Cover not available
Part of
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 155–180

Chapter 7
The diachrony of non-canonical subjects in Northwest Semitic

| University of Texas, Austin

A syntactic pattern involving non-canonical subject marking in some Northwest-Semitic languages is fascinating for two reasons: (1) it cannot be reconstructed to the proto-language and it must have developed relatively late in the history of the family, which affords us an opportunity to observe its development through textual attestations (cf. Barðdal & Eythórsson 2009); (2) the predication is by and large non-verbal, which seems to counter explanations based on passive derivations and agentivity as a possible origin (Haspelmath 2001). I suggest instead that non-canonical subjects originated from free datives in clauses where the typical agreement cannot be applied. In such cases, the dative, which is animate, definite and associated with the subject, eventually outranked the original subject, which is typically a nominalization and never animate or definite. I further discuss the special features of the non-canonical subject and argue that it is quite stable.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Subjecthood
    • 3.1Word order
    • 3.2Definiteness
    • 3.3Non-deletability of the preposition
    • 3.4Control
  • 4.Historical scenario
    • 4.1Biblical Hebrew
    • 4.2Rabbinic Hebrew
    • 4.3Modern Hebrew
  • 5.Theoretical implications
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.07pat
References
Arnold, Bill T. & Choi, John H.
2003 A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azar, Moshe
1995 The Syntax of Mishnaic Hebrew (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language and University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2009 The origin of the oblique subject construction: An Indo-European comparison. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages [Current Issue in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 179–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 ‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 363–393.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smitherman, Thomas, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Jenset, Gard B. & McGillivray, Barbara
2012 Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language 36(3): 511–547.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Smitherman, Thomas
2013 The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1): 28–67.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Arnett, Carlee, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Jenset, Gard B., Kroonen, Guus & Oberlin, Adam
2016 Dative subjects in Germanic. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 49–84.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth
1978 Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
1980 The case of an (S)VO language, subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language 56: 759–776.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blau, Joshua
2010 Phonology and Morphology of Biblical Hebrew: An Introduction. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Brustad, Kristen
2000 The Syntax of Spoken Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Coghill, Eleanor
2016 The Rise and Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic: Cycles of Alignment Change. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubnov, Keren
2008 Adjectives as predicates in non-canonical structures in early Modern Hebrew (in Hebrew). Iggud 3: 31–40.Google Scholar
Dyk, Janet W. & Talstra, Eep
1999 Paradigmatic and syntagmatic features in identifying subject and predicate in nominal clauses. In The Verbless Clause in Biblical Hebrew: Linguistic Approaches, Cynthia L. Miller (ed.), 133–185. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2005 Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon
2006 On grammatical agreement and verb-initial sentences. In Loquented linguis. Studi linguistici e orientali in onore di Fabrizio A. Pennaccietti, Pier Giorgio Borbone, Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds), 329–335. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2007 Actants and diathesis, directions of transitivity &c.: Some Satzgestaltungen and their background in Semitic and elsewhere. In From Beyond the Mediterranean, Rainer M. Voigt (ed.), 283–295. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
2013 Semitic Languages: Features, Structures, Relations, Processes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001 Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselbach, Rebecca
2013 Case in Semitic: Roles, Relations, and Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo
2012 Canaano-Akkadian: Linguistics and sociolinguistics. In Language and Nature: Papers Presented to John Huehnergard on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Rebecca Hasselbach & Na’ama Pat-El (eds), 171–218. Chicago IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Jenni, Ernst
2000 Die hebräischen Präpositionen, Band 3: Die Präposition Lamed. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan
1989 The function of the so-called dativus ethicus in classical Syriac. Orientalia 58: 473–492.Google Scholar
Joüon, Paul & Muraoka, Takamitsu
2000 A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Rome: Editrice Pontificio Instituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Kidron, Yael & Kuzar, Ron
2002 My face is paling against my will: Emotion and control in English and Hebrew. Pragmatics & Cognition 10(1): 129–157.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, N. J. C.
(Bert) 2002 Ventive, dative and allative in Old Babylonian. ZA 92(2): 200–240.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzar, Ron
1993 The impersonal predicate: A part of speech or a syntactic position? (in Hebrew). Leshonenu 56(3): 241–248.Google Scholar
2012 Sentence Patterns in English and Hebrew [Constructional Approaches to Language 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Loesov, Sergey
2006 Marginalia on the Akkadian ventive. Babel und Bibel 3: 101–132.Google Scholar
Miller, Cynthia
1999 Pivotal issues in analyzing the verbless clause. In The Verbless Clause in Biblical Hebrew, Cynthia Miller (ed.), 3–17. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Terence Frederick & El-Hassan, Shahir
1992 Modality, Mood and Aspect in Spoken Arabic. London: Routledge/Kegal Paul.Google Scholar
Mohammad, Mohammad A.
2000 Word Order, Agreement and Pronominalization in Standard and Palestinian Arabic [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 181]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mor, Uri & Pat-El, Na’ama
2016) The development of predicates with prepositional subjects in Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies 61(2): 327–346.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moshavi, Adina
2010 Word order in the Biblical Hebrew Finite Clause: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Analysis of Preposing. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Rainey, Anson F.
1996 Canaanite in the Amarna Tablets: A Linguistic Analysis of the Mixed Dialect used by Scribes from Canaan, Vol. 4. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rosén, Haim B.
1977 Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D.
2010 The Mehri Language of Oman. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Eliezer
1969 The Nominal Sentence (in Hebrew). Ha-Kibbutz Ha-Meuxad.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2013 The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects and subject-like obliques. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-prototypical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 317–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullendorff, Edward
1992 Some observations on the dativus ethicus in Semitics and elsewhere. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 15: 1–9.Google Scholar
Zewi, Tamar
2012 Prepositional phrases as subjects in several Semitic languages. In Language and Nature: Papers Presented to John Huehnergard on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, Rebecca Hasselbach & Na’ama Pat-El (eds), 465–476. Chicago IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Becker, Israela
2023. It’s all about the sentential construction. Studies in Language 47:2 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Halevy, Rivka
2022. What makes the dative-experiencer construction in Modern Hebrew different from its counterparts in European languages?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Notarius, Tania
2022. Passive, Stative, and Impersonal in Ugaritic: The G-stem Internal Passive Reconsidered. Journal for Semitics 31:1 DOI logo
Notarius, Tania
2022. Impersonal Verbal Constructions in Biblical Hebrew: Active, Stative, and Passive. Journal for Semitics 30:2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Studies in the Grammar and Lexicon of Neo-Aramaic [Semitic Languages and Cultures, 5], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.