Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes and their modus operandi in South Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surge of interest in digital currencies has led to a corresponding global increase in Ponzi schemes associated with cryptocurrencies. Scammers of cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes often target older adults who are cash-rich and have limited knowledge of digital assets. Therefore, to reduce the number of victims, it is imperative to increase the understanding of the crime itself. However, there remains a paucity of scholarly exploration focused on the criminal mechanisms underpinning such schemes and the strategic decision-making process of the perpetrators. This study seeks to address this gap in the literature and enhance the current understanding of cryptocurrency-based Ponzi schemes through an examination of their operational tactics. The methodology employed in this study distinguishes the progression of these schemes into two stages: the pre-crime phase and the criminal event phase, each scripted for further clarity, yielding three scripts for the former and eleven for the latter. Based on these parsed narratives, this research proposes several policy strategies aimed at curtailing the prevalence of cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, C., V. Morales, J.K. Baldwin, and S.D. Scott. 2017. Ezubao: A Chinese Ponzi scheme with a twist. Journal of Financial Crime 24 (2): 256–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoletti, M., B. Pes, and S. Serusi. 2018. “Data mining for detecting bitcoin Ponzi schemes.” In 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology, 75–84.

  • Bartoletti, M., S. Carta, T. Cimoli, and R. Saia. 2020. Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Identification, analysis, and impact. Future Generation Computer Systems 102: 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, E., and B. Leclerc. 2007. An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision-making. Sexual Abuse 19 (2): 115–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, E., M.F. Rebocho, and D.K. Rossmo. 2010. Target selection patterns in rape. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 7 (2): 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brayley, H., E. Cockbain, and G. Laycock. 2011. The value of crime scripting: Deconstructing internal child sex trafficking. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 5 (2): 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvajal, A., H. Monroe, B. Wynter, and C.A. Pattillo. 2009. Ponzi schemes in the Caribbean. International Monetary Fund 2009 (095): A0001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, E.T., and J. Fry. 2015. Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters 130: 32–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Z, Zheng, J. Cui, E. Ngai, P. Zheng, and Y. Zhou. 2018. “Detecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Towards healthier blockchain technology.” In Proceedings of the 2018 World wide Web Conference, 1409–1418.

  • Choi, M. 2021. Pecuniary nature of virtual currency—Case analysis on Supreme Court decision 2019 Do 1462 on May 30, 2019. Contemporary Review of Criminal Law 72: 290–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., and S. Choi. 2021. Messenger phishing modus operandi in South Korea. Journal of Korean Public Police and Security Studies 18 (3): 241–258.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., and M. Kim. 2015. A study on the voice phishing fraud crime for national security and public safety in South Korea: Focus on the its process. The Journal of Police Science 15 (3): 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., J.L. Lee, and Y.T. Chun. 2017. Voice phishing fraud and its modus operandi. Security Journal 30: 454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., and K. Rhee. 2018. Policy issues for the bitcoin transactions based on the blockchain. In Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference, 106–109.

  • Cornish, D.B. 1994. The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 3 (1): 151–196.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D.B., and R.V. Clarke. 2002. Analyzing organized crimes. Rational Choice and Criminal Behavior: Recent Research and Future Challenges 32: 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M., and H. Valente. 2014. Chapter ten Ponzi schemes: Computer simulation. Interdisciplinary Insights on Fraud: 248.

  • Deason, S., S. Rajgopal, and G. B. Waymire. 2015. Who gets swindled in Ponzi schemes?. Available at SSRN 2586490.

  • Denny, M.J., and A. Spirling. 2018. Text preprocessing for unsupervised learning: Why it matters, when it misleads, and what to do about it. Political Analysis 26 (2): 168–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. 2004. Triangulation in qualitative research. A Companion to Qualitative Research 3: 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, M.T.A., B.A. Halim, and S.A.A. Rahman. 2020. An exploratory inquiry on the decision process of Ponzi scheme investor’s: A qualitative case study approach. International Journal of Management 11 (12): 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg, R. 2011. Bitcoin: An innovative alternative digital currency. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal 4: 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, A., and T.J. Holt. 2015. A crime script analysis of the online stolen data market. British Journal of Criminology 55 (3): 596–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.J. 2018. A legal review on abuse cases of virtual currency and legal responses. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 19 (2): 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet Trend. 2023. Search Engine. Internet Trend. http://www.internettrend.co.kr/trendForward.tsp

  • Jacobs, P., and L. Schain. 2011. The never ending attraction of the Ponzi scheme. Journal of Comprehensive Research 9: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S.I., and J.Y. Kim. 2017. A study on the asset characterization of Bitcoin. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies 22 (4): 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, D.Y. 2021. A study on the sextortion M.O.(Modus Operandi) using crime script analysis. The Journal of Police Science 21 (3): 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S. 2023. 'BTC Ponzi scheme' Airbit executive pleads guilty to $100M fraud charges. Tokenpost. https://www.tokenpost.kr/article-125266

  • Jon, W. 2019. Legal characteristic of cryptocurrency and regulation improvement suggestion. The Korean Journal of Financial Law 16 (1): 147–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, H. 2022. 'Luna' and 'Terra' Crash, Failed Innovation or Scam?. SisaIN. https://www.sisain.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=47599

  • Jory, S. R., and M. J. Perry. 2011. Ponzi schemes: A critical analysis. Available at SSRN 1894206.

  • Jung, J. 2021. A study on pan-governmental and legislative controls related to cryptocurrency crime—Focusing on the amendments to the specific financial information act. The Journal of Police Science 21 (1): 61–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsiampa, P. 2017. Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters 158: 3–6.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kethineni, S., and Y. Cao. 2020. The rise in popularity of cryptocurrency and associated criminal activity. International Criminal Justice Review 30 (3): 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. 2018a. A critical review on the phenomenon of multifraud crime and normative alternatives: For an enactment of the framework act in the regulation of multifraud crime, etc. Korean Criminological Review 29 (3): 127–161.

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.J. 2020. A study on criminal policy implication of crypto currency based on block chain technology in the fourth industrial revolution. Korean Journal of Criminology 31 (4): 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E.J. 2022a. A crime process analysis of the voice phishing crimes: Based on crime script analysis of the face-to-face defraudation method. Criminal Investigation Studies 8 (2): 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., and J. Yoo. 2021. Reframing conventional regulatory tools on newly-developed-tech, ʻʻcryptocurrencyʼʼ. Contemporary Review of Criminal Law 71: 63–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Y. Cho, and J. Bae. 2020. Exploratory study on countering Internet hate speech: Focusing on case study of exposure to Internet hate speech and experts’ in-depth interview. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 20 (2): 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., J. Kim, C. Kim, and K. Kim. 2022. Cryptocurrency recommendation model using the similarity and association rule mining. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems 28 (4): 287–308.

    MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 2018. A Group that made 3 billion won selling cryptocurrency to the elderly in a pyramid scheme was caught. Sedaily. https://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/1RZPZAUYBT

  • Kim, S. 2022. Busted a U.S.-Brazilian organization that ran a trillion-won cryptocurrency scam. Global Economic. https://news.g-enews.com/article/Securities/2022/10/20221008122022770c4c55f9b3d_1?md=20221008123300_U

  • Kim, S. 2022. The head of Russia's largest cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme, Finiko, has been arrested in the United Arab Emirates. Global Economic. https://news.g-enews.com/article/Securities/2022/12/202212121056484283c4c55f9b3d_1?md=20221212112026_U

  • Koh, J. 2023. Terra·Luna has 280,000 domestic investors‥ What about investor protection?. MBC News. https://imnews.imbc.com/replay/2023/nwdesk/article/6467337_36199.html

  • Kumar, S., J. Thakur, D. Ekka, and I. Sahu. 2022. Web scraping using Python. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management 4 (9): 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. 2006. Burglar decision making and target selection: An assesment of residential vulnerability to burglary. The Journal of Police Science 6 (2): 154–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.H. 2019. Review on prevention and investigation of cryptocurrency-related crimes from the criminal justice perspective: Focused on concurrent legislative discussion. The Journal of Police Science 19 (4): 63–96.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. 2021. Population aging and Korean society. Korea Journal 61 (2): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., and C. Bae. 2023. Recent criminal law issues on cryptocurrency. Northeast Asian Law Journal 16 (4): 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., and H. Kim. 2019. A study on cryptocurrency market in China. Journal of Digital Contents Society 20 (3): 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. 2022. Virtual asset crime damage amounted to 4.74 trillion won over 5 years... 12,000 victims. Financial News. https://www.fnnews.com/news/202205241835214452

  • Lee, Z. 2022. [200 Mobile apps loved by Koreans in 2022] New trends for 2023 predicted by app rankings. Forbes Korea. https://jmagazine.joins.com/forbes/view/337083

  • Leech, N.L., and A.J. Onwuegbuzie. 2007. An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly 22 (4): 557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T., J. Han, and R. Clayton. 2012. The postmodern Ponzi scheme: Empirical analysis of high-yield investment programs. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security: 16th International Conference, 41–56.

  • Mukherjee, S., C. Larkin, and S. Corbet. 2021. Cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes. Understanding Cryptocurrency Fraud: THe Challenges and Headwinds to Regulate Digital Currencies 2: 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NolascoBraaten, C., and M.S. Vaughn. 2021. Convenience theory of cryptocurrency crime: A content analysis of US federal court decisions. Deviant Behavior 42 (8): 958–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oprea, S.V., and A. Bâra. 2022. Why Is more efficient to combine BeautifulSoup and Selenium in scraping for data under energy crisis. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series 22 (2): 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, S.I., and S. Bae. 2018. The analysis on research trends for Korea DMZ using text mining. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers 24 (3): 406–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. 2021. The 'jackpot illusion'... Coin fraud overtook 60–80 elderly people. Hankookilbo. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021052710460005694

  • Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakhmanova, E. N., and T. V. Pinkevich. 2020. Digital crime concept. In 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth”, 193–196.

  • Rosen, P. 2022. Ethereum cofounder Vitalik Buterin wants average Terra holders to be compensated via 'coordinated sympathy' after the stablecoin's crash. MARKETS INSIDER. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/terrausd-luna-crash-ethereum-vitalik-buterin-do-kwon-stablecoin-crypto-2022-5

  • Seo, J.Y. 2018. Study on the countermeasures on the bitcoin used crime. The Journal of Police Policies 32 (3): 323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suberg, W. 2015. One Coin, Much Scam: OneCoin Exposed as Global MLM Ponzi Scheme. Coin Telegraph. https://cointelegraph.com/news/one-coin-much-scam-onecoin-exposed-as-global-mlm-ponzi-scheme

  • Sun, J.S. 2022. A study on the property of cryptocurrency—Focusing on the recent Supreme Court ruling. Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law 24 (3): 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, O. 2009. Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. Methoden der vergleichenden Politik-und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue entwicklungen und anwendungen: 481–496.

  • Vasek, M., and T. Moore. 2019. Analyzing the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme ecosystem. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security: FC 2018 International Workshops, BITCOIN, VOTING, and WTSC, 101–112.

  • Williams, D.C. 2017. A Timeline and fraud triangle analysis of the SEC’s Mandoff Ponzi scheme investigation. International Journal of Business & Public Administration 14 (1): 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., and A. Buchanan. 2015. Advancing egalitarianism. In Handbook of Digital Currency, 385–402. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., D. Choi, Y. Choi, and K. Jang. 2022. 5 Trillion won in 5 years...Cryptocurrency scams now outpace voice phishing. Hankyung. https://www.hankyung.com/finance/article/2022011619501

  • Yoo, J.S., and H.K. Kang. 2018. A study of legislative plan and legal issues of virtual currency. Korea Financial Law Association 15 (1): 213–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., J. Jin, Y. Xie, J. Shen, and Q. Xuan. 2021. Ponzi scheme detection in Ethereum transaction network. In Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems: Third International Conference, BlockSys 2021, 175-186.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Security Convergence, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea

    Seoung Won Choi

  2. Department of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea

    Julak Lee

  3. Business, Wrexham Glyndwr University, Mold Road, LL11 2AW, Wrexham, United Kingdom

    Sang-Hak Lee

Authors
  1. Seoung Won Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julak Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sang-Hak Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julak Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, S., Lee, J. & Lee, SH. Cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes and their modus operandi in South Korea. Secur J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-024-00417-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-024-00417-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation