Abstract
The natural real rate of interest has been on a declining path for the past 30 years. I present a regime-switching analysis of the natural rate, which suggests that the current low levels are likely to persist in the near future. I identify a high global demand for safe assets as the most important factor in keeping the natural rate low. I conclude that the current low levels of the policy rate are generally appropriate, with some upside risk, and that forward guidance should be characterized by a flat policy rate path.
Notes
This method is using ex-post inflation. Forward-looking measures, based on Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland data on inflation expectations, are similar but more volatile.
For some analysis along this line, see Lagos (2010).
The inflation target is in terms of the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE).
See Bullard (2016) for more details on the St. Louis Fed’s approach to characterizing the U.S. economic outlook.
References
Borio, Claudio, Piti Disyatat, Mikael Juselius, and Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul. 2017. Why so low for so long? A long-term view of real interest rates. Bank for International Settlements Working Papers No. 685.
Bullard, James. 2016. The St. Louis Fed’s new characterization of the outlook for the U.S. economy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Announcement. https://www.stlouisfed.org/~/media/Files/PDFs/Bullard/papers/Regime-Switching-Forecasts-17June2016.pdf?la=en.
Cúrdia, Vasco. 2015. Why so slow? A gradual return for interest rates. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Economic Letter No. 2015–32.
Del Negro, Marco, Domenico Giannone, Marc Giannoni, and Andrea Tambalotti, 2017. Safety, liquidity and the natural rate of interest. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Spring: 235–294.
Dupor, William. 2015. Liftoff and the natural rate of interest. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. On the Economy. https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2015/june/liftoff-and-the-natural-rate-of-interest.
Gomme, Paul, B. Ravikumar, and Peter Rupert. 2011. The return to capital and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 14 (2): 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2010.11.004.
Gomme, Paul, B. Ravikumar, and Peter Rupert. 2015. Secular stagnation and returns on capital. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Economic Synopses 2015, No. 19.
Hamilton, James D. 1989. A new approach to the analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57 (2): 357–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559.
Holston, Kathryn, Thomas Laubach, and John C. Williams. 2017. Measuring the natural rate of interest: International trends and determinants. Journal of International Economics 108 (S1): S59–S75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.004.
Homer, Sidney, and Richard Sylla. 2005. A History of Interest Rates, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kahn, James A., and Robert W. Rich. 2006. Tracking productivity in real time. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Current Issues in Economics and Finance 12 (8): 1–7.
Kahn, James A., and Robert W. Rich. 2007. Tracking the new economy: Using growth theory to detect changes in trend productivity. Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (6): 1670–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.07.008.
Kim, Chang-Jin, and Charles R. Nelson. 1999. State-space Models with Regime Switching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lagos, Ricardo. 2010. Asset prices and liquidity in an exchange economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (8): 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.10.006.
Laubach, Thomas, and John C. Williams. 2003. Measuring the natural rate of interest. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815934.
Monge-Naranjo, Alexander, Juan M. Sánchez, and Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis. 2015. Natural Resources and Global Misallocation. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Working Paper No. 2015-036A.
Rachel, Lucasz, and Thomas D. Smith. 2015. Secular Drivers of the Global Real Interest Rate. Bank of England. Staff Working Paper No. 571.
Taylor, John B. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L.
Taylor, John B. 1999. A historical analysis of monetary policy rules. In Monetary policy rules, ed. John B. Taylor, 319–348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williams, John C. 2017. Three questions on r-star. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Economic Letter No. 2017-05.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is an extended version of remarks delivered at the 34th Annual NABE Economic Policy Conference, Washington, DC, February 26, 2018. The author appreciates the assistance and comments provided by colleagues at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Any opinions expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Open Market Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bullard, J.B. R-star wars: the phantom menace. Bus Econ 53, 60–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-018-0077-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-018-0077-1