Stocktake Sale on now: wide range of books at up to 70% off!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA04156
REVIEW
Contents Vol 45(11)

Lessons from agri-environmental policies in other countries for dealing with salinity in Australia

A. Weersink A C and A. Wossink B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Food, Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.

B Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8109, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: aweersin@uoguelph.ca

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(11) 1481-1493 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04156
Submitted: 30 July 2004  Accepted: 31 March 2005   Published: 16 December 2005

Abstract

Approaches to environmental policy for the agricultural sector have involved education programs, direct regulations, and market mechanisms. The effectiveness of these policies has varied depending on the characteristics of the environmental issue and incentives facing producers. This paper reviews, and provides examples of, agri-environmental policy options and points out the scenarios under which the instrument would be most effective. The paper concludes with recommendations on determining the policy solutions to the problem of salinity in Australia.

Additional keywords: education, market mechanisms, regulations.


References


Andrews RANL (1998) Environmental regulation and business ‘self-regulation. Policy Sciences 31, 177–197.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 November 2005]

Breembroek JA, Koole B, Poppe KJ, Wossink GAA (1996) Environmental farm accounting: the case of the Dutch nutrients accounting system. Agricultural Systems 51, 29–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 November 2005]

Dobbs TL, Pretty JN (2004) Agri-environmental stewardship schemes and “multifunctionality”. Review of Agricultural Economics 26, 220–237.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 November 2005]

Halberg N, Verschuur G, Goodlass G (2005) Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 105, 195–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 November 2005]

Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 947–969.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 22 November 2005]

United States Department of Agriculture (2004b) Natural Resources Conservation Service, Farm Bill 2002, Conservation Security Program Comprehensive Questions and Answers. July 2004. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/csp/ [verified 22 November 2005]

USEPA (2004) Acid Rain Program 2003 Progress Report. US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/cmprpt/arp03/2003report.pdf [verified 22 November 2005]

Wall E, Weersink A, Swanton C (2001) Agriculture and ISO 14000. Food Policy 26, 35–48.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weersink A, McKitrick R, Nailor M (2001) Voluntary cost share programs: Lessons from economic theory and their application to rural water quality programs. Current Agricultural, Food and Resource Issues. 2, 23–36. open url image1

Weersink A, Livernois J, Shogren J, Shortle J (1998) Economic instruments and environmental policy in agriculture. Canadian Public Policy 24, 309–327. open url image1

Woodward RT (2000) Market-Based Solutions to Environmental Problems. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32, 259–266. open url image1

Wossink GA, Feitshans T (2000) Pesticide policies in the European Union Drake Journal of Agricultural Law. 5, 224–249. open url image1

Wossink A (2004) The Dutch nutrient quota system: past experience and lessons for the future. In ‘Tradeable permits: policy evaluation, design and reform, 97 2004 07’. (Eds T Tietenberg, N Johnstone) pp. 107–131. (OECD: Paris)