Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
EDITORIAL

The challenge of providing medical follow-up for sexual assault victims: can we predict who will attend? A retrospective cross-sectional study

L. M. Healey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-861X A * , J. L. Hutchinson B , M. N. Pfeiffer C , L. Garton A B , B. Hatten A , M. Dobbie C , L. Simpson D and D. J. Templeton A B C E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Sexual Health Medicine, Community Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

B The Kirby Institute, University of NSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

C Sexual Assault Medical Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

D Sexual Assault Counselling Service, Community Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

E Central Clinical School, The Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.


Handling Editor: Christopher Fairley

Sexual Health 20(5) 475-477 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22180
Submitted: 17 November 2022  Accepted: 21 July 2023  Published: 21 August 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

This study examined the impact of a pathway between a sexual assault service and a public sexual health service developed to improve rates of post-sexual assault medical follow-up. Follow-up attendances improved in the first 12 months of the pathway (2014) compared with attendances in 2013 (17.8% vs 9.6%, P = 0.01). Factors independently associated with attendance at follow-up were being prescribed HIV post-exposure prophylaxis and knowing the assailant. Those with physical injuries were less likely to attend. The prevalence of sexually transmissible infections in this cohort, 8% at the acute presentation and 5% at follow-up, suggests a need for alternatives to clinic-based follow-up.

Keywords: community health, gay men, HIV/AIDS, sexual violence, STIs.

References

Long L, Butler B. Sexual assault. Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 20: 87-93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mein JK, Palmer CM, Shand MC, Templeton DJ, Parek V, Mobbs M, Haig K, Huffam SE, Young L. Management of acute adult sexual assault. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 226-230 PMID:.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Darnell D, Peterson R, Berliner L, Stewart T, Russo J, Whiteside L, Zatzick D. Factors associated with follow-up attendance among rape victims seen in acute medical care. Psychiatry 2015; 78: 89-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holmes MM, Resnick HS, Frampton D. Follow-up of sexual assault victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 336-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ackerman DR, Sugar NF, Fine DN, Eckert LO. Sexual assault victims: factors associated with follow-up care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1653-1659 PMID:.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gilmore AK, Jaffe AE, Hahn CK, Ridings LE, Gill-Hopple K, Lazenby GB, Flanagan JC. Intimate partner violence and completion of post-sexual assault medical forensic examination follow-up screening. J Interpers Violence 2021; 36: 5991-6004 PMID:.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 1993; 80: 27-38.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ogale Y, Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, Toskin I, Narasimhan M. Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4: e001349 PMID:.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |