New Arabidopsis thaliana Cytochrome c Partners: A Look Into the Elusive Role of Cytochrome c in Programmed Cell Death in Plants*

Programmed cell death is an event displayed by many different organisms along the evolutionary scale. In plants, programmed cell death is necessary for development and the hypersensitive response to stress or pathogenic infection. A common feature in programmed cell death across organisms is the translocation of cytochrome c from mitochondria to the cytosol. To better understand the role of cytochrome c in the onset of programmed cell death in plants, a proteomic approach was developed based on affinity chromatography and using Arabidopsis thaliana cytochrome c as bait. Using this approach, ten putative new cytochrome c partners were identified. Of these putative partners and as indicated by bimolecular fluorescence complementation, nine of them bind the heme protein in plant protoplasts and human cells as a heterologous system. The in vitro interaction between cytochrome c and such soluble cytochrome c-targets was further corroborated using surface plasmon resonance. Taken together, the results obtained in the study indicate that Arabidopsis thaliana cytochrome c interacts with several distinct proteins involved in protein folding, translational regulation, cell death, oxidative stress, DNA damage, energetic metabolism, and mRNA metabolism. Interestingly, some of these novel Arabidopsis thaliana cytochrome c-targets are closely related to those for Homo sapiens cytochrome c (Martínez-Fábregas et al., unpublished). These results indicate that the evolutionarily well-conserved cytosolic cytochrome c, appearing in organisms from plants to mammals, interacts with a wide range of targets on programmed cell death. The data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000280.

Programmed cell death (PCD) 1 is a fundamental event for the development of multicellular organisms and the homeostasis of their tissues. It is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism present in organisms ranging from yeast to mammals (1)(2)(3).
In mammals, cytochrome c (Cc) and dATP bind to apoptosis protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) in the cytoplasm, a process leading to the formation of the Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex known as apoptosome. This apoptosome subsequently activates caspases-3 and -7 (4,5). In other organisms, such as Caenorhabditis elegans or Drosophila melanogaster, however, Cc is not essential for the assembly and activation of the apoptosome (6) despite the presence of proteins homologous to Apaf-1-cell death abnormality-4 (CED-4) in C. elegans and Drosophila Apaf-1-related killer (Dark) in D. melanogaster-which have been found to be essential for caspase cascade activation. Furthermore, other organisms such as Arabidopsis thaliana lack Apaf-1 (7). In fact, only highly distant caspase homologues (metacaspases) (8,9), serine proteases (saspases) (10), phytaspases (11) and VEIDases (12)(13)(14) with caspase-like activity have been detected in plants; however, their targets remain veiled and whether they are activated by Cc remains unclear.
Intriguingly, the release of Cc from mitochondria into the cytoplasm during the onset of PCD is an evolutionarily conserved event found in organisms ranging from yeast (15) and plants (16) to flies (17), and mammals (18). However, understanding of the roles of this phenomenon in different species can be said to be uneven at best. In fact, the release of Cc from mitochondria has thus far been considered a random event in all organisms, save mammals. Thus, the participation of Cc in the onset and progression of PCD needs to be further elucidated.
Even in the case of mammals, the role(s) of Cc in the cytoplasm during PCD remain(s) controversial. Recently, new putative functions of Cc, going beyond the already-established apoptosome assembly process, have been proposed in the nucleus (19,20) and the endoplasmic reticulum (21)(22)(23). Neither these newly proposed functions nor other arising functions, such as oxidative stress (24), are as yet fully understood. This current state of affairs demands deeper exploration of the additional roles played by Cc in nonmammalian species.
In this study, putative novel Cc-partners involved in plant PCD were identified. For this identification, a proteomic approach was employed based on affinity chromatography and using Cc as bait. The Cc-interacting proteins were identified using nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (NanoLC-MS/MS). These Cc-partners were then further confirmed in vivo through bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) in A. thaliana protoplasts and human HEK293T cells, as a heterologous system. Finally, the Cc-GLY2, Cc-NRP1 and Cc-TCL interactions were corroborated in vitro using surface plasmon resonance (SPR).
These results indicate that Cc is able to interact with targets in the plant cell cytoplasm during PCD. Moreover, they provide new ways of understanding why Cc release is an evolutionarily well-conserved event, and allow us to propose Cc as a signaling messenger, which somehow controls different essential events during PCD.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Protein Expression and Purification-Plasmid pCytA (25), containing the coding region for A. thaliana Cc, was used to obtain the Cc mutant A111C, in which the C-terminal alanine was replaced by a cysteine, through mutagenic PCR. The oligonucleotides designed to build the A111C mutant were 5Ј-gaaggcacctgttgatgaattc-3Ј and 3Јcttccgtggacaactacttaag-5Ј. The A111C mutant was expressed and further purified using ionic exchange chromatography, a process previously described for wild-type Cc by Rodríguez-Roldá n et al. (25).
PCD was then induced according to the procedure described by De Pinto et al. (26). Explained briefly, a stationary phase culture was diluted 5:100 (v/v). Following 3 days of growth under normal conditions, 35 mM H 2 O 2 was added to 100 ml cell suspension cultures.
Cell Viability and Morphology-Cell viability was measured using the trypan blue dye exclusion test as described by De Pinto et al. (27) and cells were counted with a hemocytometer. The MM2d cell viability rate was calculated dividing the number of viable cells by the total number of cells. Following the collection of MM2d cells through centrifugation at 1000 ϫ g for 10 min, cell morphology was analyzed and visualized using an Olympus BX60 fluorescence microscope.
Protein and Chlorophyll Determination-Protein content was determined using the Bradford assay (28), whereas chlorophyll determination carried out according to MacKinney's protocol (29).
Cell Extract Preparation for Purification by Affinity Chromatography-Cell extracts from 0.5 L of culture containing either untreated or 35 mM H 2 O 2 -treated cells were prepared for affinity chromatography purification. In both cases, cells were harvested following centrifugation at 1000 ϫ g for 5 min, washed twice in PBS, pelleted again and resuspended to be further lysed by sonication in buffer I (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 0.25% Triton X-100) supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 g/ml aprotinin, 10 g⅐ml Ϫ1 leupeptin and 10 g/ml of soybean trypsin inhibitor. Cellular debris was then removed through centrifugation at 20,000 ϫ g for 30 min at 4°C. Protein aliquots were stored at Ϫ80°C.
Purification by Affinity Chromatography-As previously described in Azzi et al. (30), affinity chromatography was carried out in a column prepared by the covalent linkage of the Cc mutant A111C to the Thiol-Sepharose 4B (TS-4B) matrix (Pharmacia). As a control, a TS-4B matrix devoid of Cc (Blank TS-4B) was also prepared.
MM2d cell extracts, both those untreated and treated with 35 mM H 2 O 2 , were loaded into the columns, both with and without Cc. The columns were washed with 30 ml of buffer I and 30 ml of buffer II (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 75 mM NaCl) to remove nonspecifically bound proteins. Proteins interacting with greater strength were then eluted with 30 ml of buffer III (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl), collected, lyophilized, and stored at Ϫ80°C before being analyzed using NanoLC-MS/MS.
Four sets of samples were thus obtained: (1) untreated cell extracts loaded into Blank TS-4B column, (2) untreated cell extracts loaded into the Cc TS-4B column, (3) cell extracts treated with H 2 O 2 and purified with the Blank TS-4B column, and (4) cell extracts treated with H 2 O 2 and purified using the Cc TS-4B column.
NanoLC-MS/MS-Before the performance of NanoLC-MS/MS analysis, the purified protein samples above were digested with trypsin. Thus, samples were treated with 8 M urea and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Following 1 h of incubation at 37°C, iodoacetamide was added until a final concentration of 55 mM was reached and incubated for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. The samples were diluted with ammonium bicarbonate 4ϫ until obtaining a final concentration of 2 M urea. Finally, 25 mg of recombinant trypsin was added and the mixture was incubated overnight at 37°C.
The resulting peptides were analyzed using NanoLC-MS/MS on a linear trap quadrupole (LTQ; Thermo Electron), a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. The peptides were separated in a BioBasic C-18 PicoFrit column (75 m (internal hamester) by 10 cm; New Objective) at a flow rate of 200 nL/min. Water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% formic acid, were used as solvents A and B, respectively. The peptides were trapped and desalted in the trap column for 5 min. The gradient was started and maintained for 5 min at 5% B, then ramped to 50% B over 120 min, ramped to 70% over 10 min and finally maintained at 95% B for another 10 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode to automatically switch between full MS and MS/MS acquisition. Parameters for ion scanning were the following: full-scan MS (400 -1800 m/z) plus top seven peaks Zoom/ MS/MS (isolation width 2 m/z), normalized collision energy 35%.
Peak lists from all MS/MS spectra were extracted from the Xcalibur RAW files using a freely available program DTAsupercharge v1.19 (http://msquant.sourceforge.net).
Bioinformatics-For protein identification, the UniProt Arabidopsis protein database 100323 (90895 sequences, 33249465 residues) was searched using a local license for MASCOT 2.1. Database search parameters used were the following: trypsin as enzyme; peptide tolerance, 300 ppm; fragment ion tolerance, 0.6 Da; missed cleavage sites,1, and fixed modification, carbamidomethyl cysteine and vari-able modifications, methionine oxidation. In all protein identification, probability scores were greater than the score established by MASCOT (30) as significant, with a p value less than 0.05.
Design of Vectors for BiFC Assays-The cDNA coding available for nine out of the 10 Cc potential targets previously identified by the proteomic approach were purchased (ABRC Stocks, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA). The cDNA of Cc and its novel protein partners were fused with the C-end fragment of the yellow fluorescent protein (cYFP) of the pSPYCE vector and with the N-end part of the YFP (nYFP) of the pSPYNE vector, respectively (31). As a negative control, protoplasts were transfected with the chromatinremodeling complex element SWI3B, which is unable to interact with Cc. The oligonucleotides indicated in the supplemental Data (supplemental Fig. S1A) were used to amplify the cDNAs while introducing proper restriction sites by PCR. In supplemental Fig. S1B, a scheme is shown of the vector constructs used for the BiFC assays.
Similarly, supplemental Fig. S2A represents the oligonucleotides required for cloning cDNAs into YFP vectors. BiFC experiments in human HEK293T cells were assayed after cloning Cc cDNA into the cYFP vector and the cDNA of its targets into the nYFP vector (supplemental Following Sheen's protocol (34), protoplasts were transiently transfected with the pSPYCE/pSPYNE BiFC vectors and incubated overnight; on PCD induction with 35 mM H 2 O 2 , the resulting fluorescence was monitored.
BiFC Assays in Human HEK293T: Cell Cultures, Cellular Transfection, and Fluorescence Microscopy-HEK293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; PAA, Etobicoke, ON) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 100 U/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), 100 g/ml penicillin (Invitrogen) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (PAA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 /95% air. HEK293T cells were grown to 80% confluence in 24-well plates with 500 l of DMEM, containing 20 mm coverslips. Cells were transfected with the YFP BiFC vectors using the Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. To favor the protein expression of both constructs, the transfected cells were then incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Apoptosis was further induced with 10 M CPT (camptothecin) for 6 h and in vivo binding was assessed through YFP reconstitution visualized with fluorescence microscopy. Nuclei were then stained with 4Ј,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
Western Blot Analysis-The HEK293T cells were harvested 48 h after transfection through centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 min. Total cell extracts were obtained through repeated freeze-thaw cycles. SDS-PAGE was performed using 12% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (BioRad, Hercules, CA) using a semidry transfer system and immunoblotted with a rabbit anti-EGFP polyclonal antibody (1:1,000; Biovision Research Prod-ucts). A horseradish-peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:12,000; Sigma-Aldrich) was then used for detection. The immunoreactive bands were developed using ECL Plus Western blotting Detection System (Amersham Biosciences).

Cloning, Expression and Purification of A. thaliana Cc and Its Protein Partners-Wild-type A. thaliana
Cc was cloned in the pBTR vector under lac promoter and expressed in E. coli BL-21. For this, 25 ml of precultures were grown overnight at 37°C in LB medium. 2.5 ml of preculture was used to inoculate 2.5 L of the same medium in a 5 L Erlenmeyer flask. The culture was shaken at 30°C for 24 h, after which further protein purification was carried out as indicated in Rodríguez-Roldá n et al. (25).
Proteins interacting with A. thaliana Cc-GAPDC1, GLY2, NRP1, and TCL-were cloned in the pET-28a vector under the T7 promoter. cDNAs coding for Cc targets were purchased from ABRC. These constructs were used to express the Cc-targets in the E. coli BL-21 (DE3) RIL strain. 250 ml precultures in LB medium supplemented with 50 g/ml kanamycin were grown overnight and used to inoculate 2.5 L of LB medium in 5 L flasks. Following the induction of cultures (1 mM IPTG) and growth at 30°C for 24 h, cells were harvested at 6000 rpm for 10 min and resuspended in 40 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8), 0.8 M NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.01% phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.2 mg/ml lysozyme, 5 mM DTT and 0.02 mg/ml DNase), sonicated for 4 min and then centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 20 min. Proteins were further purified by means of an Nicolumn (GE Healthcare).
SPR Measurements-The formation of complexes between A. thaliana Cc and its protein partners-GAPDC1, GLY2, NRP1, and TCL-was assayed with SPR using a BiaCore 3000 and CM4 Chips. An automated desorption procedure was performed before each experiment to ensure the cleanliness of the BiaCore tubing, channels, and sample injection port. The initial electrostatic attraction of A. thaliana Cc to the CM4 Sensor Chip surface was assessed by taking into account its isoelectric point and was optimized to pH 5.8. The plant Cc was then covalently attached to the matrix using standard amine-coupling chemistry, as previously described (35). A reference flow cell was used as a control in which the chip surface was treated as described above, but without the injection of plant Cc.
The binding measurements were performed at 25°C using HBS-EP buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 0.005% surfactant P20, adjusted to pH 7.4. Interactions between plant Cc and its protein partners were analyzed by flowing several GAPDC1, GLY2, NRP1 and TCL proteins at different concentrations (from 0.1 to 10 M) over the Cc-modified surface at a flow rate of 10 l/min. Each concentration was injected at least three times. In each sensogram, the signals from the reference flow cell surface were subtracted. Following a 6 h period during which Cc is known to be released into the cytosol (37), the cells were collected and morphological hallmarks occurring after PCD induction in plants (38) were analyzed. Fig. 1A shows the cellular viability (75%) after 6 h H 2 O 2 treatment, a calculation obtained from the performance of the trypan blue dye exclusion test (Fig.  1D). Correspondingly, chlorophyll (Fig. 1B)  Exploring Novel Cc Protein Partners during PCD Using a Proteomic Approach Based on Affinity Chromatography and NanoLC-MS/MS-As explained earlier, understanding the role of Cc during plant PCD is necessary to grasp the evolution of heme protein-dependent PCD pathways. Hence, novel Cc protein partners during PCD were identified using a proteomic approach relying on affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry (supplemental Fig. S3). In affinity chromatography, the thiol-Sepharose matrix (TS-4B) was used, which covalently binds proteins displaying solvent-exposed cysteines. Therefore, to attach Cc to the TS-4B matrix, the C-terminal alanine residue of Cc was replaced by a cysteine through mutagenic PCR. The resulting A111C Cc mutant, expressed and purified as de-scribed in Rodríguez-Roldá n et al. (25), was able to bind covalently the TS-4B matrix through a disulfide bridge. The other two cysteine residues in Cc were unreactive because they were already binding the heme group (40). A TS-4B column devoid of A111C Cc (Blank TS-4B) was used as a control.

PCD Induction in
A. thaliana MM2d cell extracts, both untreated and H 2 O 2treated, were loaded into both types of TS-4B columns. Thus, proteins interacting with Cc were eluted by increasing ionic strength. Given the differing experimental conditions, four different protein samples were produced: (a) proteins from untreated cells purified using the control column; (b) proteins from H 2 O 2 -treated cells purified with the control column; (c) proteins from untreated cells purified using a column with Cc covalently bound to the matrix; (d) proteins from H 2 O 2 -treated cells purified using a column with Cc covalently bound to the matrix. All samples were separately lyophilized, with the mixture of proteins present in each being analyzed by NanoLC-MS/MS and the putative new Cc partners identified in this work summarized in Table I. Up to 10 novel Cc partners were identified (supplemental Data 1). Table I shows a list of these Cc-targets, indicating their molecular weight, isoelectric point, as well as their cellular localization as described in the literature.

Verification of Cc Interactions In vivo-The
BiFC approach is a widely used technique permitting the analysis of proteinprotein interactions in their biological environment, as well as the localization of the protein complexes in living cells (33). For this purpose, A. thaliana Cc cDNA as well as the cDNAs available for nine out of 10 Cc potential targets-excluding Apoptosis Inhibitory 5-were fused to the C-end and N-end fragments of YFP, respectively.
The resulting vectors were then codelivered into A. thaliana protoplasts, following the protocol described by Sheen (34). Fluorescence images showing the YFP reconstitution on Cctarget binding were captured 6 h following PCD induction (Fig.  2). In each case, representative bright-field (left) and fluorescence microscopy (right) images are shown. The YFP reconstitution is represented as green fluorescence and the nuclei appear in blue as a result of DAPI staining. Protoplasts transfected with chromatin-remodeling complex element SWI3B, a protein unable to interact with Cc, were used as a negative control. The observable YFP complementation for all constructs tested clearly indicates that the interactions previously identified in vitro through affinity chromatography also occur in vivo at the onset of PCD. In contrast, no YFP fluorescence signal was detected in cotransfected plant protoplasts before the H 2 O 2 -mediated PCD induction because the Cc-cYFP fusion protein is targeted to the mitochondria (see supplemental Fig. S4, for the target BIP2). To test the ability of the purported targets to interact with Cc in an independent heterologous system, BiFC assays were also performed on HEK293T cells. Plant cDNA was cloned into BiFC mammalian vectors nYFP and cYFP (32). HEK293T cells were efficiently cotransfected with both constructs and PCD was induced with 10 M of CPT for 6 h, as reported in Johnson et al. (41).
It had been previously reported that YFP fragments may complement each other with low efficiency, yet still yield fluorescent complexes, even in the absence of a specific interaction (42). Thus, to ensure that the interactions performed by Cc were not the result of spontaneous YFP complementation, several precise controls were designed. In particular, the most appropriate controls for BiFC assays are based on the expression of two fusion proteins that, being expressed in the same cellular compartment, are unable to interact. Therefore, pBiFC-bFosYC155 and pBiFC-bJunYN155 were used as a positive control and pBiFC-bFos⌬ZIPYC155 and pBiFC-bJunYN155 were used as a negative control (43).
Fluorescence results are shown in supplemental Fig. S5. Overall, the interaction between Cc and the 9 targets was also corroborated in human cells. Some of these interactions, like those involving eIF2␥, BiP1, BiP2, GAPDC1, and RD21, occur in the cytoplasm, whereas others like those involving GLY2 and Sm/D1 whose YFP fluorescence overlaps with DAPI staining, are characterized by nucleo-cytoplasmic localization. Interestingly, NRP1-Cc and TCL-Cc complexes take place inside the nucleus.
Notably, apo-Cc needs to be translocated from the cytosol to mitochondria to assemble its heme group and form a holoenzyme. Under homeostatic conditions, the punctuate pattern of fluorescence for the distribution of Cc, following the transfection of HEK293T cells with both the Cc-cYFP vector and empty nYFP vector, indicates mitochondrial localization of Cc (supplemental Fig. S6) (44). In contrast, CPT-treated cells show a diffuse fluorescence pattern, consistent with the release of Cc from mitochondria into the cytosol (supplemental Fig. S6). Transient expression of the Cc-targets fused to nYFP in the BiFC assays was confirmed by immunoblotting with a rabbit anti-EGFP polyclonal antibody, as shown in supplemental Fig. S5. All constructs assayed together with Cc yielded a band of the expected molecular mass for each target.
In vitro Validation of Cc Adducts: SPR Measurements-The interactions between plant Cc and the novel partners presented here were further analyzed through SPR in vitro. Of the nine Cc-targets, GAPDC1, GLY2, NRP1 and TCL were overexpressed as soluble recombinant proteins. Fig. 3 shows the SPR-sensograms resulting from increased flowing concentrations of GLY2, NRP1 or TCL on a Cc-immobilized chip. The background response was subtracted from the sample sensogram to obtain the actual binding response. The Cc- GAPDC1 interaction could not be detected by this technique. Values for dissociation constants (K D ), association and dissociation rate constants (k on and k off , respectively) are shown in supplemental Data 2.

DISCUSSION
Mammalian Cc acts as an electron shuttle in the respiratory chain. In addition, it is a constituent piece of the apoptosome platform during PCD. This moonlighting character of Cc has been underscored in recent studies revealing additional functions of the heme protein (19 -24, 45).
As mentioned previously, during PCD, Cc is released from mitochondria into the cytosol in a wide variety of organisms including yeasts (15), plants (16), flies (17), and mammals (18). Nevertheless, a function for this cytoplasmic pool of Cc has, thus far, been described only in mammals (4,5). This evolutionarily conserved release of Cc, as well as the additional and less-understood functions of mammalian Cc during PCD suggest the existence of a conserved signaling network hovering around Cc. Such would also seem to explain why Cc is a highly conserved protein (46) and, furthermore, why the mitochondria-to-cytosol translocation of the heme protein is a common, evolutionarily conserved event.
Based on a proteomic approach combined with BiFC, 9 Cc interacting proteins have been identified in A. thaliana. These novel Cc-targets are divided into seven main categories, according to their cellular functions (Fig. 4): 1. Protein Folding-Luminal binding proteins BiP1 and BiP2 have been related to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, drought tolerance and leaf senescence (47). Moreover, the overexpression of BiP proteins in tobacco protoplasts increases cell tolerance to ER stress (48). BiP1 and BiP2 are also known to be close homologs of human HSPA5, which has been related to caspase inhibition (49) and the regulation of survival pathways and cell proliferation (50 -52). Furthermore, translocation from the ER to cytoplasm has been previously described under ER stress conditions (51). Notably, HSPA5 is also targeted by Cc in human cells (Martínez-Fá bregas et al., unpublished).
2. Translational Regulation-Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is a heterotrimeric complex formed by eIF2␣, eIF2␤, and eIF2␥ (53). In mammals, the inhibition of protein synthesis enhances the induction of PCD through different stimuli (54). Under apoptotic conditions, PKR phosphorylates eIF2␣, leading to eIF2 dissociation and thereby hindering translation (55), an essential event for autophagy initiation (56). Notably, it was 3. Cell Death-In animal cells, the activation of cysteine proteases is an important step for PCD (57). These enzymes have also been detected in plant cells undergoing PCD (58 -60).
RD21 (Responsive to Dehydration 21) is a cysteine protease synthesized as a 57 kDa inactive precursor which matures into a 33 kDa active form (61). RD21 contains a redox-sensitive catalytic site, GxCGSCW, with two cysteine residues capable of forming a disulfide bond (62). It has been recently proposed that protein disulfide-isomerase-5 (PDI5) sequesters plant cysteine proteases in the protein storage vacuoles of endothelial cells, thereby blocking their protease activity until the onset of PCD. According to yeast two-hybrid assays, PDI5 interacts with RD21 and inhibits recombinant RD21 activity in vitro (63). Hence, PDI5 seems to be involved in regulating the timing of PCD (64).
4. Oxidative Stress-The glyoxalase system consists of two enzymes, GLY1 and GLY2, involved in methylglyoxal (MG) detoxification, though novel glyoxalases have been recently described (65). MG is produced in all living organisms and its levels in plants are enhanced on exposure to different abiotic stresses (66). Excessive MG formation leads to ROS production, causing oxidative stress (67). Increased levels of GLY2 have been detected in mammalian tumor cells and GLY2 inhibitors have been used to slow the growth of tumor cells in vitro (68,69). Moreover, MG has been demonstrated to induce apoptosis in different types of mammalian cells (70 -73).
5. DNA Damage-Nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1)-related proteins (NRP) are well conserved in all kingdoms. In A. thaliana, the nrp1-1 nrp2-1 double loss-of-function mutant is highly sensitive to genotoxic stress and shows increased levels of DNA damage, being essential for cell proliferation (74).
NRP1 is also a homolog of human SET (74), which has been related to DNA repair after single-strand breaks during oxidative stress (75). Nevertheless, this function has not yet been attributed to plant NRP1. Interestingly, SET has been identified as a human Cc target (Martínez-Fá bregas et al., unpublished).
6. Energetic Metabolism-GAPDC1 is homologous to mammal GAPDH, a soluble multitasking protein involved in glycolysis, apoptosis induction, cell signaling, tRNA export and DNA repair, among other functions (76). Recently, new anti-PCD functions for plant GAPDH have begun to emerge (e.g. suppression of reactive oxygen species) (77). Notably, Cc does not target the same protein in human cells, but rather another, ALDOA (Martinez-Fá bregas et al., unpublished), affecting the same metabolite, GAL-3P.
The TREX (transcription/export) complex has a conserved role in coupling transcription to mRNA export in yeast and metazoan. It consists of two export factors, Yra1/ALY/REF and Sub2/UAP56, along with the THO transcription elongation complex (92,93). The A. thaliana genome contains at least one gene (At5g59950, TCL) homologous to Yra1/ALY/ REF and two genes (At5g11170 and At5g11200) homologous to Sub2/UAP56 (94). The existence of the THO complex in plants, as well, underscores the importance of THO-related proteins in the context of plant development.
It is worth mentioning that most of these new Cc-interacting proteins, or their homologs in humans, play an anti-PCD role in plant cells, except in the cases of RD21 and API5. Finally, SPR measurements permitted us to corroborate the in vitro interaction of three targets-GLY2, NRP1, and TCL-with Cc.
In summary, the new data produced regarding the poorly understood process of nonmammalian PCD suggests that Cc targets analogous functions in different organisms. Furthermore, the data points to the conservation of the role of Cc during PCD even in organisms devoid of an apoptosome. This supports the theory proposed by D.R. Green et al. that the PCD signaling role of Cc emerged early in the evolutionary timeline (95). Thus, although the Cc-targets likely vary according to the organism, the results recorded here indicate that cytoplasmic Cc targets processes essential for cell life and may ensure the correct progress of PCD.
Acknowledgments-We thank Dr. A. Orea (Seville, Spain) for her work with fluorescence microscopy and P. Alcá ntara (Seville, Spain) for her technical support. N-YFP and C-YFP vectors were kindly provided by Dr. P. Ciruela (Barcelona, Spain), positive and negative controls for BiFC assays in HEK293T cells were kindly offered by Dr. T.K. Kerppola (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA), pSPYCE and pSPYNE vectors as well as negative controls were contributed by Dr. P.L. Rodríguez (Valencia, Spain). The proteomic analyses were carried out at the "Proteomics Facility UCM-FPCM', a member of the Spanish ProteoRed Network." * This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BFU2009-07190 and BFU2012-31670) and the Regional Government of Andalusia (BIO198). Additional funding for J. Martínez-Fá bregas was provided by a Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation FPI grant (BES-2007-16156). Support for the recording of SPR measurements at Saarland University (Saarbrü cken, Germany) was provided to K. Gonzá lez-Arzola by an IUBMB Wood-Whelam Fellowship. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http:// proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository (96) with the dataset identifier PXD000280 and DOI 10.6019/PXD000280. □ S This article contains supplemental Figs. S1 to S6, Data Files S1 and S2, and Text.