Skip to main content
Log in

Complex harms of migration externalisation: EU policy ‘creep’ processes into domestic counterterrorism at the Turkey-Iran border

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the overlap between European Union migration controls and internal counter-terror measures in the Kurdish populated region at the Turkey-Iran border. It highlights the development of an ‘externalisation creep’ in the context of this overlap. We discuss how the EU’s external measures aimed at people classed as ‘irregular migrants and smugglers’ creep into local internal border security, leading to the prioritisation, on the ground, of measures against people broadly labelled as supporting ‘terrorism’. This development has resulted in the expansion of borderwork, which is associated with unexpected border control outcomes beyond those originally intended by the EU. The article draws upon an ethnographic data collection at the Turkey-Iran border, a geographical area that has seldom featured in EU-supported border controls studies. Our analysis seeks to contribute to the academic literature on externalisation by moving away from an EU-centric perspective, and instead focusing on border governance dynamics that are situated in the local histories and domestic sites of conflict, as understood by diverse border crossing survivors. This approach allows us to foreground how EU migration externalisation co-opts domestic practices in the context of borders with pre-existing forms of insecurity, and targets migrants as well as residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The interviews with representatives of different EU institutions and with the Council of Europe revealed, as expected, the existence of diverging positions in the context of the external dimension of migration policies. Despite these divergences, a mainstream narrative on the idea that the externalisation of migration is the most efficient way to govern increasing numbers of migrant arrivals was common to all EU and Council of Europe policy makers interviewed.

References

  • Akkerman, Mark. (2018) ‘Expanding the Fortress. In Transnational Institute’. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/expanding_the_fortress_-_1.6_may_11.pdf

  • Aksel, Damla B., and Danis, Didem. (2013) ‘Diverse facets of Europeanization at the Iraq-Turkish border’. In Nurcan Özgür Baklacıoğlu & Yeşim Özer (Eds.), Turkey: Beyond the fortress paradigm at the southeastern borders of the EU (pp. 267–304). Edwin Edgar Mellen Press.

  • Andersson, Ruben. (2016) Hardwiring the frontier? The politics of security technology in Europe’s fight against illegal migration. Security Dialogue 47(1): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, Ruben and Keen, David. (2019) ‘Partners in crime? The impact of Europe’s outsourced migration controls on peace, stability and rights’. In Safeworld (Issue July). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170249

  • Arısan-eralp, Nilgün, Aydın-düzgit, Senem, Eralp, Atila., Keyman, Fuat, & Nas, Çiğdem. (2020) ‘EU-Turkey Relations After the Council Summit: a Chance for Reengagement or Facing a Complete Breakdown?’ IPC Policy Brief, November.

  • Augustova, Karolina. (2021). Impacts of EU-Turkey cooperation on migration along the Iran-Turkey border. IPC-Mercator Policy Brief May 2021. https://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/Content/Images/CKeditorImages/20210816-20082442.pdf

  • Augustova, Karolina. & Hakimi, Hameed. (2021). Migration from Afghanistan under the Taliban: Implications and strategies in the neighbourhood and Europe. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://afghanistan.fes.de/e/migration-from-afghanistan-under-the-taliban

  • Bird, Gemma, Obradovic-Wochnik, Jelena, Beattie, Amanda Russell., & Rozbicka, Patrycja. (2020) ‘The ‘Badlands’ of the ‘Balkan Route’: policy and spatial effects on urban refugee housing’. Global Policy, Special Issue: 1–13.

  • Bliesemann de Guevara, Beris & Bøås, Morten (2021). Doing Fieldwork in Areas of International Intervention: A Guide to Research in Violent and Enclosed Contexts. Bristol University Press.

  • Bøås, Morten. (2021) ‘EU migration management in the Sahel: unintended consequences on the ground in Niger?’, Third World Quarterly, 42(1): 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossong, Raphael and Carrapico, Helena. (2016) (Eds.) Shifting borders of European Union internal security: Technology, externalisation and accountability. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

  • Bozçali, Fırat. (2020) Probabilistic borderwork: oil smuggling, nonillegality, and techno-legal politics in the Kurdish borderlands of Turkey. Am Ethnol, 47(1): 72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, Matt., Fabbe, Kristin E., Kyrkopoulou, Eleni. (2022). Thy Neighbor’s Gendarme? How Citizens of Buffer States in North Africa View EU Border Security Externalization. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 1-15.

  • Caman, Mehmet Efe. (2021) ‘Authoritarianization and Human Rights in Turkey: How the AKP Legitimizes Human Rights Violations’. In Aydin, Hasan and Langley, Winston, eds ‘Human Rights in Turkey’, Vol. 15, pp. 179–97. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. (2018) Beyond the criminalisation of migration: A non-Western perspective. Migration and Border Studies 4(4): 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çetin, Raha Atakan. (2020) ‘Externalization of the European Union Migration Regime: The Case of Turkey’ New Political Science, 42(4): 538–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cold-Ravnkilde, Signe Marie. (2021) ‘Borderwork in the Grey Zone: Everyday Resistance within European Border Control Initiatives in Mali’. Geopolitics 27(5): 1450–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2021) ‘Draft Action Plan responding to the events in Afghanistan’. In StateWatch. Available at: https://www.statewatch.org/media/2726/eu-council-afghanistan-com-draft-action-plan-migration-10472-1-21-rev1.pdf

  • Crane, Austin. (2019) The politics of development and humanitarianism in EU externalization: managing migration in Ukraine. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38(1): 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuttitta, Paolo. (2020) ‘Non-governmental/civil society organisations and the European Union-externalisation of migration management in Tunisia and Egypt’. Population, Space and Place, 26(7): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuttitta, Paolo. (2022) ‘Over Land and Sea: NGOs/CSOs and EU Border Externalisation Along the Central Mediterranean Route’. Geopolitics 0(0): 1–27.

  • Delegation of the European Union to Turkey (2021) ‘Support to the Implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016. EU Response to the Refugee Crisis in Turkey’. Available at: https://www.avrupa.info.tr/en/project/support-implementation-eu-turkey-statement-18-march-2016-8006

  • El Qadim, Nora, İşleyen, Beste, de Vries, Leonie Ansems, Hansen, Signe Sofie, Karadağ, Sibel, Lisle, Debbie, and Simonneau, Damien. (2021). (Im)moral borders in practice. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1608–38.

  • European Commission (2022) ‘EU adopts new programmes in support to refugees and border management in Turkiye worth over €1.2 billion. Press Release. 12 December’. Brussels. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_7655

  • European Commision (2021). ‘Turkey 2021 Report’. In COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/turkey-report-2021_en

  • European Commission (2020). ‘Turkey 2020 Report’. In COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/turkey_report_2020.pdf

  • European Union (1993) ‘Accession Criteria (Copenhagen Criteria), Access to European Union Law’. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/glossary/accession_criteria_copenhague.html

  • Evrensel (2017) ‘Sinira duvar orulmesi-yoksulluk ve goc demektir’ (June 18). Available at: https://www.evrensel.net/haber/323964/sinira-duvar-orulmesi-yoksulluk-ve-goc-demektir

  • Frowd, Philippe M. (2021) ‘Borderwork Creep in West Africa’s Sahel’. Geopolitics 27(5): 1331–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Michael. (2021) Externalisation, immigration detention and the Committee on Migrant Workers. Forced Migration Review 44: 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garelli, Grenda, Tazzioli, Martina. (2018) The humanitarian war against migrant smugglers at sea. Antipode 50(3): 685–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genç, Denız. (2015) ‘An Analysis of Turkey’s Bordering Processes: Why and Against Whom?’, Turkish Studies 16(4): 527–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hama, Hawre Hasan. (2020) ‘The Securitization and De-Securitization of Kurdish Societal Security in Turkey, Iraq, Iran, And Syria’. World Affairs 183(4): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haner, Murat, Cullen, Francis T., and Benson, Michael L. (2020) ‘Women and the PKK: Ideology, Gender, and Terrorism’, International Criminal Justice Review 30(3): 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrowell, Elly, Davies, Thom and Disney, Tom. (2017). Making Space for Failure in Geographic Research. The Professional Geographer, 70(2), 230–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, Gerda and Hess, Sabine. (2017) ‘Tracing the Effects of the EU-Turkey Deal The Momentum of the Multi-layered Turkish Border Regime’. Movements 3(2): 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2021) ‘Turkey: Events of 2020’. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/turkey#8d3ef8

  • İçduygu, Ahmet. (2020) ‘Decentring migrant smuggling: reflections on the Eastern Mediterranean route to Europe’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(14): 3293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbiz, Ethem. (2021) ‘Electoral cost of the European Union promoted norms: Erdogan’s counter-terrorism impasse’. Global Affairs 7(5): 695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbiz, Ethem, & Kaunert, Christian. (2021) ‘EU, Turkey and Counter-terrorism: Fighting the PKK and ISIS’ Edward Elgan: Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iñiguez de Heredia, Marta (2021) EU peacebuilding’s new khaki: Exceptionalist militarism in the trading of good governed for military-capable states. Politics 41(3): 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (2020) ‘Turkey: Displacement associated with conflict and violence’. Available at: https://www.internal-displacement.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/GRID 2020 – Conflict Figure Analysis – TURKEY_1.pdf

  • International Crisis Group (2021) ‘Turkey’s PKK conflict: A visual explainer’. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/content/turkeys-pkk-conflict-visual-explainer

  • Isakjee, Arshad, Davies, Thom, Jelena, Obradovic-Wochnik, Augustova, Karolina. (2020) Liberal violence and the racial borders of the European Union. Antipode 52(6): 1751–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadıoğlu, I. Aytaç. (2019) ‘The Oslo Talks: Revealing the Turkish Government’s Secret Negotiations with the PKK’. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(10): 915–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadağ, Sibel. (2019) ‘Extraterritoriality of European borders to Turkey: an implementation perspective of counteractive strategies’. Comparative Migration Studies 7(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, Ayhan. (2021) Europeanization and De-Europeanization of Turkish Asylum and Migration Policies. In Reiners, W. & Turhan, E., eds. ‘EU-Turkey Relations: Theories, Institutions and Policies’, 347–72, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaytaz, E. (2020) ‘Held at the gates of Europe: barriers to abolishing immigration detention in Turkey’. Citizenship Studies 25(2): 203-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaytaz, Esra S. (2016) ‘Afghan Journeys to Turkey: Narratives of Immobility, Travel and Transformation’. Geopolitics 21(2): 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Jana. (2021). The ethics of ethnographic methods in conflict zones. Journal of Peace Research, 58(3), 329–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg-Pedersen, Martin. (2019) ‘Manufacturing displacement. Externalization and postcoloniality in European migration control’. Global Affairs 5(3): 247–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, Sarah and Kaunert, Christian (2022) ‘The Securitization of Migration in the European Union: Frontex and its Evolving Security Practices’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 48 (6): 1417–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, Sarah and Kaunert, Christian. (2021) ‘De-centring the Securitisation of Asylum and Migration in the European Union: Securitisation, Vulnerability and the Role of Turkey’. Geopolitics 27(3): 729–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léonard, Sarah and Kaunert, Christian. (2019) Refugees, Security and the European Union. London: Routledge; Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies Series.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandiraci, Berkay. (2016) Turkey’s PKK conflict: The death toll. Crisis group, Commentary. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/western-europemediterranean/turkey/turkey-s-pkk-conflict-deathtoll.

  • Martin, Natalie. (2019) ‘From Containment to Realpolitik and Back Again: A Realist Constructivist Analysis of Turkey–EU Relations and the Migration Issue’. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(6): 1349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutaf, Muhammet. (2020) İçişleri Bakanı Soylu Türkiye-İran sınır duvarını inceledi. AA (June 6). Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/icisleri-bakani-soylu-turkiye-iran-sinir-duvarini-inceledi/1867763

  • Neuman Stanivuković, Senka and Neuman, Marek. (2019) ‘Reading the EU’s migration and security ‘crises’ through (South-)Eastern Europe’. Journal of European Studies 49(3–4): 374–93.

  • Norman, Kelsey P. (2020) ‘Migration Diplomacy and Policy Liberalization in Morocco and Turkey’. International Migration Review 54(4): 1158–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ould Moctar, Hassan. (2022) ‘The constitutive outside: EU border externalisation, regional histories, and social dynamics in the Senegal River Valley’. Geoforum 0(0): 1–11.

  • Panebianco, Stefania. (2020) ‘The EU and migration in the Mediterranean: EU borders’ control by proxy’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(6): 1398–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Bill. (2016) ‘Regional turmoil, the rise of Islamic State, and Turkey’s multiple Kurdish dilemmas’. International Journal 71(3): 450–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raineri, Luca and Strazzari, Francesco. (2019) ‘(B)ordering Hybrid Security? EU Stabilisation Practices in the Sahara-Sahel Region’. Ethnopolitics 18(5): 544–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarigil, Zeki. (2020) ‘A micro-level analysis of the contagion effect: Evidence from the Kurdish conflict’. Journal of Peace Research 58(4): 763–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. (2021) ‘Rebordering Europe: external boundaries and integration in the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 28(3): 311–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindel, Estela. (2022). Death by nature: The European border regime and the spatial production of slow violence. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40(2): 428–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkaya, Bayram. (2012) ‘Rationalization of Turkey-Iran relations: Prospects and limits’. Insight Turkey 14(2): 137–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambøl, Eva Magdalena. (2019) ‘The rise of crimefare Europe: Fighting migrant smuggling in West Africa’. European Foreign Affairs Review 24(3): 287–308.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stojić Mitrović, Marta and Vilenica, Ana. (2019) ‘Enforcing and disrupting circular movement in an EU Borderscape: housingscaping in Serbia’. Citizenship Studies 23(6): 540–58.

  • Tezcür, Güneş Murat (2010) ‘When democratization radicalizes: The Kurdish nationalist movement in Turkey’. Journal of Peace Research 47(6): 775–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakilović, Milica. (2020). ‘On this path to Europe’- the symbolic role of the ‘Balkan corridor’ in the European migration debate. In Buikema, Rosemarie, Buyse, Anotine and Robben, Antonius C.G. (Eds).‘Cultures, Citizenship and Human Rights’, 49–63. Routledge.

  • Tsourapas, Gerasimos. (2017) ‘Migration diplomacy in the Global South: cooperation, coercion and issue linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya. Third World Quarterly 38(10): 2367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üstübici, Ayşen. (2019) ‘The impact of externalized migration governance on Turkey: technocratic migration governance and the production of differentiated legal status.’ Comparative Migration Studies 7(46): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtum, Henk. (2010) Human blacklisting: The global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(6): 957–976.

  • Varol, Mesut. (2021) December 29, 2021, Turkey halted 120,000+ irregular migrants from entering country at Iranian border. Istanbul: AA. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/in-2021-turkey-halted-120-000-irregular-migrantsfrom-entering-country-at-iranian-border/2460476.

  • Yabancı, Bilge. (2016) ‘The future of EU-Turkey relations: between mutual distrust and interdependency’. FEUTURE Online paper No. 1, November, 1–39.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Mercator-IPC Fellowship and colleagues from the Istanbul Policy Centre for the opportunity to conduct this research in Turkey, to the anonymous lawyers and participants in Van for our close collaboration during the data collection, and to the anonymous reviewers of this article for their excellent contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Carrapico.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Augustova, K., Ilbiz, E. & Carrapico, H. Complex harms of migration externalisation: EU policy ‘creep’ processes into domestic counterterrorism at the Turkey-Iran border. J Int Relat Dev 27, 25–45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00319-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00319-w

Keywords

Navigation