Abstract
I read the clash between predictive psychoanalytic theories and destabilizing queer theories on the subject of desire as a disagreement over probability. I point psychoanalysts and queer theorists towards four relevant episodes in the history of science: the debate on statistics and thermodynamics within the Victorian intelligentsia, the Einstein-Bergson feud, discussions within the cybernetics movement, and recent critiques of automated cars. Considering our sexual aims and objects as information, our desires would be due to the way we retrieve them. Psychoanalysis explains how such information is stored and queer theory how it is reorganized. In cases where repression is not accountable for lack of desire toward an external stimulus, such absence would be due to information not retrieved quick enough, rather than a genuine incapacity to desire.
References
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.
Bergson, H. (1922). Durée et simultanéité, à propos de la théorie d’Einstein [Duration and simultaneity: About Einstein’s theory]. F. Alcan.
Bersani, L. (1996). Homos. Harvard University Press.
Boyd, N. A. (2008). Who is the subject? Queer theory meets oral history. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 17(2), 177–189.
Brooks, P., & Woloch, A. (Eds.) (2000). Whose Freud?: The place of psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Yale University Press.
Buckle. H. (1857). History of civilization in England. Rose-Belford Publishing Company.
Butler. J. (1996). Imitation and gender insubordination. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall, M. (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 371–387). Routledge.
Butler. J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.
Cameron, O. C. (2017). From tragic fall to programmatic blueprint. In N. Giffney & E. Watson (Eds.), Clinical encounters in sexuality: Psychoanalytic practice and queer theory (pp. 285–300). Punctum Books.
Canales, J. (2015). The physicist and the philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the debate that changed our understanding of time. Princeton University Press.
Childers, T.L., & Jass, J. (2002). All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93–106.
Dean, T. (2009). Unlimited intimacy: Reflections on the subculture of barebacking. The University of Chicago Press.
Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Duke University Press.
Einstein, A. (1934). On the method of theoretical physics. Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 163–169.
Eliot. G. (1985). Middlemarch. Bantam Books. (original work published 1871)
Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition: Vol. 7 (pp. 126–248). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1905)
Giffney, N., & Watson, E. (Eds.). (2017). Clinical encounters in sexuality: Psychoanalytic practice and queer theory. Punctum Books.
Greven, D. (2017). Queering The Terminator: Sexuality and cyborg cinema. Bloomsbury Academic.
Gribbin. J. (2013). Erwin Schrödinger and the quantum revolution. John Wiley & Sons.
Grossman. W. I. (1986). Notes on masochism: A discussion of the history and development of a psychoanalytic concept. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55(3), 379–413.
Heilbron, J. L. (2000). The dilemmas of an upright man: Max Planck and the fortunes of German science. Harvard University Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. George Allen and Unwin.
Hite, C. (Ed.). (2017). Derrida and queer theory. Pictum Books.
Hodges, I. (2011). Queering psychoanalysis: Power, self and identity in psychoanalytic therapy with sexual minority clients. Psychology and Sexuality, 2(1), 29–44.
Hutfless, E., & Zach, B. (Eds.) (2017). Queering psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyse und queer theory – Transdisziplinäre verschränkungen. Zaglossus.
Jones, W. P., & Anderson, J. R. (1987). Short- and long-term memory retrieval: A comparison of the effects of information load and relatedness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 137–153.
Kuzniar, A. (2017). Precarious sexualities: Queer challenges to psychoanalytic and social identity categorization. In N. Giffney & E. Watson (Eds.), Clinical encounters in sexuality: Psychoanalytic practice and queer theory (pp. 51–76). Punctum Books.
Leyton, M. (2010). The neurobiology of desire: Dopamine and the regulation of mood and motivational states in humans. In M. L. Kringelbach & K. C. Berridge (Eds.), Pleasures of the brain (pp. 222–243). Oxford University Press.
Loewenstein, R. M. (1957). A contribution to the psychoanalytic theory of masochism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 5(2), 197–234.
Lopez, R. B., Wagner, D. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2015). Neuroscience of desire regulation. In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 146–160). The Guilford Press.
Murphy, A. (2017). The redress of psychoanalysis. In N. Giffney & E. Watson (Eds.), Clinical encounters in sexuality: Psychoanalytic practice and queer theory (pp. 223–234). Punctum Books.
Nigianni, C., & Storr, M. (Eds.). (2009). Deleuze and queer theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Pickering, A. (2010). The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. University of Chicago Press.
Spargo, T. (1999). Foucault and queer theory. Totem Books.
Sprenger, F. (2022). Microdecisions and autonomy in self-driving cars: Virtual probabilities. AI & Society, 37, 619–634.
Taubenfeld, A., Anderson, M. C., & Levy, D. A. (2019). The impact of retrieval suppression on conceptual implicit memory. Memory, 27(5), 686–697.
Tondre, M. (2018). The physics of possibility: Victorian science, fiction, and gender. University of Virginia Press.
Uebel, M. (2012). Psychoanalysis and the question of violence: From masochism to shame. American Imago, 69(4), 473–505.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Technology Press.
Yep, G., Chrifi Alaoui, F., & Lescure, R. (2023). Mapping queer relationalities: An exploration of communication at the edges of cultural unintelligibility. Journal of Homosexuality, 70(1), 1–16.
Zeuthen, K., & Gammelgaard, J. (2017). Enigmatic sexuality. In N. Giffney & E. Watson (Eds.), Clinical encounters in sexuality: Psychoanalytic practice and queer theory (pp. 301–312). Punctum Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dabbous, R. Is desire a matter of probability?. Psychoanal Cult Soc 28, 447–459 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-022-00366-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-022-00366-1