Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Paracrisis Origin and Response Strategy on Facebook Audience’s Perceived Organisational Reputation and Behavioural Intentions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paracrisis in social media issues needs to be anticipated, identified, monitored, and managed. While PR practitioners already have to deal with this phenomenon on a daily basis, only few studies have examined paracrisis response strategies to find adequate ways of handling these reputation threats. The objective of this study is to test selected paracrisis response strategies on Facebook that have not yet been combined by other researchers and identify the most recommendable strategy. Drawing on social representation principles and the SCCT model (Coombs in Corp Reput Rev 10(3):163–176, 2007) as well as the SMCC model (Liu et al. in: Duhe (ed) New media and public relations, 2nd edn, Peter Lang, New York, 2012), four organisational response strategies—reform, humour, refuse, and refute—are examined in two within-subjects experiments, with self-imposed and external paracrisis origins, respectively. This experiment uses fictional paracrisis in fictional international IT suppliers. Differences and effects in respondents’ perceptions of organisational reputation and paracrisis behavioural intentions are analysed. In both experiments, results show that a reform strategy is significantly the most recommendable, and a humorous strategy is the least recommendable for this paracrisis situation. This component of Public Relations practice and research can prevent potential real-world crises and protect organisations’ reputations. Paracrises are social crises, and thus organisations should be able to adapt (accommodate) to communities by explaining the situation and exchanging information horizontally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, personality and behavior. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2006) Behavioural interventions based on the theory of planned behavior. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf, accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Benoit, W.L. 1997. Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review 23 (2): 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, H.-B., A. Haas, and F. Koschel. 2012. Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 1998. The Internet as potential equalizer: New leverage for confronting social irresponsibility. Public Relations Review 24 (3): 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 2007. Protecting organisation reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (3): 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 1996. Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research 8 (4): 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2006. Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management 10 (2): 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2008. Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review 34 (3): 252–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and J.S. Holladay. 2012. The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review 38 (3): 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and J.S. Holladay. 2014. How publics react to crisis communication efforts: Comparing crisis response reactions across sub-arenas. Journal of Communication Management 18 (1): 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis-Remis, C., J.-F. Lebraty, and H. Philippe. 2013. The 2008 anti-French demonstrations in China: Learning from a social media crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 21 (1): 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., and C. Pullig. 2011. Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies. Journal of Business Research 64 (12): 1281–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer. 2013. The year of social? https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Year-of-Social/1010386, accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Einwiller, S.A., and S. Steilen. 2015. Handling complaints on social network sites—An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review 41 (2): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facebook. 2017. Newsroom-key facts. http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts, accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Freberg, K. 2012. Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relations Review 38 (3): 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby, R. 2010. Social media as crisis platform: The future of community maps/crisis maps. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 7: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L., A. Wrangmo, and K. Solberg Søilen. 2013. Optimal ways for companies to use Facebook as a marketing channel. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (2): 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., B.F. Liu, and L.L. Austin. 2014. Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management: The effects of crisis origin, information form, and source on publics’ crisis responses. Communication Research 41 (1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., X.A. Zhang, and B.W. Zhang. 2016. Self-mocking crisis strategy on social media: Focusing on Alibaba chairman Jack Ma in China. Public Relations Review 42: 903–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., K. Purcell, A. Smith, and K. Zickuhr. 2010. Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J.S. 2016. How a paracrisis situation is instigated by an online firestorm and visual mockery: Testing a paracrisis development model. Computers in Human Behavior 67: 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.F., Y. Jin, L. Austin, and M. Janoske. 2012. The social-mediated crisis communication model: Guidelines for effective crisis management in a changing media landscape. In New media and public relations, 2nd ed, ed. S. Duhe, 257–266. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.A. 1996. The situational humor response questionnaire (SHRQ) and coping humor scale (CHS): A decade of research findings. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 9 (3–4): 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhrle, Hartwin. 2004. Plädoyer für ein erweitertes Krisenverständnis. In Krisen-PR. Krisen erkennen, meistern und vorbeugen - ein Handbuch von Profis für Profis, ed. H. Möhrle, 12–29. Frankfurt am Main: F.A.Z.-Inst. für Management- Markt- und Medieninformationen

  • Moscovici, S. 1963. Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology 14: 231–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. 2017. Marc-mueller-210523.jpg [modified]. https://unsplash.com/@seven11nash?photo=Lg8xTZjs6Lg. Accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Myers, K.K., and K. Sadaghiani. 2010. Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organisational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology 25 (2): 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, A., N. Begam Binte Abul Hassan, and A. Chee Yang Chong. 2014. Negotiating crisis in the social media environment: Evolution of crises online, gaining credibility offline. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 19 (1): 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. 2016. Ilya-pavlov-87438.jpg. https://unsplash.com/photos/OqtafYT5kTw. Accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Pfeffer, J., T. Zorbach, and K.M. Carley. 2014. Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. Journal of Marketing Communications 20 (1–2): 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., K. Kuwabara, R. Zeckhauser, and E. Friedman. 2000. Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM 43 (12): 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, S. 2017. Examining the paracrisis online: The effects of message source, response strategies and social vigilantism on public responses. Public Relations Review 43: 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzborn, C. 2015. Phänomen Shitstorm. Herausforderung für die Onlinekrisenkommunikation von Unternehmen. MSc Thesis, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

  • Schultz, F., S. Utz, and A. Göritz. 2011. Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review 37 (1): 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibold, D.R. 2010. Organisational reputation scale. In Communication research measures II: A sourcebook, ed. R.B. Rubin, E. Graham, E.M. Perse, and D. Seibold, 235–238. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, L.C., P. Panagiotopoulos, Á. Regan, A. De Brún, J. Barnett, and Á. McConnon. 2015. Interactive communication with the public: Qualitative exploration of the use of social media by food and health organisations. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 47 (1): 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sony Corporation. 2017. Our exclusive new VR experience with The Chainsmokers is coming to the Playstation Store soon. Find out more at http://lostinmusic.sony/#LostInMusic. https://www.facebook.com/Sony/photos/a.121553481996.114524.56232316996/10154793378716997/?type=3. Accessed 01 November 2018.

  • Spiske, M. 2017. Markus-spiske-207946.jpg. https://unsplash.com/photos/Skf7HxARcoc. Accessed 11 April 2018.

  • Tække, J. 2017. Crisis communication in a systems- and medium theoretical perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 34 (2): 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., and M.L. Kent. 2007. Taxonomy of mediated crisis responses. Public Relations Review 33 (2): 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stuttgart, Germany

    Sophia Viktoria Honisch

  2. Department of Communication, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat, 138, 08018, Barcelona, Spain

    Lluís Más Manchón

Authors
  1. Sophia Viktoria Honisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lluís Más Manchón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophia Viktoria Honisch.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honisch, S.V., Más Manchón, L. The Effects of Paracrisis Origin and Response Strategy on Facebook Audience’s Perceived Organisational Reputation and Behavioural Intentions. Corp Reputation Rev 23, 133–144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00070-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00070-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation