Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient plant regeneration through direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve’

  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Leaf segments of the orchid sp. Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve’ were used as explants testing the effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D; 0.45, 2.26, 4.52 μM), 6-furfurylaminopurine (kinetin; 2.32, 4.65, 13.95 μM), N6-benzyladenine (BA; 2.22, 4.44, 13.32 μM), and 1-phenyl-3-(1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-yl)-urea (TDZ; 2.27, 4.54, 13.62μM) on the induction of direct somatic embryogenesis. After 20–30 d of culture in darkness, clusters of somatic embryos formed from leaf surfaces and wounded regions of explants on half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with BA and TDZ. However, kinetin had no response on direct embryo induction. In addition, 2,4-D highly retarded the frequency of embryogenesis that was induced by TDZ. Generally, adaxial surfaces near wounded regions had the highest embryogenic competency compared to other regions of explants. Histological sections revealed that somatic embryos mostly arose from epidermal cell layers of the explants. Secondary embryogenesis occurred at basal parts of embryos, and originated from outer cell layers. Following transfer of regenerated embryos onto growth regulator-free medium for 3.5–4 mo., plantlets with three to four leaves and several roots were obtained. This protocol provides a simple way to regenerate plants through direct somatic embryogenesis, and is suitable for further studies on embryo development and genetic transformation of Phalaenopsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arditti, J.; Ernst, R. Micropropagation of orchids, New York: John Wiley & Son; 1993:467–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. T.; Chang, C.; Chang, W. C. Direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’ and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 19:143–149; 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures of Oncidium (Orchidaceae). Plant Sci. 160:87–93; 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regul. 34:229–232; 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. T.; Chang, W. C. Induction of repetitive embryogenesis from seed-derived protocorms of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 40:290–293; 2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.; Piluek, C. Effects of thidiazuron and N6-benzylaminopurin on shoot regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 16:99–101; 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C.; Chang, C.; Chang, W. C. A reliable protocol for plant regeneration from callus culture of Phalaenopsis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 36:420–423; 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. X.; Chen, H.; Yazawa, S. In vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis via culture of cytokinins-induced nodes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 15:133–137; 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. B. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1–42; 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, R. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 39:273–275; 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Y.; Takamura, T.; Goi, M.; Tanaka, M. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 17:446–450; 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. O.; Ichihashi, S. Effects of sucrose, maltose and sorbitol on callus growth of Phalaenopsis, Doritaenopsis and Neofinetia. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68:1124–1131; 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W. A. Botanical histochemistry. San Francisco: Freeman; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y.; Murthy, H. N.; Pack, K. Y. Rapid propagation of Phalaenopsis from floral stalk-derived leaves. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 38:168–172; 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Goi, M. Studies on the clonal propagation of monopodial orchids by tissue culture. I. Formation of protocorm-like bodies from leaf tissues in Phalaenopsis and Vanda. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44:47–58; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teob, E. S. Orchids of Asia. Singapore: Times Books International; 1989:125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhara, K.; Mii, M. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 13:7–11; 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhara, K.; Mii, M. Induction of embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture from shoot tips excised from flower stalk buds of Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 37:457–461; 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. S.; Murthy, H. N.; Yoeup, P. K. Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 63:67–72; 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Chin Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuo, HL., Chen, JT. & Chang, WC. Efficient plant regeneration through direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis ‘Little Steve’. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 41, 453–456 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2005644

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2005644

Key words

Navigation