Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T02:02:36.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voluntary food intake of growing pigs given diets containing rapeseed meal, from different types and varieties of rape, as the only protein supplement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

Pauline A. Lee  and
R. Hill
Pauline A. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Royal Veterinary College, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Herts
R. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Royal Veterinary College, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Herts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The voluntary food intake, during 30 min periods after morning and afternoon feeds and during 24 h, by growing pigs given diets containing rapeseed meal (Rsm) or soya-bean meal (Sbm) as the only protein supplement was determined. One diet was offered at a time and a daily changeover sequence of feeding was followed.

2. Four rapeseed meals were compared, one from seeds of British-grown winter Brassica napus varieties (Brsm) and the others from seeds of the var7ieties Tower (Trsm), Erglu (Ersm) and Span (Srsm). The effects on feed intake of adding flavouring substances to the Brsm diet were also determined. The flavouring substances were molassine meal, sucrose and four commercially-available substances: P, pig nectar; H, hog nectar; S, sow nectar and A, apple.

3. Intake of the Brsm diet was significantly less than those of the Sbm, Trsm and Ersm diets.

4. Addition to the Brsm diet of molassine meal or sucrose at 50 or 100 g/kg did not improve voluntary feed intake. None of the commercial flavouring substances raised the intake of the Brsm diet to the level of the Sbm diet but they improved intake of the Brsmdiet to varying extents. Flavourings H, S and A gave similar improvements which were substantial.

5. The Sbm, Brsm and Trsm diets were each fed ad. lib. to groups of growing pigs continuously for 4 weeks. Weekly feed intakes and weight gains were determined. Feed intakes and weight gains followed closely the intake values obtained in the changeover experiments. The highest values were for the Sbm diet; those for the Trsm diet were slightly lower and those for the Brsm diet were substantially and significantly lower.

6. The glucosinolate, sinapine and tannin contents of the rapeseed meals were determined and the results suggested that voluntary feed intake of diets containing these meals was related to their glucosinolate content, but not to their sinapine or tannin contents.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 1983 , pp. 661 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Agricultural Research Council (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 3, Pigs, 278 pp. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Appelqvist, L. A. & Josefsson, E. (1967). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 510–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, F. L. & Wolff, I. A. (1968). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. M. (1975). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 55, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, R. O., Froseth, J. A. & Kromann, R. P. (1972). Journal of Animal Science 35, 211.Google Scholar
Bowland, J. P. (1965). Publication of the Canadian Department of Agriculture, no. 1257, pp. 69–80.Google Scholar
Bowland, J. P. (1974). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, R. E. (1963). Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Georgia Technical Bulletin no. 32, pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
Diaz, R., Speer, V. C., Ashton, G. C., Liu, C. H. & Catron, D. V. (1956). Journal of Animal Science 15, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, M. T. & Hill, D. C. (1971). Journal of Nutrition 101, 975–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, B. E. (1974). Publication of the Rapeseed Association of Canada, no. 35, pp. 124–129.Google Scholar
McLeod, M. N. (1974). Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 44, 803–815.Google Scholar
Manns, J. G. & Bowland, J. P. (1963). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 43, 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiser, W. E., Froseth, J. A. & Kromann, R. P. (1973). Journal of Animal Science 36, 1199.Google Scholar
Mitchall, K. G., Bell, J. M. & Sosulski, F. W. (1976). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56, 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notzold, R. A., Becker, D. E., Terrill, S. W. & Jensen, A. H. (1955). Journal of Animal Science 14, 1068–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, V. O. & Gmelin, R. (1952). Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 7B, 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, V. K. & Hill, D. C. (1975). Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 53, 630–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, S. W., Meade, A. J., Nelson, T. S. & Becker, D. E. (1952). Journal of Animal Science 11, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzagoloff, A. (1963). Plant Physiology 38, 202–206.Google Scholar
Wahlstrom, R. C., Hauser, L. A. & Libal, G. W. (1974). Journal of Animal Science 38, 1267–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar