Skip to main content
Log in

The lessons of 1969: policy learning, policy memory and voting age reform

British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article utilises the developing research literatures on policy learning and memory, with particular focus on the interconnections between institutional amnesia and policy myopia, to analyse the lowering of the age of enfranchisement to 18 for all elections in the UK in 1969 and its resonance, or otherwise, in contemporary debates concerning ‘Votes-at-16’. Political and public interest in voting age reform has intensified in recent years. There has, however, been a noticeable lack of interest from either advocates or those opposed to ‘Votes-at-16’ in the ground-breaking decision taken by the UK government in 1969 to lower the voting age to 18 and policy lessons resulting in this radical reform. The article provides an overview of the policy debates linked to the lowering of the voting age to 18 in the UK in 1969 and then explores its policy effects and potential policy learning available from the introduction of ‘Votes-at-18’. It concludes that a lack of memory of past policy interventions such as lowering the voting age to 18 can be a product of both ‘institutional amnesia’ combined with intentional and unintentional forms of ‘policy myopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adonis, A. and A. Tyndall. 2013. For the sake of democracy, we need to get the young voting again, New Statesman, 18 July.

  • Begley, P., C. Bochel, H. Bochel, A. Defty, J. Gordon, K. Hinkkainen, B. Kisby, S. McKay, and S. Strange. 2019. Assessing policy success and failure: Targets, aims and processes. Policy Studies 40 (2): 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D., and A. Jordan. 2011. What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review 9 (3): 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, A. 2019. The last milestone on the journey to full adult suffrage? 50 years of debates about the voting age, History and Policy, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-last-milestone-on-the-journey-to-full-adult-suffrage.

  • British Youth Council. 2014. Lowering the voting age to 16. London: British Youth Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., A. Adonis, and T. Travers. 1994. Failure in British Government: The politics of the poll tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catino, M. 2013. Organiszational myopia: Problems of rationality and foresight in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J., D. Grube, H. Lovell, and R. Scott. 2018a. Policy Concepts in 1000 words: Institutional Memory, Paul Cairney: Politics and Public Policy, https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2018/03/01/policy-concepts-in-1000-words-institutional-memory/.

  • Corbett, J., D. Grube, H. Lovell, and R. Scott. 2018b. Singular memory or institutional memories? Towards a dynamic approach. Governance 31 (3): 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, B., and A. Porter. 1978. Political education and political literacy. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 44 (2): 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, C. 2017. Policy learning and policy failure: Definitions, dimensions and intersections. Policy and Politics 45 (1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, J. 2018. Votes at 16: New insights from Scotland on enfranchisement. Parliamentary Affairs 71 (2): 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electoral Commission. 2003. How old is old enough? The minimum age of voting and candidacy in UK elections. London: Electoral Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electoral Commission. 2017. Scottish council elections 2017 Report on the administration of the elections held on 4 May 2017, Edinburgh, Electoral Commission.

  • Fielding, S. 2003. The Labour Governments, 1964–70, vol. 1. Labour and Cultural Change, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. 2004. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, A. 2017. The changing landscape of youth and young adulthood. In Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood, 2nd ed., ed. A. Furlong, 3–11. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, J. 2001. Democratisation in Britain: Elites, civil society and reform since 1800. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, C., A. Mycock, and J. Murakami. 2014. Becoming citizens in late modernity: A global-national comparison of young people in Japan and the UK. Citizenship Studies 18 (1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. 2014. Voter engagement in the UK, Political and Constitutional Reform. Committee fourth report 2014–15, November.

  • House of Lords. 2018. The Ties that Bind: Citizenship and Civic Engagement, Citizenship and Civic Engagement report, HL Paper 118, April.

  • Hulme, R., and R. Hulme. 2012. Policy learning? Crisis, evidence and reinvention in the making of public policy. Policy and Politics 40 (4): 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, D. 2006. This is what democracy looks like: New labour’s blind spot and peripheral vision. British Politics 1 (3): 367–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisby, B., and J. Sloam. 2012. Citizenship, democracy and education in the UK: Towards a common framework for citizenship lessons in the four home nations. Parliamentary Affairs 65 (1): 68–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Party, Labour. 1966. Time for decision. Labour party election manifesto. London: Labour Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., A. Mycock, and J. Tonge. 2021a. A coming of age: How and why the UK became the first democracy to allow votes for 18-year-olds. Contemporary British History 35 (2): 284–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., A. Mycock, and J. Tonge. 2021b. Public opinion, political partisanship and the Votes-at-16 debate in the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (in press).

  • McAllister, L., R. Campbell, S. Childs, R. Clements, D. Farrell, A. Renwick, and P. Silk. 2017. A parliament that works for wales: The report of the Expert Panel on Assembly Electoral Reform. Welsh Assembly Commission.

  • McConnell, A. 2010. Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, I., M.K. Coban, and A.S. Bali. 2021. Policy capacities and effective policy design: A review. Policy Sciences 54 (2): 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mycock, A. 2015. Should the voting age be lowered to 16 for UK elections? Political Insight 6 (2): 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mycock, A., T. Loughran, and J. Tonge. 2020. Understanding the policy drivers and effects of voting age reform. In Lowering the voting age to 16: Learning from real experiences worldwide, ed. J. Eichhorn and J. Bergh, 43–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, S., and M. Howlett. 2017. Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy and Politics 45 (1): 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. 2017. What impact could lowering the UK voting age to 16 have on the shape of the electorate? https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/elections/electoralregistration/articles/whatimpactcouldloweringtheukvotingageto16haveontheshapeoftheelectorate/2017-07-14#footnote_2.

  • Norton, P. 1975. Dissension in the house of commons: Intra-party dissent in the house of commons division lobbies 1945–1974. London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. 2000. Institutional amnesia: A paradox of the information age? Prometheus 18 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Continuity and change in public policy and management. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, Power. 2006. Power to the people. London: Power Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. 2014. The time has come—but not for ‘Votes-at-16’, http://blog.policy.manchester.ac.uk/featured/2014/04/the-time-has-come-but-not-for-votes-at-16/.

  • Scottish Youth Parliament and A. Mycock. 2019. Learning from Scotland: Your Introduction Experiences of ‘Votes at 16’, https://syp.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Learning-From-Scotland-Votes-at-16-Workshop-report.pdf.

  • Stark, A. 2018. Explaining institutional amnesia in government. Governance 32 (1): 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A., and B. Head. 2019. Institutional amnesia and public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 26 (10): 1521–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingle, L. 2015. How we forgot how to govern. Quarterly Essay 60: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. 2015. Making British Law: Committees in action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J., and A. Mycock. 2010. Citizenship and political engagement among young people: The workings and findings of the youth citizenship commission. Parliamentary Affairs 63 (1): 182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J., A. Mycock, and B. Jeffery. 2012. Does citizenship education make young people better-engaged citizens? Political Studies 60 (3): 578–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi, E. 2019. Turnout at elections, House of Commons Briefing Paper CBP 8060, 5th July.

  • Votes-at-16 Coalition. 2008. 16 for 16. 16 reason for Votes-at-16, https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/16-reasons-for-votes-at-16.pdf.

  • Youth Citizenship Commission. 2009. Old enough to make a mark? Should the voting age be lowered to 16? London: YCC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Mycock.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by the Leverhulme Trust under Grant R00476-01. The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mycock, A.J., Loughran, T.I. & Tonge, J. The lessons of 1969: policy learning, policy memory and voting age reform. Br Polit 18, 173–191 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00192-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00192-6

Keywords

Navigation