oa Navigating the complex social ecology of screen-based activity in video-mediated interaction

References

1. Arminen, Ilkka
   2005 Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arminen, Ilkka, Inka Koskela, and Hannele Palukka
   2014 “Multimodal Production of Second Pair Parts in Air Traffic Control Training.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 46–62. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli
   2016 “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (4): 290–309. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614 [Google Scholar]
4. Balaman, Ufuk
   2018 “Task-Induced Development of Hinting Behaviors in Online Task-Oriented L2 Interaction.” Language Learning, 21. doi: 10125/44640
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balaman, Ufuk, and Olcay Sert
   2017a “The Coordination of Online L2 Interaction and Orientations to Task Interface for Epistemic Progression.” Journal of Pragmatics115 (July): 115–29. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015 [Google Scholar]
6. Balaman, Ufuk, and Olcay Sert
   2017b “Development of L2 Interactional Resources for Online Collaborative Task Accomplishment.” Computer Assisted Language Learning30 (7): 601–30. doi:  10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667 [Google Scholar]
7. Balaman, Ufuk
   2019 “Sequential Organization of Hinting in Online Task-Oriented L2 Interaction.” Text & Talk39 (4): 511–34. doi:  10.1515/text‑2019‑2038
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2038 [Google Scholar]
8. Bilmes, Jack
   1994 “Constituting Silence: Life in the World of Total Meaning.” Semiotica98 (1–2): 73–88. doi:  10.1515/semi.1994.98.1‑2.73
   https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1994.98.1-2.73 [Google Scholar]
9. Brandt, Adam
   2011 “The Maintenance of Mutual Understanding in Online Second Language Talk.” PhD Thesis, Newcastle University.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brandt, Adam, and Christopher Jenks
    2013 “Computer-Mediated Spoken Interaction: Aspects of Trouble in Multi-Party Chat Rooms.” Language@Internet10: 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Due, Brian L.
    2015 “The Social Construction of a Glasshole: Google Glass and Multiactivity in Social Interaction.” PsychNology Journal13 (2): 149–178.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gardner, Rod, and Mike Levy
    2010 “The Coordination of Talk and Action in the Collaborative Construction of a Multimodal Text.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (8): 2189–2203. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.006 [Google Scholar]
13. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hal.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garfinkel, Harold
    2002 Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goodwin, Charles
    2013 “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics46 (1): 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
16. Goodwin, Charles
    2018 Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, and Charles Goodwin
    1986 “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica, 62(1–2): 51–76.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
    eds. 2014 Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.187
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187 [Google Scholar]
19. Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
    1993 “Disembodied Conduct: Interactional Asymmetries in Video-Mediated Communication.” InTechnology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, edited byGraham Button, 35–54. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
    2000 Technology in Action. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511489839
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489839 [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, John
    2007 “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” InPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, edited byNick J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 255:255–80. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hjulstad, Johan
    2016 “Practices of Organizing Built Space in Videoconference-Mediated Interactions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (4): 325–41. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2016.1199087
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199087 [Google Scholar]
23. Hoey, Elliott M.
    2020 “Self-Authorizing Action: On Let Me X in English Social Interaction.” Language in Society, 1–24. doi:  10.1017/S0047404520000779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000779 [Google Scholar]
24. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In. Conversation Analysis, Studies from First Generation, edited byGene Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
25. Jenks, Christopher Joseph, and Adam Brandt
    2013 “Managing Mutual Orientation in the Absence of Physical Copresence: Multiparty Voice-Based Chat Room Interaction.” Discourse Processes50 (4): 227–48. doi:  10.1080/0163853X.2013.777561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.777561 [Google Scholar]
26. Knight, Janine, Melinda Dooly, and Elena Barberà
    2018 “Multimodal Meaning Making: Navigational Acts in Online Speaking Tasks.” System78: 65–78. 10.1016/j.system.2018.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.007 [Google Scholar]
27. Licoppe, Christian, and Julien Morel
    2018 “Visuality, Text and Talk, and the Systematic Organization of Interaction in Periscope Live Video Streams.” Discourse Studies20 (5): 637–65. doi:  10.1177/1461445618760606
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618760606 [Google Scholar]
28. Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Jon Hindmarsh, Keiichi Yamazaki, and Shinya Oyama
    2003 “Fractured Ecologies: Creating Environments for Collaboration.” Human–Computer Interaction18 (1–2): 51–84. 10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3 [Google Scholar]
29. Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Marina Jirotka
    2016 “Embedded Reference: Translocating Gestures in Video-Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49 (4): 342–61. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088 [Google Scholar]
30. Mlynář, Jakub, Esther González-Martínez, and Denis Lalanne
    2018 “Situated Organization of Video-Mediated Interaction: A Review of Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Studies.” Interacting with Computers30 (2): 73–84. doi:  10.1093/iwc/iwx019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx019 [Google Scholar]
31. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014 “The Temporal Orders of Multiactivity.” InMultiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, edited byPentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 33–75. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/z.187.02mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.02mon [Google Scholar]
32. Näslund, Shirley
    2016 “Tacit Tango: The Social Framework of Screen-Focused Silence in Institutional Telephone Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics91 (January): 60–79. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.008 [Google Scholar]
33. O’Dowd, Robert, and Tim Lewis
    2016 Online Intercultural Exchange: Policy, Pedagogy, Practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315678931
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678931 [Google Scholar]
34. Oittinen, Tuire
    2018 “Multimodal Accomplishment of Alignment and Affiliation in the Local Space of Distant Meetings.” Culture and Organization24 (1): 31–53. 10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2017.1386189 [Google Scholar]
35. Oittinen, Tuire, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    2015 “Openings in Technology-Mediated Business Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics85: 47–66. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
36. Olbertz-Siitonen, Margarethe
    2015 “Transmission Delay in Technology-Mediated Interaction at Work.” PsychNology Journal13 (2–3): 203–34.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pekarek Doehler, Simona
    2011 “Emergent Grammar for All Practical Purposes: The On-line Formating of Dislocated Constructions in French Conversation.” InConstructions: Emerging and Emergent, edited byPeter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 46–88. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110229080.45
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080.45 [Google Scholar]
38. Pekarek Doehler, Simona and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
    2013 The Patching together of Pivot-patterns in Talk-in-interaction: On ‘Double Dislocations’ in French. Journal of Pragmatics53: 92–108. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar]
39. Pekarek Doehler, Simona and Ufuk Balaman
    2021 “The Routinization of Grammar as a Social Action Format: A Longitudinal Study of Video-mediated Interactions”. Research on Language and Social Interaction. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710 [Google Scholar]
40. Rintel, E. Sean
    2010 “Conversational Management of Network Trouble Perturbations in Personal Videoconferencing.” InProceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, 304–11. 10.1145/1952222.1952288
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952288 [Google Scholar]
41. Rintel, Sean
    2013 “Video Calling in Long-Distance Relationships: The Opportunistic Use of Audio/Video Distortions as a Relational Resource.” The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronic de Communication (EJC/REC)23.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
    1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization Ofreference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited byGeorge Pathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. doi:  10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
44. Sert, Olcay, and Ufuk Balaman
    2018 “Orientations to Negotiated Language and Task Rules in Online L2 Interaction.” ReCALL30 (3): 355–74. doi:  10.1017/S0958344017000325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000325 [Google Scholar]
45. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1979 “The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-Conversation.” InDiscourse and Syntax, edited byTalmy Givon, 261–86. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_012 [Google Scholar]
46. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, edited byElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
47. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
48. Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society35 (3): 367–92. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
49. Suchman, Lucy A.
    2007 Human-machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall, and Barry Brown
    2020 “Making time: Pausing to coordinate video ınstructions and practical tasks”. Symbolic Interaction. doi:  10.1002/symb.516
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.516 [Google Scholar]
51. Whalen, Jack
    1995 “A Technology of Order Production: Computer-Aided Dispatch in Public Safety Communications.” InSituated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, edited byPaul ten Have and George Psathas, 187–230. Washington DC: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wilkinson, Ray
    2009 “Projecting a Reference in Aphasic Talk and Normal Talk.” Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 206–225. 10.1080/01638530902728892
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728892 [Google Scholar]