Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolving Cross-Sector Collaboration in the Arts and Culture Sector: From Sponsorship to Partnership

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The arts and cultural sector offers a beneficial field of cross-sector collaboration for businesses as it is closely related to contemporary consumers’ lifestyle and civilization. This study examined the impact of two prominent cross-sector collaborations (i.e. partnership and sponsorship) on corporate reputation in the arts and culture sector, with the focus on a specific stakeholder group—the millennials. 154 millennials were recruited for an online experiment, using a convenience sampling through posting an open-call on the Facebook pages of the 100 most visited art museums in the world. The results show that partnership and sponsorship both indicate a positive effect on corporate reputation, whereas partnership is more appealing to the millennials than sponsorship. We also examined the moderation effects of sincerity, value alignment and credibility on the relationship of cross-sector collaboration and corporate reputation. All three moderators are found to strengthen the relationship, while the impact of credibility is the strongest among them. The findings imply that companies should be aware of the need to present themselves as a trustworthy collaborator and the necessity to fulfil their duties deriving from the engagement in a particular cross-sector collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasio, A.R. 2018. Understanding sponsorship involvement outcomes in partnership models. Leiden: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.E. 2000. Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Vluntary Sector Quarterly 29 (Suppl. 1): 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.E. 2010. From organization to organization: On creating value. Journal of Business Ethics 94 (Suppl. 1): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.E., and S.E.K.N. Team. 2004. Social partnering in Latin America. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.E., and M.M. Seitanidi. 2012a. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 1. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Vluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (5): 726–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.E., and M.M. Seitanidi. 2012b. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 1. Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Vluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (6): 929–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E.R. 2017. The basics of social research. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K.B., B.A. Stone, and K. Heiner. 2002. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society 41 (3): 292–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K.L., B.A. Cudmore, and R.P. Hill. 2006. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research 59 (1): 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., and L. Putterman. 2011. Trusting, trustworthiness, and CSR: Some experiments and implications. In Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance, ed. L. Sacconi, M. Blair, R.E. Freeman, and A. Vermicelli, 410–431. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, D., and C.B. Yumrukaya. 2009. Corporate social responsibility in culture and art. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 20 (3): 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. 2005. Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews 7 (2): 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, F., A. Dastous, and M. Parmentier. 2005. Consumer perceptions of sponsorship in the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11 (2): 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleoni, E. 2013. CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 18 (2): 228–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., and J.D. Creswell. 2018. Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., and L. Miles. 1998. Reputation management: Theory versus practice. Corporate Reputation Review 2 (1): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N., and E. Wahlqvist. 2006. Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility: The business social compliance initiative. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (2): 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrard, Y., and F. Colbert. 2000. Arts management: A new discipline entering the millennium? International Journal of Arts Management 2 (2): 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, J., F. Farrelly, and P. Quester. 2004. Competitive advantage through sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing 38 (8): 1013–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, L. 1990. Homo aestheticus. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., and C. van Riel. 1997. The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review 1 (2): 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. Whats in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J., N.A. Gardberg, and J.M. Sever. 2000. The reputation quotient SM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management 7 (4): 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 2010. Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics 96: 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, B.L. Parmar, and S. De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S.V., and A. Astafyeva. 2014. Millennial cultural consumers: Co-creating value through brand communities. Arts Marketing: An International Journal 4 (2): 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L.D., M.S. Glynn, and R.J. Brodie. 2014. Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 28 (2): 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W., H. Kim, and J. Woo. 2014. How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (1): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, E. 2003. Theory of alliances: Partnership and partner characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 11 (1): 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I., and J. Nelson. 2004. Profits with principles: Seven strategies for creating value with values. New York: Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchberg, V. 2011. Corporate arts sponsorship. In A handbook of cultural economics, 2nd ed, ed. R. Towse, 143–151. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, P., T. Cooper, R. Hayward, and L. Neuberger. 2010. A new era of sustainability, vol. 57. UN Global Compact, Accenture. http://www.yooyahcloud.com/MOSSCOMMUNICATIONS/FlzNj/United_Nations_Global_Compact_and_Accenture_Sustainability_Services_A_New_Era_of_Sustainability.pdf.

  • Lewandowska, K. 2015. From sponsorship to partnership in arts and business relations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 45 (1): 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. 2003. Reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of Communication Management 7 (4): 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y., and M. Lee. 2011. Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1): 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, V.W. 2015. Planning the corporate reputation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, C. 1991. Sponsorship and the image of the sponsor. European Journal of Marketing 25 (11): 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, T., J.W. Spain, and V. McGlone. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and the millennials. Journal of Education for Business 86 (4): 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicholas, B. 2004. Arts, culture and business: A relationship transformation, a nascent field. International Journal of Arts Management 7 (1): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewicz, J., and P. Herbig. 1994. Evaluating the brand extension decision using a model of reputation building. Journal of Product & Brand Management 3 (1): 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L.A., D.J. Webb, and K.E. Harris. 2001. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The Impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs 35 (1): 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. 2012. Interactive media usage among millennial consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing 29 (6): 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, C. 2011. The emergence of the social media empowered consumer. Irish Marketing Review 21 (1/2): 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’hagan, J., and D. Harvey. 2000. Why do companies sponsor arts events? Some evidence and a proposed classification. Journal of Cultural Economics 24 (3): 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D.M., T. Meyvis, and N. Davidenko. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (4): 867–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappu, R., and T.B. Cornwell. 2014. Corporate sponsorship as an image platform: Understanding the roles of relationship fit and sponsor–sponsee similarity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42 (5): 490–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R.L. 2005. Identity matters. http://designforum.aiga.org/content.cfm?contentalias=_getfullarticle&aid=1357823.

  • Ponzi, L.J., C.J. Fombrun, and N.A. Gardberg. 2011. RepTrak™ pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 14 (1): 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Shared value: How to reinvest capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Reivew 89 (1/2): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifon, N.J., S.M. Choi, C.S. Trimble, and H. Li. 2004. Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising 33 (1): 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J.W., and B. Parker. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management 31 (6): 849–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (2): 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C.J., and K.L. Becker-Olsen. 2006. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing 70 (4): 154–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R., and J. Green. 2005. Boundary workers and the management of frustration: A case study of two Healthy City partnership. Health Promotion International 20 (3): 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surman, T. 2006. Constellation collaboration: A model for multi-organizational partnership. Center for Social Innovation. San Francisco: Creative Commons

  • Thomas, S.R., S.J. Pervan, and P.J. Nuttall. 2009. Marketing orientation and arts organisations: The case for business sponsorship. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 27 (6): 736–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. 2004. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedy, C. 1991. Sponsorship of the arts—An outdated fashion or the model of the future? Museum Management and Curatorship 10 (2): 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urriolagoitia, L., and M. Planellas. 2007. Sponsorship relationships as strategic alliances: A life cycle model approach. Business Horizons 50 (2): 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakorin, V., O. Krakovska, and A. Mcintosh. 2009. Confounding effects of indirect connections on causality estimation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 184 (1): 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S., and Brown, L.D. 1997. Fostering intersectoral partnering: A guide to promoting cooperation among government, business, and civial society actors, 13. Institute for development research (IDR).

  • Yoon, Y., Z. Gürhan-Canli, and N. Schwarz. 2006. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16 (4): 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media and Communication, Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Yijing Wang & Kaspar-Pascal Holznagel

Authors
  1. Yijing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaspar-Pascal Holznagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yijing Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Holznagel, KP. Evolving Cross-Sector Collaboration in the Arts and Culture Sector: From Sponsorship to Partnership. Corp Reputation Rev 24, 95–104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00093-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00093-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation