Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 215–238

Chapter 11. Referring to oneself in the third person

A novel construction in text-based computer-mediated communication

| Åbo Akademi University

This chapter examines the increasingly popular practice in text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC) of users referring to themselves in the third person, e.g. *runs to the kitchen*. Originating in game environments, the zero subject construction has in recent years spread to other modes of CMC such as discussion forums, microblogging and texting. In these contexts, users take the trouble of typing in asterisks and other signals mimicking the screen view of early chat. Based on data from recreational discussion board threads and microblogging, the chapter focuses on the emergent grammar of the typographically marked, self-referential third-person construction and its pragmatic constraints. Special attention is paid to the variation between pronominal forms and other means of referring to oneself. It is argued that the construction is grammatically and pragmatically innovative in English.

Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.11vir
References
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Austin, John L
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S
2013 Instant Messaging. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 135-161. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Barton, David & Lee, Carmen
2013 Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barton, Ellen L
1998 The grammar of telegraphic structures. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 37-67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966 De la subjectivité dans le langage. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, Vol. 1: 258-266. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005 Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cherny, Lynn
1994 Gender differences in text-based virtual reality. In Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Mary Bucholtz, Anita C. Liang, Laurel Sutton & Caitlin Hines (eds), 102-115. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
1995 The modal complexity of speech events in a social mud. Electronic Journal of Communication 5. [URL]Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda
2001 Cyberpl@y: Communicating Online. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda, Ruedenberg-Wright, Lucia & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Yehudit
1997 “Hmmm... where’s that smoke coming from?” Writing, play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(4).Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria
2014 Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics 61: 91-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik
1981 Experiential iconicism in text strategy. Text 1(1): 97-111.Google Scholar
1989 Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds. In Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, Sture Allén (ed.), 162-186. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gardelle, Laure
2012 “Anaphora”, “anaphor” and “antecedent” in nominal anaphora: definitions and theoretical implications. Cercles 22: 25-40.Google Scholar
Gill, Martin
2011 Authenticity. In Pragmatics in Practice: Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 9, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 46-65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983 Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed), 1-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
2013 Mailing list communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 55-82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2013 The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130: 88-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea
1999 Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 3(1): 117-145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C
2001 Computer-mediated discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton (eds), 612-634. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004 Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds.), 338-376. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Grammar and electronic communication. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a Relevance in computer-mediated conversation. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 245-268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds), 1-25. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Stein, Dieter & Virtanen, Tuija
2013. Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 3-32. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeycutt, Courtenay & Herring, Susan C
2009 Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42) . Los Alamitos CA: IEEE Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings Vol. 2, Roman Jakobson (ed.), 130-147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D
1985 Note-taking English as a simplified register. Discourse Processes 8(4): 437-454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia M
2013 First-person reference in discourse: Aims and strategies. Journal of Pragmatics 48: 57-70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolko, Beth
1995 Building a world with words: the narrative reality of virtual communities. Works and Days 13(1-2): 105-126. [URL]Google Scholar
Lazaraton, Anne
2014 Aaaaack! The active voice was used! Language play, technology, and repair in the Daily Kos weblog. Journal of Pragmatics 64: 102-116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Carmen
2011 Texts and practices of micro-blogging: status updates on Facebook. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds), 110-128. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, Loukia
2013 The maxims of online nicknames. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 437-461. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Markham, Annette N. & Baym, Nancy K
2009 Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. New York NY: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E. & boyd, danah
2010 I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 3: 4-33.Google Scholar
Maybin, Janet & Swann, Joan
2007 Everyday creativity in language: textuality, contextuality, and critique. Applied Linguistics 28(4): 497-517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Harré, Rom
1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
North, Sarah
2007 “The voices, the voices”: Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics 28(4): 538-555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth
2012 Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik
, Jan 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robinson, Laura
2007 The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital era. New Media & Society 9(1): 93-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure
2001 Narrative as Virtual Reality. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J. & Emmott, Catherine
2012 Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2007 How to read Austin. Pragmatics 17: 461-473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlobinski, Peter
2001 *knuddelzurueckknuddeldichganzdollknuddel*: Inflektive und Inflektivkonstruktionen im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 29(2):192-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate
2013 Pragmatically motivated null subjects in English: A relevance theory perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 53: 68-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
2001 How performatives work. In Essays in Speech Act Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 77], Daniel Vanderveken & Susumu Kubo (eds), 85-107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004a Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b On the discourse basis of person agreement. In Approaches to Cognition Through Text and Discourse, Tuija Virtanen (ed.), 33-48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simpson, James
2013 Conversational floor in computer-mediated discourse. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 515-538. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley & Manderson, Lenore
2011 About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1581-1602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Travis, Catherine E
2014 Prosody, priming and particular constructions: the patterning of English first-person singular subject expressions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 63: 19-34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1995 The conceptual basis of performativity. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: in Honour of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 299-321. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
2004 Point of departure: cognitive aspects of sentence-initial adverbials. In Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse, Tuija Virtanen (ed.), 79-97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Adverbials of “manner” and “manner plus” in written English: Why initial placement? SKY Journal of Linguistics 21. [URL]Google Scholar
2013a Performativity in computer-mediated communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication [Handbooks of Pragmatics 9], Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), 269-290. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Mock performatives in online discussion boards: Toward a discourse-pragmatic model of computer-mediated communication. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds), 155-166. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Werry, Christopher C
1996 Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 39], Susan C. Herring (ed.), 47-63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5): 788-806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Gardelle, Laure & Sandrine Sorlin
2018. Introduction. International Journal of Language and Culture 5:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2018. *Sings myself happy birthday*. International Journal of Language and Culture 5:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2021. Enhancing Social Presence Through Textual Action: Virtual Performatives as a Relatability Strategy. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2021. Fragments online: virtual performatives in recreational discourse. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 53:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Tuija
2024. Chapter 8. Pretending to pretend. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.