References
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D
(2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242-275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bak, T., Nissan, J., Allerhand, M., & Deary, I
(2014) Does bilingualism influence cognitive aging? Annals of neurology, 75(6), 959-963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bak, T., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Sorace, A
(2014) Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B
(2001) Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 369-396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berggren, N., Richards, A., Taylor, J., & Derakshan, N
(2013) Affective attention under cognitive load: reduced emotional biases but emergent anxiety-related costs to inhibitory control. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Majumder, S
(1998) The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 69-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E
(2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3-11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117-121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Green, D., & Gollan, T
(2009) Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(3), 89-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G
(2012) Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240-250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Freedman, M
(2007) Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 459-464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M
(2004) Bilingualism, aging and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290-303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Viswanathan, M
(2009) Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112(3), 494-500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilger, R., Nuetzel, J., Rabinowitz, W., & Rzeczkowski, C
(1984) Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27(1), 32-48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A., & Alexander, J
(2007) Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339-2349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A., & Bent, T
(2008) Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707-729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bregman, A
(1994) Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brokx, J., & Nooteboom, S
(1982) Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10(1), 23-36.Google Scholar
Brosch, T., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Scherer, K
(2008) Behold the voice of wrath: Cross-modal modulation of visual attention by anger prosody. Cognition, 106(3), 1497-1503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brungart, D
(2001) Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(3), 1101-1109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brungart, D., & Simpson, B
(2002) Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(6), 2985-2995. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S., & Meltzoff, A
(2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental science, 11(2), 282-298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cherry, E
(1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 25(5), 975-979. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., & Caramazza, A
(1999) Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 231-244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A
(2005)  Lexical access in bilingual production . In J. Kroll, & A. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 308-325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113(2), 135-149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craik, F., Bialystok, E., & Freedman, M
(2010) Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease: Bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology, 75(19), 1726-1729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crinion, J., Turner, R., Grogan, A., Hanakawa, T., Noppeney, U., Devlin, J., …& Price, C
(2006) Language control in the bilingual brain. Science, 312(5779), 1537-1540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C., & Hukin, R
(1999) Auditory objects of attention: The role of interaural time differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 25(3), 617-629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Fockert, J., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Lavie, N
(2001) The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291(5509), 1803-1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Lissnyder, E., Derakshan, N., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E
(2011) Depressive symptoms and cognitive control in a mixed antisaccade task: Specific effects of depressive rumination. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 886-897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derakshan, N., Ansari, T., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M
(2009) Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48-55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M
(2009) Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dick, F., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J.A., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M
(2001) Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108(4), 759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirks, D., & Bower, D
(1969) Masking effects of speech competing messages. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 12(2), 229-245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Driver, J
(2001) A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92(1), 53-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, M., & Calvo, M
(1992) Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409-434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, M., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M
(2007) Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336-353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M
(2002) Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340-347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Festen, J., & Plomp, R
(1990) Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech‐reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(4), 1725-1736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filippi, R., & Karmiloff-Smith, A
(2012) What can neurodevelopmental disorders teach us about typical development? In C. Marshall (Ed.), Current issues in developmental disorders (pp. 193-209). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Filippi, R., Leech, R., Thomas, M., Green, D., & Dick, F
(2012) A bilingual advantage in controlling language interference during sentence comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 858-872. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filippi, R., Morris, J., Richardson, F., Bright, P., Thomas, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Marian, V
(2015) Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1-12.Google Scholar
Filippi, R., Richardson, F., Dick, F., Leech, R., Green, D., Thomas, M., & Price, C
(2011) The right posterior paravermis and the control of language interference. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(29), 10732-10740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Gollan, T., & Caramazza, A
(2006) Lexical access in bilingual speakers: What's the (hard) problem? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 153-166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T., Montoya, R., & Werner, G
(2002) Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16(4), 562-576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D
(1986) Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27(2), 210-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A., Bates, E., & Avila, L
(1996) Processing across the language boundary: A cross-modal priming study of Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 846-864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, C., & Spence, C
(2005) Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(3), 157-174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoen, M., Meunier, F., Grataloup, C., Pellegrino, F., Grimault, N., Perrin, F., …& Collet, L
(2007) Phonetic and lexical interferences in informational masking during speech-in-speech comprehension. Speech communication, 49(12), 905-916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D
(1983) Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by colour-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 497-509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalikow, D., Stevens, K., & Elliott, L
(1977) Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 1337-1351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovács, Á., & Mehler, J
(2009) Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6556-6560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavie, N
(1995) Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(3), 451-468.Google Scholar
(2005) Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(2), 75-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain research, 1080(1), 91-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, R., Aydelott, J., Symons, G., Carnevale, J., & Dick, F
(2007) The development of sentence interpretation: Effects of perceptual, attentional and semantic interference. Developmental science, 10(6), 794-813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, C., & Proctor, R
(1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174-207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P
(1986) Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15-20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E
(1989) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mariën, P., Ackermann, H., Adamaszek, M., Barwood, C., Beaton, A., Desmond, J., …& Ziegler, W
(2014) Consensus paper: language and the cerebellum: An ongoing enigma. The Cerebellum, 13(3), 386-410.Google Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M., & Bialystok, E
(2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 81-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayo, L., Florentine, M., & Buus, S
(1997) Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(3), 686-693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meador, D., Flege, J., & MacKay, I
(2000) Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 55-67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J
(1991) The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(3), 270-288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P
(2012) The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., Howerter, A., & Wager, T
(2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moray, N
(1959) Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(1), 56-60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz-Sandoval, A., Cummins, J., Alvarado, C., & Ruef, M
(1998) Bilingual verbal ability tests: Comprehensive manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Norman, D., & Shallice, T
(1980) Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behaviour, CHIP Report 99. San Diego, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
(1986) Attention to action. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouzia, J., Bright, P., Filippi, R
in preparation). Anxiety and rumination affect performance effectiveness in bilingual individuals - evidence from visual, auditory, and eye-tracking measures of inhibition.
in preparation). The effects of non-verbal interference on spoken language comprehension in monolinguals and bilinguals.
Parkinson, L., & Rachman, S
(1981) Part III—Intrusive thoughts: The effects of an uncontrived stress. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3(3), 111-118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parasuraman, R., & Haxby, J
(1993) Attention and brain function in Alzheimer's disease: A review. Neuropsychology, 7(3), 242-272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Heinze, H., Nösselt, T., & Münte, T
(2002) Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain. Nature, 415(6875), 1026-1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Van Der Lugt, A., Rotte, M., Britti, B., Heinze, H., & Münte, T
(2005) Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: Brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 422-433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C., Lister, J., Febo, D., Besing, J., & Abrams, H
(2006) Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 465-485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, V., & Spence, C
(2007) Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1311-1321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmahmann, J
(2010) The role of the cerebellum in cognition and emotion: personal reflections since 1982 on the dysmetria of thought hypothesis, and its historical evolution from theory to therapy. Neuropsychology Review, 20(3), 236-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, T., Ware, J., Fischer, C., Craik, F., & Bialystok, E
(2012) Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 48(8), 991-996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, L
(2010) Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 821-835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J., & Berbaum, K
(1990) Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the ‘Stroop effect’ vs. the ‘Simon effect’. Acta psychologica, 73(2), 159-170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J., & Wolf, J
(1963) Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99-105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soveri, A., Laine, M., Hämäläinen, H., & Hugdahl, K
(2011) Bilingual advantage in attentional control: Evidence from the forced-attention dichotic listening paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(03), 371-378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabri, D., Chacra, K., & Pring, T
(2011) Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(4), 411-422.Google Scholar
Telner, J., Wiesenthal, D., Bialystok, E., & York, M
(2008) Benefits of Bilingualism and Video Game Proficiency when Driving and Speaking on a Cellular Telephone. ICTTP , Washington DC .
Treisman, A.M
(1964) Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3(6), 449-459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M
(2001) The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 4(2), 105-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K.J., & Bradlow, A.R
(2007) Sentence recognition in native-and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 519-526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, J., & Dijkstra, T
(2002) Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 780-789 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yantis, S., & Johnston, J
(1990) On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 16(1), 135-149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Filippi, Roberto, Andrea Ceccolini, Eva Periche-Tomas, Andriani Papageorgiou & Peter Bright
2020. Developmental trajectories of control of verbal and non-verbal interference in speech comprehension in monolingual and multilingual children. Cognition 200  pp. 104252 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.