On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style

References

1. Burgers, C. & de Graaf, A.
   (2013) Language intensity as a sensationalistic news feature: the influence of style on sensationalism perceptions and effects. Communications38: 167–188. 10.1515/commun‑2013‑0010
   https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0010 [Google Scholar]
2. Fahnestock, J.
   (2009) Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. InExamining Argumentation in Context. Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. F. H. van Eemeren (pp.191–220). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.1.12fah
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.1.12fah [Google Scholar]
3. Fahnestock, J. & Y. Tonnard
   (2011) Amplification in strategic maneuvering. InKeeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics, eds. E. Feteris , B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (pp.103–116). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.163.08fah
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.08fah [Google Scholar]
4. Langacker, R. W.
   (1990) Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857733
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
5. Leech, G. & Short, M.
   (2007) Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Second edition. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
7. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2018) Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
8. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2019) Argumentative style: a complex notion. Argumentation33: 153–171. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09478‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09478-y [Google Scholar]
9. van Eemeren, F. H.
   This issue. Examining Argumentative Style: A New Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
   [Google Scholar]
10. van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P.
    (1999) Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies1: 479–497. 10.1177/1461445699001004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004005 [Google Scholar]
11. van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
    (2016) Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (2nd rev. ed.) New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315401140
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315401140 [Google Scholar]
12. van Haaften, T.
    (2019) Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic, 39, 301–328. 10.22329/il.v39i4.6037
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i4.6037 [Google Scholar]
13. van Haaften, T. & van Leeuwen, M.
    (2018) Strategic Maneuvering with Presentational Devices: A Systematic Approach. InArgumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Volume II. Studies in Logic 76, eds. S. Oswald & D. Maillat (pp.873–886). London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. van Leeuwen, M.
    (2014) Systematic stylistic analysis. The use of a checklist. InFrom Text to Political Positions. Text analysis across disciplines, eds. B. Kaal , I. Maks & A. van Elfrinkhof (pp.225–244). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.55.11lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.11lee [Google Scholar]
15. van Leeuwen, M.
    (2015) Stijl en politiek. Een taalkundig-stilistische benadering van Nederlandse parlementaire toespraken. [Style and politics. A linguistic-stylistic approach to Dutch parliamentary speeches] Dissertation Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stukker, N. & A. Verhagen
    (2019) Stijl, taal en tekst: stilistiek op taalkundige basis. [Style, language and text: stylistics on a linguistic foundation.] Leiden: Leiden University Press.
    [Google Scholar]