Skip to main content
Log in

The Fraud Triangle revisited

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article revisits the Fraud Triangle, an explanatory framework for financial fraud, originally developed by the American criminologist Donald Cressey from his interviews with embezzlers. First of all, we describe several developmental cornerstones of the Fraud Triangle. Its recent theoretical and practical application is reconsidered. In accordance with the three elements – motivation, opportunity, rationalization – and on the basis of our empirical study of 13 company fraudsters in Austria and Switzerland, we illustrate some within-company measures, which may contribute to a low fraud risk corporate culture. Although opportunity is necessary but not a sufficient condition for ‘upperworld’ criminal offences, our respondents regard the perceived pressures they experienced as salient. Rather than rationalizations, there is a ‘fraud-inhibiting inner voice’ before the crime, which normally deters an individual from fraudulent behaviour. This inner voice becomes quieter over time until the fraud occurs; at least in their cases. Our interviewees argue that all Fraud Triangle elements – including the inner voice – are highly influenced by the corporate culture in their companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, W.S. and Albrecht, C.O. (2004) Fraud Examination and Prevention. Mason: South-Western Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1961) Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P. and Hare, R.D. (2007) Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M.L., Madensen, T.D. and Eck, J.E. (2009) White-collar crime from an opportunity perspective. In: S.S. Simpson and D. Weisburd (eds.) The Criminology of White-collar Crime. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 175–193.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P. and Klein, U. (2006) Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review 55 (2): 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann, K.-D. and Werle, M. (2006) Addressing crime in companies: First findings from a global survey of economic crime. British Journal of Criminology 46 (6): 1128–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. (2012) The Hour Between Dog and Wolf: Risk-Taking, Gut Feelings and the Biology of Boom and Bust. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.W. (1987) Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology 93 (2): 406–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.W. (1989) The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-collar Crime, 2nd edn. New York: St. Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.W. (1992) Crime and money: Motivation and opportunity in a monetarized economy. The American Behavioral Scientist 35 (6): 827–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.W. (2001) The causes of white-collar crime and the validity of explanation in the social sciences. In: S.-A. Lindgren (ed.) White-collar Crime Research: Old Views and Future Potentials. Stockholm: National Council for Crime Prevention, pp. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D.R. (1950) The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review 15 (6): 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D.R. (1953) Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, R.D. (1952) Application and verification of the differential association theory. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 43 (1): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, R.D. (1954) The differential association theory and compulsive crimes. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 45 (1): 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croall, H. (2001) Understanding White Collar Crime. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhami, M.K. (2007) White-collar prisoners’ perceptions of audience reaction. Deviant Behavior 28 (1): 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donegan, J.J. and Ganon, M.W. (2008) Strain, differential association, and coercion: Insights from the criminology literature on causes of accountant's misconduct. Accounting and the Public Interest 8 (1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorminey, J.W., Fleming, A.S., Kranacher, M.-J. and Riley, R.A. (2010) Beyond the fraud triangle: Enhancing deterrence of economic crimes. The CPA Journal 80 (7): 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. (2005) Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80 (2): 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. (2011a) Fraud and recessions: Views from fraudsters and fraud managers. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 39 (3): 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. (2011b) Learning from fraudsters’ accounts of their offending. Prison Service Journal 194: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, T.W., Skalak, S.L. and Clayton, M.M. (2006) A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstraw-White, J. (2012) White-collar Crime: Accounts of Offending Behaviour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (2008) Business ethics and moral motivation: A criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4): 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M.A. and Malgwi, C.A. (2006) Playing the ponies: A $5 million embezzlement case. Journal of Education for Business 82 (1): 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, P.M., Heith, C. and Mullins, C.W. (2010) Gender, identity, and accounts: How white collar offenders do gender when making sense of their crimes. Justice Quarterly 28 (1): 46–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaSalle, R.E. (2007) Effects of the fraud triangle on students’ risk assessments. Journal of Accounting Education 25 (1/2): 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2002) Suite justice or sweet charity? Some explorations of shaming and incapacitating business fraudsters. Punishment & Society 4 (2): 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2008) The Phantom Capitalists: The Organization and Control of Long-firm Fraud, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2010a) Individual differences and white-collar crime. In: P. Wilcox and F.T. Cullen (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Criminological Theory. London: Sage Publications, pp. 469–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2010b) Serious tax fraud and non-compliance: A review of evidence on the differential impact of criminal and noncriminal proceedings. Criminology & Public Policy 9 (3): 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. and Burrows, J. (2008) Measuring the impact of fraud in the UK: A conceptual and empirical journey. British Journal of Criminology 48 (3): 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loebbecke, J.K., Eining, M.M. and Willingham, J.J. (1989) Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y.I. and Wang, M.L. (2009) Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research 7 (2): 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden, R. and Edwards, R. (2005) Internal controls for the small business: Skimming and the fraud triangle. Internal Auditing 20 (1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5 (6): 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, G. (1974) Embezzlement without problems. British Journal of Criminology 14 (1): 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. and Viswesvaran, C. (2001) Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (1/2): 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, N.L. (2012) The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white-collar crime. Crime & Delinquency 58 (3): 362–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1996) Dirty Business: Exploring Corporate Misconduct. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (2000) Suite violence: Why managers murder and corporations kill. Crime, Law and Social Change 33 (3): 243–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, S.H. (1941) Embezzlement: Pathological basis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 32 (4): 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, M.B., Albrecht, W.S. and Cherrington, D.J. (1980) Auditors and the detection of fraud: The authors provide a unique fraud-risk-evaluation questionnaire. The Journal of Accountancy 149 (5): 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Y. and Smith, R.G. (2003) Gambling as a motivation for the commission of financial crime. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 256: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnatterly, K. (2003) Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal 24 (7): 587–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N. and Hochstetler, A. (2006) Choosing White-collar Crime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slapper, G. and Tombs, S. (1999) Corporate Crime. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J.C. (1959) A study of incarcerated white-collar offenders. In: G. Geis (ed.) White-collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, E. (1977) White collar criminals. Journal of Social Issues 33 (4): 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E.H. (1940) White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review 5 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E.H. (1941) Crime and business. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 217 (1): 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E.H. and Cressey, D.R. (1960) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G.M. and Matza, D. (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review 22 (6): 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. and Waring, E. (2001) White-collar Crime and Criminal Careers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (1992) The problem of white-collar crime motivation. In: K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds.) White-collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston: Northeastern University Press, pp. 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willott, S., Griffin, C. and Torrance, M. (2001) Snakes and ladders: Upper-middle class male offenders talk about economic crime. Criminology 39 (2): 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, A. (2000) The problem-centered interview. Qualitative Social Research 1 (1), Article 22.

  • Wolfe, D.T. and Hermanson, D.R. (2004) The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal 74 (12): 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietz, D. (1981) Women Who Embezzle or Defraud: A Study of Convicted Felons. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of 13 convicted Swiss and Austrian fraudsters, the support of judicial agency staff in Switzerland and Austria, forensic experts through several conversations as well as the ACFE Switzerland Chapter. As usual, all matters of fact and interpretation remain the responsibility of the Authors. This research was funded through a 1-year grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), which did not influence the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data; nor the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication. In any event, they are an apolitical scientific body.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Schuchter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuchter, A., Levi, M. The Fraud Triangle revisited. Secur J 29, 107–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1

Keywords

Navigation