Abstract
Theories of politicization trace attempts by politicians to stay in control of an increasingly complex policy environment to three main roots: changes in mass media, changes in the way party organizations are run and administrative reforms. Each has created new political vulnerabilities, calling for a stronger presence of trusted employees in the public sector to guard the interests of politicians and parties. Consideration for the quality of government, however, may require greater administrative autonomy than is compatible with conventional agency conceptions of administration. The present study uses the Icelandic case to shed light on how such trends and countertrends affect the overall level of politicization. Case selection is justified on the basis that politicization is expected to be present according to established theories in the field. The findings indicate that politicization is a clearly observable part of ongoing tension between political control and bureaucratic autonomy in Iceland. It is more easily observed at the apex of the administrative system than lower levels, and political appointments are but one of a set of tools available to maintain political control. It seems more appropriate to speak of contained politicization of political appointments than a major watershed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allern, E., Bischoff, C. and Kristinsson, G. (2011) Political Control or Bureaucratic Autonomy? A Comparison of Public Appointments in Denmark, Iceland and Norway. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik 2011, http://new.ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/cc286054-017e-4885-9b42-b33295353408.pdf.
Bertelsen, R. (1997) ‘Om politisk ledelse og politiske hjælpere i Island’ Demokratiprojektet, arbedspapir 6, 1997. Copenhagen: Democracy Project.
Betænkning nr. 1354. (1998) Forholdet mellem minister og embedsmænd. Copenhagen: Finansministeriet.
Biezen, I. (2004) Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics 10(6): 701–722.
Blumler, J. and Kavanagh, D. (1999) The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communications 16: 209–230.
Christensen, J. G. (2004) Political responsiveness in a merit bureaucracy: Denmark. In: B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds.) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Cocops. (2014) Data from Cocops survey of public managers, http://www.cocops.eu/work-packages/work-package-3.
Connaughton, B. (2010) ‘Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists’: A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies 25(3): 347–369.
Connaughton, B. (2015) Navigating the borderlines of politics and administration: Reflections on the role of ministerial advisers. International Journal of Public Administration 38: 37–45.
De Wilde, P. (2011). No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–575.
Dunleavy, P., Margett, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J. (2006) New public management is dead – long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3): 467–494.
Eichbaum, C. and Shaw, R. (2008) Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21(3): 337–363.
Farrell, D. and Webb, P. (2002) Political parties as campaign organizations. In: R. Dalton and M. Wattenberg (eds.) Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fleischer, J. (2012) Policy Advice and Institutional Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Britain. Dr. rer. pol dissertation, University of Potsdam, published online at http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2012/6187/.
Fukuyama, F. (2013) What is governance? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(3): 347–368.
Granovetter, M. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.
Heclo, H. (1977) A Government of Strangers, Executive Politics in Washington. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
Hegel, G. (1967) Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. London: Oxford University Press.
Hustedt, T. and Salomonsen, H. (2014) Ensuring political responsiveness: Politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4): 746–765.
Indridason, I. and Kristinsson, G. H. (2015) Primary consequences. The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics, 21: 565–576.
Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy. The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.
Katz, R. and Mair, P. (2002) The ascendancy of the party in public office: Party organizational change in twentieth-century democracies. In: R. Gunther, J. Montero and J. Linz (eds.) Political Parties. Old Concepts and New Challenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kettl, D. (2002). The Transformation of Governance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kopecký, P. and Mair, P. (2012) Party patronage as an organizational resource. In: P. Kopecký, P. Mair and M. Spirova (eds.) Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kopecký, P. Mair, P. and Spirova, M. (eds.) (2012) Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kopecký, P. and Scherlis, G. (2008) Party patronage in contemporary Europe. European Review 16(3): 355–371.
Kristinsson, G. H. (1996) Parties, states and patronage. West European Politics 19(3): 433–457.
Kristinsson, G. H. (2010) Fjölmennustu flokkar heims. Meðlimaskipulag íslenskra stjórnmálaflokka. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration 6(2): 123–150.
Kristinsson, G. H. (2012) Party patronage in Iceland: Rewards and control appointments. In: P. Kopecký, P. Mair and M. Spirova (eds.) Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kristinsson, G. H. (2015) Political control and perceptions of corruption in Icelandic local government. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration 11(1): 1–17, http://www.irpa.is/article/view/a.2014.10.1.1.
Kristmundsson, O. (2003) Reinventing Government in Iceland. Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press.
Kristmundsson, O. (2005) Bakgrunnur aðstoðarmanna ráðherra: Þróun 1971–2005. Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla 1(1): 61–80.
Louw, E. (2005) The Media and Political Process. London: Sage.
Maley, M. (2011) Strategic links in a cut-throat world: Rethinking the role and relationships of Australian ministerial staff. Public Administration 89(4): 1469–1488.
Milward, H. and Provan, K. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 359–379.
Mintzberg, H. (1983) Structure in Fives. London: Prentice-Hall.
Mouritzen, P.-E., and Svara, J. (2002) Leadership at the Apex. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Mulgan, R. (2007) Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice. Public Administration 85(3): 569–586.
Peters, B. and Pierre, J. (2004) Politicization of the civil service: Concepts, causes, consequences. In: B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds.) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Piattoni, S. (ed.) (2001) Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollitt, G. and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21(2): 165–190.
Rouban, L. (2003) Politicization of the civil service. In: B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds.) Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
Salomonsen, H. and Knudsen, T. (2011) Changes in public service bargains: Ministers and civil servants in Denmark. Public Administration 89(3): 1015–1035.
Samhent stjórnsýsla [Coordination in administration]. 2010. Report from Prime Minister’s Office, http://www.forsaetisraduneyti.is/media/Skyrslur/lokaskyrsla-stjornarradslaganefnd.pdf.
Shefter, M. (1994) Political Parties and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sørensen, E. (2006) Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36(1): 98–114.
Svara, J. (1994) Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationships between policy and administration in council-manager cities. In: H.G. Frederickson (ed.) Ideal and Practice in Council-Manager Government. Washington: International City/County Management Association.
Thies, M. (2001) Keeping tabs on partners: The logic of delegation in coalition governments. American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 580–598.
Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society. Berkley: University of California Press.
Wildavsky. A. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little Brown.
Wilson, W. (1887) The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly 2(2): 197–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristinsson, G. Specialists, spinners and networkers: political appointees in Iceland. Acta Polit 51, 413–432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0001-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-016-0001-5