Abstract
Goal, Scope and Background
Temperature and soil moisture content are important environmental variables in bioremediation technologies. Optimizing these variables in-situ would enhance and maintain remediation of hazardous wastes during cold winter seasons or in cold regions and may lead to reduced maintenance and/or cost. The effect of elevated temperature and soil moisture on bioremediation efficiency was investigated using a laboratory mesocosm approach. Selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phenols degradation in contaminated flooded soils, commonly found in Superfund sites situated in coastal plains sediments/soils, were evaluated in the mesocosms.
Material and Methods
Four laboratory mesocosm treatments in triplicate simulating in-situ bioremediation of contaminated site soils using an immobilized microbe bioreactor system, i.e., bioplug, were established to evaluate temperature effects. Elevated temperature treatments of site soils with and without contaminant-specific microorganisms were established at a temperature of 42±2°C. Similarly, treatment of site soils with and without contaminant-specific microorganisms were established at an ambient temperature of 21±1°C. Composite samples were analyzed for selected PAHs and chlorinated phenols to determine rates of mineralization and overall remediation efficiency for different temperature regimes.
Results
Mesocosm studies indicated that the high temperature inoculated treatment demonstrated a significant reduction in mean total PAHs and total phenols with a kinetic rate (KR) of 76±13 ng g−1 d−1 in 49 days (approximately 84% reduction; p<0.01) The KR for low temperature inoculated treatment was 54±1 ng g−1 d−1 in 49 days (approximately 66% reduction; p<0.01). High temperature non-inoculated mesocosms exhibited significant mineralization of all constituents with KR of 15±6 ng g−1 d−1 (approximately 65% reduction; p<0.01) in 49d compared to 54% reduction for low temperature non-inoculated treatment with KR of 12±3 ng g−1 d−1 (p=0.1794). Phenol compounds in inoculated treatments were also significantly reduced (65%, p<0.01) at elevated temperatures compared to ambient (52%, p<0.01).
Discussion
Increased bioavailability and desorption were noted for elevated temperature and moisture in the soil laboratory mesocosms simulating a field in situ remediation protocol. This protocol employing the application of immobilized microflora indicated that in situ systems provide an economical advantage if optimal elevated temperature and moisture are controlled properly. Results also suggested that temperature and moisture optimization needs to be combined with efficient nutrients delivery systems for impacted soils/sediments.
Conclusions
The study demonstrated that temperature and soil moisture contents are important factors in the success of in-situ bioremediation techniques at hazardous waste sites situated in a coastal zone. Kinetic rates were significantly enhanced to remediate known recalcitrant compounds (PAHs and phenols) in aged soil.
Recommendations and Perspectives
The placement of a preferred microbial consortia such as an immobilized microbial population in an entrained bioreactor, i.e., bioplug, can significantly reduce constituents of concern in a timely manner for contaminated soils/sediments. However, frequent monitoring of the soil temperature, moisture content, nutrient level, and dissolved oxygen is necessary to achieve predictable kinetic rates of mineralization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander M (1999): Biodegradation and Bioremediation. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, California
Ammann PR, Koch GS (1993): Technical and economic analysis in the development of bioremediation processes. Remediation Journal 4, 115–128
APHA (1998): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water (20th ed). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Bento FM, Camargo FAO, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2005): Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with desel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresource Technology 96, 1049–1055
Cannavo P, Richaume A, LaFolie F (2004): Fate of nitrogen and carbon in the vadose zone: In-situ and laboratory measurements of seasonal variations in aerobic respiratory and denitrifying activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 463–478
Dibble JT, Bartha R (1979): Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. Appl Environ Mirobiol 37, 729–739
Gregor M, Wakeham SG, Fagabeli J (2003): Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and black carbon in sediments of a remote Alpine Lake Planina, NW Slovenia. Environ Toxicol Chem 22, 1009–1016
Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1995): Effect of aging of chemical in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 29, 537–545
Ho WC, Ko WH (1985): Soil microbiostasis: Effect of invironmental and edaphic factors. Soil Biol Biochem 17, 167–170
Johannes A, Leonard S, Jan D (1997): Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61, 121–135
Lee DW, Portier RJ (1999): In-Situ Bioremediation of Amine-and Glycol-Contaminated Soils Using Low-Intervention Methods. Remediation Journal 9, 117–132
Lehmann V (1998): Bioremediation: A solution for polluted soils in the South. Biotechnol & Development Monitor 34, 12–17
Loehr RC (1992): Bioremediation of PAH compounds incontaminated soil. Hydrocarbon contaminated soils and ground water. In: Calabrese EJ, Kostechi PT (eds), Proceedings 1st Annual West Coast Conference Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils Ground Water, Feb 1990, Newport Beach, CA. Vol. 1. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea MI, pp 213–222
Morville S, Scheyer A, Mirabel P, Millet M (2006): Spatial and Geographical Variations of Urban, Suburban and Rural Atmospheric Concentrations of Phenols and Nitrophenols. Env Sci Pollut Res 13, 83–89
Neff JM (1979): Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon in the Aquatic Environment. Applied Science, London, UK
Otte MP, Comeau Y, Samson R, Greer CW (1999): Enhancement of Pentacholorophenol biodegradation using organic and inorganic support. Bioremediation Journal 3, 35–45
Parr JF, Sikora LJ, Burge WD (1983): Factors affecting the degradation and inactivation of waste constituents in soils. In: Parr JF, Marsh PB, Kla JM (eds), Land Treatment of Hazardous Wastes. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ
Portier RJ (1994): Remediation of mixed wastes in soil by combined biological and chelation technologies. Proceedings 87th Annual. Mgt Air Waste Mgmt Assoc, Vol. 13
Texas Research Institute, Inc. (1982): Enhancing the microbiological degradation of underground gasoline by increasing available oxygen. Report to the American Petroleum Institute Washington DC
Trably E, Patureau D (2006): Successful Treatment of Low PAH-Contaminated Sewage Sludge in Aerobic Bioreactors. Env Sci Pollut Res 13, 170–176
USDA: 〈www.nrcs.usda.gov〉. Natural Resources Conservation Services, US Department of Agriculture
U.S. EPA (1985): Handbook for remedial action at waste disposal sites. Revised. EPA/625/6-85/006
Vaajasaari K, Joutti A (2006): Field-Scale Assessment of Phytotreatment of Soil Contaminated with Weathered Hydrocarbons and Heavy Metals. J Soils Sediments 6, 128–136
Walworth JL, Reynolds CM (1995): Bioremediation of a petroleum contaminated cryic soil: effects of phosphorus, nitrogen, and temperature. J Soil Contam 4, 299–310
Wang Z, Fingas M (1999): Identification of the source(s) of unknown spilled oils. International oil spill conference, American Petroleum Institute, pp. 162
White JC, Alexander M, Pignatello JJ (1999): Enhancing the bioavailability of organic compounds sequestered in soil and aquifer solids. Environ Toxicol Chem 18, 182–187
Wise DL, Torantolo DJ (1994): Remediation engineering of hazardous waste contaminated soil. Marcel Dekker Inc., NY
Yerushalmi L, Rocheleau S, Cimpoia R, Sarrazin M, Sunahara G, Peisajovich A, Leclair G, Guiot SR (2003): Enhanced Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Bioremediation Journal 7, 37–51
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ESS-Submission Editor: Dr. Teresa Cutright (tcutright@uakron.edu)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iqbal, J., Metosh-Dickey, C. & Portier, R.J. Temperature effects on bioremediation of PAHs and PCP contaminated south Louisiana soils: A laboratory mesocosm study. J Soils Sediments 7, 153–158 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.01.204
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.01.204