Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brands are increasingly required to be ‘woke’ and communicate their stance on various divisive sociopolitical issues and to do so particularly on social media platforms. However, research shedding light on the outcome of woke brand communication is in short supply; it does not compare the suasory effects of the latter with those achieved by traditional persuasive appeals; and it provides scant guidance on which brands ought to adopt this strategy. Combining language expectancy theory, the brands-as-intentional-agents framework, and the literature on consumer engagement in social media, this paper aims to fill these gaps by means of a multi-industry, text-mining-based study which investigates both the volume and the semantic virality patterns of traditional vs. woke persuasive appeals adopted by brands on social media platforms. The findings suggest that woke communication generates higher levels of consumer engagement than do traditional persuasive appeals; in particular, woke communication is more effective for warm brands. Moreover, when competent brands undertake woke campaigns, they tend to trigger more polarized reactions in consumers’ comments than warm brands do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J., K.D. Vohs, and C. Mogilner. 2010. Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm perceptions matter. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (2): 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abitbol, A., and M.S. VanDyke. 2023. Analyzing the nature of self-transcendent emotional elicitors in corporate social advocacy messages. Public Relations Review 49 (4): 102364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abitbol, A., N. Lee, S. Lee, and T. Seltzer. 2018. # RaceTogether: Starbucks’ attempt to discuss race in America and its impact on company reputation and employees. Public Relations Journal 12 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aboelenien, A., and Nguyen, C. M. 2023. From Dr. Seuss to Barbie’s cancellation: brand’s institutional work in response to changed market logics. Journal of Brand Management 1–18.

  • Afifi, W.A., and S. Metts. 1998. Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15 (3): 365–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P., and A.L. McGill. 2012. When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (2): 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, F., F. Guzmán, and B. Kidwell. 2022. Effective messaging strategies to increase brand love for sociopolitical activist brands. Journal of Business Research 151: 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L.S., and S.G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airoldi, E.M., D.M. Blei, E.A. Erosheva, and S.E. Fienberg. 2015. Introduction to mixed membership models and methods. Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications 100: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akpinar, E., and J. Berger. 2017. Valuable virality. Journal of Marketing Research 54 (2): 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alalwan, A.A. 2018. Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management 42: 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alalwan, A.A., N.P. Rana, Y.K. Dwivedi, and R. Algharabat. 2017. Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics 34 (7): 1177–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuizen, N. 2021. Revisiting Berlyne’s inverted U-shape relationship between complexity and liking: The role of effort, arousal, and status in the appreciation of product design aesthetics. Psychology & Marketing 38 (3): 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda, A.M., K. Sele, H. Etchanchu, J.Y. Guyt, and E. Vaara. 2021. From big data to rich theory: Integrating critical discourse analysis with structural topic modeling. European Management Review 18 (3): 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, T., P. Neijens, and R. Vliegenthart. 2015. What motivates consumers to re-tweet brand content? The impact of information, emotion, and traceability on pass-along behavior. Journal of Advertising Research 55 (3): 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C., and T. Tuten. 2015. Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing 32 (1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, L.L., and B.M. Gaither. 2016. Examining public response to corporate social initiative types: A quantitative content analysis of Coca-Cola’s social media. Social Marketing Quarterly 22 (4): 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, L., B. Gaither, and T.K. Gaither. 2019. Corporate social advocacy as public interest communications: Exploring perceptions of corporate involvement in controversial social-political issues. The Journal of Public Interest Communications 3 (2): 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G.C., H.M. Woznyj, R.S. Wesslen, and R.L. Ross. 2018. A review of best practice recommendations for text analysis in R (and a user-friendly app). Journal of Business and Psychology 33 (4): 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barasch, A., E.E. Levine, J.Z. Berman, and D.A. Small. 2014. Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107 (3): 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barger, V., J.W. Peltier, and D.E. Schultz. 2016. Social media and consumer engagement: A review and research agenda. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 10 (4): 268–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, T.E., and D.J. Howard. 1990. A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 9 (2): 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista, J.M., L.S. Barros, F.V. Peixoto, and D. Botelho. 2022. Sarcastic or assertive: How should brands reply to consumers’ uncivil comments on social media in the context of brand activism? Journal of Interactive Marketing 57 (1): 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., A. Ahuvia, and R.P. Bagozzi. 2012. Brand love. Journal of Marketing 76 (2): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, S.F., J. Van Doorn, and P.C. Verhoef. 2018. Good, better, engaged? The effect of company-initiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 46 (3): 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., and K.L. Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2): 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat, Y., N.L. Warren, J.T. Beck, and G.F. Watson IV. 2020. Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing 84 (5): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D.M. 2012. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D., and J. Lafferty. 2006. Correlated topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18: 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D.M., A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M., X.H. Wen, and S. Kim. 2022. A lure or a turn-off: Social media reactions to business model innovation announcements. Marketing Letters 34: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. 2010. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In A networked self (pp. 47–66). Routledge.

  • Brady, W.J., J.A. Wills, J.T. Jost, J.A. Tucker, and J.J. Van Bavel. 2017. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (28): 7313–7318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, W.J., M.J. Crockett, and J.J. Van Bavel. 2020. The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15 (4): 978–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, O.S.A.C., and J. Lee. 2020. The mediating effects of message agreement on millennials’ response to advocacy advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications 26 (8): 856–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J., A. Ilic, B. Juric, and L. Hollebeek. 2013. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research 66 (1): 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., R.V. Kozinets, and J.F. Sherry Jr. 2003. Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing 67 (3): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J.K. 1993. Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12 (1–2): 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, M., P.V. Denning, and L. Roberts. 2002. Language expectancy theory. In The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, ed. J.P. Dillard and M. Pfau, 117–137. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, D., M. Meadows, D. Wong, and S. Xia. 2021. Understanding consumers’ social media engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context. Journal of Business Research 122: 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., and J. Littler. 2022. An anatomy of carewashing: Corporate branding and the commodification of care during Covid-19. International Journal of Cultural Studies 25 (3–4): 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., S.Q. Liu, and A.S. Mattila. 2019. “How may i help you?” Says a robot: Examining language styles in the service encounter. International Journal of Hospitality Management 82: 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., Jung, Y., and Myaeng, S. H. 2010. Identifying controversial issues and their sub-topics in news articles. Pacific-Asia Workshop on Intelligence and Security Informatics: 140–153.

  • Chu, S.C., H. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2023. When brands get real: The role of authenticity and electronic word-of-mouth in shaping consumer response to brands taking a stand. International Journal of Advertising 42 (6): 1037–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2018. Social issue qua wicked problems: The role of strategic communication in social issues management. Journal of Communication Management 22 (1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza, T.R., M.R. Solomon, and W.S. Kwon. 2015. Credibility in the blogosphere: A study of measurement and influence of wine blogs as an information source. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14 (2): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A.J., S.T. Fiske, and P. Glick. 2008. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The perception content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Santini, F., W.J. Ladeira, D.C. Pinto, M.M. Herter, C.H. Sampaio, and B.J. Babin. 2020. Customer engagement in social media: A framework and meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 48 (6): 1211–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, L., S. Gensler, and P.S. Leeflang. 2012. Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26 (2): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehler-Holland, J., M. Okoh, and D. Keles. 2022. Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis–The case of wind power in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 175: 121354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Q., Y. Wang, M. Rod, and S. Ji. 2021. Speak to head and heart: The effects of linguistic features on B2B brand engagement on social media. Industrial Marketing Management 99: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico, G., J. Sit, A. Ishizaka, and D. Nunan. 2021. Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research 124: 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., M. Nag, and D. Blei. 2013. Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics 41 (6): 570–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dineva, D., J. Breitsohl, B. Garrod, and P. Megicks. 2020. Consumer responses to conflict-management strategies on non-profit social media fan pages. Journal of Interactive Marketing 52: 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiRusso, C., C. Buckley, P. Diddi, F.E. Dardis, M. Vafeiadis, and N. Eng. 2022. Designing effective corporate social advocacy campaigns using valence, arousal, and issue salience. Public Relations Review 48 (3): 102207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, R., J. Conduit, C. Frethey-Bentham, J. Fahy, and S. Goodman. 2019. Social media engagement behavior: A framework for engaging customers through social media content. European Journal of Marketing 53 (10): 2213–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., C.B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., D.D. Rucker, and A.D. Galinsky. 2016. Dynamics of communicator and audience power: The persuasiveness of competence versus warmth. Journal of Consumer Research 43 (1): 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y.K., K.K. Kapoor, and H. Chen. 2015. Social media marketing and advertising. The Marketing Review 15 (3): 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenraam, A.W., J. Eelen, A. Van Lin, and P.W. Verlegh. 2018. A consumer-based taxonomy of digital customer engagement practices. Journal of Interactive Marketing 44: 102–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenraam, A.W., J. Eelen, and P.W. Verlegh. 2021. Let me entertain you? The importance of authenticity in online customer engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing 54: 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertimur, B., and G. Coskuner-Balli. 2021. Brands expressing compassion and care through advertising. Journal of Advertising 50 (3): 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., H. Chen, and L. He. 2019. Consumer responses to femvertising: A data-mining case of Dove’s “Campaign for Real Beauty” on YouTube. Journal of Advertising 48 (3): 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., H. Chen, and H.Y.A. Ahn. 2021. How consumers react to woke advertising: Methodological triangulation based on social media data and self-report data. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15 (4): 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., A.J.C. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) perception content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 878–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, J.A.G., M. Porter III., M.B. Godbole, and K.E. Reynolds. 2016. The effects of negatively valenced emotional expressions in online reviews on the reviewer, the review, and the product. Psychology & Marketing 33 (9): 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., J. Marguc, and M. Gillebaart. 2010. Novelty categorization theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (9): 736–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (4): 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresneda, J.E., T.A. Burnham, and C.H. Hill. 2021. Structural topic modelling segmentation: A segmentation method combining latent content and customer context. Journal of Marketing Management 37 (7–8): 792–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetti, R.C., and S. Biraghi. 2023. Branded activism: Navigating the tension between culture and market in social media. Futures 145: 103080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garimella, K., G.D.F. Morales, A. Gionis, and M. Mathioudakis. 2018. Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 1 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, R., and C. Cryder. 2018. Goods donations increase charitable credit for low-warmth donors. Journal of Consumer Research 45 (2): 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazzini, L., D. Acuti, and G. Aiello. 2021. Solving the puzzle of sustainable fashion consumption: The role of consumers’ implicit attitudes and perceived warmth. Journal of Cleaner Production 287: 125579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., A.L. Roggeveen, R. Sisodia, and J. Nordfält. 2017. Enhancing customer engagement through consciousness. Journal of Retailing 93 (1): 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, J., and B.M. Stewart. 2013. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, M., and Korschun, D. 2023. Peer effects on brand activism: evidence from brand and user chatter on Twitter. Journal of Brand Management, 1–15.

  • Gummerus, J., V. Liljander, E. Weman, and M. Pihlström. 2012. Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review 35 (9): 857–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gvili, Y., and S. Levy. 2018. Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: The role of social capital. Online Information Review 42 (4): 482–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang, H., L. Aroean, and Z. Chen. 2020. Building emotional attachment during COVID-19. Annals of Tourism Research 83: 103006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, T.R., R.F. Haans, K. Vakili, H. Tchalian, V.L. Glaser, M.S. Wang, and P.D. Jennings. 2019. Topic modeling in management research: Rendering new theory from textual data. Academy of Management Annals 13 (2): 586–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg, M., C.S. Katsikeas, H.E. Ozkaya, and M. Taube. 2020. How nostalgic brand positioning shapes brand equity: Differences between emerging and developed markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 48 (5): 869–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, K. 2011. Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers’ social media behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 10 (6): 356–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J.L., J.G. Klein, and W. von Hippel. 1991. Attention allocation and impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 548–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L. D., Sharma, T. G., Pandey, R., Sanyal, P., and Clark, M. K. 2021. Fifteen years of customer engagement research: a bibliometric and network analysis. Journal of Product and Brand Management. In press

  • Hovland, C.I., I.L. Janis, and H.H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, N., T. Zhang, B. Gao, and I. Bose. 2019. What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model. Tourism Management 72: 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A., and R.J.H. Wang. 2018. Automated text analysis for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 44 (6): 1274–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, K.H., and S.Y. Li. 2007. The influence of eWOM on virtual consumer communities: Social capital, consumer learning, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Advertising Research 47 (4): 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydock, C., N. Paharia, and T.J. Weber. 2019. The consumer response to corporate political advocacy: A review and future directions. Customer Needs and Solutions 6 (3): 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydock, C., N. Paharia, and S. Blair. 2020. Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research 57 (6): 1135–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O., and N. Ind. 2020. Towards a theory of conscientious corporate brand co-creation: The next key challenge in brand management. Journal of Brand Management 27 (6): 710–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismagilova, E., E. Slade, N.P. Rana, and Y.K. Dwivedi. 2020. The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 53: 101736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, and Tibshirani, R. 2017. An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. 1st ed. 2013, Corr. 7th printing 2017 edition. Springer.

  • Jensen, M.L., J.M. Averbeck, Z. Zhang, and K.B. Wright. 2013. Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 30 (1): 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnen, M., and O. Schnittka. 2019. When pushing back is good: The effectiveness of brand responses to social media complaints. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47: 858–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Z.S., Y.J. Lee, and M.T. Ashoori. 2018. Brand associations: The value of ability versus social responsibility depends on consumer goals. Journal of Brand Management 25 (1): 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungblut, M., and Johnen, M. 2021. When brands (don’t) take my stance: the ambiguous effectiveness of political brand communication. Communication Research 1–26

  • Kabadayi, S., and K. Price. 2014. Consumer – brand engagement on Facebook: Liking and commenting behaviors. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 8 (3): 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantar. 2021. Kantar BrandZTM Most Valuable Italian Brands, 6 May, http://www.kantar.com/campaigns/brandz/italy

  • Karpen, I.O., and J. Conduit. 2020. Engaging in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Theorizing customer engagement through different paradigmatic lenses. Journal of Service Management 31 (6): 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., S.T. Fiske, and C. Malone. 2012. Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (2): 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., S.T. Fiske, and C. Malone. 2022. Social perception of brands: Warmth and competence define images of both brands and social groups. Consumer Psychology Review 5 (1): 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.E., and K.K. Johnson. 2013. The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics 112: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.H., L. Spiller, and M. Hettche. 2015. Analyzing media types and content orientations in Facebook for global brands. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 9 (1): 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., and H. Rim. 2019. The role of public skepticism and distrust in the process of CSR communication. International Journal of Business Communication 1–21.

  • Klostermann, J., C. Hydock, and R. Decker. 2021. The effect of corporate political advocacy on brand perception: An event study analysis. Journal of Product and Brand Management 31 (5): 780–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korschun, D. and Smith, N. C. 2018. Companies can’t avoid politics and shouldn’t try to. Harvard Business Review (Digital Article), https://hbr.org/2018/03/companies-cant-avoid-politics-and-shouldnt-try-to

  • Korschun, D., Rafieian, H., Aggarwal, A., and Swain, S. D. 2019. Taking a stand: Consumer responses when companies get (or don’t get) political. Available at SSRN 2806476.

  • Kralj Novak, P., J. Smailović, B. Sluban, and I. Mozetič. 2015. Sentiment of Emojis. PLoS ONE 10 (12): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

  • Kronrod, A., A. Grinstein, and L. Wathieu. 2012a. Enjoy! Hedonic consumption and compliance with assertive messages. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (1): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronrod, A., A. Grinstein, and L. Wathieu. 2012b. Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing 76 (1): 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, R.V., A. Colicev, and K.H. Pauwels. 2020. Social media’s impact on the consumer mindset: When to use which sentiment extraction tool? Journal of Interactive Marketing 50: 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., R. Bezawada, R. Rishika, R. Janakiraman, and P.K. Kannan. 2016. From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. Journal of Marketing 80 (1): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. 2000. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication 50 (1): 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leak, R.L., O.P. Woodham, and K.R. McNeil. 2015. Speaking candidly: How managers’ political stances affect consumers’ brand attitudes. Journal of Product & Brand Management 24 (5): 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.K. 2021. Emotional expressions and brand status. Journal of Marketing Research 58 (6): 1178–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.Y., and S. Chung. 2023. Publics’ views of corporate social advocacy initiatives: Exploring prior issue stance, attitude toward a company, and news credibility. Management Communication Quarterly 37 (2): 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.H., and C. Mason. 1999. Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research 26 (2): 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.H., and H. Yu. 2020. The impact of language on retweeting during acute natural disasters: Uncertainty reduction and language expectancy perspectives. Industrial Management and Data Systems 120 (8): 1501–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., K. Hosanagar, and H.S. Nair. 2018. Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science 64 (11): 5105–5460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J.Y., J.K. Kim, and K. Alharbi. 2022. Exploring the role of issue involvement and brand attachment in shaping consumer response toward corporate social advocacy (CSA) initiatives: The case of Nike’s Colin Kaepernick campaign. International Journal of Advertising 41 (2): 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liadeli, G., F. Sotgiu, and P.W. Verlegh. 2023. A meta-analysis of the effects of brands’ owned social media on social media engagement and sales. Journal of Marketing 87 (3): 406–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, N.C. 2019. Structural topic modeling for social scientists: A brief case study with social movement studies literature, 2005–2017. Social Currents 6 (4): 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, C., and S. Yuan. 2019. Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (1): 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, E., Sekhon, T., and Salinas, T. C. 2022. Do well, do good, and know your audience: the double-edged sword of values-based CSR communication. Journal of Brand Management: 1–17.

  • Lucisano P, and Piemontese, M.E. 1998. GULPEASE: a formula to predict readability of texts written in Italian language. In School and Town, La nuova Italia, Brescia (Italy), pp. 3–31.

  • Luo, X., M.A. Wiles, and S. Raithel. 2013. Make the most of a polarizing brand. Harvard Business Review. 91 (11): 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafael, A., S.A. Gottschalk, and H. Kreis. 2016. Examining biased assimilation of brand-related online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing 36: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, R.G. 2022. Understanding worldview beliefs to allay skepticism toward CSR advertising. Journal of Brand Management 29: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangiò, F., G. Pedeliento, and D. Andreini. 2021. Branding rhetoric in times of a global pandemic: A text-mining analysis. Journal of Advertising 50 (3): 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maryott, K. 2021. Polarization – why, for brands, it’s a good thing. WARC. January 22, https://www.warc.com/newsandopinion/opinion/polarization--why-for-brands-its-a-good-thing/en-gb/4022

  • McShane, L., E. Pancer, M. Poole, and Q. Deng. 2021. Emoji, playfulness, and brand engagement on twitter. Journal of Interactive Marketing 53 (1): 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, A., and G.M. Rose. 2013. Effects of advertising-evoked vicarious nostalgia on brand heritage. Journal of Business Research 66 (12): 2619–2625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, K., and S. Turnbull. 2021. How advertising got ‘woke’: The institutional role of advertising in the emergence of gender progressive market logics and practices. Marketing Theory 21 (4): 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfeld, T., and D.J. Flint. 2020. When brands take a stand: The nature of consumers’ polarized reactions to social narrative videos. Journal of Product and Brand Management 30 (4): 532–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei, A., D.C. Wilkie, and H. Siuki. 2022. Woke brand activism authenticity or the lack of it. Journal of Business Research 139: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, S.M., and P.D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence 29 (3): 436–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. 2020. Commentary: Brand activism in a political world. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 39 (4): 388–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, S., G. Pires, P. Rita, and P. Cortez. 2020. A cross-cultural case study of consumers’ communications about a new technological product. Journal of Business Research 121: 438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, S., and N. Althuizen. 2020. Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand? International Journal of Research in Marketing 37 (4): 772–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntinga, D.G., M. Moorman, and E.G. Smit. 2011. Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising 30 (1): 13–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S.K., K. Layous, S.W. Cole, and S. Lyubomirsky. 2016. Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion 16 (6): 850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, J., and C., Ordanini, A., and Giambastiani, G. 2021. The Concept of Authenticity: What It Means to Consumers. Journal of Marketing 85 (4): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pancer, E., V. Chandler, M. Poole, and T.J. Noseworthy. 2019. How readability shapes social media engagement. Journal of Consumer Psychology 29 (2): 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigyrakis, G., A. Panopoulos, and E. Koronaki. 2020. All we have is words: Applying rhetoric to examine how social media marketing activities strengthen the connection between the brand and the self. International Journal of Advertising 39 (5): 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parcha, J.M., and C.Y. Kingsley Westerman. 2020. How corporate social advocacy affects attitude change toward controversial social issues. Management Communication Quarterly 34 (3): 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhankangas, A., and M. Renko. 2017. Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 32 (2): 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. 2021. The mediating role of skepticism: How corporate social advocacy builds quality relationships with publics. Journal of Marketing Communications 28: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., T.B. Lawrence, and C. Hardy. 2004. Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review 29 (4): 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, P. C., Bassi-Suter, M., & Didonet, S. R. (2023). Brand activism as a marketing strategy: an integrative framework and research agenda. Journal of Brand Management: 1–23.

  • Pletikosa Cvijikj, I., and F. Michahelles. 2013. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining 3 (4): 843–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, S.A.O., C. Veloutsou, and A. Morgan-Thomas. 2019. I hate what you love: Brand polarization and negativity towards brands as an opportunity for brand management. Journal of Product and Brand Management 28 (5): 614–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenbichler, M., and T. Reutterer. 2019. Topic modeling in marketing: Recent advances and research opportunities. Journal of Business Economics 89 (3): 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., S. Karimi, A.B. Velázquez, and J. Cai. 2023. Endorsement effectiveness of different social media influencers: The moderating effect of brand competence and warmth. Journal of Business Research 156: 113476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, R., W. Van Dolen, M. Mazloom, and M. Worring. 2020. What you feel, is what you like influence of message appeals on customer engagement on Instagram. Journal of Interactive Marketing 49: 20–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rim, H., Y. Lee, and S. Yoo. 2020. Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review 46 (2): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M.E., B.M. Stewart, D. Tingley, C. Lucas, J. Leder-Luis, S.K. Gadarian, and D.G. Rand. 2014. Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1064–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M.E., B.M. Stewart, and D. Tingley. 2019. Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software 91: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocklage, M.D., and R.H. Fazio. 2020. The enhancing versus backfiring effects of positive emotion in consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 57 (2): 332–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G.D., L. Gómez, Z. Ngoh, Y.P. Lin, and S. Dietrich. 2019. Do CSR messages resonate? Examining public reactions to firms’ CSR efforts on social media. Journal of Business Ethics 155 (2): 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefers, T., T. Falk, A. Kumar, and J. Schamari. 2021. More of the same? Effects of volume and variety of social media brand engagement behavior. Journal of Business Research 135: 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.J., N. Ind, F. Guzman, and E. Kennedy. 2021. Sociopolitical activist brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management 31 (1): 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, T., O. Müller, and J. Vom Brocke. 2019. Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods 22 (4): 941–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M., and E.S. Clemens. 2006. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory 24 (3): 195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I.K., and N. Schwarz. 2017. Mixed feelings: The case of ambivalence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 15: 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaznezhad, H., R. Dolan, and M. Rashidirad. 2021. The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing 53: 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Y., and K.W. King. 2015. The effects of interpersonal tie strength and subjective norms on consumers’ brand-related eWOM referral intentions. Journal of Interactive Advertising 15 (1): 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoenberger, H., E. Kim, and Y. Sun. 2021. Advertising during COVID-19: Exploring perceived brand message authenticity and potential psychological reactance. Journal of Advertising 50 (3): 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobande, F. 2019. Woke-washing:“Intersectional” femvertising and branding “woke” bravery. European Journal of Marketing 54 (11): 2723–2745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobande, F. 2020. ‘We’re all in this together’: Commodified notions of connection, care and community in brand responses to COVID-19. European Journal of Cultural Studies 23 (6): 1033–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprout Social. 2023. The Sprout Social Index, Edition XVII: Accelerate. August 28, https://sproutsocial.com/insights/data/index-accelerate/

  • Song, B., and Choi, M. 2023. Testing Publics’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Advocacy Messaging: Linking Organizational and Social Outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1–20.

  • Stubbersfield, J. M., Dean, L. G., Sheikh, S., Laland, K. N., and Cross, C. P. 2019. Social transmission favours the ‘morally good’over the ‘merely arousing’. Palgrave Communications 5(1).

  • Suddaby, R., and R. Greenwood. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility, 73–100 MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative

  • Swaminathan, V., A. Sorescu, J.B.E.M. Steenkamp, T.C.G. O’Guinn, and B. Schmitt. 2020. Branding in a hyperconnected world: Refocusing theories and rethinking boundaries. Journal of Marketing 84 (2): 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V., H.A. Schwartz, R. Menezes, and S. Hill. 2022. The language of brands in social media: Using topic modeling on social media conversations to drive brand strategy. Journal of Interactive Marketing 57 (2): 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swani, K., and Labrecque, L. I. 2020. Like, Comment, or Share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices. Marketing Letters 31(2): 279–298.

  • Swani, K., and G.R. Milne. 2017. Evaluating Facebook brand content popularity for service versus goods offerings. Journal of Business Research 79: 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafesse, W., and A. Wien. 2018. Using message strategy to drive consumer behavioral engagement on social media. Journal of Consumer Marketing 35 (3): 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.R. 2020. Editorial: Advertising and COVID-19. International Journal of Advertising 39 (5): 587–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G.J., D.J. MacInnis, S. Tirunillai, and Y. Zhang. 2019. What drives virality (sharing) of online digital content? The critical role of information, emotion, and brand prominence. Journal of Marketing 83 (4): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.L., and K. Fowler. 2023. Examining the outcomes of influencer activism. Journal of Business Research 154: 113336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C.J., and A. Kumar. 2022. Analyzing the cultural contradictions of authenticity: Theoretical and managerial insights from the market logic of conscious capitalism. Journal of Marketing 86 (5): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirunillai, S., and G.J. Tellis. 2014. Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Marketing Research 51 (4): 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tromble, R. 2021. Where have all the data gone? A critical reflection on academic digital research in the post-API age. Social Media+ Society 7(1): 2056305121988929.

  • Tsai, W.H.S., and L.R. Men. 2013. Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with brand pages on social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 13 (2): 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnava, V., and A. Aravindakshan. 2021. How does consumer engagement evolve when brands post across multiple social media? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49 (5): 864–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallaster, C., and S. von Wallpach. 2013. An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation. Journal of Business Research 66 (9): 1505–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J., K.N. Lemon, V. Mittal, S. Nass, D. Pick, P. Pirner, and P.C. Verhoef. 2010. Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research 13 (3): 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarroel Ordenes, F., D. Grewal, S. Ludwig, K.D. Ruyter, D. Mahr, and M. Wetzels. 2019. Cutting through content clutter: How speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages. Journal of Consumer Research 45 (5): 988–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachvei, A., Notta, O., and Koronaki, E. 2021. Effects of content characteristics on stages of customer engagement in social media: investigating European wine brands. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. Vol. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0275.

  • Voorveld, H.A. 2019. Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising 48 (1): 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, J., S. Kapitan, A. Spry, and J.A. Kemper. 2020. Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 39 (4): 444–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.W., and A.C. Scheinbaum. 2018. Enhancing brand credibility via celebrity endorsement: Trustworthiness trumps attractiveness and expertise. Journal of Advertising Research 58 (1): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., M.S. Qin, X. Luo, and Y. Kou. 2022. Frontiers: How support for black lives matter impacts consumer responses on social media. Marketing Science: In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wannow, S., Haupt, M., and Ohlwein, M. 2023. Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism. Journal of Brand Management, 1–25.

  • Weber, T.J., J. Joireman, D.E. Sprott, and C. Hydock. 2023. Differential response to corporate political advocacy and corporate social responsibility: Implications for political polarization and radicalization. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 42 (1): 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzimmer, L.G., and C.A. Esken. 2016. Risky business: Taking a stand on social issues. Business Horizons 59 (3): 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, D., P.R. Spence, and B. Van Der Heide. 2014. Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (2): 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciszke, B., R. Bazinska, and M. Jaworski. 1998. On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (12): 1251–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Shen, H., Fan, A., and Mattila, A. S. 2017. The impact of language style on consumers′ reactions to online reviews. Tourism Management: 590–596.

  • Xie, C., R.P. Bagozzi, and K. Grønhaug. 2019. The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences. Journal of Business Research 95: 514–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, A., A. Saffer, and Y. Li. 2020. Managing stakeholder expectations in a politically polarized society: An expectation violation theory approach. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research 3 (2): 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., P. Chuenterawong, and K. Pugdeethosapol. 2021. Speaking up on Black lives matter: A comparative study of consumer reactions toward brand and influencer-generated corporate social responsibility messages. Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, J.G., S. Vedula, and M.J. Lenox. 2018. It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Academy of Management Journal 61 (4): 1492–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarantonello, L., S. Romani, S. Grappi, and M. Fetscherin. 2018. Trajectories of brand hate. Journal of Brand Management 25 (6): 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zawisza, M., and C. Pittard. 2015. When do warmth and competence sell best? The “Golden quadrant” shifts as a function of congruity with the product type, targets’ individual differences, and advertising appeal type. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 37 (2): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, P., Z. Ma, T. Gill, and C. Ranaweera. 2023. Social media sentiment polarization and its impact on product adoption. Marketing Letters 34: 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Lou, C., and Huang, X. 2023. Transcendent Brand Activism Advertising: Explicating the Roles of Color and Message Framing in Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 1–17.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all participants for their involvement in this research and colleagues as well as attendees at the 15th Global Brand Conference 2022 (4th–6th May 2022, Sheffield Hallam University) for comments on earlier versions of this research. The empirical sections are partly based on data collected for the first author’s (unpublished) PhD dissertation at the University of Bergamo, XXXV graduate programme in Business and Law.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Bergamo, Via Dei Caniana 2, 24127, Bergamo, Italy

    Federico Mangiò, Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini

  2. Faculty of Business and Law, University of Roehampton, London, UK

    Lia Zarantonello

Authors
  1. Federico Mangiò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe Pedeliento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniela Andreini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lia Zarantonello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Mangiò.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest.

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangiò, F., Pedeliento, G., Andreini, D. et al. How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook. J Brand Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00347-4

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00347-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation