Skip to main content
Log in

Globalization and stock price crash risk: evidence from the US granting permanent normal trade relations to China

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s remarkable growth in exports has sparked concerns regarding the negative effects of the China trade shock; yet its positive aspects often go overlooked. This study uncovers a previously unexplored advantage of the China trade shock – its positive influence on financial stability. We focus on its influence on the stock price crash risk of US firms by leveraging the US granting of Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status to China in 2000 as a quasi-natural experiment. Our study identifies a reduction in stock price crash risk for US firms after PNTR. This result remains robust after controlling for various other contemporaneous policies that may be spuriously correlated with the PNTR shock, such as the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, the burst of the Internet bubble in 2000, and policy changes in China. Further examination of the effects of PNTR on Chinese imports, earnings management, investment efficiency, and governance, along with an analysis of cross-sectional variations, indicates that the disciplinary channel, as opposed to the offshoring channel, is likely the primary underlying mechanism. This study enriches our understanding of the consequences of the China trade shock.

Plain language summary

In recent years, the world has witnessed a significant rise in globalization (the process of interaction and integration among people, companies, and governments worldwide), which has greatly benefited the global economy. However, events like Brexit (the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union) and the US-China trade war (a conflict between the United States and China over trade policies) have sparked debates about the true costs and benefits of globalization. A pivotal moment in this ongoing process was China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO - an international organization that deals with the global rules of trade between nations), which marked a significant shift and led to a surge in globalization. This study concentrates on the effects of the China trade shock—specifically, the impact on financial stability in the US, as measured by stock price crash risk (the probability of a sudden and significant decrease in the price of a company's stock).

The research investigates how the China trade shock, following the US granting Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR - a legal designation in the United States for free trade with a foreign nation) status to China in 2000, affects the likelihood of sudden and significant stock price declines, known as stock price crashes. These crashes can have severe consequences, including the loss of investor wealth and potential financial crises. The study uses a quasi-natural experiment approach (a method used in social sciences to estimate causal relationships), leveraging the policy shock of PNTR, to identify the causal influence of the China trade shock on the stock price crash risk of US firms.

The study analyzes extensive data on stock transactions and financial information from the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP - a database of historical stock market data) and Compustat databases (a database of financial, statistical and market information on active and inactive global companies), covering the period from 1998 to 2003, with a total of 11,812 firm-year observations. The research is completed, and the findings show a significant decrease in stock price crash risk following the PNTR policy. This decrease is both statistically and economically meaningful, suggesting that globalization, through the China trade shock, can decrease the risk of stock price crashes for US firms.

The results suggest that the China trade shock may discipline managers to avoid opportunistic behavior (actions taken to benefit oneself at the expense of others), which is a major contributor to stock price crashes. Additionally, the shock allows US firms to offshore production to China, taking advantage of lower labor costs, which could improve firm performance and reduce the likelihood of stock price crashes.

In conclusion, the research uncovers a positive effect of the China trade shock on financial stability by reducing stock price crash risk. This finding contributes to the broader understanding of globalization's impact and suggests that the integration of China into the global trade system has benefits beyond economic growth, potentially leading to more stable financial markets. The study's insights could be valuable for investors, regulators, and policymakers as they navigate the complexities of globalization and its effects on financial stability.

This text was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then reviewed by the author(s) to ensure accuracy.

Résumé

La croissance remarquable des exportations de la Chine a suscité des inquiétudes quant aux effets négatifs du choc commercial chinois, mais ses aspects positifs sont souvent négligés. Cetie recherche met en lumière un avantage jusqu'ici inexploré du choc commercial chinois, à savoir son influence positive sur la stabilité financière. Nous nous focalisons sur son influence sur le risque de krach boursier des entreprises américaines en exploitant l'octroi par les États-Unis du statut de relations commerciales normales permanentes (Permanent Normal Trade Relations - PNTR) à la Chine en 2000 en tant qu'expérience quasi-naturelle. Notre recherche identifie une réduction du risque de krach boursier pour les entreprises américaines après l'octroi du statut de PNTR. Ce résultat reste robuste après avoir contrôlé diverses autres politiques contemporaines susceptibles d'être faussement corrélées avec le choc de PNTR, telles que la loi Sarbanes-Oxley, l'éclatement de la bulle Internet en 2000 et les changements de politique en Chine. Un examen plus approfondi des impacts du statut de PNTR sur la gestion des bénéfices, l'efficience des investissements, la gouvernance, et les importations chinoises, accompagné d’ailleurs d’une analyse des variations transversales, indique que le canal disciplinaire, par opposition au canal de délocalisation, est probablement le principal mécanisme sous-jacent. Cetie recherche enrichit notre compréhension des conséquences du choc commercial chinois.

Resumen

El crecimiento sorprendente de las exportaciones en China ha suscitado preocupaciones sobre los efectos negativos del impacto comercial de China; aún esto sus aspectos positivos se pasan por alto a menudo. Este estudio revela una ventaja del impacto comercial de China que previamente estaba inexplorada, su influencia positiva en la estabilidad financiera. Nos enfocamos en su influencia en el riesgo de caída del precio de las acciones de las empresas estadounidenses al apalancarse en la concesión por parte de los Estados Unidos del estatus de Relaciones Comerciales Normales Permanentes (PNTR por sus iniciales en inglés) en el año 2000 como un experimento cuasi natural. Nuestro estudio identifica una reducción del riesgo de caída del precio de las acciones para las empresas estadounidenses luego del PNTR. Este resultado sigue siendo sólido luego de controlar varias otras políticas contemporáneas que pueden estar erróneamente correlacionadas, como la Ley Sarbanes-Oxley, el estallido de la burbuja de internet en el 2000, y los cambios de política en China. Además de examinar los efectos del PNTR en las importaciones chinas, la gestión de ganancias, la eficiencia de las inversiones, y la gobernanza, junto con un análisis de variaciones trasversales, indica que el canal disciplinario, opuestamente al canal de externalización en el extranjero, es probablemente el mecanismo subyacente. Este estudio enriquece nuestro entendimiento del impacto comercial chino.

Resumo

A notável expansão das exportações Chinesas suscitou preocupações em relação aos efeitos negativos do choque comercial da China; no entanto, seus aspectos positivos muitas vezes passam despercebidos. Este estudo revela uma vantagem anteriormente inexplorada do choque comercial da China – sua influência positiva na estabilidade financeira. Centramo-nos na sua influência no risco de queda acentuada de preços das ações de empresas norte-americanas, aproveitando a concessão pelos EUA do estatuto de Relações Comerciais Normais Permanentes (PNTR) à China em 2000 como um experimento quase natural. Nosso estudo identifica uma redução no risco de queda acentuada de preços das ações de empresas norte-americanas após o PNTR. Este resultado permanece robusto após controlá-lo por várias outras políticas contemporâneas que podem estar espuriamente correlacionadas com o choque do PNTR, como a Lei Sarbanes-Oxley, o estouro da bolha da Internet em 2000 e mudanças políticas na China. Uma análise mais aprofundada dos efeitos do PNTR nas importações chinesas, na gestão de resultados, na eficiência de investimentos e na governança, juntamente com uma análise das variações transversais, indica que o canal disciplinar, em oposição ao canal de offshoring, é provavelmente o principal mecanismo subjacente. Este estudo enriquece nossa compreensão das consequências do choque comercial da China..

摘要

中国卓越的出口增长引发了人们对中国贸易冲击的消极影响的担忧;但它的积极方面却常常被忽 视。这项研究揭示了中国贸易冲击的—个先前未被探索的优势—它对金融稳定的积极影响。我 们利用2000年美国给予中国永久正常贸易关系(PNTR)地位作为准自然实验, 重点关注其对美国 企业股价崩盘风险的影响。我们的研究发现, 在PNTR 之后美国公司的股价崩盘风险降低。在控 制了可能与 PNTR 冲击虚假相关的各种其它同期政策(例如《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》、2000 年互 联网泡沫的破裂以及中国的政策变化)后, 这—结果仍然稳健。进—步考察 PNTR 对中国进口、 盈余管理、投资效率和治理的影响, 以及对横截面变化的分析, 表明纪律渠道(而不是离岸渠 道)可能是主要的潜在机制。这项研究丰富了我们对中国贸易冲击后果的认识。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Prior studies, such as Pierce and Schott (2016) and Hombert and Matray (2018), document a significant increase in the US imports from China relative to other countries after PNTR, especially for firms with higher exposure to the policy shock.

  2. Our main results remain robust, whether measuring the stock price crash risk by isolating industry effects or employing various asset-pricing models, such as the Fama French three-factor model, the Carhart four-factor model, and the Fama French five-factor model.

  3. Refer to Section B.1 of the online Appendix of Pierce and Schott (2016) for further details on the construction of NTR gaps.

  4. The raw CRSP/Compustat data have 43,873 observations. After merging the CRSP/Compustat data with the NTR gap data, our sample size reduces to 18, 143 observations. We then exclude observations with missing values for the variables in our baseline regression and require that all sample firms have at least 1 year of data in both the pre- and post-event periods to facilitate the DID analysis. This results in a final sample of 11,812 firm-year observations. The size for this 6-year sample is comparable to the 18-year sample of 27,309 firm-year observations in the study conducted by Chen et al. (2022). Their research also merges the Compustat data with the NTR gap data to examine the influence of PNTR on corporate tax policies.

  5. We choose the managerial entrenchment measures in 1998 because the data of the entrenchment index are not available in 1999 in Bebchuk et al. (2009). Our results are robust if we use the average values observed during the 1998 to 1999 period.

  6. The Appendix D in Loughran and Ritter (2004) has provided the SIC codes for high tech industries.

  7. The data regarding the change in Chinese import tariffs are obtained from Pierce and Schott (2016).

  8. We use the same industry classifications (six-digit NAICS codes) as in our main regressions.

  9. Our result remain robust if we use C-Score as the measure for accounting conservatism.

  10. Our results remain robust when we classify industries using four-digit NAICS codes, four-digit SIC codes, or two-digit SIC codes.

  11. The sample, based on changes in independent ratio, is split into two equal halves due to its smaller size, while other indicator samples are divided into top and bottom quartiles.

References

  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. 1999. Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1063–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiti, M., Dai, M., Feenstra, R. C., & Romalis, J. 2020. How did China’s WTO entry affect U.S. prices? Journal of International Economics, 126: 103339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, Z., Chen, Z., Li, D., & Xing, L. 2018. Individualism and stock price crash risk. Journal of International Business Studies, 49: 1208–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. 2020. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of risking trade exposure. American Economic Review, 110: 3139–3183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggs, J., & Brander, J. A. 2006. Trade liberalization, profitability, and financial leverage. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargeron, L. L., Lehn, K. M., & Zutter, C. J. 2010. Sarbanes–Oxley and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49: 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrot, J.-N., Loualiche, E., Plosser, M., & Sauvagnat, J. 2022. Import competition and household debt. Journal of Finance, 77: 3037–3091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, A. M., Fang, X., & Pittman, J. A. 2021. The importance of IRS enforcement to stock price crash risk: The role of CEO power and incentives. The Accounting Review, 96: 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. 2009. What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22: 783–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleck, A., & Liu, X. 2007. Market transparency and the accounting regime. Journal of Accounting Research, 45: 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. 2016. Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 83: 87–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K., & Nagel, S. 2004. Hedge funds and the technology bubble. Journal of Finance, 59: 2013–2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. 2015. Religion and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50: 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, X., Chen, Y., & Zolotoy, L. 2017. Stock liquidity and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52: 1605–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. 2001. Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61: 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., Lin, C., & Shao, X. 2022. Globalization and US corporate tax policies: Evidence from import competition. Management Science, 68: 6145–6162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., Erkens, D. H., & Zhang, J. 2017. Do client characteristics really drive the big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63: 3628–3649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLisle, R. J., Wang, M., Yüksel, H. Z., & Zaynutdinova, G. R. 2023. The effects of import competition on domestic financial markets: The role of limits-to-arbitrage. Journal of International Business Studies, 1–23.

  • Derrien, F., & Kecskés, A. 2013. The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage. Journal of Finance, 68: 1407–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E. 1979. Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7: 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. 1997. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43: 153–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Li, Z., & Swenson, D. L. 2017. Trade policy uncertainty and exports: Evidence from China’s WTO accession. Journal of International Economics, 106: 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. 1995. A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents. Journal of Political Economy, 103: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroud, X., & Muller, H. M. 2010. Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? Journal of Financial Economics, 95: 312–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroud, X., & Muller, H. M. 2011. Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices. Journal of Finance, 66: 563–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Kim, H., & Leary, M. 2020. CEO-board dynamics. Journal of Financial Economics, 137: 612–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedhami, O., Knill, A., Megginson, W. L., & Senbet, L. W. 2022. The dark side of globalization: Evidence from the impact of COVID-19 on multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 53: 1603–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., & Limão, N. 2017. Policy uncertainty, trade, and welfare: Theory and evidence for China and the United States. American Economic Review, 107: 2731–2783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. D. 1983. The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. Bell Journal of Economics, 14: 366–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika, S., Karpoff, J. M., & Nahata, R. 2012. Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 104: 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, G., & Moon, S. K. 2017. Offshore activities and financial vs operating hedging. Journal of Financial Economics, 125: 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hombert, J., & Matray, A. 2018. Can innovation help U.S. manufacturing firms escape import competition from China? Journal of Finance, 73: 2003–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C., Wang, R., & Whipple, B. C. 2022. Non-GAAP earnings and stock price crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73: 101473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Q., & Kim, R. 2019. Capital structure decisions along the supply chain: Evidence from import competition. Journal of International Business Studies, 50: 873–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. 2022. Government subsidies and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74: 101480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Lin, C., Liu, S., & Tang, H. 2023. Trade networks and firm value: Evidence from the US-China trade war. Journal of International Economics, 145: 103811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94: 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 76: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48: 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. 2006. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79: 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 193–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. 2008. The consequences to managers for cooking the books. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48: 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 versus non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79: 473–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. 2019. Readability of 10-K reports and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36: 1184–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. 2011a. CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 101: 713–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. 2011b. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100: 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39: 163–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., & Penalva, F. 2016. Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61: 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., & Zhan, X. 2019. Product market threats and stock crash risk. Management Science, 65: 4011–4031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. 2010. Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity ... for some plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125: 1051–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. 2004. Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management, 33: 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mion, G., & Zhu, L. 2013. Import competition from and offshoring to China: A curse or blessing for firms? Journal of International Economics, 89: 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. 2016. The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. American Economic Review, 106: 1632–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. 2018. Investment responses to trade liberalization: Evidence from US industries and establishments. Journal of International Economics, 115: 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. 2020. Trade liberalization and mortality: Evidence from US counties. American Economic Review: Insights, 2: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman, M. M. 2016. Chinese import competition and the provisions for external debt financing in the US. Journal of International Business Studies, 47: 898–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. M. 1997. Managerial incentives and product market competition. Review of Economic Studies, 64: 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, P. K. 2008. The relative sophistication of Chinese exports. Economic Policy, 53: 6–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergey, N. 2023. Selection effects, inequality, and aggregate gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 142: 103752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivakumar, L. 2000. Do firms mislead investors by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29: 339–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1989. Management entrenchment-the case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. F. 2008. Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, I. X. 2007. Economic consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44: 74–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Chen, K. H. 2008. Staggered boards and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 83: 1347–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Zhang, X., Yang, G., & Wang, L. 2023. Product market competition, corporate governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 1–9.

  • Zhou, J., Booth, L., & Chang, B. 2013. Import competition and disappearing dividends. Journal of International Business Studies, 44: 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Hong is grateful to the editor Lemma Senbet and to one anonymous review editor and two anonymous referees for useful comments that significantly improved the paper. Hong also gratefully acknowledges the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 72203017), the Ministry of Education of China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 21YJC790044), and the Youth Talent Support Program of Beihang University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jieying Hong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accepted by Lemma Senbet, Area Editor, 7 February 2024. This article has been with the author for three revisions.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (pdf 112 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, J. Globalization and stock price crash risk: evidence from the US granting permanent normal trade relations to China. J Int Bus Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00697-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00697-4

Keywords

Navigation