Skip to main content
Log in

Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper examines the origins and impact of rapid recent growth of herbicide use in Mali. Primary data come from interviews with herbicide importers and distributors and from a 2014/2015 survey of farm households in Mali’s Sudanian Savanna zone. Results suggest that a series of major supply-side changes are driving growth in Mali’s herbicide markets, most conspicuously a proliferation in the number of sellers and herbicide brands marketed, a shift to low-cost suppliers in China and India, and consequently falling herbicide prices. At the farm level, herbicides cost on average 50 per cent less than hiring weeding labor. Despite low econometric estimates of damage abatement, herbicide adoption rates reach 25 per cent in remote rural zones and 75 per cent in more accessible rural areas. Key factors affecting adoption include spatial variation in herbicide prices and rural wage rates. At current levels, herbicide use reduces peak season rural labor demand by roughly 14 per cent.

Cette étude examine l’augmentation rapide de l’utilisation des herbicides au Mali, ses origines et son impact. Les données primaires utilisées dans l’étude proviennent des entretiens auprès des importateurs et distributeurs d’herbicide, et aussi d’une enquête en 2014-2015 auprès des ménages agricoles dans la zone Malienne du Savannah Soudanien. Les résultats indiquent que la croissance du marché des herbicides au Mali est dû à des changements dans l’offre des herbicides, en particulier à une prolifération du nombre de vendeurs et des marques disponibles, au déplacement des sources de herbicides a des fournisseurs bas coût en Inde et en Chine, et à une conséquente chute des prix des herbicides. Au niveau des fermes, l’utilisation des herbicides implique des couts 50% inferieurs à ceux assumés en embauchant des travailleurs pour désherber. En dépit des faibles réductions de dégâts, estimés économétriquement, l’adoption des herbicides touche le 25% dans les zones rurales les plus éloignées, et le 75% dans les zones rurales plus accessibles. Les facteurs-clé affectant l’adoption des herbicides comprennent la variation spatiale du prix des herbicides, et les salaires ruraux. Au niveau actuel des prix et des salaires, l’utilisation des herbicides réduit la demande de travail agricole d’un 20% pendant la haute saison horticole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Source: Comité Sahélien des Pesticides (CSP).

Figure 2
Figure 3

Source: Fitted quadratic plots with 95 per cent confidence intervals, computed from 2014/2015 farm household survey described in Smale et al (2015).

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Abiola, F.A., Diarra, A., Biaou, F.C. and Cisse, B. (2004) Le Comité Sahélien des Pesticides (CSP) : 10 ans au service des Etats du CILSS. Revue Africaine de Santé et de Productions Animales (RASPA) 2(1):83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariga, J. and Jayne, T.S. (2009) Unlocking the market: fertilizer and maize and Kenya. Chapter 14 in D. Spielman and R. Pandya-Lorch (eds.) Millions Fed: Proven Successes in Agricultural Development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • Assima, A., Haggblade, S. and Smale, M. (2017) Counterfeit Herbicices and Farm Productivity in Mali: A multivalued Treatment Approach. Research Paper No. 50, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy. East Lansing, Michigan: Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University.

  • Barrows, G., Sexton, S. and Zilberman, D. (2014) Agricultural biotechnology: The promise and prospects of genetically modified crops. Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1):99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltran, J.C., Pannell, D.J. and Doole, G.J. (2011) Economic implications of herbicide resistance and high labour costs for management of annual barnyardgrass in Philippine rice farming system. Crop Protection 31:31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, A., Materia, V., Venus, T. and Wesseler, J. (2017) The plant protection sector in the EU, with a special view on herbicides. European Journal of Development Research.

  • Burke, W.J. (2009) Fitting and interpreting Cragg’s tobit alternative using Stata. The Stata Journal 9(4): 584–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara, M., Haidara, F. and Traoré, A. (2003) Etude socio-économique de l’utilisation des pesticides au Mali. Bamako: Institut du Sahel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco-Tauber, C. and Moffitt, L.J. (1992) Damage control econometrics: Functional specification and pesticide productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1): 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.G., Karagiannis, G. and Tzouvelekas, V. (2010) Another look at pesticide productivity and pest damage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(5): 1401–1419. doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellule de Planification et de Statistique du Secteur Développement Rural (CPS/SDR). (2010) Dimension genre du secteur agricole au Mali. Bamako: Ministère de l’Agriculture.

  • Charles, D. (2001) Lords of the harvest : biotech, big money and the future of food. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRAD-GRET. (2012) Memento de l’agronome. Editions du GRET, Edition Quae, Ministere français des affaires étrangères.

  • Cissé, B.S. (2012) Rapport sur l’étude de dossiers pour le suivi sanitaire et environnemental pour le passage de l’autorisation provisoire de vente à l’homologation. Bamako: Comité Sahelien des Pesticides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comité Sahélien des Pesticides (CSP). (2015) Composition du dossier d’homologation des pesticides à usage agricole. Bamako: Comité permanent inter-états de lutte contre la sécheresse dans le Sahel (CILSS).

  • Cragg, J.G. (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39(5): 829–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diarra, A. (1998) Activité des gestion des pesticides à l’Institut du Sahel. Bamako: Institut du Sahel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diarra, A. (2015) Revue des politiques sur les pesticides et les produits vétérinaires dans l’espace CEDEAO. Amadou DIARRA. Laboratoire d’innovation FSP - Document de Travai N° West Africa-JSR-2015-2. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • Diarra, S.B., Traoré, P. and Keita, F. (2014) L’inclusion des femmes, des jeunes et des pauvres dans la chaine de valeur du riz au Mali. Bamako: Observatoire du marché agricole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diarisso, T. and Diarra, A. (2015) Etude sur le marché des intrants agricoles au Mali. Bamako: Observatoire du marché agricole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, J. (2010) Opportunities and investment strategies to improve food security and reduce poverty in Mali through the diffusion of improved agricultural technologies. Report to the USAID-Mali Accelerated Economic Growth (AEG) Group. Bamako: USAID.

  • Franz, J.E., Mao, M.K., Sikorski, J.A. (1997) Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. ACS Monograph 189. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 653 pp.

  • Gebretsadiz, R., Shimelis, H., Laing, M.D. and Mandefro, N. (2014) A diagnostic appraisal of the sorghum farming system and breeding priorities in Striga infested agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems 123: 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L. and Williams, A. (2011) Overlooking the obvious: the opportunity for herbicides in Africa. Outlooks in Pest Management (October): 211–215.

  • Grabowski, P. and Jayne, T.S. (2016) Analyzing Trends in Herbicide Use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Economics. International Development Working Paper 141. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

  • Haggblade, S., Smale, M., Kergna, A., Thériault, V. and Assima, A. (2016) Causes and consequences of increasing herbicide use in Mali. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Paper 24. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • Haggblade, S., Diallo, B., Diarra, A., Keita, N., Tasie, O. and Traoré, A. (2017) National implementation of regional pesticide policies: Mali case study report. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Paper 47. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • Hall, D.C. and Moffitt, L.J. (2002) Modelling for pesticide productivity measurement. In: Hall D.C., Moffitt L.J. (eds.), Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources 4: Economics of Pesticides, Sustainable Food Production, and Organic Food Markets. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA). (1990) Livestock systems research manual—Volume 1. ILCA Working Paper 1. Addis Ababa: ILCA.

  • Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER). (2013) Procédures d’expérimentation des pesticides et engrais par l’Institut d’Economie Rurale. Bamako: IER.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2014) Youth and Agriculture: Key Challenges and Concrete Solutions. Rome: IFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, T.S. and Rashid, S. (2013) Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics 44(6):547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keita, D. (1992) Evaluation des risques d’exposition chez les travailleurs manipulant les insecticides organophosphores et pyrethrinoides en zone CMDT de Koutiala. Thèse, Diplôme d’Etat. Bamako : Ecole Nationale de Medecine et de Pharmacie.

  • Kergna, A. (2016) (personal communication, August 17, 2016). IER crop budgets for sorghum, millet and maize. Bamako: IER.

  • Klumper, W. and Qaim, M. (2014) A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE 9(11): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouser, S. and Qaim, M. (2014) Bt cotton, damage control and optimal levels of pesticide use in Pakistan. Environment and Development Economics 19(6): 704–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E. and Zilberman, D. (1986) The econometrics of damage control: why specification matters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68:261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, B., Fréwguin-Gresh, S. and White, E.T. (2014) Structural Transformation and Rural Change Revisited: Challenges for Late Developing Countries in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIR Plus. (2012) Evaluation de la qualité des pesticides commercialisés dans huit pays de l’espace CEDEAO. Abuja and Abidjan: ECOWAS and UEMOA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyanga, P.H., Johnsen, F.H. and Kalinda, T.H. (2012) Gendered Impacts of Conservation Agriculture and Paradox of Herbicide Use among Smallholder Farmers. International Journal of Technology and Development Studies 3(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerke, E.C. (2006) Crop Losses to Pests. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 144:31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office du Niger. (2012) Rapport de la campagne 2011/12. Ségou: Office du Niger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), U.S. Congress. (1990) A Plague of Locusts-Special Report, OTA-F-450. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, M. D.K. and Zelaya, I.A. (2005) Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Management Science 61:301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. (1989) The econometrics of damage control: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, J., and Demont, M. (2009) Potential of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Technologies for Sub-Saharan Africa. AgBioForum 12(3&4):313–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A., Shumway, C.R. and Havenner, A. (1997) The economics and econometrics of damage control. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3): 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, R. and Thirtle, C. (2005) Pesticide productivity and transgenic cotton technology: the South African smallholder case. Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(1):97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, M., Assima, A., Kergna, A., Traroe, A. and Keita, N. (2015) Survey research report: diagnostic survey of sorghum production in the Sudanian savanna, 2014. FSP Innovation Lab Working Paper No. Mali-2015-1. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • Soungalo, S. (2016) Personal communication, March 9, 2016.

  • Tamru, S., Minten, B., Bachewe, F. and Alemu, D. (2017) The rapid expansion of herbicide use in smallholder agriculture in Ethiopia: Patterns, drivers, and implications. European Journal of Development Research (this issue).

  • Tefft, J. (2010) Mali’s white revolution: smallholder cotton, 1960–2006. Chapter 4 in Haggblade and Hazell (eds.) Successes in African Agriculture: Lessons for the Future. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Thériault, V., Kergna, A., Traore, A., Teme, B. and Smale, M. (2015) Review of the structure and performance of the fertilizer value chain in Mali. FSP Innovation Lab Working Paper No. Mali-2015-2. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

  • Theriault, V., Smale, M. and Haider, H. (2017) How Does Gender Affect Sustainable Intensification of Cereal Production in the West African Sahel? Evidence from Burkina Faso. World Development, 92: 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traoré, Alain Sy; Dimithe, Georges et Toe, Adama M. (2011) perspectives des communautés économiques régionales en matière de gestion des pesticides. Gestion des en Afrique de l’Ouest No.8:14-19. Rome and Abuja: FOA and ECOWAS.

  • Waterfield, G. and Zilberman, D. (2012) Pest management in food systems: an economic perspective. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 37:223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weersink, A., Llewellyn, R.S. and Pannell, D.J. (2005) Economics of pre-emptive management to avoid weed resistance to glyphosate in Australia. Crop Protection 24:659–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesseler, J., Scatasta, S. and Fall, E.H. (2011) The environmental benefits and costs of genetically modified (gm) crops. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization 10:171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesseler, J. and Smart, R. (2014) Environmental Impacts. Chapter 6 in Falck-Zepeda, J., Ludlow, K. and Smyth, S., (eds.) Socio-economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation. Springer: New York, NY, USA, pp. 81–95.

  • World Bank, Département pour le Développement Humain de la Région Afrique. (2010) Le système éducatif malien: analyse sectorielle pour une amélioration de la qualité et de l’efficacité du système. World Bank Working Paper no. 198. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2009) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by Hazard. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zindahl, R.L. (2007) Fundamentals of Weed Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl, R.L. (2016) A History of Weed Science in the United States. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Haggblade.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table A1 OLS and Tobit adoption models explaining herbicide use (liters per plot) on maize and sorghum plots, Sudan Savanna, Mali
Table A2 Weeding labor requirements by crop
Table A3 Agricultural population and rural economic activity rates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haggblade, S., Smale, M., Kergna, A. et al. Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali. Eur J Dev Res 29, 648–674 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0087-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0087-2

Keywords

Navigation