Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deeper than the surface: Exploring symbolic cultural cues behind skin color among three groups of women of Chinese heritage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cultural Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We integrated cosmetic and appearance-related scenario elicitation and in-depth interviews to explore aesthetic attitudes toward skin color in bicultural contexts among three groups of emerging Chinese adults. Results indicated that Chinese women, who grew up in China until age 18 and then moved to the US, generally leaned toward Chinese culture, found lighter skin more beautiful, and chose shades of makeup foundation lighter than their skin color. Chinese adoptees, raised in the US by Euro-American parents, leaned toward Euro-American culture, considered tanned skin more attractive, and chose darker colored foundations in most social contexts other than professional. Chinese Americans, raised in the US by first-generation Chinese parents, expressed mixed preferences. Women’s preferences revealed how everyday decisions reflect cultural beliefs and symbolic values behind skin color, suggesting that attitude formation is contextually dependent. People favor different shades of foundation makeup for different occasions, suggesting agentic awareness and the use of behavioral modification to gain acceptance in a given context. Appearance manipulation is a form of self-expression and conveys sociocultural cues. Understanding subtle sociocultural meanings and aesthetics in complex cultural contexts has significant implications for body image and colorism-related research, promoting the exploration of cultural influences on appearance, ideal skin color internalization, and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, K.K., L.R. Allen, and J.J. Gray. 1993. Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors, psychological adjustment, and ethnic identity: A comparison of black and white female college students. International Journal of Eating Disorders 14 (1): 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. 2008. Iconic Consciousness: The Material Feeling of Meaning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 782–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. 2010. The Celebrity-icon. Cultural Sociology 4: 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Fye, E. 2011. Body images in non-Western cultures. In Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention, ed. T.F. Cash and L. Smolak, 244–252. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Fye, E. 2012. Anthropological perspectives on human appearance and body image. In The encyclopedia of body image and human appearance, ed. T.F. Cash, 15–22. London: Elsevier Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J.J. 2015. Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J.J., and J. Tanner. 2006. Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, O.M. 2011. No necessary tradeoff: Context, life course and social networks in second-generation nigerian immigrant identity formation in the USA. Ethnicities 11 (4): 436–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, O.M. 2012. Cultural and cosmopolitan: Idealized femininity and embodied nationalism in nigerian beauty pageants. Gender & Society 26 (3): 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beausoleil, N. 1992. Makeup in everyday life: An inquiry into the practices of urban American women of diverse backgrounds. In Many mirrors: Body image and social relations, ed. N. Sault, 33–57. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H.R., and G.W. Ryan. 2010. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. 2003. Analyzing quantitative data. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P., and M. Richins. 1992. You look “mahvelous”: The pursuit of beauty and the marketing concept. Psychology and Marketing 9 (1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S., and T.F. Cash. 1992. Black beauty: Skin color and body images among African American college women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (11): 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. 2004. From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies 27 (6): 931–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. 2002. Skin deep: Dying to be white. CNN. 15 May, https://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/13/asia.whitening/.

  • Bullock, B.E., and A.J. Toribio (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafri, G., J.K. Thompson, P.B. Jacobsen, and J. Hillhouse. 2009. Investigating the role of appearance-based factors in predicting sunbathing and tanning salon use. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 32 (6): 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafri, G., J.K. Thompson, M. Roehrig, A. Rojas, S. Sperry, P.B. Jacobsen, and J. Hillhouse. 2008. Appearance motives to tan and not tan: Evidence for validity and reliability of a new scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35 (2): 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfas, J. 2015. Study: Fewer U.S. adults use indoor tanning beds. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/07/01/indoor-tanning-decline-us-adults/29519255/.

  • Casanova, E.M. 2004. No ugly women: Concepts of race and beauty among adolescent women in ecuador. Gender & Society 18 (3): 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T., and P. Henry. 1995. Women’s body images: The results of a National Survey in the U.S.A. Sex Roles 33: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T.F. 1989. Body-image affect: Gestalt versus summing the parts. Perceptual and Motor Skills 69 (1): 17–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caulkins, D.D., M. Offer-Westort, and C. Trosset. 2005. Perceiving ethnic differences: The use of consensus analysis and personhood in Welsh-American populations. Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory: An International Journal 1 (4): 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., C. Yarnal, G. Chick, and N.G. Jablonski. 2018. Egg white or sun-kissed: A cross-cultural exploration of skin color and women’s leisure behavior. Sex Roles 78 (3): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., and B. Monin. 2005. Where are you really from? Asian Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89: 717–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., S. Lee, and K. Wilson. 2010. Magazine exposure, tanned women stereotypes, and tanning attitudes. Body Image 7 (4): 364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.B., and M.K. Clark. 1940. Skin color as a factor in racial identification of Negro preschool children. Journal of Social Psychology 11: 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNN (2020). L'Oreal to remove words like ‘whitening’ and ‘fair’ from its products. Retrieved from http://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_81e7ff663ce255ff19c45f7e5ed0baba.

  • Craig, L.M. 2009. The color of an ideal Negro beauty queen: miss bronze 1961–1968. In Shades of difference: Why skin color matters, ed. E.N. Glenn, 81–94. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., and D.L. Miller. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., and V.L. Plano Clark. 2010. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill, I.C., et al. 2017. The biology of color. Science 357: 6350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.F. 2018. Selling whiteness? A critical review of the literature on marketing and racism. Journal of Marketing Management 34 (1–2): 134–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, K., and C. Williams. 1997. Makeup at work: Negotiating appearance rules in the workforce. Gender and Society 11 (2): 151–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M., and G. Brown. 2009. Globalization and international adoption from China. Child and Family Social Work 14: 352–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, A.E. 1990. Culture in the mirror: sociocultural determinants of body image. In Body images: Development, deviance, and change, ed. T.F. Cash and T. Pruzinsky, 80–109. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, A.E., and P. Rozin. 1985. Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 94: 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D.M. 2010. Ethnography: Step-by step. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., K. Grammer, and P.J. Matts. 2006. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes. 2020. Critics slam unilever rebrand of ‘Fair & Lovely’ skin lightener as ‘Glow & Lovely’, 2 Jul, https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/07/02/critics-slam-unilever-rebrand-of-fair--lovely-skin-lightener-as-glow--lovely/#14174a154b7a.

  • Fredrickson, B.L., and T. Roberts. 1997. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women quarterly 21: 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T. 2006. A vision of pale beauty carries risks for Asia's women. The New York Times, 14 March, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/world/asia/14thailand.html?pagewanted=all.

  • Gillen, M.M., and E.S. Lefkowitz. 2009. Emerging adults’ perceptions of messages about physical appearance. Body Image 6: 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E.N. 2008. Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender and Society 22 (3): 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E.N. 2009. Shades of difference: Why skin color matters. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self In Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1979. Gender Advertisement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gender Advertisement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Groesz, L.M., M.P. Levine, and S.K. Murnen. 2002. The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders 31: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18 (1): 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E. 2008. Racism in the 21st century: An empirical analysis of skin color. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J.L., A.C. Geller, M. Schoenhammer, M. Gordon, M. Bishop, E. Shuk, S. Oliveria, and A.C. Halpern. 2014. Tanning and beauty: Mother and teenage daughters in discussion. Journal of Health Psychology 21 (7): 1261–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink, M., I. Hutter, and A. Bailey. 2011. Qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillhouse, J., R. Turrisi, F. Holwiski, and S. McVeigh. 1999. An examination of psychological variables relevant to artificial tanning tendencies. Journal of Health Psychology 4: 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, K., and P. Hondagneu-Sotelo. 2005. Dress matters: Change and continuity in the dress practices of Bosnian Muslim refugee women. Gender and Society 19: 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 2002. “If you’re light you’re alright”: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender and Society 16 (2): 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 2005. Race, gender and the politics of skin tone. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 2005. Cultural politics and masculinities: Multiple-partners in historical perspective in KwaZulu-Natal. Culture, Health & Sexuality 7 (3): 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 2007. The persistent problem of colorism skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass 1: 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 2011. Buying racial capital: Skin-bleaching and cosmetic surgery in a globalized world. Journal of Pan African Studies 4 (4): 142–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, N. 2010. Colour of life achievements: Historical and media influence of identity formation based on skin colour in south Asia. Journal of Intercultural Studies 31 (4): 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N.G. 2011. Transforming “racial characteristics” is it an appropriate role for aesthetic surgery? Aesthetic Surgery Journal 31 (3): 352–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N.G. 2012. Living color: The biological and social meaning of skin color. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N.G. 2020. Persistence of race persistence of race (STIAS Book 15). African Sun Media.

  • Jablonski, N.G., and G. Chaplin. 2000. The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution 39: 57–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. 2015. The global beauty industry: Colorism, racism, and the national body. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keesling, B., and H.S. Friedman. 1987. Psychosocial factors in sunbathing and sunscreen use. Health Psychology 6: 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keevak, M. 2011. Becoming yellow: A short history of racial thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, V.M., and C. Herring. 1991. Skin tone: A stratification in the Black community. The American Journal of Sociology 97 (3): 760–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. 2004. The prisoner of Foucault and the discipline of the female body. Journal of International Women’s Studies 5: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. 2003. In mendel’s mirror: Philosophical reflections on biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, S., and M.N. Trautner. 2009. Beauty work: Individual and institutional rewards, the reproduction of gender, and questions of agency. Sociology Compass 3: 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidre, M.E., and R.A. Johnstone. 2013. Animal signals. Current Biology 23 (18): 829–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S. 2006. Who’s the fairest of them all? Television ads for skin-whitening cosmetics in Hong Kong. Asian Ethnicity 7 (2): 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G.E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.M., et al. 2009. Changes in skin tanning attitudes. American Journal of Public Health 99 (12): 2140–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, M., de Waal Malefyt, T., Fabri, A. 2020. Women, makeup, and authenticity: Negotiating embodiment and discourses of beauty. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(4): 656–677.

  • McKinley, N.M., and J. Hyde. 1996. The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly 20: 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. 2013. Cultural socialization in international adoptive families. MSc thesis, University of Puget Sound, WA.

  • Moore, L., and M. Kosut. 2010. The body reader: Essential social and cultural readings. Purchase College: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, L.P., S. Vazire, P.J. Rentfrow, and S.D. Gosling. 2009. Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (12): 1661–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBC News. 2020. Skin lightening cream 'Fair & Lovely' to change name after backlash. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asianamerica/skin-lightening-cream-fair-lovely-change-name-after-backlash-n1232124

  • Nelson, D.A., et al. 2006. Parenting and peergroup behavior in cultural contest. In Peer relationship in cultural context, ed. X. Chen, D.C. French, and B.H. Schneider, 213–246. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, K.J. 2014. Color matters: Skin tone bias and the myth of a postracial America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, K. J., Foreman, V. S. 2014. The ubiquitousness of colorism: Then and now. In Norwood, K. J. (Ed.), Color matters: Skin tone bias and the myth of a post-racial America (pp 9-28). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • NPR. 2020. 'Fair & Lovely' skin lightening brand, popular in South Asia, To change name. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/liveupdates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/06/25/883322883/fair-lovely-skin-lightening-brand-popular-in-south-asia-to-change-name

  • Park, J. 2011. Locating Korean American adoptees: Race, emotion, and out-of-place subjectivity. Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey.

  • Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiss, K. 1996. Making up, making over: cosmetics, consumer culture, and women’s identity. In The sex of things: Gender and consumption in historical perspective, ed. V. de Garcia and E. Furlough, 311–336. Los Angeles: University of California press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peiss, K. 2011. Hope in a jar: The making of America’s beauty culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peryam, D.R., and F.J. Pilgrim. 1957. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preference. Food Technology 11: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, M. 2020. “Black Lives Matter,” say these companies that sell skin lightening products, 13 Jun, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/meghara/skin-lightening-cream-black-lives-matter-companies.

  • Riemer, H., S. Shavitt, M. Koo, and H.R. Markus. 2014. Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review 121: 619–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondilla, J.L. 2009. “Filipinos and the color complex: ideal Asian beauty. In Shades of difference: Why skin color matters, ed. E. Nekano Glenn. Palto Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondilla, J.L., and P.R. Spickard. 2007. Is lighter better: Skin-tone discrimination among Asian Americans. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Cole, K., M. Wilson, and R.E. Hall. 1992. The color complex: The politics of skin color among African Americans. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Cole, K., M. Wilson, and R.E. Hall. 2013. The color complex: The politics of skin color in a new millennium. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, M., Wiseman, H., & Farah, F. 2011. Parent-adolescent relationships and social adjustment: The case of a collectivistic culture. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2017. Revenue of tanning salons (NAICS 81219c) in the United States from 2008 to 2013.

  • Statista. 2019. Beauty and personal care products purchased by consumers in the United States as of May 2017 by age group.

  • The New York Times. 2020. Criticism of skin lighteners brings retreat by unilever and Johnson & Johnson, June 25, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/25/business/unilever-jj-skin-care-lightening.html.

  • Tracy, S.J. 2013. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tull, E.S., J. Ambrose, and E.C. Chambers. 2003. A preliminary assessment of acculturation and its relationship to body size and glucose intolerance among Blacks in the US Virgin Islands. Ethnicity & Disease 13 (1): 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, R. 2001. Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender and Society 15: 667–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., L. Tam, and M.G. Witt. 2005. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 918–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Albert and Lorraine Kligman Fellowship from the College of Health and Human Development at The Pennsylvania State University. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and AJCS Editor Philip Smith for their insightful feedback and constructive suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Hsin-Yu Chen & Nina G. Jablonski

Authors
  1. Hsin-Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nina G. Jablonski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Yu Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, HY., Jablonski, N.G. Deeper than the surface: Exploring symbolic cultural cues behind skin color among three groups of women of Chinese heritage. Am J Cult Sociol 10, 136–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00124-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00124-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation