Abstract
In this paper, we use the country institutional profile to investigate how selected cognitive, normative, and regulative aspects of various countries relate to traditional gender role attitudes of managers from these countries. Our cross-level analyses, using hierarchical linear modeling, control for a number of individual characteristics (i.e., age, education, gender, and social class). Results support our hypotheses that managers' traditional gender role attitudes relate positively to nation-level uncertainty avoidance and power distance. Moreover, the results support our predictions that gender egalitarian normative institutions, degree of regulation, and degree of educational development are negatively related to managers' traditional gender role attitudes. However, results reject our hypotheses regarding nation-level religiosity, assertiveness, and masculinity, not showing the proposed relationship with managers' traditional gender role attitudes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagozzi, R. P. 1994. Principles of marketing research. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Bajdo, L. M., & Dickson, M. W. 2001. Perceptions of organizational culture and women's advancement in organizations: A cross-cultural examination. Sex Roles, 45 (5/6): 399–414.
Banaszak, L. A., & Plutzer, E. 1993. Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe. American Political Science Review, 87 (1): 147–157.
Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. 2003. Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68 (5): 760–781.
Bergh, J. 2006. Gender attitudes and modernization processes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19 (1): 5–23.
Bowers, J., & Drake, K. W. 2005. EDA for HLM: Visualization when probabilistic inference fails. Political Analysis, 13 (4): 301–326.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. 1992. Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. 2002. Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 994–1003.
Chandy, P. R., & Williams, T. 1994. The impact of journals and authors on international business research: A citational analysis of JIBS articles. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (4): 715–728.
Chang, M. L. 2000. The evolution of sex segregation regimes. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (6): 1658–1701.
Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. 1995. Models for describing the underlying structure of sex segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (4): 931–971.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L.S 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. 2004. Cross-national differences in managers' willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3): 411–421.
Duch, R., & Taylor, M. 1993. Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 37 (3): 747–779.
Durham, J. 1999. Econometrics of income distribution: Toward more comprehensive specification of institutional correlates. Comparative Economic Studies, 41 (1): 43–74.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. 2003. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6): 807–834.
Ellison, C. 1991. Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32 (1): 80–99.
Ellison, C. G., & Sherkat, D. E. 1995. Is sociology the core discipline for the scientific study of religion? Social Forces, 73 (4): 1255–1266.
Eyring, A., & Stead, B. 1998. Shattering the glass ceiling: Some successful corporate practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (3): 245–251.
Firestone, J. M., Harris, J. R., & Lambert, L. C. 1999. Gender role ideology and the gender based differences in earnings. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20 (2): 191–215.
Fisher, M. P. 1999. Living religions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Flammang, J. A. 1985. Female officials in the feminist capital: The case of Santa Clara County. Western Political Quarterly, 38 (1): 94–118.
Gibson, C. B. 1995. An investigation of gender differences in leadership across four countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (2): 255–279.
Hammick, M., & Acker, S. 1998. Undergraduate research supervision: A gender analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 23 (3): 335–347.
Harris, R. J., & Firestone, J. M. 1998. Changes in predictors of gender role ideologies among women: A multivariate analysis. Sex Roles, 38 (3/4): 239–252.
Himmelstein, J. L. 1986. The social basis of antifeminism: Religious networks and culture. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25 (1): 1–15.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24 (5): 623–641.
Hofstede, G. 1998a. Religion, masculinity, and sex. In G. Hofstede & Associates (Eds), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 192–209. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 1998b. The cultural construction of gender. In G. Hofstede & Associates (Eds), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 77–105. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2002. Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55 (11): 1355–1361.
Hofstede, G. 2006. What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers' minds vs respondents' minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 882–896.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds) 2004. Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hui, M. K., Au, K., & Fock, H. 2004. Empowerment effects across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 46–60.
Iannaccone, L. R. 1998. Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (3): 1465–1496.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. 2000. Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65 (1): 19–51.
Inglehart, R., Basañez, M., & Moreno, A. 1998. Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. 1999. Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78 (1): 235–269.
Kirchmeyer, C. 2002. Gender differences in managerial careers: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Business Ethics, 37 (1): 5–24.
Kostova, T. 1997. Country institutional profile: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 180–189.
Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–324.
Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. 2000. Power distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26 (4): 685–704.
Lindsey, L. L. 2005. Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Lipman-Blumen, J. 1984. Gender roles and power. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Liu, D., & Boyle, E. H. 2001. Making the case: The women's convention and equal employment opportunity in Japan. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62 (4): 389–404.
Ludwig, T. M. 2001. The sacred paths: Understanding the religions of the world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lyness, K. S., & Kropf, M. B. 2005. The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work–family balance: A study of European managers. Human Relations, 58 (1): 33–60.
Martin, P. Y. 2004. Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82 (4): 1249–1273.
Mayer, L., & Smith, R. E. 1985. Feminism and religiosity: Female electoral behavior in Western Europe. Western European Politics, 8 (4): 38–49.
Meyer, A., & Rowan, B. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 41–62. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, J. W. 1977. The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (1): 55–77.
Moore, L. M., & Vanneman, R. 2003. Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes. Social Forces, 82 (1): 115–139.
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parboteeah, K. P., & Cullen, J. B. 2003. Social institutions and work centrality: Explorations beyond national culture. Organization Science, 14 (2): 137–148.
Parboteeah, K. P., Cullen, J. B., & Lim, L. 2004. Formal volunteering: A cross-national test. Journal of World Business, 39 (4): 431–441.
Pedhauzer, E. J. 1997. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Peterson, M. F. 2004. Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (4): 641–647.
Peterson, M. F., & Castro, S. L. 2006. Measurement metrics at aggregate levels of analysis: Implications for organization culture research and the GLOBE project. Leadership Quarterly, 17 (5): 506–521.
Raudenbush, S. W., Spybrook, J., Liu, X., & Congdon, R. 2006. Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research: Documentation for the “optimal design” software. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/group-based/optimal_design_software. Accessed 8 February 2008.
Raykov, T., & Widaman, K. F. 1995. Issues in applied structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 2 (4): 289–318.
Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7 (1): 1–37.
Saint-Germain, M. 1990. Does their difference make a difference? The impact of women on public policy in the Arizona legislature. Social Science Quarterly, 70 (4): 956–965.
Schreiber, P. 1998. Women's career development patterns. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 80 (1): 5–13.
Schwartz, S. H. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48 (1): 23–47.
Scott, R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Singh, J. 1995. Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (3): 597–619.
Sjöberg, O. 2004. The role of family policy institutions in explaining gender-role attitudes: A comparative multilevel analysis of thirteen industrialized countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 14 (2): 107–123.
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. 2002. Cultural values, sources of guidance and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 33 (2): 188–208.
Smits, J., Ultee, W., & Lammers, L. 1997. Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63 (2): 264–285.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. 1993. Standard errors and sample sizes for two-level research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18 (3): 237–259.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. 2003. Multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stack, S., & Kposowa, A. 2006. The effect of religiosity on tax fraud acceptability: A cross-national analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45 (3): 325–351.
Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. 1985. The future of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Thomas, S. 1991. The impact of women on state legislative policies. Journal of Politics, 53 (4): 958–976.
Tittle, C. R., & Welch, M. R. 1983. Religiosity and deviance: Toward a contingency theory of constraining effects. Social Forces, 61 (3): 653–682.
Turner, J. H. 1997. The institutional order. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
VanYperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. 1991. Sex-role attitudes, social comparison, and satisfaction with relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54 (2): 169–180.
Verweij, J. 1998. The importance of femininity in explaining cross-national differences in secularization. In G. Hofstede & Associates (Eds), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 179–191. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Warwick, P. V. 1998. Disputed cause, disputed effect: The post-materialist thesis re-examined. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62 (4): 583–609.
Wilensky, H. L. 2002. Rich democracies: Political economy, public policy, and performance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Williamson, O. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2): 269–296.
World Bank 2003. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Values Study Group 2000. World values surveys and European values surveys, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993, and 1995–1997 (Computer file). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Acknowledgements
We thank associate editor Mark Peterson and the three anonymous reviewers for their extensive and helpful comments throughout the review process. We also acknowledge the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) for making available a significant portion of the data used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Mark Peterson, Departmental Editor, 17 September 2007. This paper has been with the authors for four revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parboteeah, K., Hoegl, M. & Cullen, J. Managers' gender role attitudes: a country institutional profile approach. J Int Bus Stud 39, 795–813 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400384
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400384