Skip to main content
Log in

Ghosts in the machine: Is IR eternally haunted by the spectre of old concepts?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Where ideas such as the ‘End of History’, ‘Globalisation’ or a ‘New World Order’ once animated the academy, recent debates within International Relations (IR) seem indicative of an emerging sea-change in intellectual trends. Scholars are now mooting instead a ‘Return of History’, the ‘Return of Authoritarian Great Powers’, the ‘Return of Realism’, the ‘Resurgence of geopolitical competition’ and even a ‘Replay of the Great Game’. The resurrection of these so-called ‘traditional’ concepts raises an intriguing question: is the study of IR continually plagued by concepts that refuse to go away? This article begins by reviewing the intellectual historiography of IR, demonstrating that heralds of a ‘new dawn’ have repeatedly encountered the stubborn lingering presence of ‘old’ assumptions. The article then proceeds to analyse how the philosophical metaphor of a ‘ghost in the machine’ can help elucidate these peculiar intellectual quirks of IR, before concluding by contemplating the possibility of eventual ‘exorcism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, A. (2003/2004) Will Asia's past be its future? International Security 28 (3): 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, N. (2007) The Great Illusion (originally published in 1909), reprinted by Cosimo Classics: New York.

  • BBC. (2007) Russia's bear bomber returns. 10 September, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6984320.stm, accessed 10 September.

  • BBC. (2009) Insecurity haunts NATO-Russia ties. 5 May, http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/europe/8033274.stm, accessed 6 May.

  • Blute, M. (2005) If the genome isn’t a god-like ghost in the machine, then what is it? Biology and Philosophy 20 (2–3): 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. and Wheeler, N. (2008) The Security Dilemma. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, S. (2008) Arctic meltdown. Foreign Affairs 87 (March/April): 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1999) History ends, worlds collide. Review of International Studies 25 (5): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffet, C. and Heuser, B. (1998) Haunted by History: Myths in International Relations. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G.W. (2002) Our power to change the world: The tragedy of September 11 has also presented a great opportunity. Guardian, Guardian 12 September, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/12/september11.usa7.

  • Bush, G.W. (2007) Press conference by the President. 17 October, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/10/20071017.html.

  • Bull, H. (1972) The theory of international politics, 1919–1969. In: B. Porter (ed.) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics, 1919–1969. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. (1939) Twenty Years’ Crisis, reprinted by Perennial, New York, 2001.

  • Carr, E.H. (1969) A History of Soviet Russia: The Interregnum 1923–24. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (2008) China, the US and the Power-Transition Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartier, G. (2007) Niebuhr's ghost? Conversations in Religion and Theology 5 (1): 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2002) The contemporary security dilemma: Deterring a Taiwan conflict. The Washington Quarterly 25 (4): 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M., Booth, K. and Dunne, T. (1999) Introduction: The interregnum, 1989–1999. Review of International Studies 5 (December): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curti, G.H. (2008) The ghost in the city and a landscape of life: A reading of difference in Shirow and Oshii's ghost in the shell. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (1): 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, R. (2005) The gothic scene of international relations: Ghosts, monsters, terror after September 11. Review of International Studies 31: 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorment, R. (2006) The Daily Telegraph (UK). 7 March, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/03/07/batri07.xml.

  • Dowd, A. (2007) Declinism. Hoover Review (August/September) 8 May 2008, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/5864.

  • Ferguson, N. (2005) Sinking globalization. Foreign Affairs 84 (December): 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, A. (2000) Will Europe's past be Asia's future? Survival 42 (3): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. and Paulo, M. (2007) A new scramble for African oil? African Affairs 106 (423): 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1989) The end of history? The National Interest, 16 (Summer), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (2001) From narrative history to problem-oriented history. In: G. Roberts (ed.) The History and Narrative Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, J.L. (2004) Surprise, Security and the American Experience. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaonkar, D.P. (2002) Toward new imaginaries. Popular Culture 14 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gat, A. (2007) The return of authoritarian great powers, Foreign Affairs 86 (4): 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. (2007) Remarks at the Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce. 3 May, http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1148.

  • Gray, C. (1999) Clausewitz rules, ok? The future is the past – With GPS. Review of International Studies 25 (5), Special Issue December, 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2002) World politics as usual after September 11: Realism vindicated. In: K. Booth and T. Dunne (eds.) Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 226–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. and Kozyrev, V. (2006) China, Japan and the scramble for Siberia. Survival 48 (1): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa, T. and Togo, K. (2008) East Asia's Haunted Present: Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. and McGrew, A. (1998) The end of the old order? Globalisation and the prospects for world order. Review of International Studies 24 (5): 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1988/1989) The US – Decline or renewal? Foreign Affairs 67 (2): 76–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1989) No exit: The errors of endism. National Interest 17 (Fall): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Politics. (2008) Series of articles under heading ‘Return of Realism?’. International Politics 45 (1): 19–71.

  • Johnson, D. (2008) Africa's plight: How Europe lost Africa. Spiegel 28 February, http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,537699,00.html.

  • Kagan, R. (2007) End of dreams, return of history. Hoover Institution Policy Review (August/September), http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/8552512.html.

  • Kagan, R. (2008a) The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2008b) The end of the end of history. The New Republic 23 April.

  • Kaplan, R. (2009) The revenge of geography. Foreign Policy 172 (May/June): 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G. (2006) Naturalising empire: Echoes of Mackinder for the next American century? Geopolitics 11 (1): 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegley, C. and Raymond, G. (2002) Exorcising the Ghost of Westphalia: Building World Order in the New Millennium. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy-Pipe, C. and Rengger, N. (2006) Apocalypse now? Continuities or disjunctions in world politics after 9/11. International Affairs 82 (3): 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. and Nye, J. (1977) Power and Independence. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1935) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoong, Y.-F. (1992) Analogies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, A. (2008) Heralding the end of war. New York Sun. 8 May 2009, http://www.nysun.com/arts/heralding-the-end-of-war/68782/.

  • Koestler, A. (1968) The Ghost in the Machine. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreilkamp, K. (1976) Ghosts, machines, and skeletons. The Review of Politics 38 (2): 272–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. (2007) Thucydides and deterrence. Security Studies 16 (2): 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (2008) Falling upwards: Declinism, the box set. World Affairs 171 (1): 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (2009) Persistent primacy and the future of the American era. International Politics 46 (2/3): 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. (2008) The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, E. (2008) The New Cold War: How the Kremlin menaces Russia and the West. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, E.N. (1990) From geopolitics to geo-economics. The National Interest 20 (Summer): 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, E.N. (2008) Georgia conflict: Moscow has blown away ‘soft’ power. Daily Telegraph, UK, 17 August.

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981) After virtue. Notre Dame, USA: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Maclntyre, A. (1982) How moral agents became ghosts. Synthese 53: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1987) The idea of an educated public. In: P. Hirst (ed.) Education and Values, London: The Richard Peters Lectures. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1998) A Short History of Ethics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (1990) Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15 (4): 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monten, M. (2006) Thucydides and modern realism. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munkler, H. (2007) Empires: The Logic of World Domination from Ancient Rome to the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (1991) Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (2004) The Remnants of War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.B. and Nexon, D. (eds.) (2006) Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, W. (2000) Lifting the Fog of War. Farar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, J. (2005) Three powers in replay of the great game. The Times, London, 21 July.

  • Pape, R. (2005) Soft-balancing against the United States. International Security 31 (1): 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J.-A. (2001) Towards a new world order: A twentieth century story. Review of International Studies 27: 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, E. (2007) Canada flexes its muscles in scramble for the Arctic. Guardian 11 July.

  • Pretorius, J. (2008) The security imaginary: Explaining military isomorphism. Security Dialogue 39 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putin, V. (2008) Putin warns West against starting new arms race. Reuters 11 September, http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSLB25447920080911, accessed 12 August 2009.

  • Rengger, N. (2003) Eternal return? Modes of encountering religion in international relations. Millennium 32 (2): 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2005) Globalization theory: A post mortem. International Politics 42 (1): 2–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. (2007) Firefly/serenity: Gendered space and gendered bodies. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (2): 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynning, S. and Ringsmose, J. (2008) Why are revisionist states revisionist? Reviving classical realism as an approach to understanding international change. International Politics 45 (1): 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, R. (2007) Securing Japan: The current discourse. Journal of Japanese Studies 33 (1): 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, J. (2008) Where Have all the Soldiers Gone. New York: Houghton Muffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth, I. (2003) Bite me, professor. Financial Times 11 September.

  • Sorensen, G. (2007) After the security dilemma: The challenges of insecurity in weak states and the dilemma of liberal values. Security Dialogue 38 (3): 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammen, R. and Kugler, J. (2006) Power-transition and US-China conflicts. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 1 (1): 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2009) And now for a nuclear remake. 12 March.

  • Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (2002) The continuity of international politics. In: K. Booth and T. Dunne (eds.) Worlds in Collision. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J. (eds.) (2003) To Seek out New Worlds: Exploring links between Science Fiction and World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, D. (2003) Why international relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies 29: 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2002) National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington DC: White House.

  • Williams, A. (1998) Failed Imagination? New World Orders of the Twentieth Century. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (2007) Failed Imagination: Anglo-American New World Orders from Wilson to Bush, 2nd edn. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2003) Ghosts of paradigms past: The once and future evolution of psychoanalytic thought. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51 (3): 825–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (2003) The International Theory of Leonard Woolf: A Study in Twentieth Century Idealism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfowitz, P. (1997) Bridging centuries: Fin de siecle all over again. The National Interest Spring: 3–8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author especially thanks Nick Rengger for his encouragement and advice in writing this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heng, YK. Ghosts in the machine: Is IR eternally haunted by the spectre of old concepts?. Int Polit 47, 535–556 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.23

Keywords

Navigation