Skip to main content
Log in

Urban sprawl, population density, and crime: an examination of contemporary migration trends and crime in suburban and rural neighborhoods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

This study examines the effects of urban sprawl and population density on crime in suburban and rural municipalities. It is posited that population density provides additional context to macro-level crime research, potentially impacting the vitality of neighborhoods’ social institutions. Three models were created using data from the 2000 and 2010 US Census and Uniform Crime Reports for 142 municipalities, measuring the effect of municipal characteristics and population density on violent and property crimes. The results reveal that the traditional neighborhood characteristics measured in social disorganization research provide significant explanatory power for both measures of crime at the municipal level. Population density was found to have a significant negative relationship with property crime. A discussion and future research suggestions are presented to conclude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battin, J.R. 2015. Collective efficacy theory and perceptions of crime: Documenting neighborhood context effects. El Paso, TX: LFB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J.K., and A.G. Largey. 2008. Social interaction and urban sprawl. Journal of Urban Economics 64(1): 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonanno, P., G. Pasini, and P. Vanin. 2012. Crime and social sanction. Papers in Regional Science 91(1): 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christens, B., and P.W. Speer. 2005. Predicting violent crime using urban and suburban densities. Behavior and Social Issues 14: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choldin, H.M. 1978. Urban density and pathology. Annual Review of Sociology 4: 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review 86: 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D.S., W.J. Wilson, D. Huizinga, R.J. Sampson, A. Elliott, and B. Rankin. 1996. The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33: 389–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., and S. Hamidi. 2014. Measuring urban sprawl and validating sprawl measures. Metropolitan Research Center. http://gis.cancer.gov/tools/urban-sprawl/.

  • Ewing, R., R. Pendall, and D. Chen. 2003. Measuring sprawl and its transportation impacts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1831: 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C., J. Zhao, N. Layrich, and M. Gaffney. 2002. Social integration, individual perceptions of collective efficacy, and fear of crime in three cities. Justice Quarterly 19: 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries, K. 2006. Property crimes and violence in United States: An analysis of the influence of population density. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 1(2): 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A.H. 1972. Population density and the city. Demography 9: 521–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemley, D.D., and L.R. McPheters. 1974. Crime as an externality of regional economic growth. Review of Regional Studies 4: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M.J., M. Gottfredson, and J. Garofalo. 1978. Victims of personal crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J.R., and A. Roussell. 2013. Population density and crime: Micro- and macro-environment population and the consequences for crime rates. Social Forces 92(2): 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1995. The uses of sidewalks. In In metropolis: Center and symbol of our times, ed. P. Kasinitz. New York, NY: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C.E., T.D. Stucky, and M.D. Krohn. 2009. Researching theories of crime and deviance. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvalseth, T.O. 1975. Statistical models of urban crime: A study of burglary. In Paper presented at the Joint National Meeting of the Operations Research Society of American and the Institute of Management Sciences, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Kvalseth, T.O. 1977. Note on effects of population density and unemployment on urban crime. Criminology 15(1): 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. and J. Rainwater. 2000. The real picture of land-use, density, and crime: A GIS application. http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc00/professional/papers/pap508/p508.htm.

  • Maimon, D., and C.R. Browning. 2010. Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology 48: 443–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., R. Wickes, and J. McBroom. 2010. Community variations in violence: The role of social ties and collective efficacy in comparative context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47(1): 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J.J. 2004. Establishing the statistical relationship between population size and UCR crime rate: Its impact and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice 32: 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. 1983. Metropolitan structure and violent crime: Which measure of crime. American Sociological Review 48: 434–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J. 2001. The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D.W. 1981. Dangerous places: Crime and residential environment. Social Forces 60(1): 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. 1983. Structural density and criminal victimization. Criminology 21(2): 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J., and W.B. Groves. 1989. Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology 94: 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., S. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J., and O. Wikstrom. 2007. The social order of violence in Chicago and Stockholm neighborhoods: A comparative inquiry. In Order, conflict, and violence, ed. S.N. Kalyvas, I. Shapiro, and T. Masoud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, B. 2014. Social disorganization and crime: Searching for the determinants of crime at the community level. Latin American Research Review 49(3): 218–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. 1974. The validity of official crime statistics: An empirical investigation. Social Science Quarterly 54: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.B., B.A. Koons, E.M. Kurtz, J.R. Greene, and D.D. Perkins. 1995. Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: Evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia. Urban Affairs Review 31(1): 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W., J. Schafer, S. Varano, and T. Bynum. 2006. Neighborhood residents’ production of order: The effects of collective efficacy on responses to neighborhood problems. Crime & Delinquency 52: 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. and M.P. Peterson. 2007. A spatial analysis of neighbourhood crime in Omaha, Nebraska using alternative measures of crime rates. Internet Journal of Criminology 31: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua R. Battin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battin, J.R., Crowl, J.N. Urban sprawl, population density, and crime: an examination of contemporary migration trends and crime in suburban and rural neighborhoods. Crime Prev Community Saf 19, 136–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0020-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0020-9

Keywords

Navigation