Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:43:42.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The flow of endogenous nitrogen in the digestive tract of young pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jane Leibholz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Twenty pigs were given one of five diets containing 0.9–39.2 g nitrogen/kg dry matter (DM) during the period 13–27 d of age.

2. The pigs were fed hourly, from 22–27 d of age, with a diet sprayed with an indigestible marker, 103 Ru-labelled Tris (l,10-phenanthroline)-ruthenium (II) chloride. All pigs were slaughtered at 27 d of age.

3. Flows of endogenous N estimated by feeding the diet containing 0.9 g N/kg and by regression analysis using results from all diets, were similar.

4. Flows of endogenous N were: stomach 1.8. duodenum 4.5, jejunum 4.2, ileum 3.5, caecum 2.7, large intestine 2.6 and faeces 1.7 g/kg dm intake.

5. Values are given for the flow of endogenous amino acids to the ileum.

6. Of the DM, 70% was digested anterior to the duodenum and for N the value was 10%. The percentage of N digested anterior to the jejunum was 70.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

REFERENCES

Arkhipovets, A. I. (1956). Sechenov fiziol. Zh SSSR 42, 882.Google Scholar
Buraczewska, L., Buraczewski, S., Horszczaruk, F., Jones, A. & Zebrowska, T. (1975). Roczn. Nauk roln. Ser. B 96, 103.Google Scholar
Buraczewska, L., Zebrowska, T., Wünsche, J., Hennig, U., Krawielitzki, K., Kreinenbring, F., Meinl, M., Borgmann, E. & Bock, H. D. (1979). Archs Tierernähr. 29, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, K. H. & Bayley, H. S. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corring, T. (1975). Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 15, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corring, T., Aumaitre, A. & Rerat, A. (1972). Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 12, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S., Leadbeater, P. A. & Horney, F. D. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horszczaruk, F., Buraczewska, L. & Buraczewski, S. (1974). Roczn. Nauk roln. Ser.B 95, 69.Google Scholar
Köhler, R., Zebrowska, T. & Gebhardt, G. (1978). Archs Tierernähr. 28, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krawielitzki, K., Völker, T., Zebrowska, T., Buraczewska, L., Hennig, U., Wünsche, J. & Bock, H. D. (1979). Archs Tierernähr. 29, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvasnitskii, A. V. (1951). Voprosy fiziologii pishchevareniya u svinei, Sel'khozgiz, Moscow.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1972). Br. vet. J. 128, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibholz, J. (1981). Br. J. Nutr. 46, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. & Zebrowska, T. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasset, E. S. (1965). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs. exp. Biol. 24, 953.Google Scholar
Sambrook, I. E. (1981). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 32, 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. H. & Leibholz, J. (1979). Anim. Prod. 28, 391.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. H. & Leibholz, J. (1981 a). Br. J. Nutr. 45, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. H. & Leibholz, J. (1981 b). Br. J. Nutr. 45, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wünsche, J., Zebrowska, T., Hennig, U., Kreienbring, F., Borgmann, E., Völker, T., Idzior, B., Bock, H. D. & Buraczewski, S. (1979). Archs Tierernähr. 29, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, T. & Buraczewska, L. (1972). Roczn. Nauk roln. Ser B 94, 81.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Buraczewska, L., Buraczewski, S. & Horszczaruk, F. (1975). Roczn. Nauk roln. Ser. B 96, 79.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Simon, O., Munchmeyer, R. & Bergner, H. (1976). Archs Tierernähr. 26, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar