council on Social Welfare. .

            16. ICVA. . 1988. . Relations Between Southern and Northern NGOs: Policy Guidelines . , Geneva : : International Council of Voluntary Agencies. .

            17. Lecomte B. . 1986. . Project Aid: Limitations and Alternatives . , Paris : : Development Studies Centre, OECD. .

            18. Mansoni V. . 1985. . “‘Nongovernmental Organizations and Development’. ”. In Finance and Development . , p. 39––31. . Washington , D.C. : : The World Bank. .

            19. McCarthy K. . 1989. . “‘The Voluntary Sector Overseas: Notes From the Field’. ”. In Working Papers . , Center for the Study of Philanthropy, City University of New York. .

            20. Mills D. . 1988. . “‘Direct Funding: Implications for Caribbean NGOs’. ”. In Development . , Vol. Vol. No. 4. , p. 19––25. . Rome : : Society of International Development. .

            21. Mushi S, Semboja J and Therkildsen O. . ‘Issues of Service Provision in the 1990s in East Africa’. In: . paper presented to a Seminar on State and non‐State Provision of Services in Eastern Africa and South Asia; . Copenhagen : : Centre for Development Research. .

            22. Oakley P. . 1991. . Projects With People: The practice of participation in rural development . , Geneva : : ILO. .

            23. ODA. . 1992. . Report of Working Group on ODA/NGO Collaboration . , London : : Overseas Development Administration. .

            24. OECD. . 1988. . “International Co‐operation and Institutional Strengthening of Non‐Governmental Organisations in Africa’. ”. Paris : : OECD, Development Co‐operation Directorate. .

            25. OECD. . 1990. . Directory of Non‐Governmental Development Organisations in OECD Member Countries . , Paris : : OECD. .

            26. Robinson M. . 1991. . “‘Development NGOs in Europe and North America: A Statistical Profile’. ”. In Charity Trends . , p. 154––165. . Tonbridge : : Charities Aid Foundation. .

            27. Salmen L and Eaves A. . 1989. . “‘World Bank Work with Nongovernmental Organizations’. ”. In Working Paper . , Washington , D.C. : : The World Bank, Country Economics Dept. .

            28. Scott W. . 1987. . Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems . , Englewood Cliffs : : Prentice‐Hall. .

            29. Smith D. . 1987. . “‘Study of the Role of United Kingdom NGOs in Providing Development Aid’. ”. Washington , D.C. : : World Bank. .

            30. Stokke O. . 1988. . The Determinants of Aid Policy: A Comparative Analysis of the Aid Policies of Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden . , Oslo : : Norwegian Ministry of Development Cooperation. .

            31. UN. . 1992. . World Investment Report . , New York : : United Nations Publications. .

            32. UNDP. . 1990. . Human Development Report . New York :

            33. van Hulst W and van de Veen H. . July/August. 1992 . “‘Wat doen ze met onze geld?’, (What do they do with our money). ”. In Onze Wereld . July/August. , p. 6––16. . The Hague :

            34. van Til J. . 1989. . Mapping the Third Sector . , New York : : The Foundation Center. .

            35. Vukasin H. . 1987. . “‘Can NGOs Come To the Rescue of International Donors?’. ”. In Ambo . Vol. Vol. 16. , p. 220––221. . New York :

            36. Whitaker B. . 1974. . The Foundations: An Anatomy of Philanthropy and Society . , London : : Eyre Methuen. .

            37. Wallerstein I. . 1988. . The Politics of the World Economy . , CUP. .

            38. Williams A. . 1990. . “‘A Growing Role for NGOs in Development’. ”. In Finance and Development . , p. 31––33. . Washington , D.C. : : World Bank. .

            39. Wolfe A. . 1989. . Whose Keeper?: Social Science and Moral Obligation . , Berkeley : : University of California Press. .

            40. World Bank. . 1989. . Sub‐Saharan Africa: From Crisis to Sustainable Development . , Washington , D.C. : : World Bank. .

            41. World Bank. . 1990a. . World Development Report . Washington , D.C. :

            42. , 1990b , ‘The Bank and NGOs: Recent Experience and Emerging Trends’ , draft paper of the International Economic Relations Division, External Affairs Department , unreferenced, Washington , D.C. , October , mimeo.

            Comments

            Comment on this article