Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR23033
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 51(1)

Evaluating predator control using two non-invasive population metrics: a camera trap activity index and density estimation from scat genotyping

Jessica L. Keem https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-0389 A * , Bronwyn A. Hradsky https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0141-020X A , Joe Benshemesh B , Mark Le Pla https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-815X C , Abigail Watkins D , Andrew R. Weeks https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-135X E F , Anthony van Rooyen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1221-7712 F , John Black F and Darren Southwell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-9014 A G
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Quantitative and Applied Ecology Group, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

B National Malleefowl Recovery Group, VIC, Australia.

C Conservation Ecology Centre, Cape Otway, VIC 3233, Australia.

D Parks Victoria Wimmera, Wail, VIC 3414, Australia.

E Bio21 Institute, School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

F Cesar Australia, Brunswick, VIC 3056, Australia.

G Conservation Science Research Group, School of Environmental and Life Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

* Correspondence to: jessica.keem@unimelb.edu.au

Handling Editor: Thomas Prowse

Wildlife Research 51, WR23033 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23033
Submitted: 2 February 2022  Accepted: 27 August 2023  Published: 12 September 2023

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Invasive mammalian predators are a threat to biodiversity and agriculture globally, yet management outcomes for lethal predator control remain difficult to monitor and evaluate. Understanding whether changes in activity indices correspond to true changes in population density will help inform effective monitoring and management programs.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of poison baiting on invasive red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations using two alternative population metrics: fox activity from camera trap surveys and density estimation from scat genetic analysis.

Methods

We conducted before–after control–impact studies in two regions of semi-arid Australia (Wimmera and Mallee) by monitoring paired non-treatment and treatment sites during unbaited and baited periods. We estimated the effects of poison baiting on: (1) a monthly fox activity index, derived from an array of 10 off-road camera traps per site; and (2) fox density. To estimate density, we collected fox scats along 14-km transects, identified individuals using polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers and fitted spatially explicit capture–recapture models.

Key results

Fox activity remained consistently low at all sites except the Mallee non-treatment. The top-ranked models of fox activity and density contained an interaction between treatment and period, with an interactive and additive effect of region, respectively. However, there was little evidence that baiting reduced fox activity or density. In the unbaited period, fox densities ranged from 0.69 (95% CI: 0.47–1.0) to 1.06 (95% CI: 0.74–1.51) foxes km−2 and were similar across regions.

Conclusions

Camera traps have the potential to provide continuous index-based measures of fox populations but may not record sufficient observations to detect change. Indices can also be confounded by variations in animal behaviour. Scat genetic analysis is a viable option for providing direct estimates of population change at specific snapshots in time; however, this approach is considerably more expensive, and large sample sizes may be required if genotyping success is low.

Implications

Our study presents a rare example of multiple concurrent – and non-invasive – monitoring techniques to evaluate the effectiveness of predator control. We highlight the value of rigorous study designs and high-quality density information for designing predator management and monitoring programs.

Keywords: 1080 baiting, activity index, BACI design, density estimation, genetic sampling, Leipoa ocellata, non-invasive sampling, semi-arid, Vulpes vulpes.

References

Allsop SE, Dundas SJ, Adams PJ, Kreplins TL, Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2017) Reduced efficacy of baiting programs for invasive species: some mechanisms and management implications. Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 240-257.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Anile S, Ragni B, Randi E, Mattucci F, Rovero F (2014) Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods. Journal of Zoology 293, 252-261.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benshemesh J, Stokie P, Thompson D, Irvin J, Macfarlane N, Willis K, Willis C, Cattanach P, Bannerman M, Davies S (2014) Motion-sensitive cameras for monitoring a range of animals in malleefowl monitoring sites. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th National Malleefowl Forum’. pp. 151–161. (Printak Pty Ltd: Adelaide, South Australia)

Benshemesh J, Southwell DM, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Hauser CE, Rumpff L, Bode M, Burnard T, Wintle BA (2018) The national malleefowl monitoring effort: citizen scientists, databases and adaptive management. In ‘Monitoring threatened species and ecological communities’. (Eds S Legge, DB Lindenmayer, NM Robinson, BC Scheele, DM Southwell, BA Wintle) pp. 389–398. (CSIRO Publishing: Australia)

Berghout M (2001) The ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the central tablelands of New South Wales. PhD Thesis, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Berry O, Sarre SD, Farrington L, Aitken N (2007) Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: the case of feral foxes in Tasmania. Wildlife Research 34, 1-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Berry O, Algar D, Angus J, Hamilton N, Hilmer S, Sutherland D (2012) Genetic tagging reveals a significant impact of poison baiting on an invasive species. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76, 729-739.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Blacket MJ, Robin C, Good RT, Lee SF, Miller AD (2012) Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments – an efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Molecular Ecology Resources 12, 456-463.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Blasco-Moreno A, Pérez-Casany M, Puig P, Morante M, Castells E (2019) What does a zero mean? Understanding false, random and structural zeros in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 949-959.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64, 377-385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brinkman TJ, Schwartz MK, Person DK, Pilgrim KL, Hundertmark KJ (2010) Effects of time and rainfall on PCR success using DNA extracted from deer fecal pellets. Conservation Genetics 11, 1547-1552.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bureau of Meteorology (2020a) Climate statistics for Australian locations: Nhill. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_078086.shtml [accessed 21 July 2020]

Bureau of Meteorology (2020b) Climate statistics for Australian locations: Ouyen. Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_076047.shtml [accessed 21 July 2020]

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag: New York) doi:10.1007/b97636

Calhoun JB, Casby JU (1958) Calculation of home range and density of small mammals. Public Health Monograph 55, 1-24.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |

Carter A, Luck GW, Mcdonald SP (2012) Ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in an agricultural landscape. 2. Home range and movements. Australian Mammalogy 34, 175-187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carter A, Potts JM, Roshier DA (2019) Toward reliable population density estimates of partially marked populations using spatially explicit mark–resight methods. Ecology and Evolution 9, 2131-2141.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Clayton R, Cowan P (2010) Management of animal and plant pests in New Zealand – patterns of control and monitoring by regional agencies. Wildlife Research 37, 360-371.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Coman BJ, Robinson J, Beaumont C (1991) Home range, dispersal and density of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes L.) in central Victoria. Wildlife Research 18, 215-223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cutler TL, Swann DE (1999) Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006) 27, 571-581.
| Google Scholar |

Daniels MJ, Beaumont MA, Johnson PJ, Balharry D, Macdonald DW, Barratt E (2001) Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 146-161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Doherty TS, Ritchie EG (2017) Stop jumping the gun: a call for evidence-based invasive predator management. Conservation Letters 10, 15-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Doherty TS, Glen AS, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR (2016) Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 11261-11265.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Efford MG (2011) Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of data from area searches. Ecology 92, 2202-2207.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Efford MG (2019) Non-circular home ranges and the estimation of population density. Ecology 100, e02580.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Efford MG (2020) secr: spatially explicit capture–recapture models. R package version 4.3. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=secr

Efford MG, Boulanger J (2019) Fast evaluation of study designs for spatially explicit capture–recapture. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 1529-1535.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Efford MG, Borchers DL, Byrom AE (2009) Density estimation by spatially explicit capture–recapture: likelihood-based methods. In ‘Modeling demographic processes in marked populations’. (Eds DL Thomson, EG Cooch, MJ Conroy) pp. 255–269. (Springer US: Boston, MA)

Efford MG, Dawson DK, Jhala YV, Qureshi Q (2016) Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture–recapture. Ecography 39, 676-688.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

FastStone (2020) FastStone Image Viewer. Available at https://www.faststone.org/. [accessed 24 October 2020]

Findlay MA, Briers RA, White PJC (2020) Component processes of detection probability in camera-trap studies: understanding the occurrence of false-negatives. Mammal Research 65, 167-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fleming PJS, Ballard G, Reid NCH, Tracey JP (2017) Invasive species and their impacts on agri-ecosystems: issues and solutions for restoring ecosystem processes. The Rangeland Journal 39, 523-545.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Foster RJ (2008) The ecology of jaguars in a human-influenced landscape. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, England, United Kingdom.

Francisco LV, Langsten AA, Mellersh CS, Neal CL, Ostrander EA (1996) A class of highly polymorphic tetranucleotide repeats for canine genetic mapping. Mammalian Genome 7, 359-362.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gentle M (2005) Factors affecting the efficiency of fox baiting practices on the central tablelands of New South Wales. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Gentle M, Speed J, Allen BL, Harris S, Haapakoski H, Bell K (2017) The longevity of para-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) wild dog baits and the implications for effective and safe baiting campaigns. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 24, 12338-12346.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Geyle HM, Stevens M, Duffy R, Greenwood L, Nimmo DG, Sandow D, Thomas B, White J, Ritchie EG (2020) Evaluation of camera placement for detection of free-ranging carnivores; implications for assessing population changes. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 1, e12018.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gopalaswamy AM, Royle JA, Delampady M, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, Macdonald DW (2012) Density estimation in tiger populations: combining information for strong inference. Ecology 93, 1741-1751.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Greentree C, Saunders G, Mcleod L, Hone J (2000) Lamb predation and fox control in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 935-943.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Güthlin D, Storch I, Küchenhoff H (2014a) Is it possible to individually identify red foxes from photographs? Wildlife Society Bulletin 38, 205-210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Güthlin D, Storch I, Küchenhoff H (2014b) Toward reliable estimates of abundance: comparing index methods to assess the abundance of a mammalian predator. PLoS ONE 9, e94537.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Harris DB, Macdonald DW (2007) Interference competition between introduced black rats and endemic galápagos rice rats. Ecology 88, 2330-2344.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hartig F (2020) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package 0.3.2.0. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/index.html

Hauser CE, Southwell D, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Rumpff L, Benshemesh J, Burnard T, van Hespen R, Wright J, Wintle B, Bode M (2019) Adaptive management informs conservation and monitoring of Australia’s threatened malleefowl. Biological Conservation 233, 31-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holmes NG, Dickens HF, Parker HL, Binns MM, Mellersh CS, Sampson J (1995) Eighteen canine microsatellites. Animal Genetics 26, 132-133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hopkins HL, Kennedy ML (2004) An assessment of indices of relative and absolute abundance for monitoring populations of small mammals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 1289-1296.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hradsky BA, Robley A, Alexander R, Ritchie EG, York A, Di Stefano J (2017) Human-modified habitats facilitate forest-dwelling populations of an invasive predator, Vulpes vulpes. Scientific Reports 7, 12291.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hradsky BA, Kelly LT, Robley A, Wintle BA (2019) FoxNet: an individual-based model framework to support management of an invasive predator, the red fox. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 1460-1470.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hunter DO, Lagisz M, Leo V, Nakagawa S, Letnic M (2018) Not all predators are equal: a continent-scale analysis of the effects of predator control on Australian mammals. Mammal Review 48, 108-122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Immell D, Anthony RG (2008) Estimation of black bear abundance using a discrete DNA sampling device. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 324-330.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Keem JL, Hradsky B, Benshemesh J, Le Pla M, Watkins A, Weeks AR, van Rooyen A, Black J, Southwell D (2022) Data from: Evaluating predator control using two non-invasive population metrics: a camera trap activity index and density estimation from scat genotyping. [Dataset]. Zenodo. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5883417

Kolowski JM, Oley J, McShea WJ (2021) High-density camera trap grid reveals lack of consistency in detection and capture rates across space and time. Ecosphere 12, e03350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lazenby BT, Mooney NJ, Dickman CR (2014) Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania. Wildlife Research 41, 407-420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Le Pla MN, Birnbaum EK, Rees MW, Hradsky BA, Weeks AR, Van Rooyen A, Pascoe JH (2022) Genetic sampling and an activity index indicate contrasting outcomes of lethal control for an invasive predator. Austral Ecology 47, 1062-1076.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lonsinger RC, Lukacs PM, Gese EM, Knight RN, Waits LP (2018) Estimating densities for sympatric kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) using noninvasive genetic sampling. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96, 1080-1089.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, Poorter M (2000) ‘100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database.’ (Invasive Species Specialist Group: Auckland, New Zealand) doi:10.1525/9780520948433-159

Magnusson A, Skaug H, Nielsen A, Berg C, Kristensen K, Maechler M, Bentham K van, Bolker B, Lüdecke D, Lenth R, O’Brien J, Geyer CJ, McGillycuddy M, Brooks M (2021) glmmTMB: generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmmTMB [accessed 22 August 2021]

Mann GKH, O’Riain MJ, Parker DM (2015) The road less travelled: assessing variation in mammal detection probabilities with camera traps in a semi-arid biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation 24, 531-545.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Manning AD, Andrewartha TA, Blencowe A, Brewer K, Gordon IJ, Evans MJ (2021) Bettering the devil you know: can we drive predator adaptation to restore native fauna? Conservation Science and Practice 3, e447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marks CA, Bloomfield TE (1999) Distribution and density estimates for urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Melbourne: implications for rabies control. Wildlife Research 26, 763-775.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marks CA, Gigliotti F, Busana F (2002) Estimated 1080 dose rate for the M-44 ejector for the control of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 29, 291-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marks CA, Gigliotti F, McPhee S, Piggott MP, Taylor A, Glen AS (2009) DNA genotypes reveal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance, response to lethal control and limitations of contemporary survey techniques. Wildlife Research 36, 647-658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marlow NJ (1992) Ecology of the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the arid zone. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales.

Marlow NJ, Thomson PC, Algar D, Rose K, Kok NE, Sinagra JA (2000) Demographic characteristics and social organisation of a population of red foxes in a rangeland area in Western Australia. Wildlife Research 27, 457-464.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McLeod R (2004) ‘Counting the cost: impact of invasive animals in Australia.’ (Pest Animal Control Co-operative Research Centre: Canberra, Australia)

Meek PD, Ballard G, Claridge A, Kays R, Moseby K, O’Brien T, O’Connell A, Sanderson J, Swann DE, Tobler M, Townsend S (2014) Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 2321-2343.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS, Meek PD, Ballard G-A, Fleming PJS (2015) The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 37, 13-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morin PA, McCarthy M (2007) Highly accurate SNP genotyping from historical and low-quality samples. Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 937-946.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morin DJ, Waits LP, McNitt DC, Kelly MJ (2018) Efficient single-survey estimation of carnivore density using fecal DNA and spatial capture–recapture: a bobcat case study. Population Ecology 60, 197-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moruzzi TL, Fuller TK, DeGraaf RM, Brooks RT, Li W (2002) Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distribution. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006) 30, 380-386.
| Google Scholar |

Moseby K, Nano T, Southgate R (2012) ‘Tales in the sand: a guide to identifying Australian arid zone fauna using spoor and other signs.’ 3rd edn. (Ecological Horizons: South Australia)

Murphy MA, Kendall KC, Robinson A, Waits LP (2007) The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification. Conservation Genetics 8, 1219-1224.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, 133-142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nakashima Y, Fukasawa K, Samejima H (2018) Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 735-744.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, van der Wal R (2015) Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner’s perspective. Ambio 44, 624-635.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Niedballa J, Sollmann R, Courtiol A, Wilting A (2016) camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 1457-1462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Norbury G (2001) Conserving dryland lizards by reducing predator-mediated apparent competition and direct competition with introduced rabbits. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 1350-1361.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Palmer MS, Swanson A, Kosmala M, Arnold T, Packer C (2018) Evaluating relative abundance indices for terrestrial herbivores from large-scale camera trap surveys. African Journal of Ecology 56, 791-803.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537-2539.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pech RP, Sinclair ARE, Newsome AE, Catling PC (1992) Limits to predator regulation of rabbits in Australia: evidence from predator-removal experiments. Oecologia 89, 102-112.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Piggott MP (2004) Effect of sample age and season of collection on the reliability of microsatellite genotyping of faecal DNA. Wildlife Research 31, 485-493.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Piggott MP, Taylor AC (2003) Extensive evaluation of faecal preservation and DNA extraction methods in Australian native and introduced species. Australian Journal of Zoology 51, 341-355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Piggott MP, Wilson R, Banks SC, Marks CA, Gigliotti F, Taylor AC (2008) Evaluating exotic predator control programs using non-invasive genetic tagging. Wildlife Research 35, 617-624.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Proffitt KM, Garrott R, Gude JA, Hebblewhite M, Jimenez B, Paterson JT, Rotella J (2020) Integrated carnivore-ungulate management: a case study in West-Central Montana. Wildlife Monographs 206, 1-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ramsey DSL, Caley PA, Robley A (2015) Estimating population density from presence-absence data using a spatially explicit model: estimating density from presence-absence data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79, 491-499.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2022) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ R Core Team.

Reddiex B, Forsyth DM, McDonald-Madden E, Einoder LD, Griffioen PA, Chick RR, Robley AJ (2006) Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring. Wildlife Research 33, 691-709.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robinson OJ, Fefferman NH, Lockwood JL (2013) How to effectively manage invasive predators to protect their native prey. Biological Conservation 165, 146-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rodgers TW, Giacalone J, Heske EJ, Janečka JE, Phillips CA, Schooley RL (2014) Comparison of noninvasive genetics and camera trapping for estimating population density of ocelots (Leopardus Pardalis) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Tropical Conservation Science 7, 690-705.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowcliffe JM, Field J, Turvey ST, Carbone C (2008) Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1228-1236.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Royle JA, Young KV (2008) A hierarchical model for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology 89, 2281-2289.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ruell EW, Riley SPD, Douglas MR, Pollinger JP, Crooks KR (2009) Estimating bobcat population sizes and densities in a fragmented urban landscape using noninvasive capture–recapture sampling. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 129-135.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sadlier LMJ, Webbon CC, Baker PJ, Harris S (2004) Methods of monitoring red foxes Vulpes vulpes and badgers Meles meles: are field signs the answer? Mammal Review 34, 75-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Šálek M, Kreisinger J, Sedláček F, Albrecht T (2010) Do prey densities determine preferences of mammalian predators for habitat edges in an agricultural landscape? Landscape and Urban Planning 98, 86-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Saunders G, McLeod L (2007) ‘Improving fox management strategies in Australia.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra, Australia)

Saunders GR, Gentle MN, Dickman CR (2010) The impacts and managezment of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia: impact and management of foxes in Australia. Mammal Review 40, 181-211.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schaus J, Uzal A, Gentle LK, Baker PJ, Bearman-Brown L, Bullion S, Gazzard A, Lockwood H, North A, Reader T, Scott DM, Sutherland CS, Yarnell RW (2020) Application of the Random Encounter Model in citizen science projects to monitor animal densities. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 6, 514-528.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Siddig AA, Ellison AM, Jackson S (2015) Calibrating abundance indices with population size estimators of red back salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) in a New England forest. PeerJ 3, e952.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sollmann R, Mohamed A, Samejima H, Wilting A (2013) Risky business or simple solution – relative abundance indices from camera-trapping. Biological Conservation 159, 405-412.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Baker PJ, White PCL, Harris S (2011) Behavioral and spatial analysis of extraterritorial movements in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Journal of Mammalogy 92, 190-199.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Southwell D, McCowen S, Mewett O, Hennecke B (2011) Understanding the drivers and barriers towards adoption of innovative canid control technologies: a review. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: report prepared for the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra.

Spencer EE, Newsome TM, Dickman CR (2017) Prey selection and dietary flexibility of three species of mammalian predator during an irruption of non-cyclic prey. Royal Society Open Science 4, 170317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Stephens PA, Pettorelli N, Barlow J, Whittingham MJ, Cadotte MW (2015) Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson JA, Fleming PJS (1994) Evaluation of the efficacy of 1080 poisoning of red foxes using visitation to non-toxic baits as an index of fox abundance. Wildlife Research 21, 27-39.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson GG, Thompson SA, Bengsen A (2019) The value of camera traps in monitoring a feral-cat and fox reduction program. Wildlife Research 46, 599-609.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Towerton AL, Penman TD, Kavanagh RP, Dickman CR (2011) Detecting pest and prey responses to fox control across the landscape using remote cameras. Wildlife Research 38, 208-220.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Towerton AL, Dickman CR, Kavanagh RP, Penman TD (2016) Control of the red fox in remnant forest habitats. Wildlife Research 43, 169-177.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Trewhella WJ, Harris S, McAllister FE (1988) Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 423-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Triggs B (2004) ‘Tracks, scats and other traces: a field guide to Australian mammals.’ (Oxford University Press: South Melbourne, Australia)

van Bommel L, Johnson CN (2012) Good dog! Using livestock guardian dogs to protect livestock from predators in Australia’s extensive grazing systems. Wildlife Research 39, 220-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

van Hespen R (2015) Designing a camera trap monitoring program to detect changes in fox abundance. Masters Thesis, School of BioSciences: The University of Melbourne.

van Hespen R, Hauser CE, Benshemesh J, Rumpff L, Monfort JJL (2019) Designing a camera trap monitoring program to measure efficacy of invasive predator management. Wildlife Research 46, 154-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

van Polanen Petel AM, Marks CA, Morgan DG (2001) Bait palatability influences the caching behaviour of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 28, 395-401.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (2005a) Ecological vegetation classes: Wimmera bioregion. The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment. Available at https://www.environment.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/48759/Wim_EVCs_combined.pdf

Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (2005b) Ecological vegetation classes: Murray Mallee bioregion. The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment. Available at https://www.environment.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/48734/MuM_EVCs_combined.pdf

Vine SJ, Crowther MS, Lapidge SJ, Dickman CR, Mooney N, Piggott MP, English AW (2009) Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildlife Research 36, 436-446.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Molecular Ecology 10, 249-256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Walsh JC, Wilson KA, Benshemesh J, Possingham HP (2012) Unexpected outcomes of invasive predator control: the importance of evaluating conservation management actions. Animal Conservation 15, 319-328.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wandeler P, Funk SM (2006) Short microsatellite DNA markers for the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 98-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wearn OR, Glover-Kapfer P (2019) Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods. Royal Society Open Science 6, 181748.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wegge P, Bakke BB, Odden M, Rolstad J (2019) DNA from scats combined with capture–recapture modeling: a promising tool for estimating the density of red foxes – a pilot study in a boreal forest in southeast Norway. Mammal Research 64, 147-154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations: modeling, estimation and decision making. Available at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/5200256 [accessed 24 January 2022]

Wilson DJ, Mulvey RL, Clarke DA, Reardon JT (2017) Assessing and comparing population densities and indices of skinks under three predator management regimes. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 41, 84-97.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Woinarski JCZ, Burbidge AA, Harrison PL (2015) Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 4531-4540.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wyatt KB, Campos PF, Gilbert MTP, Kolokotronis S-O, Hynes WH, DeSalle R, Daszak P, MacPhee RDE, Greenwood AD (2008) Historical mammal extinction on Christmas Island (Indian Ocean) correlates with introduced infectious disease. PLoS ONE 3, e3602.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |